Next Article in Journal
Exploring Awareness and Public Perception towards the Importance of Visual Aesthetics for Preservation of Permanent Forest Reserve (PFR) in Malaysia
Next Article in Special Issue
Optimization Model of Permanent Basic Farmland Indicators Distribution from the Perspective of Equity: A Case from W County, China
Previous Article in Journal
Inequitable Changes to Time Spent in Urban Nature during COVID-19: A Case Study of Seattle, WA with Asian, Black, Latino, and White Residents
Previous Article in Special Issue
Theoretical Development Model for Rural Settlements against Rural Shrinkage: An Empirical Study on Pingyin County, China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Spatial Planning Implementation Effectiveness: Review and Research Prospects

1
Law School, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China
2
Law School, Shantou University, Shantou 515063, China
3
Land Academy for National Development, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310029, China
4
School of Management, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Land 2022, 11(8), 1279; https://doi.org/10.3390/land11081279
Submission received: 4 July 2022 / Revised: 4 August 2022 / Accepted: 5 August 2022 / Published: 9 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Territory Spatial Planning toward High-Quality Development in China)

Abstract

The question of how to implement spatial planning more effective is a fundamental but very difficult one and one that has been of great interest to both the academic and practical community. However, a comprehensive review of the conceptual models and methodological systems for evaluating spatial planning implementation, and the existing practical research results of various types of spatial planning implementation evaluation, are yet to be presented. The study systematically reviews the main research findings in the field of spatial planning implementation from four aspects: conceptual analysis, measurement methods, evaluation frameworks and evaluation methods. This study found three distinct evolutionary features of research in this field: (1) The evaluation concept changes from complete rationality to limited rationality; (2) research methodology changes from a simple closed system to a complex open system; (3) the research perspective shifts from the map to the main body of planning implementation behavior. It is suggested that an important part of future research lies in establishing a system for evaluating the effectiveness based on a single subject who is an actor in the planning implementation process. On this basis, the micro-influencing mechanisms of planning implementation effects will then be explored. Deepening the research to the individual level will help improve planning implementation’s effectiveness.
Keywords: spatial planning; planning implementation effectiveness; planning implementation evaluation spatial planning; planning implementation effectiveness; planning implementation evaluation

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, G.; Wang, L.; Wu, C.; Xu, Z.; Zhuo, Y.; Shen, X. Spatial Planning Implementation Effectiveness: Review and Research Prospects. Land 2022, 11, 1279. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11081279

AMA Style

Li G, Wang L, Wu C, Xu Z, Zhuo Y, Shen X. Spatial Planning Implementation Effectiveness: Review and Research Prospects. Land. 2022; 11(8):1279. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11081279

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Guan, Liping Wang, Cifang Wu, Zhongguo Xu, Yuefei Zhuo, and Xiaoqiang Shen. 2022. "Spatial Planning Implementation Effectiveness: Review and Research Prospects" Land 11, no. 8: 1279. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11081279

APA Style

Li, G., Wang, L., Wu, C., Xu, Z., Zhuo, Y., & Shen, X. (2022). Spatial Planning Implementation Effectiveness: Review and Research Prospects. Land, 11(8), 1279. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11081279

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop