Next Article in Journal
Multi-Temporal Assessment of Remotely Sensed Autumn Grass Senescence across Climatic and Topographic Gradients
Next Article in Special Issue
Spatial Justice and Residents’ Policy Acceptance: Evidence from Construction Land Reduction in Shanghai, China
Previous Article in Journal
Predictive Scenarios of LULC Changes Supporting Public Policies: The Case of Chapecó River Ecological Corridor, Santa Catarina/Brazil
Previous Article in Special Issue
Spatial Impact of Government Venture Capital on Urbanization and Its Path—Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration in China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Economic Growth Target, Government Expenditure Behavior, and Cities’ Ecological Efficiency—Evidence from 284 Cities in China

1
School of Government, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
2
School of Business Administration, The Open University of China, Beijing 100039, China
3
China Life Reinsurance Company Ltd., Beijing 100033, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Land 2023, 12(1), 182; https://doi.org/10.3390/land12010182
Submission received: 10 November 2022 / Revised: 28 December 2022 / Accepted: 31 December 2022 / Published: 5 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urbanization and City Development in China's Transition)

Abstract

As a composite indicator that incorporates economic efficiency and environmental protection, ecological efficiency is a valuable tool for measuring regional green development and accelerating regional green transformation. As the economy transitions, Chinese economic growth targets affect local governments’ behaviors, thereby impacting ecological efficiency. In this study, the ecological efficiency level of 284 cities in China was measured using the EBM-DEA method from 2007 to 2019, and the spatial exploration analysis method and the dynamic double fixed effect spatial Durbin model were applied to analyze urban ecological efficiency’s spatial correlations, impacts, and mechanisms. The conclusions are as follows: China’s urban ecological efficiency has increased over time. At the spatial level, it shows the distribution characteristics of east > northeast > middle > west. In terms of spatial agglomeration, there are typically spatial agglomerations, high–high agglomerations, and low–low agglomerations in Chinese cities’ ecological efficiency. There is an inverted U-shaped relationship between economic growth target and ecological efficiency. According to regional differences, the economic growth target in the eastern region has a U-shaped impact on ecological efficiency, while in the central, northeast, and western cities they have an inverted U-shaped effect on ecological efficiency. In terms of the impact mechanism, through the intermediary effect test, it is found that appropriate economic growth target setting can promote the proportion of energy conservation and environmental protection expenditure and fiscal science and technology expenditure. Excessive economic growth target setting can inhibit the proportion of energy conservation and environmental protection expenditure and fiscal science and technology expenditure. The proportion of energy conservation and environmental protection expenditure and fiscal science and technology expenditure can promote ecological efficiency. The enlightenment is as follows: China should weaken the economic growth target in official promotion assessment, set differentiated economic growth targets for different regions, and increase the proportion of energy conservation and environmental protection expenditure and fiscal science and technology expenditure to promote ecological efficiency.
Keywords: economic growth target; proportion of energy conservation and environmental protection expenditure; proportion of fiscal science and technology expenditure; ecological efficiency; dynamic spatial Durbin model economic growth target; proportion of energy conservation and environmental protection expenditure; proportion of fiscal science and technology expenditure; ecological efficiency; dynamic spatial Durbin model

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, C.; Liu, T.; Li, J.; Xu, M.; Li, X.; Wang, H. Economic Growth Target, Government Expenditure Behavior, and Cities’ Ecological Efficiency—Evidence from 284 Cities in China. Land 2023, 12, 182. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12010182

AMA Style

Zhang C, Liu T, Li J, Xu M, Li X, Wang H. Economic Growth Target, Government Expenditure Behavior, and Cities’ Ecological Efficiency—Evidence from 284 Cities in China. Land. 2023; 12(1):182. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12010182

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Can, Tengfei Liu, Jixia Li, Mengzhi Xu, Xu Li, and Huachun Wang. 2023. "Economic Growth Target, Government Expenditure Behavior, and Cities’ Ecological Efficiency—Evidence from 284 Cities in China" Land 12, no. 1: 182. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12010182

APA Style

Zhang, C., Liu, T., Li, J., Xu, M., Li, X., & Wang, H. (2023). Economic Growth Target, Government Expenditure Behavior, and Cities’ Ecological Efficiency—Evidence from 284 Cities in China. Land, 12(1), 182. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12010182

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop