Next Article in Journal
An Algebraic Non-Equilibrium Turbulence Model of the High Reynolds Number Transition Region
Next Article in Special Issue
Numerical Study on the Effect of Crown Clearance Thickness on High-Head Pump Turbines
Previous Article in Journal
Estimation of Hypoxic Areas in the Western Baltic Sea with Geostatistical Models
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Transient Characteristics of the Cavitation Evolution of the Shroud of High-Speed Pump-Jet Propellers under Different Operating Conditions
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Internal Flow Phenomena of Two-Way Contra-Rotating Axial-Flow Pump-Turbine with Various Numbers of Blades in Pump Mode

Water 2023, 15(18), 3236; https://doi.org/10.3390/w15183236
by Ce An, Yiming Chen, Qiang Fu and Rongsheng Zhu *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Water 2023, 15(18), 3236; https://doi.org/10.3390/w15183236
Submission received: 22 March 2023 / Revised: 12 June 2023 / Accepted: 28 June 2023 / Published: 11 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advancements in the Complex Vortex Flow in Hydraulic Machinery)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Review Report

Journal Name: Water (MDPI)

Title: Internal Flow Phenomena of Two-Way Contra-Rotating Axial Flow Pump-Turbine with Various Numbers of Blades in Pump Mode

Manuscript ID: water-2330068

Decision: Minor Revision

At the outset, I appreciate the authors for their contribution towards the two-way contra-rotating and characteristics. Although the work is novel, some possible corrections make the article more informative and easily understandable to a researcher.

a. There are significant concerns about the grammar, usage, and overall readability of the manuscript. Therefore, request is to revise the text to fix the grammatical errors and improve the overall readability of the text before this work is considered for publication.

b. Would you explicitly specify the novelty of your work? What progress against the most recent state-of-the-art similar studies was made?

c. Re-draw figure 1 and explain its phenomena with physical justification.

d. The literature review section should be improved. It should be dedicated to present critical analysis of state-of-the-art related work to justify the objective of the study. Also, critical comments should be made on the results of the cited works.

e. Re-checked equations 10-11.

f. Add some details about two-way contra-rotating in the novelty paragraph.

g. Give the nomenclature for the betterment of the manuscript and understanding of the reader.

h. The introduction section should be made more concise to show previous work in the field. For instance:

https://doi.org/10.1002/er.7134.

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Please revise the manuscript according to the attached file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

The manuscript is acceptable in present form.

Back to TopTop