Next Article in Journal
A Framework to Evaluate Urban Flood Resilience of Design Alternatives for Flood Defence Considering Future Adverse Scenarios
Previous Article in Journal
Influencing Factors of the Spatial–Temporal Variation of Layered Soils and Sediments Moistures and Infiltration Characteristics under Irrigation in a Desert Oasis by Deterministic Spatial Interpolation Methods
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

New Approach in COD Fractionation Methods

Water 2019, 11(7), 1484; https://doi.org/10.3390/w11071484
by Ewelina Płuciennik-Koropczuk * and Sylwia Myszograj
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Water 2019, 11(7), 1484; https://doi.org/10.3390/w11071484
Submission received: 17 June 2019 / Revised: 15 July 2019 / Accepted: 16 July 2019 / Published: 17 July 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Wastewater Treatment and Reuse)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This study tries to deepen into the understanding of the different fractions of organic matter in wastewater, regarding its biodegradability. The methodology and the approach that the authors followed seems reasonable. I believe the results should be published and made available to the wider scientific audience, to enable further discussion on the topic. It is clear that more practical tests with a wider range of OM composition is required to be able to adopt the modified  methodology.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer.

Thank you for your comments. All of them were taken into account and an amendment was made to the manuscript. Changes are made using the "track changes".

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Topic of the manuscript is very relevant to the journal and for the real world as well. This will give a new powerful insight to assess WWTP's efficiency.

Authors did a fantastic job to present their research findings in articulate manner. Before being accepted for publication, i have couple of comments:

Considering significant amount of grammatical errors, English proofreading for this manuscript is a must before being accepted for publication.   

Please explain ATV-A 131 guideline in the methodology part rather just giving a reference for the same to make it clear how your modification going to help.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear Reviewer.

Thank you for your comments. All of them were taken into account and an amendment was made to the manuscript. Changes are made using the "track changes".


Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop