Next Article in Journal
A Framework to Evaluate Urban Flood Resilience of Design Alternatives for Flood Defence Considering Future Adverse Scenarios
Previous Article in Journal
Influencing Factors of the Spatial–Temporal Variation of Layered Soils and Sediments Moistures and Infiltration Characteristics under Irrigation in a Desert Oasis by Deterministic Spatial Interpolation Methods
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

New Approach in COD Fractionation Methods

by
Ewelina Płuciennik-Koropczuk
* and
Sylwia Myszograj
Faculty of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Environmental Engineering, Institute of Environmental Engineering, University of Zielona Góra, 15 Prof. Z. Szafrana St, 65-516 Zielona Góra, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2019, 11(7), 1484; https://doi.org/10.3390/w11071484
Submission received: 17 June 2019 / Revised: 15 July 2019 / Accepted: 16 July 2019 / Published: 17 July 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Wastewater Treatment and Reuse)

Abstract

:
Conventional quality parameters such as Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) or Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) give information about the quantity of organic matter present in wastewater, but do not give a clear indication of the biodegradability of the pollutants flowing in the WWTP. Detailed knowledge can be obtained by dividing the total COD into fractions. Fractionation and balancing of COD can be determined in various ways and with varying accuracy. Good wastewater characteristics are obtained on the basis of COD fractionation in accordance with ATV-A 131 guidelines, especially when the wastewater characteristics are in high compliance with the assumptions of the method. The article proposes a modification of the ATV-A131 method that increases the accuracy of determining the COD fraction. In order to reduce errors in the calculation of COD fractions, the value of fraction XS was calculated on the basis of the biochemical degradation rate determined in studies (k) for raw wastewater, whereas the SI fraction was calculated from the difference between SCOD and BODTot of filtered treated wastewater. BODTot of the treated wastewater was calculated taking into account the rate of biochemical degradation determined in the studies (k) for treated wastewater. The shares of individual COD fractions in raw wastewater calculated on the basis of the standard and modified procedure differed by approx. 10% in the case of suspension fractions. Modification of the methodology to determine the COD of the treated wastewater SS fraction significantly influenced the contents of all fractions in treated wastewater.

1. Introduction

The basis for the design and optimization of biological treatment processes is a properly prepared balance of pollutants in raw wastewater. The effectiveness of these processes is determined by the content of biodegradable substances, which are a source of energy or a building material for microorganisms. The easily decomposable substances contained in the waste water include carbohydrates and proteins that are already metabolised as a result of catalytic and enzymatic reactions during transport through the wastewater system, which results in mainly the hydrolysis products of these compounds, i.e., amino acids and fatty acids, reaching the wastewater treatment plant. The distribution of slowly biodegradable waste, on the other hand, requires the presence of bacteria with a long generation time, the development of which is not possible using technologies used for easily decomposable substances [1,2,3]. The content of organic compounds in wastewater can be expressed indirectly as Total Organic Carbon (TOC) based on the amount of carbon dioxide produced during combustion [3,4]:
C o r g + O 2 temp , catalyst C O 2
Another method is determining the content of organic compounds based on total oxygen demand (TOD). Determining TOD relies on the oxidation of organic substances at 950 °C in the presence of a catalyst. Under these conditions, decompose organic substances non-oxidized in the COD method. Therefore, the value of TOD is higher than that of COD. Meanwhile, the ultraviolet absorbance (UV250 nm) is a measure of the content only of organic compounds that absorb UV radiation, e.g., phenol, surface-active substances. A dependence was determined between COD and UV250 represented by the formula Equation (2). [3]:
COD = 45.2 · UV250 + 13.6
The standard characteristic of wastewater in this area is usually based on the values of indicators such as Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) and Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD).
Biochemical Oxygen Demand is a measure of the amount of biodegradable organic matter and determines the amount of oxygen needed for bacteria to oxidize biochemically degradable organic compounds under aerobic conditions, without access to light, at a temperature 20 °C [5,6]. The biochemical decomposition of organic compounds takes place in two phases: oxidation of carbon compounds and oxidation of nitrogen compounds. The kinetics of the first phase of BOD distribution can be described by the 1st order reaction:
BODt = BODTot · (1 − ek · t)
where:
  • BODt—biochemical oxygen demand after time t,
  • k—coefficient of the rate of kinetic reaction,
  • BODTot—total oxygen demand for the 1st phase of decomposition.
The course of oxygen consumption depends on many factors, among others on the type and concentration of organic substances, the amount and activity of microorganisms, the content of biogenic compounds, temperature, pH, and alkalinity, which affects the value of the k coefficient, which in raw wastewater can range from 0.07 to 0.8 d−1 [7].
In turn, the COD determination means an equivalent amount of oxygen taken from the oxidant (in mg O2 dm−3) needed to oxidize organic compounds and certain inorganic compounds to simple mineral forms [6,8]. The analytical method for determining COD can be schematically represented as:
C x H y O z + o x i d i z e r H 2 SO 4 + catalyst + temperature C O 2 + H 2 O + organic compounds
The efficiency of this reaction depends on: type of organic compounds, oxidizer and catalyst used, temperature, and heating time. The highest oxidation state of organic compounds is obtained using potassium dichromate in a strongly acidic environment and in the presence of iron salt as a catalyst. The presence of a catalyst is necessary for high concentrations of ammonia, organic amines or nitrogenous organic compounds. The catalyst for the oxidation reaction of alcohols and acids is AgSO4. The COD index gives a good representation of the total organic content in wastewater. However, it should be remembered that numerous organic compounds are not determined under the conditions of this test, e.g., some aromatic (benzene, pyridine) and aliphatic (n-hexane, n-heptane) hydrocarbons. During the determination, it is possible to lose volatile organic compounds before they are oxidized. COD is a summary measure of the content of organic compounds in wastewater both subject to and not subject to biochemical degradation, but does not allow separate determination [9,10,11].
Although the processes of biochemical and chemical oxidation have a separate character, in a number of cases, especially for a given type of wastewater, there is a specific correlation between COD and BOD5, which allows to initially estimate the biodegradability of pollutants. Wastewater can be considered susceptible to biodegradation if 1.5 < COD/BOD5 < 2.5. A high value of the COD/BOD5 ratio (>2.5) indicates a slow decomposition and a high content of organic substances that are hardly decomposable or biologically indecomposable, which may be caused by a large proportion of industrial wastewater in municipal wastewater. In turn, the value of COD/BOD5 < 2.0 indicates a significant content of biologically degradable contaminants [5,12,13] (Table 1).
Significant dependencies can be determined for wastewater which contains only substances undergoing biochemical oxidation and that are quantitatively oxidizable by chemical means. Apart from biologically easily biodegradable compounds, non-degradable, slowly degradable, or biodegradable compounds that are not oxidizable under the conditions of the dichromate method (e.g., pyridine and its derivatives) are present, this interpretation of results only has an illustrative dimension, and the practical evaluation of the composition wastewater is often misleading.
Knowledge of the share of organic contaminants susceptible to biodegradation and resistant to biodegradation is very important in the design of biological removal of nitrogen and phosphorus, as it influences the dynamics of the activated sludge process, e.g., the oxygen demand, maintaining a constant sludge age, and kinetic parameters of the biological reactor operation. Acceptance of COD as the main parameter determining the amount of organic carbon in wastewater and the division of COD into fractions describing different degrees of their biodegradation is for now a significant extension of the characteristic of wastewater [8]. One of the COD fractions plays an active component in biochemical transformations. Other factions are e.g., substrates in metabolism for the biomass. Among them, we distinguish easily biodegradable substrates and those that hydrolyse slowly. The rest of the organic matter is not biodegradable (inert). The division of COD in municipal wastewater into fractions is shown in Figure 1 [14].
The total COD of wastewater, divided into fractions, can be calculated in a simplified way [15]:
TCOD = SS + SI + XS + XI, g O2 m−3
where:
  • SS—COD of soluble readily biodegradable substrates,
  • SI—COD of inert soluble organic substrates,
  • XS—COD of particulate slowly biodegradable substrates,
  • XI—COD of inert particulate organic substrates,
and in detail [10]:
TCOD= SLKT SF+ SI + XS +CX + XH + XI, g O2 m−3
where:
  • SLKT—COD of volatile fatty acids,
  • SF—COD of fermentable organic substrates,
  • CX—COD of slowly biodegradable colloidal substrates,
  • XH—COD of heterotrophic biomass fraction.
The COD fractionation method is not devoid of errors. The share of fractions can be determined in various methods and with varying accuracy. Some of the fractions cannot be determined directly [16]. SS fraction can be determined by filtration through a 0.1 or 0.45 μm filter, combining coagulation with Zn(OH)2 and filtration through a 0.45 μm filter, based on tests of the oxygen uptake rate of the activated sludge, or most often with the use of BOD5 measurements [1,17,18]. In the case of fraction SI, only physico-chemical methods are known [16]. The fraction of inert particulate organic substrates (XI) can be determined on the basis of the mass balance of the sludge in the system, taking into account active sludge, degradation products, and accumulation of fraction XI in the sludge accumulated in the secondary wastewater settling tank and lost with effluent [17] or by the direct weight method [19]. Concentration of fraction XS can be determined on the basis of the amount of oxygen used for the distribution of activated sludge, determined on the basis of batch or continuous tests.
The methods of determination of biodegradable fractions [1,17,18,19] described in the literature require a long time to obtain a result and additional analytical procedures deviating from standard determinations carried out in raw wastewater.
In the commonly used methodology for determining fractions according to ATV-A 131 [20], the fraction of particulate slowly biodegradable substrates XS is defined as the difference of total BOD, calculated on the basis of BOD5 raw unfiltered wastewater and the rate of biochemical degradation and the immediately decomposed dissolved fraction on the basis of the assumed kinetic value of the decomposition rate k. The share of industrial or transported wastewater in a municipal wastewater system affects the rate of biochemical degradation of organic pollutants [21]. Therefore, the calculation of the COD fraction based on the assumed, and not determined for a given wastewater value of the coefficient of biochemical degradation rate k = 0.1 d−1 may be miscalculated.
Table 2 presents literary data on the share of individual COD fractions in municipal wastewater depending on the share of industrial wastewater.
The data comparison in Table 2 shows that the share of COD fraction in municipal wastewater is not constant and changes, sometimes considerably, and the proportion between individual factions is significantly affected by the share of industrial wastewater in them.
As describes above, fractionation and balancing of COD can be determined in various ways and with varying accuracy. In practice, good wastewater characteristics are obtained on the basis of COD fractionation in accordance with ATV-A 131 guidelines, especially when the wastewater characteristics are in high compliance with the assumptions of the method. The article proposes a modification of the ATV-A131 method that increases the accuracy of determining the COD fraction.
The conducted research tries to delve into the understanding of the different fractions of organic matter in wastewater, regarding its biodegradability. To use practical tests with a wider range of organic matter composition is required to be able to adopt the modified methodology. The results can be ground for further scientific discussion on this topic.

2. Aims and Methodology of the Study

The aim of the research was to determine the share in municipal wastewater, raw and treated, of waste resistant and susceptible to biodegradation on the basis of COD fraction determined in accordance with standard and modified assumptions.
The methodology for determining the COD fraction has been included in the ATV-A131 guidelines [20]. Guideline ATV-DVWK A131P The dimensioning of single-stage sewage treatment plants with activated sludge, developed by the German Association of Engineers and Technicians of Wastewater Treatment, is widely used in design practice and at the stage of optimization and modeling of the wastewater treatment process. It allows to describe processes based on wider than basic characteristics of raw wastewater. According to which, the determination of the SS, SI, XS and XI fraction is based on the determination of COD and BOD5 in samples of filtered (0.45 µm) and unfiltered raw and treated wastewater, where:
  • The COD of inert soluble organic substrates SI is defined as COD in treated filtered wastewater.
  • The COD of soluble readily biodegradable substrates SS is calculated from the difference in the concentration of dissolved organic pollutants SCOD determined in raw filtered wastewater and fraction SI: SS = SCOD − SI.
  • The COD of particulate slowly biodegradable substrates XS is defined as the difference of total BOD, calculated on the basis of BOD5 raw unfiltered wastewater and the rate of biochemical degradation and the easily decomposed dissolved fraction: XS = (BOD5 / k1) − SS.
  • The fraction of inert particulate organic substrates XI is determined from the dependence: XI = XCOD − XS where XCOD is the total COD of organic suspensions.
  • The total COD of wastewater is the sum of all fractions: TCOD= SI + SS + XS + XI.
According to the methodology ATV-131, the value of fraction XS is calculated on the basis of the constant rate of biochemical degradation k = 0.1 d−1, for which BODTot =BOD5 / 0.6. The calculation also assumes that the fraction SI corresponds to the COD value in filtered treated wastewater. This assumption is reflected in the calculation of the SS fraction because it is calculated based on the difference SCOD − SI, which in treated wastewater is equal to zero in each case.
In order to reduce errors in the calculation of COD fractions resulting from the simplifications used in the ATV-131 methodology, the value of fraction XS in the modified method was calculated on the basis of the biochemical degradation rate determined in studies (k) for raw wastewater, whereas the SI fraction was calculated from the difference between SCOD and BODTot of filtered treated wastewater. BODTot of the treated wastewater was calculated taking into account the rate of biochemical degradation determined in the studies (k) for treated wastewater.
To determine the dissolved fraction, the method of filtering the wastewater samples through the 0.45 μm filter was assumed.
Samples of wastewater for testing were collected from a mechanical–biological wastewater treatment plant with an average daily flow of 3450 m3 d−1 (approx. 27,000 P.E.), working in the technology of low-load activated sludge. Wastewater is supplied to the wastewater treatment plant by sanitary sewerage and transported by septic tankers.

3. Results

The characteristics of organic pollutants in raw and treated wastewater are presented in Table 3. During the tests carried out on the raw and treated wastewater samples, high variability of indicators expressing the content of organic pollutants was not noted. In raw wastewater, the average values were: COD = 1164 ± 157 mg O2 dm−3, BOD5 = 641 ± 84 mg O2 dm−3, and TOC = 267 ± 93 mg O2 dm−3. The average efficiency of removal of organic substances was 94.6 ± 1.5% for COD, 97.8 ± 0.7% for BOD5, and 94.5 ± 1.8% for TOC.
Values of the COD/BOD5 quotient for raw wastewater were from 1.8 to 2.0, which at the efficiency of COD removal above 90% classifies organic contaminants contained in wastewater entering the treatment plant as easily biodegradable (Table 1).
The value of the quotient (COD/BOD5 = 3.6–6.2) calculated for treated wastewater indicates that the compounds were slowly biodegradable (COD/BOD5 = 3.6–5) or non-biodegradable (COD/BOD5 > 5–6.2). Estimated on the basis of changes in the COD/BOD5 value, susceptibility to biodegradability of wastewater has been extended by the COD fraction values expressing susceptible and biodegradable fractions, taking into account the presence of contaminants (dissolved, undissolved).
The separation of the fractions into dissolved and undissolved was performed by filtration through a 0.45 µm. filter. In order to control the degree of fraction separation, the particle sizes were determined before and after the filtration process. The distribution of particle sizes in samples of non-filtered wastewater and after filtration is shown in Figure 2.
The particles of sizes between 0.22 and 1.72 μm were found most frequently in the raw wastewater sludge, and of sizes between 0.16 to 0.30 μm in the filtered wastewater. The results confirm the appropriateness of the fraction separation by filtration on a 0.45 μm membrane.
Table 4 presents the values of individual fractions and their percentage in total COD of raw and treated wastewater, determined in accordance with the standard ATV-A131 methodology.
In raw wastewater, the highest COD values were noted for biodegradable fractions: COD of slow-biodegradable undissolved fraction (XS) was on average 787.6 ± 131.8 mg O2 dm−3, and COD of the dissolved fraction SS 280.4 ± 56.3 mg O2 dm−3. The average COD values of non-biodegradable, suspended and dissolved fractions were XI = 61.2 ± 19.2 mg O2 dm−3, and SI = 34.4 ± 10.4 mg O2 dm−3, respectively. The share of individual fractions in the total COD was as follows: XS = 67.6 ± 5.3%, SS = 24.2 ± 4.3%, XI = 5.2 ± 1.1% and SI = 3.0 ± 0.9%.
In treated wastewater, the average COD values of the determined fractions were: SI = 34.4 ± 10.4 mg O2 dm−3, XS = 23.4 ± 10.2 mg O2 dm−3 and XI = 4.6 ± 3.2 mg O2 dm−3, and the corresponding share in the total COD was as follows: SI = 55.9 ± 7.2%, XS = 37.3 ± 7.0% and XI = 6.8 ± 2.1%. According to the standard methodology for determining the COD fraction in treated wastewater, no SS fraction was recorded.
In order to calculate specific fractions of COD based on the modified methodology, the rates of raw and treated wastewater were determined for the rate of biochemical degradation (k). The course of the BOD curves on the basis of which the constants (k) are determined for raw and treated wastewater are shown in Figure 3.
The biochemical degradation rate values determined for raw wastewater and treated wastewater differ significantly from the value of constant k = 0.1 d−1, taken as a standard in calculations in accordance with ATV-A131. The mean values of the biochemical degradation rate constants were, respectively, for raw wastewater k = 0.225 d−1 and for treated wastewater k = 0.174 d−1, which corresponds to raw wastewater BODTot = BOD5 / 0.68, and in treated BODTot = BOD5 / 0.58.
The COD values of individual fractions determined on the basis of the modified ATV-A131 methodology and the percentage of fractions in total COD of raw and treated wastewater are presented in Table 5.
In raw wastewater, the highest COD values were recorded for biodegradable fractions and were respectively XS = 656.3 ± 121.5 mg O2 dm−3 and SS = 292 ± 55.4 mg O2 dm−3, while the average COD of non-biodegradable, suspended and dissolved fractions were at the level of: XI = 192.5 ± 27.8 mgO2/dm3 and SI = 22.8 ± 12.5 mg O2 dm−3. The share of individual fractions in the total COD was as follows: XS = 67.6 ± 5.3%, SS = 24.2 ± 4.3%, XI = 5.2 ± 1.1% and SI = 3.0 ± 0.9%. In treated wastewater, the average COD values for the analyzed fractions were: SI = 22.8 ± 12.5 mg O2 dm−3 and XS = 9.3 ± 10.9 mg O2 dm−3, SS = 11.7 ± 4.4 mg O2 dm−3, XI = 18.7 ± 4.6 mg O2 dm−3, and the corresponding share in the total COD was as follows: SI =35 ± 13.2%, SS = 20.9 ± 10.2%, XS = 12.5 ± 9.5% and XI = 31.6 ± 8.5%.

4. Discussion of Results

Based on the conducted research, it was shown that the method of assessing wastewater susceptibility to biochemical degradation and assumptions accepted for calculations have a significant impact on the obtained results. Figure 4 and Figure 5 present the total and detailed share of biodegradable and non-biodegradable COD fractions in raw and treated wastewater, determined on the basis of the standard assumptions of ATV-A131 and the modified calculation methodology. In the raw wastewater, biodegradable fractions (COD-S) accounted for 91.8 and 81.6% of total COD, respectively, and non-biodegradable (COD-I) 8.2 and 18.4% (difference by approx. 10%). In treated wastewater, the difference in fraction content depending on the calculation methodology was approx. 3%. The biodegradable fractions equaled 37.3 and 33.4% respectively, with the share of non-biodegradable fraction being 62.7 and 65.6%.
A detailed analysis of the basic values of the COD fraction showed that in the raw wastewater, the highest COD was obtained for the fractions: XS and SS (biodegradable fractions), and XI and SI (non-decomposed fractions) (Figure 5). The shares of the dissolved fractions were slightly different, and equalled respectively SS and SI: 24.2 and 3%, and 25.3 and 1.9%. However, the difference for the COD value of the suspension fraction was over 10%. The shares of this fraction are respectively XS = 67.6% and XI = 5.2%, and XS = 56.3% and XI = 16.5%.
According to the standard method of determining the ATV-A13 fraction in treated wastewater, the proportion of individual fractions was as follows: SI = 55.9%, XS = 37.3% and XI = 6.8%. Modification of the methodology made it possible to determine the share in COD of wastewater of the treated SS fraction, which significantly affected the share of all factions that were at the level of: SI = 35%, SS = 20.9%, XS = 12.5% and XI = 31.6%.

5. Conclusions

Depending on the adopted method, the susceptibility of contaminants contained in wastewater to biodegradation can be estimated with varying accuracy. Initial estimation of wastewater biodegradability based on the value of the COD/BOD5 ratio in raw and treated wastewater, combined with a COD removal, allows to control the correctness of the biochemical process of oxidation of organic pollutants contained in wastewater. However, it does not provide information on the share of susceptible and biodegradable compounds in wastewater. The division of COD into fractions is a significant extension of wastewater characteristic in terms of its degree of biodegradation. The methods of determination of biodegradable fractions described in the literature require a long time to obtain a result and additional analytical procedures deviating from standard determinations carried out in raw wastewater.
Good wastewater characteristics are obtained based on COD fractionation in accordance with ATV-A 131 guidelines. The method of determining individual fractions is based on the adoption of general calculation assumptions, which, for example, does not allow to determine in the treated wastewater the proportion of biodegradable dissolved pollutants (COD of fraction SS).
Introducing to the ATV-A131 calculation methodology a modification regarding the determination of concentrations of fractions XS and SI while taking into account the kinetic coefficients determined for raw and treated wastewater makes it possible to determine the shares of individual fractions with greater accuracy. Calculation of the SI fraction concentration from the difference between SCOD and BODTot of the treated filtered wastewater on the basis of a constant decomposition rate allows to determine the concentration of the SS fraction in treated wastewater, which in turn affects the value of share of other fractions.
The advantage of the modified method is the possibility of using it to characterize raw wastewater in the design and optimization of domestic wastewater treatment plants, based on one-off tests. The disadvantage is the inability to use in the case of wastewater, which characteristics differ significantly from the average values assumed in ATV-A131, e.g., for wastewater with a large share of industrial wastewater, inference about their biodegradability based on COD fraction calculated in accordance with this methodology may be incorrect.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.P.-K. and S.M.; Methodology, E.P.-K. and S.M.; Software, E.P.-K. and S.M.; Validation, E.P.-K. and S.M.; Formal Analysis, E.P.-K. and S.M.; Investigation, E.P.-K. and S.M.; Resources, E.P.-K. and S.M.; Writing-Original Draft Preparation, E.P.-K. and S.M.; Writing-Review & Editing, E.P.-K. and S.M.; Visualization, E.P.-K. and S.M.; Supervision E.P.-K. and S.M.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Melcer, H.; Dold, P.L.; Jones, R.M.; Bye, C.M.I.T.; Stensel, H.D.; Wilson, A.W.; Sun, P.; Bury, S. Methods for Wastewater Characterisation in Activated Sludge Modelling. Water Environment Research Foundation; IWA Publishing and Water Environment Federation: Alexandria, VA, USA; London, UK, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  2. Tchobanoglous, G.; Burton, F.L.; Stensel, H.D. Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse, 4th ed.; Metcalf & Eddy Inc., McGraw-Hill Science Engineering: New York, NY, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  3. Miksch, K.; Sikora, J. Biotechnologia Ścieków; Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN: Warszawa, Poland, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  4. Mara, D.; Horan, N. Handbook of Water and Wastewater Microbiology; School of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds: Leeds, UK, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ekama, G.A.; Wenzel, M.C. Denitrification kinetics in biological N and P removal activated sludge systems treating municipal wastewater. Water Sci. Technol. 1999, 39, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hermanowicz, W.; Dożańska, W.; Dojlido, J.; Koziorowski, B. Fizyczno-Chemiczne Badanie Wody i Ścieków; Arkady: Warszawa, Poland, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  7. Imhoff, K.K.R. Kanalizacja Miast i Oczyszczanie Ścieków. Poradnik; Oficyna Wydawnicza Projprzem-EKO: Bydgoszcz, Poland, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  8. Viana da Silva, A.M.E.; Bettencourt da Silva, R.J.N.; Filomena, M.; Camões, G.F.C. Optimization of the determination of chemical oxygen demand in wastewaters. Anal. Chem. Acta 2011, 699, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Çokgör, E.U.; Sözen, S.; Ohron, D.; Henze, M. Respirometric analysis of activated sludge behavior—I. Assessment of the readily biodegradable substrate. Water Res. 1998, 32, 461–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Henze, M. Biological Wastewater Treatment: Principles Modelling and Design; Henze, M., van Loosdrecht, M.C.M., Ekama, G.A., Brdjanovic, D., Eds.; IWA Publishing: London, UK, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  11. Karahan, Ö.; Dogruel, S.; Dulekgurgen, E.; Ohron, D. COD fraction of tannery wastewaters—Particle size distribution, biodegradability and modeling. Water Res. 2008, 42, 1083–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ashley, R.; Hvitved-Jacobsen, T.; Krajewski, J.L.B. Quo vadis sewer process modelling? Water Sci. Technol. 1999, 39, 9–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Klimiuk, E.; Łebkowska, M. Biotechnologia w Ochronie Środowiska; Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN: Warszawa, Poland, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  14. Choi, Y.Y.; Baek, S.R.; Kim, J.I.; Choi, J.W.; Hur, J.; Lee, T.U.; Park, C.J.; Lee, B. Characteristics and biodegradability of wastewater organic matter in municipal wastewater treatment plants collecting domestic wastewater and industrial discharge. Water 2017, 9, 409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ekama, G.A.; Dold, P.L.; Marais, G.V.R. Procedures for determining influent COD. Fractions and the maximum species growth rate of heterotrophs in activated sludge systems. Water Sci. Technol. 1986, 18, 94–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Myszograj, S.; Płuciennik-Koropczuk, E.; Jakubaszek, A.; Świętek, A. COD fractions—Methods of measurement and use in wastewater treatment technology. Civil Environ. Eng. Rep. 2017, 24, 195–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Henze, M.; Harremoes, P.; Jes la Cour Jansen, A.E. Oczyszczanie Ścieków. Procesy Biologiczne i Chemiczne; Wydawnictwo Politechniki Świętokrzyskiej w Kielcach: Kielce, Poland, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  18. Rybicki, S.M. Metody Oznaczania Wskaźników Zanieczyszczeń Organicznych w Wodzie i Ściekach. Wyznaczanie Stężenia Łatwo Rozkładalnego ChZT w Ściekach—Metoda Pomiaru i Zastosowanie w Technologii Oczyszczania; Materiały seminaryjne, Politechnika Krakowska: Kraków, Poland, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kappeler, J.; Gujer, W. Estimation of kinetic parameters of heterotrophic biomass under aerobic conditions and characterization of wastewater for activated sludge modeling. Water Sci. Technol. 1992, 25, 125–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. ATV-A. 131—The dimensioning of single-stage sewage treatment plants with activated sludge; German ATV-DVWK Rules and Standards: Hennef, German, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  21. Myszograj, S.; Płuciennik-Koropczuk, E. Frakcje ChZT a charakterystyka ścieków komunalnych. Technol. Wody 2018, 6, 70–75. [Google Scholar]
  22. Sözen, S.; Çokgör, E.U.; Ohron, D.; Henze, M. Respirometric analysis of activated sludge behavior—II. Heterotrophic growth under aerobic and anoxic conditions. Water Res. 1998, 32, 476–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Płuciennik-Koropczuk, E.; Jakubaszek, A.; Myszograj, S.; Uszakiewicz, S. COD fractions in mechanical-biological wastewater treatment plant. Civil Environ. Eng. Rep. 2017, 24, 207–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Baban, A.; Yediler, A.; Ciliz, N.K.; Kettrup, A. Biodegradability oriented treatability studies on high strength segregated wastewater of a woolen textile dyeing plant. Chemosphere 2004, 57, 731–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Struk-Sokołowska, J. COD Fraction Changes in the Process of Municipal and Dairy Wastewater Treatment in SBR Reactors. PhD Thesis, Bialystok University of Technology, Bialystok, Poland, 2015. (In Polish). [Google Scholar]
  26. Struk-Sokołowska, J.; Tkaczuk, J. Analysis of bakery sewage treatment process options based on COD fraction changes. J. Ecol. Eng. 2018, 19, 226–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chiavola, A.; Farabegoli, G.; Antonetti, F. Biological treatment of olive mill wastewater in a sequencing batch reactor. Biochem. Eng. J. 2014, 85, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the chemical oxygen demand (COD) fractions and their fates in a biological wastewater treatment plant [14].
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the chemical oxygen demand (COD) fractions and their fates in a biological wastewater treatment plant [14].
Water 11 01484 g001
Figure 2. Particle size distribution in raw wastewater samples (a) and after filtration through 0.45 μm filter (b).
Figure 2. Particle size distribution in raw wastewater samples (a) and after filtration through 0.45 μm filter (b).
Water 11 01484 g002aWater 11 01484 g002b
Figure 3. The course of BOD curves for raw and treated wastewater. (a) Raw wastewater; (b) treated wastewater.
Figure 3. The course of BOD curves for raw and treated wastewater. (a) Raw wastewater; (b) treated wastewater.
Water 11 01484 g003
Figure 4. Total share of COD biodegradable and non-biodegradable fraction in raw and treated wastewater. (a) Methodology in accordance with ATV-A131; (b) modified calculation methodology.
Figure 4. Total share of COD biodegradable and non-biodegradable fraction in raw and treated wastewater. (a) Methodology in accordance with ATV-A131; (b) modified calculation methodology.
Water 11 01484 g004
Figure 5. Average fraction shares in total COD of raw and treated wastewater. (a) Methodology in accordance with ATV-A131; (b) modified calculation methodology.
Figure 5. Average fraction shares in total COD of raw and treated wastewater. (a) Methodology in accordance with ATV-A131; (b) modified calculation methodology.
Water 11 01484 g005
Table 1. Biodegradability of organic compounds [12,13].
Table 1. Biodegradability of organic compounds [12,13].
COD/ BOD5Value decrease COD, [%]Assessment of Susceptibility to Biochemical Biodegradation
<2.0>90easily biodegradable
2.0–2.550–90Biodegradable
2.5–5.010–50slowly biodegradable
>5.0<10resistant to biodegradation
Table 2. Share of COD fraction in municipal raw wastewater and municipal wastewater with a significant share of industrial wastewater.
Table 2. Share of COD fraction in municipal raw wastewater and municipal wastewater with a significant share of industrial wastewater.
COD fractions, %
SSSIXSXI
Municipal wastewater
10–207–1153–607–15Kappeler, Gujer, 1992 [19]
9.04.077.010.0Sozen, 1998 [22]
50.0–61.72.2–6.022.0–34.48.0–16.2Płuciennik-Koropczuk, Myszograj, 2017 [23]
20–258–1060–655–7Ekama, 1986 [15]
24–328–1143–4911–20Henze, 2002 [17]
Municipal wastewater with a significant share of industrial wastewater
Textile industry wastewater
25.014.059.02.0Baban et al. 2004 [24]
Dairy industry wastewater (10%)
38.82.345.514.8Struk-Sokołowska, 2015 [25]
Baking industry wastewater (10%)
38.81.044.215.2Struk-Sokołowska, 2017 [26]
Oil processing wastewater
29.29.937.423.5Chiavola 2014 [27]
Paper industry wastewater (25%)
4.239.543.113.2Choi 2017 [14]
Table 3. Characterization of organic waste in raw and treated wastewater.
Table 3. Characterization of organic waste in raw and treated wastewater.
Wastewater SampleRangeCOD mg O2 dm3BOD5 mg O2 dm3TOC mg C dm3
rawminimum1000548182.7
maximum1340738451.3
average1164 ± 157641 ± 84267 ± 93
treatedminimum407.75.7
maximum982422.1.
average62 ± 2214 ± 614 ± 5
Table 4. COD fractions in raw wastewater and treated according to the ATV-A131 method.
Table 4. COD fractions in raw wastewater and treated according to the ATV-A131 method.
Wastewater SampleValueSSSIXSXITotal COD
mg O2 dm−3
RawMinimum 23020663 471000
Maximum35248990951340
Average280.4 ± 56.334.4 ± 10.4787.6 ± 131.861.2 ± 19.21164 ± 157
TreatedMinimum 02013240
Maximum048401098
Average0 ± 0.034.4 ± 10.423.4 ± 10.24.6 ± 3.262 ± 22
%
RawMinimum18.21.962.84.2(-)
Maximum29.54.075.17.1
Average24.2 ± 4.33.0 ± 0.967.6 ± 5.35.2 ± 1.1
TreatedMinimum049.027.15.0
Maximum066.745.010.2
Average0 ± 055.9 ± 7.237.3 ± 7.06.8 ± 2.1
Table 5. COD fractions in raw wastewater and treated wastewater according to the modified ATV-A131 method.
Table 5. COD fractions in raw wastewater and treated wastewater according to the modified ATV-A131 method.
Wastewater sampleValueSSSIXSXITotal COD
mg O2 dm−3
RawMinimum 24375451651000
Maximum359418452361340
Average292 ± 55.422.8 ± 12.5656.3 ± 121.5192.5 ± 27.81164 ± 157
TreatedMinimum 7731240
Maximum1641292498
Average11.7 ± 4.422.8 ± 12.510.9 ± 9.318.7 ± 4.662 ± 22
%
RawMinimum18.70.751.215.2(-)
Maximum30.83.164.117.6
Average25.3 ± 4.51.9 ± 0.956.3 ± 5.316.5 ± 0.9
TreatedMinimum16.76.96.521.7
Maximum51.233.329.342.6
Average23.4 ± 10.235.0 ± 13.212.5 ± 9.531.6 ± 8.5

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Płuciennik-Koropczuk, E.; Myszograj, S. New Approach in COD Fractionation Methods. Water 2019, 11, 1484. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11071484

AMA Style

Płuciennik-Koropczuk E, Myszograj S. New Approach in COD Fractionation Methods. Water. 2019; 11(7):1484. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11071484

Chicago/Turabian Style

Płuciennik-Koropczuk, Ewelina, and Sylwia Myszograj. 2019. "New Approach in COD Fractionation Methods" Water 11, no. 7: 1484. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11071484

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop