Next Article in Journal
Structure and Properties Study of PA6 Nanocomposites Flame Retarded by Aluminium Salt of Diisobutylphosphinic Acid and Different Organic Montmorillonites
Next Article in Special Issue
Structural Transformations of Amino-Acid-Based Polymers: Syntheses and Structural Characterization
Previous Article in Journal
Reusable Xerogel Containing Quantum Dots with High Fluorescence Retention
Previous Article in Special Issue
Two Chemically Stable Cd(II) Polymers as Fluorescent Sensor and Photocatalyst for Aromatic Dyes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 10
Issue 3
10.3390/polym10030311
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Enantiopure Chiral Coordination Polymers Based on Polynuclear Paddlewheel Helices and Arsenyl Tartrate

by
Ángela Valentín-Pérez
1,2,3,4,
Ahmad Naim
3,4,
Elizabeth A. Hillard
1,2,*,
Patrick Rosa
3,4 and
Miguel Cortijo
1,2,3,4,*
1
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Centre de Recherche Paul Pascal, UMR 5031, 33600 Pessac, France
2
Université de Bordeaux, Centre de Recherche Paul Pascal, UMR 5031, 33600 Pessac, France
3
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut de Chimie de la Matière Condensée de Bordeaux, UMR 5026, 33600 Pessac, France
4
Université de Bordeaux, Institut de Chimie de la Matière Condensée de Bordeaux, UMR 5026, 33600 Pessac, France
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2018, 10(3), 311; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10030311
Submission received: 17 February 2018 / Revised: 9 March 2018 / Accepted: 11 March 2018 / Published: 13 March 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Coordination Polymer)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Herein, we report the preparation of chiral, one-dimensional coordination polymers based on trinuclear paddlewheel helices [M3(dpa)4]2+ (M = Co(II) and Ni(II); dpa = the anion of 2,2′-dipyridylamine). Enantiomeric resolution of a racemic mixture of [M3(dpa)4]2+ complexes was achieved by chiral recognition of the respective enantiomer by [Δ-As2(tartrate)2]2− or [Λ-As2(tartrate)2]2− in N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), affording crystalline coordination polymers formed from [(Δ-Co3(dpa)4)(Λ-As2(tartrate)2)]·3DMF (Δ-1), [(Λ-Co3(dpa)4)(Δ-As2(tartrate)2)]·3DMF (Λ-1), [(Δ-Ni3(dpa)4)(Λ-As2(tartrate)2)]·(4 − n)DMF∙nEt2O (Δ-2) or [(Λ-Ni3(dpa)4)(Δ-As2(tartrate)2)]·(4 − n)DMF∙nEt2O (Λ-2) repeating units. UV-visible circular dichroism spectra of the complexes in DMF solutions demonstrate the efficient isolation of optically active species. The helicoidal [M3(dpa)4]2+ units that were obtained display high stability towards racemization as shown by the absence of an evolution of the dichroic signals after several days at room temperature and only a small decrease of the signal after 3 h at 80 °C.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The study of the self-assembly of molecular building blocks into polymeric structures extended in one, two, or three dimensions opens the way not only to a vast quantity of diverse materials but also to multiple applications. Specifically, chiral Coordination Polymers (CPs) offer a great potential in the context of numerous fields such as enantioselective catalysis [1,2,3,4], nonlinear optics [5,6], ferroelectricity [7], and magnetochiral dichroism [8]. Such enantiopure complexes can be obtained fortuitously by spontaneous resolution during crystallization [9,10] or by design, using chiral ligands, metalloligands [11,12,13], or chiral inductors, such as solvents, templates, or counteranions [14,15,16]. However, and despite the progress made in this direction, rational preparation of chiral CPs still presents a challenge in coordination chemistry.
We are here interested in the family of clusters known as “extended metal atom chains” or “metal strings”. These terms refer to polynuclear paddlewheel complexes with three or more linearly-arranged metal atoms bridged by four equatorial ligands, typically oligopyridylamines. These compounds, often containing metal-metal bonds, have been extensively studied since the late 1990s because of their fascinating magnetic and electronic properties [17,18,19]. Much less studied, however, is the use of such complexes to build extended structures, with only few one-dimensional (1D) and two-dimensional (2D) CPs based on [Co3(dpa)4]2+ [20,21,22] and [Ni3(dpa)4]2+ [23,24] (dpa = the anion of 2,2′−dipyridylamine) to be found in the literature.
Another relatively unexplored feature of such linear cluster complexes is their helicoidal chirality. This feature arises from the mutual steric hindrance of the 3-pyridyl protons, resulting in the twisting of the dpa ligands around the metal axis (Figure 1). Among the notable examples where enantiopure compounds have been obtained, we can cite the work by Cotton et al. in the chiral resolution of a racemic mixture of [Ni3(dpa)4Cl2] by chromatography using a macrocyclic glycopeptide-based chiral stationary phase [25,26]. This separation yielded enantiopure mixtures of [Ni3(dpa)4Cl2] and [Ni3(dpa)4Cl(OH)], which displayed enormous specific rotation values of ca. ±5000 deg∙mL∙g−1∙dm−1, comparable to those observed for some helicenes [27]. In another elegant work, Peng and coworkers were able to obtain enantiopure Ni5-based paddlewheel complexes using naphthyridylpyridyldiamine ligands functionalized with bulky chiral groups [28].
Recently, an approach based on anion exchange has been employed by our group to resolve a racemic mixture of [Co3(dpa)4(MeCN)2]2+ clusters [29]. For this purpose, inexpensive chiral dianions based on commercially available (2R,3R)-(+)- or (2S,3S)-(−)-tartaric acid were employed, affording the molecular species [Δ-Co3(dpa)4(MeCN)2](NBu4)2[Λ-As2(tartrate)2]2 and [Λ-Co3(dpa)4(MeCN)2](NBu4)2[Δ-As2(tartrate)2]2, respectively, by selective crystallization. Mirror-image Electronic Circular Dichroism (ECD) spectra of the enantiomers in acetonitrile were obtained, similar to those that were reported by Cotton et al. for the spontaneously resolved enantiomers of [Co3(dpa)4(MeCN)2][PF6]2 [30]. Furthermore, significant X-ray natural circular dichroism (XNCD) signals were also detected at the Co K-edge in circularly polarized X-ray absorption experiments made on oriented single crystals [29].
In this work, we report a synthetic procedure to obtain one-dimensional chiral coordination polymers built from [M3(dpa)4]2+ (M = Co(II) and Ni(II)) and [As2(tartrate)2]2− units (Figure 2). The use of enantiopure Δ- or Λ-[As2(tartrate)2]2− promotes enantiomeric resolution of the helicoidal [M3(dpa)4]2+ cations by chiral recognition during the self-assembly process, uniquely affording polymers based on [(Δ-Co3(dpa)4)(Λ-As2(tartrate)2)]·3DMF (Δ-1), [(Λ-Co3(dpa)4)(Δ-As2(tartrate)2)]·3DMF (Λ-1), [(Δ-Ni3(dpa)4)(Λ-As2(tartrate)2)]·(4 − n)DMF∙nEt2O (Δ-2) or [(Λ-Ni3(dpa)4)(Δ-As2(tartrate)2)]·(4 − n)DMF∙nEt2O (Λ-2) repeating units. ECD measurements in DMF solutions of the two pairs of enantiomers demonstrate the efficiency of the chiral resolution strategy employed and the high stability towards racemization that these enantiopure helices display in solution.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Materials

Syntheses were carried out under inert atmosphere using standard glovebox or Schlenk techniques. Acetonitrile (MeCN) and diethyl ether (Et2O) were purified using an Inert solvent purification system (Amesbury, MA, USA). Anhydrous N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) was purchased from Acros Organics (Geel, Belgium) and used as received, and AgPF6 and AgBF4 were purchased from Strem (Newburyport, MA, USA) and stored in a nitrogen glovebox. [Co3(dpa)4Cl2] [31], [Ni3(dpa)4Cl2] [32,33,34], and (NBu4)2[As2(tartrate)2] (Δ and Λ) [35,36] were prepared as reported elsewhere.

2.2. Physical Measurements

CHN elemental analyses were performed by the Service d’Analyse Elémentaire, UMR 7565, Université de Lorraine (Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France). IR spectra were measured in the 4000–550 cm−1 range using a Nicolet 6700 FT-IR spectrometer (Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with a SMART-iTRTM accessory. Circular dichroism measurements were performed at 20 °C using a Jasco J815 circular dichroism spectropolarimeter (Tokyo, Japan). The measurements were made using DMF solutions of 1.89 × 10−5 M (Δ-1), 4.63 × 10−6 M (Λ-1), 1.59 × 10−5 M (Δ-2), and 1.86 × 10−5 M (Λ-2). Class A volumetric flasks and a Mettler MX5 microbalance (Greifensee, Switzerland) with an estimated error of 2 μg/mg were employed in the sample preparation. The spectra were measured with a 2 nm bandwidth and a scan speed of 50 nm/min. The millidegree data were converted to Δε using the following equation:
Δ ε = θ 32 , 980 × c × l
where θ is the dichroic signal measured in millidegrees, c is the concentration in M and l is the pathlength of the cuvette in cm.

2.3. Crystallography

Powder X-ray diffraction measurements were performed using both a PANalytical X’Pert PRO MPD diffractometer (Almelo, The Netherlands) with Bragg-Brentano geometry, Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 1.54184 Å) and a graphite back scattering monochromator or a laboratory-built experimental set-up equipped with a Rigaku Nanoviewer (XRF microsource generator, MicroMax 007HF, Tokyo, Japan), with a 1200-W rotating anode coupled to a confocal Max-FluxH Osmic mirror (Applied Rigaku Technologies, Tokyo, Japan) and a MAR345 image plate detector (MARResearch, Norderstedt, Germany).
Crystals suitable for single crystal X-ray diffraction were selected under immersion oil and were attached to a MiTeGen microloop (Ithaca, NY, USA) in ambient conditions. The crystals were mounted in a stream of nitrogen and centered in the beam using a video camera. A Bruker APEX II Quasar diffractometer (Billerica, MA, USA) with Mo Kα (λ = 0.71073 Å) radiation (Δ-1, Λ-1, Δ-2 and [(Λ-Co3(dpa)4)(Δ-As2(tartrate)2)] (4-n)DMF∙nEt2O (Λ-3)) or a Rigaku FRX diffractometer (Tokyo, Japan) with Cu Kα (λ = 1.54184 Å) radiation (Λ-2) were employed. The structures were solved using direct methods [37,38] and refined by least-squares refinement on F2 followed by difference Fourier synthesis [39]. The hydrogen atoms were introduced at idealized positions and were allowed to ride on the neighboring atoms with relative isotropic displacement coefficients. CCDC 1824503-1824507 contain the crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif. Crystal and refinement data are shown in Table 1.

2.4. Synthesis

2.4.1. Synthesis of [(Co3(dpa)4)(As2(tartrate)2)]·3DMF (Δ-1) and (Λ-1)

A mixture of [Co3(dpa)4Cl2] (0.15 g, 0.16 mmol), AgBF4 (0.07 g, 0.36 mmol) and 3 mL of DMF was stirred at room temperature for 12 h. The resulting deep green suspension was filtered using a VWR syringe filter (0.2 μm, Radnor, USA), added to the corresponding (NBu4)2[As2(tartrate)2] (0.30 g, 0.32 mmol), and stirred for 2 h. The solution was filtered and small dark green plates suitable for single crystal X-ray diffraction were obtained after three days by Et2O vapor diffusion into the DMF solution. The crystals were kept in the mother liquor in inert atmosphere conditions.
Δ-1: Yield: 0.074 g (30%). Anal. Calcd for Co3N12C48H36As2O12·3C3H7NO (1518.82 g·mol−1) C, 45.08; H, 3.78; N, 13.83%. Found: C, 44.82; H, 3.85; N, 13.56%. FT-IR (cm−1): 3108(w), 3072(w), 3038(w), 2922(w), 2884(w), 1661(vs), 1606(vs), 1592(vs), 1547(m), 1470(vs), 1455(vs), 1422(vs), 1382(s), 1367(s), 1337(m), 1314(m), 1263(m), 1155(m), 1127(m), 1091(m), 1076(m), 1061(m), 1021(m), 982(w), 924(w), 898(m), 760(s), 733(s), 658(s), 634(s), 572(m), 561(m).
Λ-1: Yield: 0.083 g (34%). Anal. Calcd for Co3N12C48H36As2O12·3C3H7NO (1518.82 g·mol−1) C, 45.08; H, 3.78; N, 13.83%: C, 44.88; H, 3.94; N, 13.42%. FT–IR (cm−1): 3111(w), 3074(w), 3038(w), 2920(w), 2884(w), 1663(vs), 1606(vs), 1592(vs), 1547(m), 1470(vs), 1455(vs), 1422(vs), 1382(s), 1366(s), 1337(m), 1314(m), 1263(m), 1155(m), 1127(m), 1091(m), 1075(m), 1060(m), 1021(m), 982(w), 924(w), 898(m), 760(s), 734(s), 659(s), 634(s), 573(m), 561(m).

2.4.2. Synthesis of [Ni3(dpa)4[As2(tartrate)2]·DMF (Δ-2) and (Λ-2)

A solution of [Ni3(dpa)4Cl2] (0.15 g, 0.16 mmol) in 3 mL of DMF and a solution of AgPF6 (0.08 g, 0.32 mmol) in 1 mL of DMF were combined and stirred overnight. The resulting suspension was filtered using a VWR syringe filter (0.2 μm, Radnor, USA) and added to the corresponding (NBu4)2[As2(tartrate)2] (0.30 g, 0.32 mmol). The solution was stirred for 2 h, filtered using a VWR syringe filter (0.2 μm, Radnor, PA, USA) and dark purple crystals that are suitable for single crystal X-ray diffraction were obtained after several days by Et2O vapor diffusion into the DMF solution. The crystals were washed with diethyl ether and dried in the air.
Δ-2: Yield: 0.068 g (31%). Anal. Calcd for Ni3C48H36N12As2O12·C3H7NO·3H2O (1425.95 g·mol−1): C, 42.96; H, 3.46; N, 12.77%. Found: C, 43.22; H, 3.23; N, 12.44%. FT-IR (cm−1): 3069 (w), 3028 (w), 2958 (w), 2931 (w), 2881 (w), 1652 (m), 1602 (s), 1591 (s), 1549 (m), 1467 (s), 1459 (s), 1420 (s), 1389 (m), 1351 (s), 1312 (s), 1281 (m), 1264 (m), 1250 (m), 1154 (m), 1130 (m), 1097 (m), 1076 (m), 1056 (m), 1016 (m), 926 (m), 898 (m), 842 (m), 812 (m), 763 (s), 733 (s), 660 (m), 630 (s), 597 (m), 573 (m).
Λ-2: Yield: 0.067 g (31%). Anal. Calcd for Ni3C48H36N12As2O12·C3H7NO·3H2O (1425.95 g·mol−1): C, 42.96; H, 3.46; N, 12.77%. Found: C, 42.92; H, 3.29; N, 12.30%. FT-IR (cm−1): 3073 (w), 3028 (w), 2972 (w), 2931 (w), 2889 (w), 1644 (m), 1603 (s), 1591(s), 1549 (m), 1468 (s), 1459 (s), 1420 (s), 1352 (s), 1312 (s), 1283 (m), 1264 (m), 1250 (m), 1153 (m), 1125 (m), 1073 (m), 1056 (m), 1016 (m), 929 (m), 897 (m), 841 (m), 811 (m), 763 (s), 734 (s), 661 (m), 632 (s), 597 (m), 574 (m).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Synthesis

In this work, a similar approach to that recently employed to obtain the coordination polymers [Co3(dpa)4MF6]·2DMF (M = Zr(IV), Sn(IV), Re(IV), Ir(IV), Os(IV)) has been used [20,21]. The protocol consists of two synthetic steps, first removing the axial chloride ligands in [M3(dpa)4Cl2] with a silver salt, and then replacing the counteranion by a polytopic ligand, in this case, arsenyl tartrate, thus allowing for the construction of polymeric structures. When this reaction was performed in acetonitrile, the chiral resolution of the [Co3(dpa)4(MeCN)2]2+ clusters with Δ- or Λ-[As2(tartrate)2]2− yielded enantiopure zero-dimensional compounds of the general formula [Co3(dpa)4(MeCN)2](NBu4)2[As2(tartrate)2]2, in which acetonitrile caps the axial position of the trinuclear cluster and [As2(tartrate)2]2− acts as a counteranion [29]. However, when DMF was used in the anion exchange reaction with Δ- or Λ-[As2(tartrate)2]2+ , enantiomeric resolution was accomplished by the formation of one-dimensional CPs, where axial [As2(tartrate)2]2− anions connect the clusters, giving [(Δ-Co3(dpa)4)(Λ-As2(tartrate)2)]·3DMF (Δ-1) or [(Λ-Co3(dpa)4)(Δ-As2(tartrate)2)]·3DMF (Λ-1), depending on the chirality of the arsenyl tartrate used. A similar procedure was followed with the {Ni3} clusters, yielding [(Δ-Ni3(dpa)4)(Λ-As2(tartrate)2)]·(4 − n)DMF∙nEt2O (Δ-2) or [(Λ-Ni3(dpa)4)(Δ-As2(tartrate)2)]·(4 − n)DMF∙nEt2O (Λ-2).
Two equivalents of (NBu4)2[As2(tartrate)2] were routinely employed in these reactions, giving a crystalline yield of ca. 30% in all cases. The maximum expected yield is 50%, given that the clusters are not expected to interconvert in solution [25,26,29,30]. The use of 0.5 or 1 equivalent of (NBu4)2[As2(tartrate)2] also gave the same compounds, but the yields were considerably lower. (We should point out that 0.5 equivalent of (NBu4)2[Δ-As2(tartrate)2] or (NBu4)2[Λ-As2(tartrate)2] is the stoichiometric amount that will react with a given enantiomer in 1 equivalent of the racemic mixture of [Co3(dpa)4]2+.) The compounds described in this work could be also obtained by diethyl ether vapor diffusion into DMF solutions of the molecular [Δ-M3(dpa)4(MeCN)2](NBu4)2[Λ-As2(tartrate)2]2 and [Λ-M3(dpa)4(MeCN)2](NBu4)2[Δ-As2(tartrate)2]2 species, but in lower yields than in the previously-described direct synthesis.

3.2. Crystal Structrures

The crystal structures of Δ-1 and Λ-1 were solved and refined in the non-centrosymmetric P21 space group with final Flack parameters of −0.010(3) and 0.008(9), respectively (Table 1). Bond distances and angles are typical of the starting materials and show no unusual features (Tables S1 and S2). The structures consist of neutral CPs that are formed by alternating [Co3(dpa)4]2+ and [As2(tartrate)2]2− building blocks. One of the two carboxylate groups of each of the tartrate moieties in the [As2(tartrate)2]2− units bridges the As and Co ions, giving rise to zig-zag CPs as shown in Figure 3. The cation-anion interactions are heterochiral: [Δ-Co3(dpa)4]2+ helices and [Λ-As2(tartrate)2]2− form Δ-1, whereas [Λ-Co3(dpa)4]2+ helices crystallize exclusively with [Δ-As2(tartrate)2]2− in Λ-1. The {Co3} units are symmetrical with respect to the Co−Co distances, 2.306(1) and 2.304(1) Å, in both Δ-1 and Λ-1. To the best of our knowledge, the only other examples of bridging [As2(tartrate)2]2− units are found in [Ag5As4(C4H2O6)4(H2O)5(X)]n (X = NO3−, ClO4−), [Na8As10(C4H2O6)8(C4H3O6)2(H2O)19]n, and [Ag9As10(C4H2O6)9(C4H3O6)(H4As2O5)(H2O)10] [40,41].
In general, the crystals of 1 that we obtained were quite small and weakly diffracting. While the polymer could be directly modeled from the electron density map, the solvent molecules of crystallization were not always apparent. For example, Δ-1 and Λ-1 crystallize with a total of three DMF molecules. In Δ-1, the crystal data was of sufficient quality to model all three DMF molecules anisotropically. However, in Λ-1, only one of the DMF molecules could be satisfactorily modeled, and the presence of the remaining two DMF molecules was confirmed using the PLATON SQUEEZE procedure [42]. Elemental and thermogravimetric (Figure S1) analyses on Δ-1 and Λ-1 furthermore confirm a total of three DMF molecules per formula unit in the crystal structure.
Powder X-ray diffraction measurements (PXRD) were performed on samples that were obtained both by direct synthesis in DMF and by recrystallization of [Co3(dpa)4(MeCN)2](NBu4)2[As2(tartrate)2]2 complexes from DMF/Et2O. Comparison of the diffractograms with those simulated from the single-crystal diffraction experiments, suggested that the samples consist of only one phase (Figures S2 and S3). However, a second phase of the coordination polymer, Λ-3, crystallizing in the non-centrosymmetric C2 space group was discovered in a single crystal obtained by recrystallization of [Λ-Co3(dpa)4(MeCN)2](NBu4)2[Δ-As2(tartrate)2]2 from a dilute (1 mg/mL) DMF solution (Λ-3, Table 1 and Table S3).
Surprisingly, the nickel-based compounds Δ-2 and Λ-2 were found to be isostructural with this latter structure. While crystals of 2 also proved to be quite small and weakly diffracting, the structures could be solved and refined in the C2 space group with Flack parameters of 0.037(5) and 0.017(15) (Table 1). The asymmetric unit in Δ-2 and Λ-2 consists of two {Ni3}2+ units and two [As2(tartrate)2]2− units. Five DMF molecules per asymmetric unit could be visualized from the electron density map, but remaining Q-peaks suggested the presence of additional disordered solvent. The PLATON SQUEEZE procedure performed on a model retaining two of the interstitial DMF molecules gave results corresponding to approximately six additional DMF and/or diethyl ether molecules per asymmetric unit for a total of four solvent molecules per [(Ni3(dpa)4)(As2(tartrate)2)] formula unit. The Ni−Ni distances in Δ-2 and Λ-2 are in the 2.389(1)–2.406(1) Å range, which are typical values for linear nickel clusters that do not display M−M bonding, and other bond distances and angles showed no unusual features (Tables S4 and S5). Single-phase samples were obtained, as shown by PXRD measurements (Figures S4 and S5).
From a molecular point of view, Δ-2 and Λ-2 are analogous to Δ-1 and Λ-1, having the same connectivity, coordination modes, and heterochiral interactions between the cations and anions. However, the packing in the crystal is quite different for the two compounds. The cobalt-based chains in the crystal structure of the P21 phase propagate along the c crystal axis and are thus globally parallel to one another, orienting themselves in an approximation of cubic close packing (Figure 4a). On the other hand, the nickel-based chains, crystallizing in the C2 phase, are not aligned with any cell axis, but rather form sheets of polymers in the ab plane. The polymers within a sheet are parallel to one another, and each sheet is oriented such that the polymers are orthogonal to those of an adjacent sheet (Figure 4b). Indeed, the difficulty in modelling the solvent molecules in the C2 phase is likely due to this lamellar packing in the three-dimensional structure. Solvent molecules are free to move in the spaces between the sheets, and thermogravimetric analysis (Figure S6) and elemental analysis made on samples that were stored in the air show that the solvents can be easily lost and replaced by adventitious water molecules.

3.3. Circular Dichroism Studies

Electronic circular dichroism (ECD) measurements were performed on DMF solutions of Δ-1, Λ-1, Δ-2, and Λ-2. Mirror-image dichroic signals were obtained at 20 °C in the 650–270 nm range. The comparable intensity of these signals, arising from two solutions prepared and measured separately, exclude the fast racemization of the complexes in solution (Figure 5). All of the observed peaks correspond to transitions in the [M3(dpa)4]2+ helices, as the [As2(tartrate)2]2− peaks appear below 250 nm [35,36] and are thus masked by the strong absorption of the solvent below 270 nm. The study of the arsenyl tartrate peaks is indeed difficult in this type of complex because it has been shown that acetonitrile solutions of chiral [Co3(dpa)4(MeCN)2][PF6]2 complexes also display strong dichroic signals in the 270–190 nm range when measured in MeCN [29].
The stability towards racemization of the [M3(dpa)4]2+ units in solution was investigated by measuring the CD spectra of DMF solutions of Δ-1 and Λ-2 after 15 and 9 days of preparation, respectively. No significant decrease of the dichroic signals was found when compared with those of the freshly prepared solutions (Figure 5). The robustness of these polynuclear helices in solution was also demonstrated by a decrease of only 15% in the intensity of the dichroism spectrum of Δ-2 after heating to 80 °C (the highest attainable temperature for our experimental setup) for 3 h. This is similar to what was observed for enantiomerically resolved [Co3(dpa)4(MeCN)2](NBu4)2[As2(tartrate)2]2 and [Co3(dpa)4(MeCN)2][PF6]2 complexes, which showed conformational stability in MeCN solution, even in the absence of chiral anions [29]. DMF was chosen for the present experiments, as it was one of the few solvents in which the compounds were sufficiently soluble. The integrity of the polymeric structures in DMF solution is most likely concentration-dependent with oligomeric and/or monomeric structures being favored under highly dilute conditions, such as those that were employed in these measurements. This accounts for the similar spectra and stability observed for 1 and the corresponding molecular species [29].
The anisotropy factors, g, namely the ratio of the dichroic absorption coefficients to the isotropic absorption coefficients (Δε/ε), observed for the transitions in Δ-1 are 2.5 × 10−3 at 325 nm, −2.8 × 10−3 at 375 nm, −2.2 × 10−2 at 460 nm, and −9.7 × 10−3 at 550 nm, whereas the anisotropy factors found in Δ-2 are 2.8 × 10−3 at 320 nm, 3.0 × 10−3 at 340 nm, −1.4 × 10−2 at 375 nm, and −1.2 × 10−2 at 500 nm. The value of g is related to the nature of the transition. Absolute values equal or less than 5 × 10−3 are associated with electric dipole allowed-magnetic dipole forbidden transitions such as charge transfer and ligand π−π* transitions, while magnetic dipole allowed-electric dipole forbidden transitions such as ligand field transitions give absolute values equal or higher than 5 × 10−3 [43]. Thus, based on the large g values, the two lowest-energy transitions in each spectrum likely correspond to metal-centered transitions. The highest Δε/ε value obtained in the present polymers is −2.2 × 10−2 for a metal-centered transition at 460 nm in Δ-1, which is comparable to that found in the 1Bb bands of [7] helicene [44].

4. Conclusions

Chiral [As2(tartrate)2]2− anions have been successfully employed to resolve racemic mixtures of [M3(dpa)4]2+ (M = Co(II), Ni(II)) cations, while simultaneously acting as bridging units in the self-assembly of chiral coordination polymers. The isolated optically active compounds give strong dichroic signals in the UV-vis range with high anisotropy factors for metal-centered transitions. This chiral resolution method may potentially reveal even higher anisotropy factors when applied to the resolution of linear clusters of higher nuclearity. The chiral [M3(dpa)4]2+ helices are very stable in DMF solution, showing no change in the ECD spectra after several days at room temperature and only a small decrease in the signals after being heated at 80 °C. We are now investigating different types of dichroism in these complexes and exploring the preparation of chiral [M3(dpa)4]2+ with different axial ligands.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/10/3/311/s1: Table S1: Selected bond lengths [Å] for Δ-1, Table S2: Selected bond lengths [Å] for Λ-1, Figure S1: Thermogravimetric analysis for Δ-1, Figure S2: powder diffraction pattern of Λ-1, Figure S3: powder diffraction pattern of Δ-1, Table S3: Selected bond lengths [Å] for Λ-3, Table S4: Selected bond lengths [Å] for Δ-2, Table S5: Selected bond lengths [Å] for Λ-2. Figure S4: Powder diffraction pattern of Λ-2, Figure S5: Powder diffraction pattern of Δ-2, Figure S6: Thermogravimetric analysis for Δ-2.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the CNRS, the University of Bordeaux, the Conseil Régional de la Nouvelle Aquitaine, the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 706556 CHIMMM (Postdoctoral fellowship for Miguel Cortijo), the ANR project CHIROTS ANR-11-JS07-013-01 (Patrick Rosa, PhD fellowship for Ahmad Naim). The authors warmly thank Eric Lebraud and Ahmed Bentaleb for powder diffractograms, Brice Kauffmann for single crystal data of Λ-2, and Stéphanie Exiga for technical assistance.

Author Contributions

Elizabeth A. Hillard, Patrick Rosa and Miguel Cortijo conceived and designed the experiments; Ángela Valentín-Pérez and Miguel Cortijo performed the experiments; Miguel Cortijo performed the final refinements of the crystal data; Ahmad Naim contributed to the preparation of reagents; Miguel Cortijo and Elizabeth A. Hillard contributed to writing the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Larionov, V.A.; Yashkina, L.V.; Smol’yakov, A.F.; Zubavichus, Y.V.; Babievsky, K.K.; Akat’yev, N.V.; Titov, A.A.; Belokon, Y.N.; Maleev, V.I. Synthesis and investigations of chiral NNO type copper(II) coordination polymers. ChemistrySelect 2018, 3, 653–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yadav, M.; Bhunia, A.; Jana, S.K.; Roesky, P.W. Manganese- and Lanthanide-based 1D chiral coordination polymers as an enantioselective catalyst for sulfoxidation. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 55, 2701–2708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ding, K.; Uozumi, Y. (Eds.) Homochiral Metal–Organic Coordination Polymers for Heterogeneous Enantioselective Catalysis: Self-Supporting Strategy. In Handbook of Asymmetric Heterogeneous Catalysis; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA: Weinheim, Germany, 2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Dai, L.-X. Chiral metal–organic assemblies—A new approach to immobilizing homogeneous asymmetric catalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 5726–5729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Medishetty, R.; Zaręba, J.K.; Mayer, D.; Samoć, M.; Fischer, R.A. Nonlinear optical properties, upconversion and lasing in metal–organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 4976–5004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Mingabudinova, L.R.; Vinogradov, V.V.; Milichko, V.A.; Hey-Hawkins, E.; Vinogradov, A.V. Metal–organic frameworks as competitive materials for non-linear optics. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 5408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Zhang, W.; Xiong, R.-G. Ferroelectric metal–organic frameworks. Chem. Rev. 2011, 112, 1163–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Sessoli, R.; Boulon, M.-E.; Caneschi, A.; Mannini, M.; Poggini, L.; Wilhelm, F.; Rogalev, A. Strong magneto-chiral dichroism in a paramagnetic molecular helix observed by hard X-rays. Nat. Phys. 2015, 11, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Bartual-Murgui, C.; Piñeiro-López, L.; Valverde-Muñoz, F.J.; Muñoz, M.C.; Seredyuk, M.; Real, J.A. Chiral and racemic spin crossover polymorphs in a family of mononuclear Iron(II) compounds. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 13535–13546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Verma, A.; Tomar, K.; Bharadwaj, P.K. Chiral Cadmium(II) metal−organic framework from an achiral ligand by spontaneous resolution: An efficient heterogeneous catalyst for the strecker reaction of ketones. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 13629–13633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Zhao, Y.-W.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, X.-M. Homochiral MOF as circular dichroism sensor for enantioselective recognition on nature and chirality of unmodified amino acids. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 20991–20999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Grancha, T.; Qu, X.; Julve, M.; Ferrando-Soria, J.; Armentano, D.; Pardo, E. Rational synthesis of chiral metal−organic frameworks from preformed rodlike secondary building units. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 6551–6557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Gu, Z.-G.; Song, Y.; Zuo, J.-L.; You, X.-Z. Chiral molecular ferromagnets based on copper(II) polymers with end-on azido bridges. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 46, 9522–9524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Iazzolino, A.; Hamouda, A.O.; Naım, A.; Stefanczyk, O.; Rosa, P.; Freysz, E. Nonlinear optical properties and application of a chiral and photostimulable iron(II) compound. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2017, 110, 161908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Fujiki, M. Supramolecular chirality: Solvent chirality transfer in molecular chemistry and polymer chemistry. Symmetry 2014, 6, 677–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, J.; Chen, S.; Nieto, R.A.; Wu, T.; Feng, P.; Bu, X.A. Tale of Three carboxylates: Cooperative asymmetric crystallization of three-dimensional microporous framework from achiral precursors. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 1267–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Berry, J.F. Extended Metal Atom Chains. In Multiple Bonds between Metal Atoms, 3rd ed.; Cotton, F.A., Murillo, C.A., Walton, R.A., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2005; p. 699. [Google Scholar]
  18. Majumdar, M.; Bera, J.K. Transition-Metal-Based Linear Chain Compounds. In Macromolecules Containing Metal and Metal-Like Elements; Abd-El-Aziz, A.S., Carraher, C.E., Pittman, C.U., Zeldin, M., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hua, S.A.; Cheng, M.C.; Chen, C.-h.; Peng, S.-M. From homonuclear metal string complexes to heteronuclear metal string complexes. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2015, 2510–2523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cortijo, M.; Bulicanu, V.; Pedersen, K.S.; Rouzières, M.; Bendix, J.; Clérac, R.; Hillard, E.A. Rational self-assembly of tricobalt extended metal atom chains and [MF6]2– building blocks into one-dimensional coordination polymers. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 320–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bulicanu, V.; Pedersen, K.S.; Rouzières, M.; Bendix; Dechambenoit, P.; Clérac, R.; Hillard, E.A. One-dimensional coordination polymers of [Co3(dpa)4]2+ and [MF6]2− (M = ReIV, ZrIV, and SnIV). Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 17748–17751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Wang, J.; Ozarowski, A.; Kovnir, K.; Thompson, C.M.; Yaroslavtsev, A.; Chernikov, R.V.; Dalal, N.S.; Shatruk, M. Trimetallic [M3(dpa)4]2+ complexes (M = Co, Ni) as building blocks for cyano-bridged coordination polymers. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2012, 2012, 4652–4660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Peng, C.-H.; Wang, C.-C.; Lee, H.-C.; Lo, W.-C.; Leeand, G.-H.; Peng, S.-M. Two polymeric linear tri-nickel(II) complexes: [Ni3(μ3-dpa)4(C4O4Me)]n(BF4)n and [Ni3(μ3-dpa)4(N3)]n(PF6)n synthesis, structural characterization and magnetic properties. J. Chin. Chem. Soc. 2001, 48, 987–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, J.; Zhu, L.-G. Synthesis, structures, and properties of three coordination compounds based on trinickel clusters extended by phenyldicarboxylate ligands. CrystEngComm 2011, 13, 553–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Armstrong, D.W.; Cotton, F.A.; Petrovic, A.G.; Polavarapu, P.L.; Warnke, M.M. Resolution of enantiomers in solution and determination of the chirality of extended metal atom chains. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 46, 1535–1537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Warnke, M.M.; Cotton, F.A.; Armstrong, D.W. Enantioseparation of extended metal atom chain complexes: Unique compounds of extraordinarily high specific rotation. Chirality 2007, 9, 179–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Pascal, R.A., Jr.; West, A.P., Jr. The reliability and utility of high reported specific rotations: Reports and predictions of molecules with extremely high specific rotations, and high specific rotations suggest revision of the structures of huperzines E′ and F′. Tetrahedron 2013, 69, 6108–6115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yu, C.-H.; Kuo, M.-S.; Chuang, C.-Y.; Lee, G.-H.; Hua, S.-A.; Jin, B.-Y.; Peng, S.-M. Chirality control of quadruple helixes of metal strings by peripheral chiral ligands. Chem. Asian J. 2014, 9, 3111–3115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Srinivasan, A.; Cortijo, M.; Bulicanu, V.; Naim, A.; Clérac, R.; Sainctavit, P.; Rogalev, A.; Wilhelm, F.; Rosa, P.; Hillard, E.A. Enantiomeric resolution and X-ray optical activity of a tricobalt extended metal atom chain. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 1136–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Clérac, R.; Cotton, F.A.; Dunbar, K.R.; Lu, T.; Murillo, C.A.; Wang, X. New linear tricobalt complex of di(2-pyridyl)amide (dpa), [Co3(dpa)4(CH3CN)2][PF6]2. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 39, 3065–3070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Clérac, R.; Cotton, F.A.; Daniels, L.M.; Dunbar, K.R.; Kirschbaum, K.; Murillo, C.A.; Pinkerton, A.A.; Schultz, A.J.; Wang, X. Linear tricobalt compounds with di(2-pyridyl)amide (dpa) ligands:  Temperature dependence of the structural and magnetic properties of symmetrical and unsymmetrical forms of Co3(dpa)4Cl2 in the solid state. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 6226–6236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hurley, T.J.; Robinson, M.A. Nickel(II)-2,2′-bipyridylamine system. I. synthesis and stereochemistry of the complexes. Inorg. Chem. 1968, 7, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Berry, J.F.; Cotton, F.A.; Daniels, M.; Murillo, C.A.; Wang, X. Oxidation of Ni3(dpa)4Cl2 and Cu3(dpa)4Cl2: nickel-nickel bonding interaction, but no copper-copper bonds. Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42, 2418–2427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Berry, J.F.; Cotton, F.A.; Murillo, C.A. Linear trichromium, tricobalt, trinickel and tricopper complexes of 2,2′-dipyridylamide. Inorg. Synth. 2014, 36, 103–110. [Google Scholar]
  35. Naim, A.; Bouhadja, Y.; Cortijo, M.; Duverger-Nédellec, E.; Flack, H.D.; Freysz, E.; Guionneau, P.; Iazzolino, A.; Ould Hamouda, A.; Rosa, P.; et al. Towards ultrafast non-linear optical switches based on chiral [Fe(phen)3]2+ complexes. Submitted for publication.
  36. Marcovich, D.; TapScott, R.E. 13C NMR studies on Arsenic(III) and Antimony(III) dihydroxydicarboxylate complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 5712–5717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Altomare, A.; Burla, M.C.; Camalli, M.; Cascarano, G.L.; Giacovazzo, C.; Guagliardi, A.; Moliterni, A.G.G.; Polidori, G.; Spagna, R. SIR97: A new tool for crystal structure determination and refinement. J. Appl. Cryst. 1999, 32, 115–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sheldrick, G.M. A short history of SHELX. Acta Cryst. 2008, A64, 112–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Sheldrick, G.M. SHELXL-97: Program for Crystal Structure Refinement; University of Göttingen: Göttingen, Germany, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  40. Bott, R.C.; Smith, G.; Sagatys, D.S.; Mak, T.C.W.; Lynch, D.E.; Kennard, C.H.L. Group 15 complexes with carboxylic acids. V. The preparation and crystal structures of {Ag5As4(C4H2O6)4(H2O)5(X)}n[(C4H2O6) = (+)-Tartrate(4-); X = NO3−, ClO4−]. Aust. J. Chem. 1993, 46, 1055–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bott, R.C.; Smith, G.; Sagatys, D.S.; Lynch, D.E.; Kennard, C.H.L. Group 15 complexes with α-hydroxy carboxylic acids: 7. The preparation and structure determination of sodium (+)-tartrato arsenate(III), [Na8As10(C4H2O6)8(C4H3O6)2(H2O)19]n; silver(I) (+)-tartrato arsenate(III), [Ag9As10(C4H2O6)9(C4H3O6)(H4As2O5) (H2O)10]n and rubidium citrato antimonate(III), [Rb2Sb4(C6H5O7)2(C6H6O7)2(C6H7O7)4(H2O)2]. Aust. J. Chem. 2000, 53, 917–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Spek, A.L. PLATON SQUEEZE: A tool for the calculation of the disordered solvent contribution to the calculated structure factors. Acta Cryst. 2015, C71, 9–18. [Google Scholar]
  43. Eliel, E.L.; Wilen, S.H. Stereochemistry of Organic Compounds; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  44. Nakai, Y.; Mori, T.; Inoue, Y. Theoretical and experimental studies on circular dichrosim of carbo[n]-helicenes. J. Phys. Chem. A 2012, 116, 7372–7385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Polymers 10 00311 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) Ball and stick representation of [Co3(dpa)4Cl2]. Cobalt: dark blue, nitrogen: light blue, chlorine: green, carbon: gray, hydrogen: pink; (b) Representation along the M−M−M axis of [Δ-Co3(dpa)4Cl2] (red) and [Λ-Co3(dpa)4Cl2] (blue). Figures generated from X-ray diffraction data.
Figure 1. (a) Ball and stick representation of [Co3(dpa)4Cl2]. Cobalt: dark blue, nitrogen: light blue, chlorine: green, carbon: gray, hydrogen: pink; (b) Representation along the M−M−M axis of [Δ-Co3(dpa)4Cl2] (red) and [Λ-Co3(dpa)4Cl2] (blue). Figures generated from X-ray diffraction data.
Polymers 10 00311 g001
Polymers 10 00311 g002 550
Figure 2. Synthetic approach employed to prepare chiral one dimensional Coordination Polymers (CPs) of the general formula [(M3(dpa)4)(As2(tartrate)2)] (M = Co(II) and Ni(II)). Inset: Representation of the coordination mode of the [As2(tartrate)2]2− ligands.
Figure 2. Synthetic approach employed to prepare chiral one dimensional Coordination Polymers (CPs) of the general formula [(M3(dpa)4)(As2(tartrate)2)] (M = Co(II) and Ni(II)). Inset: Representation of the coordination mode of the [As2(tartrate)2]2− ligands.
Polymers 10 00311 g002
Polymers 10 00311 g003 550
Figure 3. Representation of the coordination polymer in Δ-1 from X-ray diffraction data. Cobalt: dark blue, nitrogen: light blue, carbon: black, arsenic: purple, oxygen: red, hydrogen: pink.
Figure 3. Representation of the coordination polymer in Δ-1 from X-ray diffraction data. Cobalt: dark blue, nitrogen: light blue, carbon: black, arsenic: purple, oxygen: red, hydrogen: pink.
Polymers 10 00311 g003
Polymers 10 00311 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) Representation of (a) Δ-1 along the crystal c axis, (b) Λ-2 along the crystal c axis. Green and violet polymers are related to each other by a two-fold screw (a) or rotation (b) axis.
Figure 4. (a) Representation of (a) Δ-1 along the crystal c axis, (b) Λ-2 along the crystal c axis. Green and violet polymers are related to each other by a two-fold screw (a) or rotation (b) axis.
Polymers 10 00311 g004
Polymers 10 00311 g005 550
Figure 5. ECD spectra measured at 20 °C for DMF solutions of (a) Δ-1 (red), Λ-1 (blue) and Δ-1 after 15 days (black) and (b) Δ-2 (red), Λ-2 (blue), Λ-2 after 9 days (brown) and Δ-2 after being heated 3 h at 80 °C (black).
Figure 5. ECD spectra measured at 20 °C for DMF solutions of (a) Δ-1 (red), Λ-1 (blue) and Δ-1 after 15 days (black) and (b) Δ-2 (red), Λ-2 (blue), Λ-2 after 9 days (brown) and Δ-2 after being heated 3 h at 80 °C (black).
Polymers 10 00311 g005
Table
Table 1. Crystallographic data for complexes Δ-1, Λ-1, Δ-2, Λ-2, and Λ-3.
Table 1. Crystallographic data for complexes Δ-1, Λ-1, Δ-2, Λ-2, and Λ-3.
Crystallographic parametersΔ-1Λ-1Δ-2 aΛ-2 aΛ-3 a
λ/Å0.710730.710730.710731.541840.71073
T/K130(10)120(2)120(2)120(2)120(2)
FormulaC57H56As2Co3 N15O15C57H56As2Co3 N15O15C102H86As4N26 Ni6O26C102H86As4N26 Ni6O26C102H86As4Co6 N26O26
fw1517.791517.792743.902743.902745.22
Space groupP21P21C2C2C2
a/Å13.5231(5)13.3130(9)45.622(5)45.5728(6)45.879(3)
b/Å14.7889(5)14.9023(11)13.7163(14)13.6960(2)13.7591(9)
c/Å15.7030(5)15.7246(11)20.815(2)20.6775(4)20.3544(14)
β/°98.8470(10)97.981(3)94.431(5)94.589(2)95.307(4)
V/Å33103.11(18)3089.5(4)12,986(2)12,864.8(4)12,793.8(14)
Z22444
d calc (g/cm3)1.6241.6321.4031.4171.425
μ (mm−1)1.9301.9381.9372.7161.861
R indices (all data) bR1 = 0.0292 wR2 = 0.0690R1 = = 0.0940 wR2 = 0.1449R1 = 0.0896 wR2 = 0.1396R1 = 0.0541 wR2 = 0.1360R1 = 0.0433 wR2 = 0.0859
GooF on F20.9951.0201.0201.0431.051
Flack parameter−0.010(3)0.008(9)0.037(5)0.017(15)0.010(3)
a Data reported for structure with only two DMF solvents (out of eight total solvents of crystallization) modeled, and therefore formula weight and density are artificially low; b R1 = Σ||Fo| − |Fc||/Σ|Fo|; wR2 = [Σ[w(Fo2 − Fc2)2]/Σ[w(Fo2)2]]1/2, w = 1/σ2(Fo2) + (aP)2 + bP, where P = [max(0 or Fo2) + 2(Fc2)]/3.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Valentín-Pérez, Á.; Naim, A.; Hillard, E.A.; Rosa, P.; Cortijo, M. Enantiopure Chiral Coordination Polymers Based on Polynuclear Paddlewheel Helices and Arsenyl Tartrate. Polymers 2018, 10, 311. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10030311

AMA Style

Valentín-Pérez Á, Naim A, Hillard EA, Rosa P, Cortijo M. Enantiopure Chiral Coordination Polymers Based on Polynuclear Paddlewheel Helices and Arsenyl Tartrate. Polymers. 2018; 10(3):311. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10030311

Chicago/Turabian Style

Valentín-Pérez, Ángela, Ahmad Naim, Elizabeth A. Hillard, Patrick Rosa, and Miguel Cortijo. 2018. "Enantiopure Chiral Coordination Polymers Based on Polynuclear Paddlewheel Helices and Arsenyl Tartrate" Polymers 10, no. 3: 311. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10030311

APA Style

Valentín-Pérez, Á., Naim, A., Hillard, E. A., Rosa, P., & Cortijo, M. (2018). Enantiopure Chiral Coordination Polymers Based on Polynuclear Paddlewheel Helices and Arsenyl Tartrate. Polymers, 10(3), 311. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10030311

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop