Skip to Content
CrystalsCrystals
  • Review
  • Open Access

20 August 2024

Investigating the Effect of Pore Size Distribution on the Sorption Types and the Adsorption-Deformation Characteristics of Porous Continua: The Case of Adsorption on Carbonaceous Materials

,
,
and
1
School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Zografou Campus, 15780 Athens, Greece
2
Division of Green Areas and Urban Fauna, City of Athens, P. Kanellopoulou 5, 11525 Athens, Greece
3
School of Chemical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Zografou Campus, 15773 Athens, Greece
4
Department of Geography, Sultan Qaboos University, Al-Khoud 123, Oman

Abstract

In the chemical industry and in the manufacturing sector, the adsorption properties of porous materials have been proven to be of great interest for the removal of impurities from liquid and gas media. While it is acknowledged that significant progress and literature production have been developed in this field, there have been adsorption studies that failed to further advance our knowledge in generating a better understanding of the prevailing sorption types and dominant adsorption processes. Therefore, this review study has focused on porous materials, their sorption types and their adsorption properties, further investigating the adsorption properties of porous materials at either solid–gas and solid–liquid interfaces, underscoring both the properties of the materials, the characterization and the correlation between the porosity and the adsorption capacity, as well as the emergent interactions between the adsorbent and adsorbate molecules, including the adsorption mechanisms, the types of sorption and the kinetic and thermodynamic information conveyed.

1. Introduction

The literature describes a mild and straightforward protocol for creating graphene-based porous materials. This protocol is crucial for effective pore design development. As a result, it is critical for the development of graphene-based porous materials with adjustable surface areas. In the relevant literature, intercalating fluorinated graphene (FG) in alignment with the detected reactive CF bonds on graphene sheets with various amine-terminated molecules has been studied [1]. Graphene sheets are porous materials that function as building blocks, while the role of the pillar is played by diamines covalently bonded to the graphene framework. Diamines can be successfully grafted onto the graphene sheets under varied grafting ratios, based on FG reduction levels and considering the chemical reactivity of the diamines; the latter are chemically anchored at one end, thus differentially reacting at the other end and supporting three distinct conformations of graphene derivatives [1].
A notable study introduced a new type of oil-water separation material: thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) porous material. This material boasts excellent properties, including low density, a high specific surface area and superior oil-water separation performance. However, the effectiveness of TPU porous materials is often hindered by various factors. Conducting numerous experiments to examine the relationship between these factors and adsorption performance can be both costly and time-consuming. To mitigate this, machine learning (ML) techniques have been employed to model and predict experimental outcomes [2]. In this study, an integrated hybrid model was developed to forecast the adsorption performance of materials, thereby reducing the need for some experiments [2]. These models demonstrated high prediction accuracy and effectively elucidated the impact of both single-factor and multi-factor characteristics on material properties [2].
The experimental section on slow-release materials highlights their ability to control the gradual release of drugs. Extensive research has been conducted on polymer-based slow-release materials, but issues such as poor stability and difficulty in controlling the release of components persist. Diatomite mineral, known for its light weight, small volume and stable physical and chemical properties, was used to develop a series of diatomite-based porous slow-release materials to explore their adsorption-release performance. The resulting slow-release materials exhibited excellent porous structures and adsorption-release properties [3]. The maximum adsorption capacity reached 217.86 mg/g at 25 °C, with release limits of 60.04% and 80.2%, respectively. The slow-release duration extended up to 25 days, effectively reducing phoxim residues. According to the Ritger-Peppas model fitting results, the release process was governed by a Fickian diffusion mechanism [3].
The exploration of adsorption properties in innovative carbon materials, particularly sibunites, marks an exciting frontier. Sibunites are mesoporous materials characterized by highly developed pore surfaces. To understand their porous structure, benzene vapor adsorption isotherms were employed. Upon reviewing the primary methods for calculating the porous structure parameters of sibunites, it was evident that even minimal micropore presence could skew the results. Thus, the Dubinin-Zaverina equation emerged as the optimal method for assessing mesopore surfaces. Water vapor adsorption experiments corroborated the calculated surface parameters of sibunites [4].
Investigating the adsorption traits of different porous materials was essential for the removal of trace mercury from syngas or coal gas generated via coal gasification. In coal gas, mercury exists either attached to particulate dust or vaporized at high temperatures within the synthetic gas. The presence of mercury and other heavy metals in syngas can poison catalysts in downstream processes, such as syngas-to-fuel conversion, resulting in catalyst deactivation. Furthermore, mercury emissions into the atmosphere can severely harm the environment [5].
Another study emphasized the significance of understanding gas storage and separation by utilizing known structure-property relationships through computer-aided design and extensive computer simulations. The development of enhanced porous materials hinges on gathering and comparing adsorption data from numerous materials, yet the interpretation of this data remains challenging. To address this issue, the authors introduced a novel computational method that maps the structure-property spaces of porous materials, proving beneficial for adsorption-driven applications [6].
A pivotal element in the study of porous materials involves identifying substituents that can act as cationic components within porous crystal compounds, particularly those created from azamacrocyclic nickel(II) complexes and the 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylate anion. Recognizing the significant effects on the adsorption behavior of water, methane and n-hexane vapor is crucial. The experimental compounds demonstrated reversible changes during adsorption and desorption within the crystal lattices, as well as stoichiometric reactions with water vapor, though they exhibited relatively low hydrolytic stability under high humidity [7].
In another notable study, researchers simultaneously estimated the specific surface area and micropore volume of a hybrid alcogel (both organic and inorganic). Through non-isothermal adsorption with cyclopentane across a temperature range of 333–313 K, the study outlined how effectively adsorption data can describe the specific adsorbate/adsorbent system, modeled as a combination of meso- and macropore BET and micropore Dubinin-Radushkevitch (DR) frameworks [8].
The Zn–BTB metal-organic framework (MOF) structure was synthesized using a solvothermal method. Utilizing the theory of the volume filling of micropores, methane adsorption equilibria were calculated for the Zn–BTB sample across temperatures of 243–313 K and pressures up to 35 MPa. The differential molar isosteric heats of adsorption were subsequently determined, with a maximum methane adsorption capacity of around 14.5 mmol/g at 8 MPa and 243 K [9].
Hierarchical porous carbon materials derived from cork were produced through an eco-friendly method that involved air activation, eliminating the need for templates or chemical agents. The influence of air activation on the texture and surface properties of the carbon materials was analyzed using various characterization techniques [10]. The results indicated that air oxidation significantly enhanced the surface area and hierarchical porous structure of the carbon materials, along with increasing the number of oxygen-containing functional groups on their surfaces [10]. These materials showed excellent dye removal capabilities, highlighting the potential of porous carbon derived from biomass for wastewater treatment applications [10].

2. Methodology and Bibliometric Analysis

The methodology of this study has been based on a literature search at the Scopus database in the middle of 2024, with a time period from 1980 up to the present day. The key phrase in the “article title” was “porous materials” together with the word “adsorption”. This literature search retrieved 292 documents that were organized and allocated in six separate clusters: “subject area”, “document type”, “source title” (top 20), “keyword” (top 30), “country-territory” (top 25) and “open access”. The visual and arithmetic representation of findings is shown below in Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4 and Table 1 and Table 2.
Figure 1. Documents allocation per “subject area”. Source: Authors’ own study.
Figure 2. Documents allocation per “document type”. Source: Authors’ own study.
Figure 3. Documents allocation per “keyword” (top-30). Source: Authors’ own study.
Figure 4. Documents allocation per “open access”. Source: Authors’ own study.
Table 1. Documents allocation per “source title” (top-20). Source: Authors’ own study.
Table 2. Documents allocation per “country-territory” (top-25). Source: Authors’ own study.
Based on Figure 2 it is demonstrated that almost 78% of the total documents have been published as “Articles”, followed by the less commonly reported formats, such as reviews and book chapters.
Based on Figure 1, it can be noted that there were conceptually overlapping subject areas; thus, a grouping of all “homogeneous” subject areas was made and included in Figure 1. These clusters of subject areas are:
-
Chemistry: including the fields of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering;
-
Engineering: including the fields of Engineering, Materials Science;
-
Biosciences: including the fields of “Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology”, “Agricultural and Biological Sciences”, “Medicine”, “Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics”, “Immunology and Microbiology”.
The other fields have been kept as they were in the literature search results, thus formulating 13 fields in total. Furthermore, it was observed that the top four entries (that accounted for 30% of the total entries) corresponded to 87% of the total documents retrieved, which corresponded to a total of 655 documents. This observation was slightly different if no homogeneity was applied, as if the documents were considered “per se”, then the subject area of Chemistry should correspond to 50% of the total reported documents, followed by the subject areas of Chemical Engineering, Material Science, Physics and Astronomy and Engineering. In such a case, the 528 items in the top five subject areas should cover 80% of the total documents (655 in total).
Another significant outcome of the bibliometric analysis, as shown in Table 1, is the fact that the most popular source titles are those directly related to porous material advancements, interface phenomena, chemicals, physics and physical chemical publications. This finding also disclosed a more balanced and smooth decline in the number of documents reported, implying a research focus and prioritization of the “experimental chemistry” behind the operation and functionality of porous materials, comparing other dimensions such as environmental concerns and energy-intensiveness, as well as the scalability prospects offered to real-world applications, i.e., manufacturing and industrial applications. This “Chemistry” research priority is also reported in Figure 3, in which the top 30 keywords are identified.
In Figure 4, there are noteworthy instances in the literature of a move toward open access published research comparing subscription-issued journals and enabling greater technological know-how and advancement in both academia and industry nationally and globally. In an attempt to organize and represent an indicative technological background of the role of adsorption of porous media and the sorption behavior reported, a corpus of representative technologies, identified adsorption characteristics, kinetics and research outlines, as well as advantages and disadvantages, are all collectively presented in Table 3.
Table 3. A collective roadmap of co-evaluating adsorption kinetics of porous media. Source: Authors’ own study that was based on the relevant literature.
Based on Table 3 above, as well as taking into consideration the relevant literature, it can be signified that typical equations apply to adsorption equations and calculations [21], but a similar calculation process is also applied to all relevant literature sources:
qe = ((C0 − Ce) × V)/m
where: qe—the amount of adsorbate per 1 g of adsorbent at equilibrium [mg g−1]; C0—the initial concentration of the adsorbate [mg L−1]; Ce—the equilibrium concentration of the adsorbated [mg L−1]; V—the adsorbate solution volume [L]; m—the sample weight [g].
The full description of kinetic process refers to the linear form equations of the PFO (Equation (2)), PSO (Equation (3)), Elovich kinetic model (Equation (4)) and intraparticle diffusion model (Equation (5)):
ln(qe − qt) = lnqe − k1t
t/qt = 1/(k2 × qe2) + t/qe
qt = 1/β ln (αβ) + 1/β lnt
qt = kd t1/2+ C
where: qt—the amount of adsorbed substance per 1 g of adsorbent after time t [mg g−1]; qe—the amount of adsorbed dye per 1 g of adsorbent at equilibrium [mg g−1]; k1—the reaction rate constant [h−1]; k2—the reaction rate constant [g mg−1 h−1]; —the initial adsorption rate [mg g−1 h−1]; β—the desorption constant [g mg−1]; kd—the intraparticle diffusion rate constant [mg g−1 h1/2]; C—the boundary layer thickness [mg g−1]; t—the adsorption time [h].
The determination of the adsorption isotherm is actually described by the use of the adsorption isotherms, the Langmuir (Equation (6)) and Freundlich (Equation (7)) models:
Ce/qe = 1/qm × Ce + 1/qm × KL
logqe = logKF + 1/n ×logCe
where: qe—the amount of adsorbed substance per g of adsorbent in the equilibrium state [mg g−1]; qm—the maximum amount of adsorbate [mg g−1]; Ce—the equilibrium concentration of the dye solution [mg L−1]; KL—the Langmuir adsorption equilibrium constant [L mg−1]; KF—the Freundlich constant, which indicates the adsorption capacity [mg1–1/n (dm3)1/n g−1]; n—the Freundlich adsorption intensity constant.
The main experimental results showed the mixed adsorption capacity of the adsorbents, comparing each case result with the relevant literature findings. In this context, in the case of Pb2+, the adsorption capacity reached 353.9 mgg−1 and the removal rate was 88.03% [22]. In similar studies, the use of sodium hydroxide and slag as raw materials to prepare geopolymer microsphere adsorbents achieved high adsorption capacities in aqueous solutions, reaching 335.43 mgg−1, 414.38 mgg−1 and 91.21 mgg−1 for Cu2+, Ni2+ and Co2+, respectively. The adsorption process conformed to the pseudo-second-order kinetic model and the Langmuir isotherm model [22]. Other critical parameters of the relevant studies are the cost-effectiveness and the efficiencies achieved [22].
Electrostatic attraction and ion exchange were the main mechanisms for the adsorption of metal cations. For cations with the same charge number, the ion radius was inversely proportional to the cation exchange and adsorption capacity. Among cations with different charge numbers, cations with lower ion potential were more easily adsorbed on the gel surface. In summary, geopolymer has been proven to be an effective adsorbent, but its disadvantage is that the geopolymer structure is relatively dense and the adsorption efficiency is low. Therefore, the preparation of porous geopolymer is proposed to improve the adsorption capacity of heavy metal ions [22]. In the following Table 4, selected types of non-carbonaceous materials serving as adsorbents are presented, pointing out their most important advantages and disadvantages.
Table 4. Advantageous and disadvantageous characteristics of typical non-carbonaceous adsorbent materials. Source: Based on [25].

3. Case Study: Adsorption Behavior on Porous Carbonaceous Materials

In this case study, a “reverse” problem has attracted the current research interest: that the adsorbate matter (not the adsorbent matter) is carbonaceous. In such a case, there are certain economical and technical properties that have to be presented in order to select the best solid adsorbent candidate for a particular carbonaceous capture application. For research convenience, the most studied carbonaceous material today is carbon dioxide (CO2), and for this material, the following criteria can be met [25]. Actually, the routes and the adsorption logic are similar to those of carbonaceous adsorbents in aqueous solutions, offering useful insights into the sorption mechanisms developed in similar experimental or industrial-commercial applications.
-
The adsorption capacity of CO2: The equilibrium adsorption capacity is represented by the equilibrium adsorption isotherm of a sorbent material. The adsorption capacity is a crucial characteristic of adsorption, not only because it causes a reduction in the sorbent quantity, but also when considering the cost of the applied process. In order to enhance the adsorption capacity of solid sorbents, functionalization has been developed through existing monoethanolamine (MEA) [25]. The CO2 working capacity of the sorbent can be ranged at 2–4 mmol/g [25].
-
Selectivity for CO2: CO2 adsorption selectivity means the sorption uptake ratio of a target gas species compared to another type (for example, N2) is/are contained in a gaseous mixture under specific operation conditions. Therefore, CO2 adsorption selectivity is linked with the purity of the adsorbed gas in the effluent [25]. Since the purity of CO2 influences transportation and sequestration, it is an important criterion that contributes to CO2 sequestration [25].
-
Adsorption and desorption kinetics: The quick time taken to employ adsorption/desorption kinetics for CO2 is attributed to the fact that this adsorption/desorption cycle can control the whole cycle time of a fixed-bed adsorption system. Indeed, fast kinetics are inducing a sharp CO2 breakthrough curve in which effluent CO2 concentration changes are measured as a function of time, while slow kinetics should provide a distended breakthrough curve. However, both fast and slow adsorption and desorption kinetics are impacting the amount of sorbent required. In functionalized solid sorbents, the overall kinetics of CO2 adsorption are mainly bounded by the existing functional groups as well as the mass transfer or diffusional resistance of the gas phase through the sorbent structures. The porous support structures of functionalized solid sorbents can be further tailored to minimize diffusional resistance. Fast CO2 adsorption/desorption also implies less need to capture a given volume of flue gas [25].
-
Mechanical strength of sorbent particles: This property refers to the stable microstructure and morphological structures in adsorption and regeneration steps that each sorbent must sustain. Otherwise, disintegration of the sorbent particles should be reported due to the high volumetric flow rate of flue gas, vibration, and temperature. The disintegration of the sorbent particles could also occur due to abrasion or crushing. Therefore, sufficient mechanical strength of sorbent particles is required to keep the CO2 capture process cost-effective [25].
-
Chemical stability/tolerance towards impurities: The stability of solid CO2 capture sorbents, such as amine-functionalized sorbents, is dependent on the oxidizing environment of flue gas and should be resistant to common flue gas contaminants [25].
-
Regeneration of sorbents: The regeneration of the sorbent is energy-saving, and is one of the most important parameters required to improve energy efficiency [25]. Regeneration achievement can be accomplished through the adjustment of the thermodynamics of CO2-solid adsorbent interactions [25]. Considering regeneration, physisorption is mostly favored over chemisorption, since chemisorption requires high energy consumption for regeneration.
-
Sorbent costs: The production cost is a key aspect when considering industrial applications for reasonable gas selectivity and adsorption performance [25].
In the following Table 5, the chemisorption and physisorption definitions and descriptions of functionality, as well as typical examples and reported efficiencies, are presented.
Table 5. Chemisorption and physisorption characteristics. Source: Based on [25].
The chemical absorption of CO2 is more suitable than physical absorption owing to its high adsorption capacity, relatively easy synthesis routes and lower regeneration energy requirements. Among many chemisorbents, SiO2-based adsorbents, including amine-functionalized SiO2, support higher CO2 selectivity and adsorption capacities, making them ideal candidates for CO2 capture. However, the performance of currently available amine-functionalized SiO2 needs to be further developed and improved in terms of stability, gas selectivity and resistivity to thermal degradation. Furthermore, major financial, technical and environmental barriers and prospects are associated with porous silica-based materials during the scalability process [25].
In the following Table 6, a representative cluster of studies that are relevant to carbonaceous porous materials used in adsorption processes has been provided. Furthermore, the full development of this case study also contains the following subsections: “Adsorption and Porosity” and “Adsorption Kinetics and Isotherms”, which can be studied in alignment with the conveyed information in Table 3, Table 4, Table 5 and Table 6 accordingly.
Table 6. A representative cluster of studies on carbonaceous porous materials in the process of adsorption. Source: Based on a synthesis of the relevant literature.
The contents of Table 6 were determined through a literature search using the Scopus database using the keywords “carbonaceous materials” and “sorption” in the article title. Then, a total of 28 documents were retrieved, which were further organized in alignment with the following 5 thematic areas. These thematic areas have been presented in descending order of studies containing -which is aligned with the descending order of number of studies mentioned as “No #” per thematic area, in Table 6: organic and biochar; pharmaceutical-antibiotics; inorganic and metals; waste; pesticides.
The document allocation also contained some overlapping thematic areas; thus, their placement was made only once in Table 6, considering the priority field keyword that these overlapping documents featured. Based on the outcomes of Table 6, it can be argued that the main research focus was directed on organic and pharmaceutical applications of removing pollutants using carbonaceous adsorbent materials, while the inorganic, waste and pesticide studies attracted less research attention.

3.1. Adsorption and Porosity

Based on Table 3, Table 4, Table 5 and Table 6, it can be inferred that carbonaceous materials were used in the adsorption process. In recent years, adsorption has become the most widely used method for water and wastewater treatment. This is a relatively cheap method and does not require expensive and complicated equipment [21].
If the rectilinear relationship does not pass through the origin of the coordinate system, it means that intra-particle diffusion is involved in the adsorption process, but this is not a speed-controlling step in the adsorption process. In the case of multi-linear relationship types, the intra-particle diffusion model shows that there are two or more stages that make up and determine the adsorption process: (a) the first (the fastest) stage is related to the external surface adsorption—the adsorbed molecules move from the solution to the surface of the adsorbent by diffusion through the boundary layer (diffusion in the boundary film); (b) the second stage includes the gradual diffusion of the adsorbate through the pores of the adsorbent (intra-particle diffusion); (c) the third stage is a state of equilibrium that includes very slow diffusion of the adsorbate from the larger pores to the smaller ones (micropores) [21].
Another important study on porosity examined the modified porous sorbents of energy storage and heat transformation capability, which were utilized to examine water adsorption properties by measurements through thermogravimetry (TG), differential thermogravimetry (DTG), microcalorimetry, water adsorption isotherms and storage tests. A chabazite type, a dealuminated faujasite type zeolite and a mesostructured aluminosilicate were coordinated and evaluated for common zeolites X, Y and silica gel, showing that the optimum lattice composition as well as the pore architecture can effectively characterize and disclose the detected hydrophilic properties and the concurring beneficial steep isotherm [54].
In addition to water, the mercury adsorption capacities of zeolite, activated carbon and copper-loaded alumina were examined to evaluate their effectiveness in extracting mercury from the gas phase [5]. During the adsorption experiments, the mercury concentration in the nitrogen gas was maintained at approximately 70 ppbv to study the adsorption properties of the materials. The variation in mercury concentration was monitored over time at the outlet of an adsorption column containing about 5 g of the porous adsorbent. Throughout the tests, the adsorption column was held at room temperature. Among the various porous adsorbents tested, activated carbon exhibited a superior capacity for mercury adsorption. In contrast, zeolite, despite its relatively high surface area, showed diminished adsorption performance. Copper-loaded alumina also demonstrated some capacity for mercury adsorption, but its overall performance was inadequate [5]. The effective removal of gaseous mercury posed a challenge, as the short residence time of mercury within the adsorption column made the adsorption rate a critical consideration. Among the adsorbents with high surface areas, only activated carbon delivered satisfactory results, indicating that a larger surface area does not necessarily correlate with better mercury adsorption. Rather, the presence of specific functional groups on the adsorbent surface seems to play a more critical role. Therefore, a detailed analysis of the functional groups present on activated carbon, along with the identification of those most effective for mercury adsorption, could pave the way for developing a highly efficient mercury adsorbent [5].
Among the studies on novel materials, a noteworthy achievement involved the successful preparation of a new porous adsorption material (PAM) derived from raw coal slag. This material was characterized using various techniques, including nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements [25]. The PAM was synthesized with a remarkable yield of 99.20 wt.% at 90 °C over a duration of 4 h, utilizing a Ca/Si molar ratio of 0.75:1. According to the Langmuir model, the PAM exhibited a maximum phenol adsorption capacity of 63.78 mg/g. Thermodynamic analyses indicated that the adsorption process was exothermic, thermodynamically feasible, spontaneous and chemically controlled [55].
Exploring the potential applications of plant-based materials, such as tobacco stems, researchers have developed a comprehensive method combining fermentation, microwave drying, agglomeration, semi-carbonization and modification, with KOH serving as the modifier [56]. The resulting porous materials were examined through scanning electron microscopy, specific surface area analysis, pore analysis and infrared analysis, determining their structural characteristics and properties when developing adsorption isotherm models, their kinetics and the thermodynamics of phenol solutions [56]. The study indicated optimal conditions for the production of porous materials, characterized by a typical porous structure enriched with numerous cavities and pores due to KOH modification. These materials exhibited higher specific surface areas and pore volumes [56]. Furthermore, they contained abundant functional groups, such as -OH and -CH, enhancing their potential for organic compound adsorption. The phenol solution adsorption isotherm was successfully modeled using the Freundlich isotherm equation, while the quasi-second-order kinetic model was found to be suitable for the adsorption process. Additionally, thermodynamic studies confirmed that the adsorption was predominantly physical and exothermic in nature [56].

3.2. Adsorption Kinetics and Isotherms

In the case of the adsorption process, kinetics has been proven to be an extremely important step in enabling researchers to determine the substance absorption rate, e.g., from the liquid phase by the adsorbent particles. Therefore, kinetics represents the adsorption efficiency of a given adsorbent, thus supporting the identification of its potential applications. However, it should be taken into account that adsorption is a complex process involving electrostatic, chemical and physical interactions. Subsequently, the rate of adsorption of pollutants depends, inter alia, on the contact time of the adsorbent and the solution, as well as on the diffusion process [21].
In the relevant literature, it is generally known that the pseudo-first order (PFO) kinetic model describes an adsorption rate that is directly proportional to the difference between the equilibrium and instantaneous adsorbate on the adsorbent surface. In turn, the pseudo-second order (PSO) kinetic model assumes that the rate of occupancy of the accessible active sites by the adsorbate is proportional to the square of the number of vacant sites [21]. In cases where the correlation coefficient R2 can reach the highest possible value, such as 0.99, these higher values are reported by applying the pseudo-second order (PSO) equation. This means that the kinetics of the adsorbate adsorption process, such as that of methylene blue on the tested adsorbents and that of biochars, can be described by the PSO model. Model adaptation showed that the rate of adsorption can be largely interrelated to the accessibility of active centers, but not to the concentration of adsorbates in the solution [21].
Regarding the adsorption kinetics of carbonaceous adsorbents, it can also be denoted that with an increase in temperature, the values of qe and exp increase, implying that adsorption can be described as an endothermic process. In the tested pairs of adsorbates in carbonaceous adsorbent materials, the maximum adsorption capacity can be met at 303 K, indicating the influence of temperature on the adsorption process. These dependencies are grounded by the increase in the adsorbate molecules’ diffusion rate throughout the external boundary layer or the greater mobility of some adsorbate molecules at higher temperatures, which facilitates diffusion in the porous structure of activated carbons [21].
In the relevant literature, it was calculated that the greatest adsorption capacity could be achieved at temperatures of 298 K, 303 K and 308 K, which corresponded to 212.59 mg/g, 220.79 mg/g and 241.95 mg/g, respectively. Among the tested carbonaceous materials, the AC-1-OX-activated biocarbon material exhibited good adsorption properties, and had lower qe,exp values compared with the other discussed sample. Those samples characterized by a much smaller sorption capacity (152–174 mg/g) compared to the materials activated in the steam atmosphere were additionally modified by the use of microwave energy. These differences can be attributed to the characteristics of both the porous structure and the surface chemical nature [21]. Well-developed surfaces are related to the micro/mesoporous structure. Contrarily, rough surfaces explain faster and easier diffusion through pores with larger diameters, such as mesopores. Moreover, microwave treatment can extend the already existing pores, which makes it easier for the adsorbate molecules to penetrate the pores’ interior and occupy active centers [21]. Other determining factors of the adsorption phenomenon are the presence of oxygen and acidic groups; the latter can occupy some active centers that become inaccessible to the adsorbate molecules—causing a reduction in interactions between the activated carbon surface and the adsorbate molecules [21].
Complete analysis and interpretation of the adsorption process include the different influences of the surface functional groups that affect the adsorption process. In the case of the Freundlich model, the relatively smaller values of the R2 compared with the Langmuir one are an indicator, together with the high KF coefficient for all tested materials, of the strength of the interactions between the adsorbate and the adsorbent. Moreover, the n values are >2, where applicable, indicating the significant contribution of chemical adsorption [21].
The current understanding of the process and material properties of porous adsorbent materials prepared from magnesium slag is insufficient, including preparation methods, stability, durability and adsorption mechanisms. Furthermore, the potential application fields of porous magnesium slag materials need to be further expanded to fully exploit their application potential [22]. This study focuses on the utilization of magnesium slag, a solid waste, as the primary raw material by which to prepare magnesium slag-based porous materials (MSBPM) through alkali activation and foaming using H2O2 and aluminum powder, respectively. The effects of the foaming agent dosage, the alkali dosage and the water glass modulus on the compressive strength, apparent density and porosity of MSBPM were investigated. Furthermore, the adsorption performance of the adsorbents prepared by the two foaming methods for Pb2+ in an aqueous solution was studied under different conditions [22].
Based on the test results for narrow porous silica gel, it can be concluded that the adsorption isotherms for temperatures at 40 °C, 50 °C and 60 °C at water vapor saturation pressures from 10% to 100% P/P0 according to the IUPAC classification take the shape characteristic for the type IV isotherm. Both the shape of the adsorption isotherms and the maximum weight gain of the sorbent are similar in the range of the tested temperatures and equal a maximum value of 26%, on average. In the case of the desorption process, a slight hysteresis is observed, depending on the process temperature, and it is characteristic of the type IV isotherm. The hysteresis takes a shape similar to the H2 type, which may indicate that spherical pores with numerous constrictions and open ends are present in the material [23]. Pore diameters smaller than 5 nm are considered very narrow for water sorption processes. In such a case, the ideal characteristics of adsorbents in adsorption chillers that work with water as the adsorbate phase are: a large active surface area, higher than 5 nm pore diameters and noticeable thermal conductivity coefficients [23].
Similar literature studies have introduced models that can depict chemical potential as a linear combination of gas-like and solid-like contributions, enhanced by a new fraction parameter, g, in addition to the fluidity factor from the original 2PT method [54]. This extended method, known as ext-2PT, allows for the computation of the chemical potential of an adsorbed system based on adsorption uptake. By employing an interpolation scheme, the equilibrium loading at any given gas-phase chemical potential can be determined, resulting in adsorption isotherms. The ext-2PT model has shown its efficacy through accurate predictions of methane adsorption and diffusion in two metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), IRMOF-1 and Cu-BTC, as well as in zeolite FAU with inaccessible volume. Overall, the ext-2PT model is a robust and efficient approach for simultaneously computing adsorption isotherms and diffusion coefficients using a single set of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations [57].
It can also be argued that nitrogen sorption isotherms have been reported as valuable tools to demonstrate that the surface area and pore distribution of the resulting porous materials are significantly influenced by the size and structure of the diamine pillars. Characterization of CO2 uptake capacity revealed that ethylenediamine-intercalated FG achieved a high CO2 uptake density of 18.0 CO2 molecules per nm2 at 0 °C and 1.1 bars, with a high adsorption heat of up to 46.1 kJ mol−1 at zero coverage [1].
An important discovery in the recent literature is the interaction between water molecules and surfaces in porous systems, which is crucial in various applications such as catalysis, adsorption and electrochemical energy storage or conversion [58]. The hydrophilicity of typically non-polar carbon-based materials can be enhanced by incorporating heteroatoms, such as nitrogen. However, understanding the interaction mechanisms on a molecular level remains challenging due to the lack of porous carbons with well-defined and regular atomic structures, as well as the absence of suitable structural models for such substances. This complexity makes theoretical calculations difficult. To shed light on the interactions between nitrogen-doped carbon surfaces and water molecules, studies on water adsorption have been conducted using model materials with varying pore structures and atomic configurations [58]. Solid-state NMR spectroscopy, combined with theoretical calculations, revealed that water in nitrogen-rich C2N materials exhibited an exceptionally strong rate of adsorption, significantly above 60 kJ mol−1, which is far greater than what is typically associated with physisorption. In these porous materials, water becomes an integral part of the chemical structure, justifying the term “zeocarbons [58]”.

4. Discussion

4.1. Limitation Implications and Future Research Considerations on Porous Carbonaceous Materials

In a separate study focused on innovative materials, researchers developed a novel microporous carbon material, referred to as MUM-51, derived from waste coffee grounds through a process of carbonization followed by activation with KOH. MUM-51 was thoroughly characterized using a variety of techniques, including nitrogen adsorption-desorption at 77 K, X-ray powder diffraction, Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and Raman spectroscopy. To assess its methane adsorption capabilities, experiments were performed on the synthesized adsorbent under varying pressures (up to 10 MPa) and temperatures (up to 323.15 K). The specific pore volume of the adsorbent, calculated using density functional theory (DFT), was determined to be VDFT = 1.604 cm3/g, while the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) specific surface area was found to be SBET = 3456 m2/g. At a temperature of 298.15 K and a pressure of 10 MPa, the maximum methane adsorption capacity approached 19 mmol/g. The average relative deviations between the experimental data and predictions made by the Dubinin-Radushkevich model were found to be below 3%. Moreover, the initial differential molar heat of methane adsorption on the MUM-51 adsorbent was recorded at 28.7 kJ/mol [59].
An overview of novel materials in the relevant literature highlights a study in which the authors developed an algorithm to generate random porous “pseudomaterials”. Researchers calculated the structural characteristics of these pseudomaterials, such as surface area, pore size and void fraction, along with their gas adsorption properties, through molecular simulations. The research specifically focused on void fraction and xenon (Xe) adsorption at varied pressures of 1–10 bars. In this study, they identified pseudomaterials exhibiting rare combinations of mutating void fraction and Xe adsorption in order to create new pseudomaterials. This approach determined new emerging fields of mapping the structure-property, thus supporting future gas storage and separation applications through the design of new porous materials [6].
Another significant study focused on the lead adsorption properties of nano-hydroxyapatite/chitosan porous materials, which combine hydroxyapatite (HAP) and chitosan (CS) powders—both of which demonstrate good adsorption activity for Pb2⁺ ions but are challenging to separate from wastewater. The bioinspired fabrication of nano-HAP/CS porous materials (HCPMs) was achieved through a two-step process: (a) freeze-drying the brushite (DCPD)/CS porous materials (BCPMs) and (b) converting the BCPMs into HCPMs using alkaline solution treatment. The HCPMs featured interconnected, three-dimensional (3D) macropores with sizes ranging from 150 to 240 μm and a porosity of 93.0% [60]. Kinetic and isotherm studies revealed that the adsorption of Pb2⁺ ions on the HCPMs aligned well with pseudo-second-order kinetics and the Langmuir isotherm model, demonstrating their suitability for the chemical adsorption of Pb2⁺ ions from wastewater [60].
In a related study, the isotropic and anisotropic characteristics of adsorption-induced deformation in carbon adsorbents were explored [61]. A simplified model of microporous zones within carbon adsorbents was developed based on the structure dictated by raw materials and activation conditions. This model enabled the evaluation of the number of micropores (approximately 1020 g−1) and the number of microporous nanocrystals, referred to as elementary microporous zones (EMZ), estimated at around 1011 g−1 for four different carbon adsorbents with varying raw materials and activation conditions [61]. The contraction-expansion transition, along with the magnitude of contraction, was found to be temperature-dependent within a range of 216.6 to 393 K. The compressibility and tri-axial compression modulus of Sorbonorit-4 were assessed across the temperature range of 216.6 to 293 K, with both parameters exhibiting temperature-dependent behavior that could be approximated by exponential functions. Notably, the tri-axial compression modulus of Sorbonorit-4 decreased from 42 to 10 GPa, while compressibility increased fivefold within the specified temperature range [61].
Innovative hierarchical porous carbon materials (HPCs) were developed using a reactive template-induced in situ hyper-crosslinking method. This study examined how various carbonization conditions influenced the microstructure and morphology of the HPCs, as well as their ability to adsorb methylene blue (MB) [62]. The resulting HPCs exhibited a complex hierarchical structure consisting of micro-, meso- and macropores, formed through the overlapping of hollow nanospheres with microporous shells and macroporous interiors. Key factors such as carbonization temperature, duration and heating rate significantly influenced the formation of these nanostructures. The BET-specific surface area reached an impressive 2388 m2/g, with a micropore-specific surface area of 1892 m2/g [62]. Thanks to their well-structured pores, the HPCs demonstrated a methylene blue removal efficiency exceeding 99% under optimized conditions. The kinetics of adsorption were effectively modeled by a pseudo-second-order equation, while the thermodynamic behavior conformed to the Langmuir model. Additionally, this adsorption process was characterized as spontaneous and endothermic in nature [62].

4.2. Synthesizing and Designing Aspects of Adsorptive Materials Fabrication

The industrial wastewater management sector faces an urgent demand for multifunctional materials that can effectively separate both oil-in-water and water-in-oil emulsions while simultaneously adsorbing heavy metal ions. To meet this critical need, a novel three-dimensional porous material was developed, consisting of polystyrene-divinylbenzene-trimethylolpropane triacrylate/polyethyleneimine (P(St-D-T)/PEI20) [63]. This material features underliquid dual superlyophobicity and was synthesized using a one-pot high internal phase emulsion polymerization technique. The design strategy for this material integrated both hydrophilic and hydrophobic components. Cationic polyethyleneimine (PEI) was chemically grafted onto the surface of the hydrophobic P(St-D-T) porous structure via a 1,4-conjugate addition reaction. This modification endowed the material with underliquid dual superlyophobicity and introduced metal ion-chelating coordination groups. The resulting composite exhibited exceptional performance in continuously separating surfactant-stabilized oil-in-water and water-in-oil emulsions, achieving separation efficiencies of 99.4% and 97.4%, respectively, with separation flux rates of 2543 L m−2h−1 bar−1 and 8363 L m−2h−1 bar−1. Furthermore, this material displayed excellent mechanical stability and remarkable resistance to chemical degradation [63].
To conclude this section, it is worth noting the findings from two studies [64,65]. Study [64] involved the preparation of porous materials (P-Mt) using a gel casting method with nano-montmorillonite (Nano-Mt) powder. These P-Mt materials demonstrated the ability to adsorb low concentrations of Cr3+ from tanning wastewater [64]. When P-Mt was sintered at 600 °C, it retained effective Cr3+ adsorption. However, sintering temperatures exceeding 700 °C led to a significant alteration in the crystal structure and lamellar arrangement of P-Mt, resulting in reduced Cr3+ adsorption capacity. This indicates that 600 °C is the optimal sintering temperature for P-Mt to efficiently remove Cr3+ from tanning wastewater. Additionally, this method addressed issues related to the aggregation and recycling difficulties of Nano-Mt powder in liquid environments [64]. In an earlier study (published almost four decades ago), a complete computer analysis of the morphological properties of porous solid samples was obtained from gas adsorption data [65]. An interactive procedure was developed, enabling even non-specialized computer users to determine the volume and surface characteristics of samples. This method of automatic data analysis can support research laboratories interested in standard characterizations and data archives. The most important feature of this procedure was its improvement in providing calculation options without modifying the structure of the original program. It was also possible to select from different geometrical pore models that obeyed a generalized form of the Kelvin equation [65].

5. Conclusions

From a general perspective, the literature studies intended to establish the chemical principles of new types of methods, such as water chemistry, which were confined to strongly interacting sorption mechanisms, such as nanopores [55]. It is noteworthy that porous materials featuring a bimodal pore size distribution (comprising both micro and mesopores) have been successfully synthesized under ambient conditions [66]. These materials consist of uniformly sized mesoporous channels that are randomly distributed, resulting in exceptionally high surface areas and pore volumes. When examining their adsorption characteristics for water and various large organic molecules, these materials demonstrated water sorption capacities approximately 300% greater than those of traditional zeolite molecular sieves, such as zeolite 13X [66].
One of the primary features of these materials is their remarkable ability to adsorb substantial molecules, such as tetralin, at concentrations exceeding 60 wt.%, which are typically excluded by zeolites. The materials’ open architecture and extensive pore size contribute to rapid adsorption and desorption rates. These enhanced adsorption capabilities underscore the promising potential of these new materials for various applications in both adsorption and catalysis. Furthermore, the anticipated large-scale production of these mesosieve materials is expected to be both efficient and cost-effective [66].
The results of relevant research indicate that carbon material derived from waste coffee grounds possesses a high specific surface area and porosity, making it an effective adsorbent for greenhouse gases (GHGs), particularly methane [59]. A comprehensive theoretical and experimental review of published studies further highlighted that the activated carbon fibrous materials and granular activated carbon in relation to vapors of benzene, toluene, ethyl acetate and acetone are all determined by the reported porous structure and adsorption properties [67]. The porous structures of these adsorbents can be characterized by their adsorption mechanism of benzene, which serves as a standard substance, allowing for the calculation of their adsorption characteristics concerning the organic solvents examined. A strong correlation for all adsorbents was reported between their calculated and experimental characteristics. Furthermore, it was established that the adsorption properties of both activated carbon fibrous adsorbents and granular activated carbon are directly related to the molecular polarizability of the adsorptive, as well as the volume and size of the adsorbing pores [67]. In conclusion, two key insights from the bibliometric analysis were emphasized:
-
The adsorption properties of polytetrafluoroethylene and silica chemically modified with an organofluoric coating match gas chromatography at low coverage compared with other hydrophobic materials, showing that polytetrafluoroethylene is a nonpolar material with the lowest energy of adsorption of all the adsorbents studied, irrespective of their chemical nature [68].
-
New research efforts can focus on developing porous materials with underliquid dual superlyophobicity to address complex wastewater treatment challenges, particularly in the treatment of oily wastewater and organic pollutants in aqueous solutions [63,69,70].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.L.K.; Data curation, K.T.; Formal analysis, G.L.K. and K.T.; Funding acquisition, G.L.K.; Investigation, G.L.K.; Methodology, K.T.; Project administration, I.S. and Y.C.; Resources, G.L.K. and I.S.; Software, K.T. and Y.C.; Supervision, G.L.K.; Validation, I.S. and Y.C.; Visualization, G.L.K. and K.T.; Writing—original draft, K.T. and G.L.K.; Writing—review and editing, I.S. and Y.C.; Contributor Roles Taxonomy. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Li, B.; Fan, K.; Ma, X.; Liu, Y.; Chen, T.; Cheng, Z.; Wang, X.; Jiang, J.; Liu, X. Graphene-based porous materials with tunable surface area and CO2 adsorption properties synthesized by fluorine displacement reaction with various diamines. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2016, 478, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  2. Ma, K. Integrated hybrid modeling and SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) to predict and explain the adsorption properties of thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) porous materials. RSC Adv. 2024, 14, 10348–10357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  3. Liu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Sheng, X.R.; Li, N.; Ping, Q.W.; Niu, M.H.; Lu, P.; Zhang, J. Preparation of Diatomite Based Porous Slow-Release Materials and its Adsorption-Release Properties on Phoxim. J. Environ. Inform. 2023, 41, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  4. Polyakov, N.S.; Petukhova, G.A.; Surovikin, V.F. Adsorption properties and porous structure of new carbon materials. Russ. Chem. Bull. 1993, 42, 1308–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  5. Kwon, B.C.; Lee, Y.J.; Park, N.-K.; Lee, T.J.; Kang, M.; Hong, J.-P. Adsorption property of porous materials for removal of small content mercury contained in coal gas. World Congr. Recent Adv. Nanotechnol. 2018, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  6. Kaija, A.R.; Wilmer, C.E. Efficiently mapping structure-property relationships of gas adsorption in porous materials: Application to Xe adsorption. Faraday Discuss. 2017, 201, 221–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  7. Tsymbal, L.V.; Andriichuk, I.L.; Yaremov, P.S.; Ilyin, V.G.; Lampeka, Y.D. Adsorption Properties of Porous Materials Based on Macrocyclic Nickel(II) Complexes and Benzenetricarboxylate Relative to Water, Methanol, and Hexane Vapor. Theor. Exp. Chem. 2013, 49, 270–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  8. Larsen, G.; Silva, H.S.; De Silva, R.V. On a simple nonisothermal adsorption experiment with organic vapors and an inertial microbalance to study the surface properties of hybrid (organic/inorganic) porous materials. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2000, 224, 205–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  9. Khyazeva, M.K.; Fomkin, A.A.; Shkolin, A.V.; Men’shchikov, I.E.; Grinchenko, A.E.; Solovtsova, O.V.; Pulin, A.L. Adsorption Properties of a Functional Porous Material Based on a Zn–BTB Metal–Organic Framework Structure. Prot. Met. Phys. Chem. Surf. 2022, 58, 6–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  10. Ren, S.; Deng, L.; Zhang, B.; Lei, Y.; Ren, H.; Lv, J.; Zhao, R.; Chen, X. Effect of air oxidation on texture, surface properties and dye adsorption of wood-derived porous carbon materials. Materials 2019, 12, 1675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  11. Chen, J.X.; Li, J.H.; Bao, A. B/N codoped porous carbon materials with rich microporous structure and their CO2 adsorption properties. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  12. Zhu, L.; Zhao, N.; Tong, L.; Lv, Y.; Li, G. Characterization and evaluation of surface modified materials based on porous biochar and its adsorption properties for 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid. Chemosphere 2018, 210, 734–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  13. Hsien, T.-Y.; Rorrer, G.L. Effects of Acylation and Crosslinking on the Material Properties and Cadmium Ion Adsorption Capacity of Porous Chitosan Beads. Sep. Sci. Technol. 1995, 30, 2455–2475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  14. Lee, W.H.; Park, J.S.; Sok, J.H.; Reucroft, P.J. Effects of pore structure and surface state on the adsorption properties of nano-porous carbon materials in low and high relative pressures. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2005, 246, 77–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  15. Cui, L.; Xiong, Z.; Guo, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, C.; Zhu, P. Fabrication of interpenetrating polymer network chitosan/gelatin porous materials and study on dye adsorption properties. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 132, 330–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  16. Perovic, M.; Qin, Q.; Oschatz, M. From Molecular Precursors to Nanoparticles—Tailoring the Adsorption Properties of Porous Carbon Materials by Controlled Chemical Functionalization. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 1908371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  17. Pires, J.; Araújo, A.C.; Carvalho, A.P.; Pinto, M.L.; González-Calbet, J.M.; Ramírez-Castellanos, J. Porous materials from clays by the gallery template approach: Synthesis, characterization and adsorption properties. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2004, 73, 175–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  18. Xiao, X.; Li, W.; Jiang, J. Porphyrin-cucurbituril organic molecular porous material: Structure and iodine adsorption properties. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2013, 35, 156–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  19. Chakraborty, A.; Saha, B.B.; Ng, K.C.; El-Sharkawy, I.I.; Koyama, S. Thermodynamic property surfaces for adsorption of R507A, R134a, and n-butane on pitch-based carbonaceous porous materials. Heat Transf. Eng. 2010, 31, 917–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  20. Dos Reis, G.S.; Guy, M.; Mathieu, M.; Jebrane, M.; Lima, E.C.; Thyrel, M.; Dotto, G.L.; Larsson, S.H. A comparative study of chemical treatment by MgCl2, ZnSO4, ZnCl2, and KOH on physicochemical properties and acetaminophen adsorption performance of biobased porous materials from tree bark residues. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2022, 642, 128626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  21. Charmas, B.; Ziezio, M.; Jedynak, K. Assessment of the Porous Structure and Surface Chemistry of Activated Biocarbons Used for Methylene Blue Adsorption. Molecules 2023, 28, 4922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  22. Lu, G.; Han, J.; Chen, Y.; Xue, H.; Qiu, R.; Zhou, X.; Ma, Z. Synthesis of Porous Materials Using Magnesium Slag and Their Adsorption Performance for Lead Ions in Aqueous Solution. Materials 2023, 16, 7083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  23. Sztekler, K.; Mlonka-Mędrala, A.; Khdary, N.H.; Kalawa, W.; Nowak, W.; Mika, Ł. Possibility of Advanced Modified-Silica-Based Porous Materials Utilisation inWate Adsorption Processes—A Comparative Study. Energies 2022, 15, 368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  24. Setnickova, K.; Jerabek, K.; Strasak, T.; Mullerova, M.; Jandova, V.; Soukup, K.; Petrickovic, R.; Tseng, H.-H.; Uchytil, P. Synthesis, Characterization, and Gas Adsorption Performance of Amine-Functionalized Styrene-Based Porous Polymers. Polymers 2023, 15, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  25. Amaraweera, S.M.; Gunathilake, C.A.; Gunawardene, O.H.P.; Dassanayake, R.S.; Cho, E.-B.; Du, Y. Carbon Capture Using Porous Silica Materials. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 2050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  26. Moermond, C.T.A.; Traas, T.P.; Roessink, I.; Veltman, K.; Hendriks, A.J.; Koelmans, A.A. Modeling decreased food chain accumulation of PAHs due to strong sorption to carbonaceous materials and metabolic transformation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 6185–6191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  27. Jeong, S.; Wander, M.M.; Kleineidam, S.; Grathwohl, P.; Ligouis, B.; Werth, C.J. The role of condensed carbonaceous materials on the sorption of hydrophobic organic contaminants in subsurface sediments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 1458–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  28. Sigmund, G.; Gharasoo, M.; Hüffer, T.; Hofmann, T. Deep Learning Neural Network Approach for Predicting the Sorption of Ionizable and Polar Organic Pollutants to a Wide Range of Carbonaceous Materials. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 4583–4591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  29. Shen, X.; Guo, X.; Zhang, M.; Tao, S.; Wang, X. Sorption mechanisms of organic compounds by carbonaceous materials: Site energy distribution consideration. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 4894–4902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  30. Jeong, S.; Werth, C.J. Spectroscopic characterization of carbonaceous material properties that affect hydrophobic organic chemical sorption. ACS Div. Environ. Chem.–Prepr. Ext. Abstr. 2004, 44, 1186–1189. [Google Scholar]
  31. Cheremisina, O.; Lutekiy, D.; Paritsky, D. Sorption activity of organic carbonaceous material of “Stubborn” ores and concentrates. Int. Multidiscip. Sci. GeoConference Surv. Geol. Min. Ecol. Manag. SGEM 2016, 2, 1189–1194. [Google Scholar]
  32. Schüth, C.; Taubald, H.; Bolaño, N.; Maciejczyk, K. Carbon and hydrogen isotope effects during sorption of organic contaminants on carbonaceous materials. J. Contam. Hydrol. 2003, 64, 269–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  33. Kupryianchyk, D.; Hale, S.; Zimmerman, A.R.; Harvey, O.; Rutherford, D.; Abiven, S.; Knicker, H.; Schmidt, H.-P.; Rumpel, C.; Cornelissen, G. Sorption of hydrophobic organic compounds to a diverse suite of carbonaceous materials with emphasis on biochar. Chemosphere 2016, 144, 879–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  34. Zhi, Y.; Liu, J. Sorption and desorption of anionic, cationic and zwitterionic polyfluoroalkyl substances by soil organic matter and pyrogenic carbonaceous materials. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 346, 682–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  35. Kah, M.; Sigmund, G.; Xiao, F.; Hofmann, T. Sorption of ionizable and ionic organic compounds to biochar, activated carbon and other carbonaceous materials. Water Res. 2017, 124, 673–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  36. Zhao, Q.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, X.; Lei, L.; Ma, W.; Ma, C.; Song, L.; Chen, J.; Pan, B.; Xing, B. Cation-Pi Interaction: A Key Force for Sorption of Fluoroquinolone Antibiotics on Pyrogenic Carbonaceous Materials. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 13659–13667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  37. Wang, G.; Grathwohl, P. Isosteric heats of sorption and desorption of phenanthrene in soils and carbonaceous materials. Environ. Pollut. 2013, 175, 110–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  38. Yang, Y.; Hofmann, T.; Pies, C.; Grathwohl, P. Sorption of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) to carbonaceous materials in a river floodplain soil. Environ. Pollut. 2008, 156, 1357–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  39. Muñoz-Vega, E.; Horovitz, M.; Dönges, L.; Schiedek, T.; Schulz, S.; Schüth, C. Competitive sorption experiments reveal new regression models to predict PhACs sorption on carbonaceous materials. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 471, 134239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  40. Wang, G.; Kleineidam, S.; Grathwohl, P. Sorption/desorption reversibility of phenanthrene in soils and carbonaceous materials. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 1186–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  41. Kushwaha, A.; Goswami, S.; Hans, N.; Singh, A.; Vishwakarma, H.S.; Devi, G.; Mishra, P.; Bhan, U.; Hussain, C.M. Sorption of pharmaceutical and personal care products from the wastewater by carbonaceous materials. In Emerging Trends to Approaching Zero Waste: Environmental and Social Perspectives; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 175–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  42. Jeong, S.; Werth, C.J. Evaluation of methods to obtain geosorbent fractions enriched in carbonaceous materials that affect hydrophobic organic chemical sorption. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 3279–3288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  43. Wang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Du, C.; Jin, Y.; Wu, X.; He, K.; Yang, Y.; Li, X. Effects of charge-assisted hydrogen bond on sorption and co-sorption of pharmaceutical contaminants on carbonaceous materials: Spectroscopic and theoretical studies. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 908, 168375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  44. Serrano-Gómez, J.; López-González, H.; Olguín, M.T.; Bulbulian, S. Carbonaceous material obtained from exhausted coffee by an aqueous solution combustion process and used for cobalt (II) and cadmium (II) sorption. J. Environ. Manag. 2015, 156, 121–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  45. Wang, B.; Wang, Y.; Wang, J. Sorption of naphthalene and 2-naphthol onto porous carbonaceous materials as a function of pore size, metals, and oxygen-containing groups. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 18717–18728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  46. Nishimiya, N.; Toyama, T.; Kojima, Y. Hydrogen sorption by carbonaceous materials and carbon nitride modified with transition metals. In Proceedings of the 17th World Hydrogen Energy Conference WHEC, Queensland, Australia, 15–19 June 2008; Volume 2, pp. 641–645. [Google Scholar]
  47. Kossmann, J.; Rothe, R.; Heil, T.; Antonietti, M.; López-Salas, N. Ultrahigh water sorption on highly nitrogen doped carbonaceous materials derived from uric acid. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2021, 602, 880–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  48. Varshal, G.M.; Velyukhanova, T.K.; Korochantsev, A.V.; Tobelko, K.I.; Galuzinskaya, A.K.; Akhmanova, M.V. The Relation between the Sorption Capacity of the Carbonaceous Material in Rocks for Noble Metals and Its Structure. Geochem. Int. 1996, 33, 139–146. [Google Scholar]
  49. Gutiérrez-Segura, E.; Solache-Ríos, M.; Colín-Cruz, A. Sorption of indigo carmine by a Fe-zeolitic tuff and carbonaceous material from pyrolyzed sewage sludge. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 170, 1227–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  50. Torres-Pérez, J.; Solache-Ríos, M.; Colín-Cruz, A. Sorption and desorption of dye remazol yellow onto a Mexican surfactant-modified clinoptilolite-rich tuff and a carbonaceous material from pyrolysis of sewage sludge. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2008, 187, 303–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  51. Zhang, M.; Shen, J.; Zhong, Y.; Ding, T.; Dissanayake, P.D.; Yang, Y.; Tsang, Y.F.; Ok, Y.S. Sorption of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) from water and wastewater by carbonaceous materials: A review. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 52, 727–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  52. Simón, M.; García, I.; Diez-Ortiz, M.; González, V. Biochar from Different Carbonaceous Waste Materials: Ecotoxicity and Effectiveness in the Sorption of Metal(loid)s. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2018, 229, 224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  53. Guo, Z.; Chen, T.; Wang, X.; Zhang, L.; Wang, L.; Dong, D.; Hua, X. Addition of carbonaceous material to aquatic sediments for sorption of lindane and p,p’-dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  54. Jänchen, J.; Stach, H. Adsorption properties of porous materials for solar thermal energy storage and heat pump applications. Energy Procedia 2012, 30, 289–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  55. Tang, W.; Huang, H.; Gao, Y.; Liu, X.; Yang, X.; Ni, H.; Zhang, J. Preparation of a novel porous adsorption material from coal slag and its adsorption properties of phenol from aqueous solution. Mater. Des. 2015, 88, 1191–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  56. Zhang, L.; Zhang, T.D.; Gao, R.; Zhao, Y.L.; Zhang, W.; Tang, D.Y.; Jiao, J.; Ma, H.Y.; Yang, J.Y. Preparation and phenol adsorption property of tobacco stem based modified porous materials. IOP Conference Series: Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 397, 012131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  57. Lin, M.-H.; Lin, L.-C. Simultaneously Probing Gaseous Diffusion and Adsorption Properties in Porous Materials Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations. J. Phys. Chem. C 2023, 127, 17497–17507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  58. Heske, J.; Walczak, R.; Epping, J.D.; Youk, S.; Sahoo, S.K.; Antonietti, M.; Kühne, T.D.; Oschatz, M. When water becomes an integral part of carbon–combining theory and experiment to understand the zeolite-like water adsorption properties of porous C2N materials. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 22563–22572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  59. Memetova, A.E.; Zelenin, A.D.; Memetov, N.R.; Yagubov, V.S.; Chapaksov, N.A.; Stolyarov, R.A.; Gerasimova, A.V.; Mkrtchyan, E.S. Methane Adsorption Properties of a Functional Porous Material Based on Coffee Waste. Inorg. Mater. Appl. Res. 2023, 14, 1298–1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  60. Lei, Y.; Chen, W.; Lu, B.; Ke, Q.-F.; Guo, Y.-P. Bioinspired fabrication and lead adsorption property of nano-hydroxyapatite/chitosan porous materials. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 98783–98795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  61. Shkolin, A.V.; Men’shchikov, I.E.; Khozina, E.V.; Yakovlev, V.Y.; Fomkin, A.A. Isotropic and anisotropic properties of adsorption-induced deformation of porous carbon materials. Adsorption 2023, 29, 237–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  62. Cai, L.-F.; Zhan, J.-M.; Liang, J.; Yang, L.; Yin, J. Structural control of a novel hierarchical porous carbon material and its adsorption properties. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 3118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  63. Huang, H.; Cai, Y.; Zhao, C.; Chen, Z.; Liao, Z.; Xie, H.; Li, H.; Xiang, D.; Wu, Y.; Cheng, J.; et al. Fabrication of 3D porous materials with underliquid dual superlyophobic properties for oil–water emulsion separation and Cu2+ adsorption. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2024, 339, 126691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  64. Tao, E.; Li, Y.; Yang, S.; Qian, J.; Liu, L.; Xing, J. Nano-montmorillonite-based porous material prepared by gel casting: Structure and adsorption properties. Micro Nano Lett. 2018, 13, 332–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  65. Belleri, G.; Barco, L.; Beruto, D. Interactive procedure for the automatic analysis of adsorption isotherm data relevant to the morphological properties of porous materials. Surf. Technol. 1981, 13, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  66. Guo, C.J. Bimodal porous materials with superior adsorption properties. Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 1995, 97, 165–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  67. Dolidovich, A.F.; Akhremkova, G.S. Theoretical and experimental studies of the porous structure and adsorption properties of carbofibrous materials. J. Eng. Phys. Thermophys. 2010, 83, 917–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  68. Roshchina, T.M.; Astakhov, A.L.; Gurevich, K.B.; Lisichkin, G.V. Adsorption properties of porous materials with organofluoric surface. Russ. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 74, 1670–1674. [Google Scholar]
  69. Zamparas, M.; Kyriakopoulos, G.L.; Kapsalis, V.C.; Drosos, M.; Kalavrouziotis, I.K. Application of novel composite materials as sediment capping agents: Column experiments and modelling. Desalination Water Treat. 2019, 170, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  70. Kyriakopoulos, G.; Xiarchos, I.; Doulia, D. Treatment of contaminated water with pesticides via adsorption. Int. J. Environ. Technol. Manag. 2006, 6, 515–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.