Next Article in Journal
MEMS Mirrors for LiDAR: A Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Technical Model of Micro Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM) Milling Suitable for Bottom Grooved Micromixer Design Optimization
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Au Film Thickness and Surface Roughness on Room-Temperature Wafer Bonding and Wafer-Scale Vacuum Sealing by Au-Au Surface Activated Bonding
Review

A Review of Passive Micromixers with a Comparative Analysis

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Current address: Department of Industrial and Production Engineering, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Jessore 7408, Bangladesh
Micromachines 2020, 11(5), 455; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi11050455
Received: 2 March 2020 / Revised: 24 April 2020 / Accepted: 24 April 2020 / Published: 27 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Analysis, Design and Fabrication of Micromixers)
A wide range of existing passive micromixers are reviewed, and quantitative analyses of ten typical passive micromixers were performed to compare their mixing indices, pressure drops, and mixing costs under the same axial length and flow conditions across a wide Reynolds number range of 0.01–120. The tested micromixers were selected from five types of micromixer designs. The analyses of flow and mixing were performed using continuity, Navier-Stokes and convection-diffusion equations. The results of the comparative analysis were presented for three different Reynolds number ranges: low-Re (Re ≤ 1), intermediate-Re (1 < Re ≤ 40), and high-Re (Re > 40) ranges, where the mixing mechanisms are different. The results show a two-dimensional micromixer of Tesla structure is recommended in the intermediate- and high-Re ranges, while two three-dimensional micromixers with two layers are recommended in the low-Re range due to their excellent mixing performance. View Full-Text
Keywords: passive micromixers; comparative analysis; Navier-Stokes equations; mixing index; pressure drop; mixing cost passive micromixers; comparative analysis; Navier-Stokes equations; mixing index; pressure drop; mixing cost
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Raza, W.; Hossain, S.; Kim, K.-Y. A Review of Passive Micromixers with a Comparative Analysis. Micromachines 2020, 11, 455. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi11050455

AMA Style

Raza W, Hossain S, Kim K-Y. A Review of Passive Micromixers with a Comparative Analysis. Micromachines. 2020; 11(5):455. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi11050455

Chicago/Turabian Style

Raza, Wasim, Shakhawat Hossain, and Kwang-Yong Kim. 2020. "A Review of Passive Micromixers with a Comparative Analysis" Micromachines 11, no. 5: 455. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi11050455

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop