Next Article in Journal
Perfect Labelling: A Review and Outlook of Label Optimization Techniques in Dynamic Earth Observation
Next Article in Special Issue
Time-Series Deformation and Kinematic Characteristics of a Thaw Slump on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau Obtained Using SBAS-InSAR
Previous Article in Journal
An Improved Machine Learning-Based Method for Unsupervised Characterisation for Coral Reef Monitoring in Earth Observation Time-Series Data
Previous Article in Special Issue
Simulation and Prediction of Thermokarst Lake Surface Temperature Changes on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Predictive Skill of a Remote Sensing-Based Machine Learning Model for Ice Wedge and Visible Ground Ice Identification in Western Arctic Canada

1
Department of Geography, Environment & Geomatics, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
2
Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(7), 1245; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17071245
Submission received: 15 February 2025 / Revised: 28 March 2025 / Accepted: 29 March 2025 / Published: 1 April 2025

Abstract

Fine-scale maps of ground ice and related surface features are critical for permafrost-related modelling and management. However, such maps are lacking across almost the entire Arctic. Machine learning provides the potential to automate regional fine-scale ground ice mapping using remote sensing and topographic data. Here, we evaluate the predictive skill of XGBoost models for identifying (1) ice wedge and (2) top-5m visible ground ice in the Tuktoyaktuk Coastlands. We find high predictive skill for ice wedge occurrence (ROC AUC = 0.95, macro F1 = 0.80), with the most important predictors being slope, distance to the coast, and probability of depression. The model accurately predicted regional and local trends in ice wedge occurrence, with an increase in ice wedge polygon (IWP) probability towards the coast and in poorly drained depressions. The model also captured IWP in well-drained uplands of the study area, including locations with poorly visible troughs not contained in the training data. Spatial transferability analyses highlight the regional variability of ice wedge probability, reflecting contrasting climatic and surface conditions. Conversely, the low predictive skill for visible ground ice (ROC AUC = 0.67, macro F1 = 0.53) is attributed to limitations in training data and weak associations with the remotely sensed predictors. The varying predictive accuracy highlights the importance of high-quality reference data and site-specific conditions for improving ground ice studies with data-driven modelling from remote sensing observations.
Keywords: ice wedge; remote sensing; machine learning; ground ice ice wedge; remote sensing; machine learning; ground ice

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chang, Q.; Zwieback, S.; Berg, A.A. The Predictive Skill of a Remote Sensing-Based Machine Learning Model for Ice Wedge and Visible Ground Ice Identification in Western Arctic Canada. Remote Sens. 2025, 17, 1245. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17071245

AMA Style

Chang Q, Zwieback S, Berg AA. The Predictive Skill of a Remote Sensing-Based Machine Learning Model for Ice Wedge and Visible Ground Ice Identification in Western Arctic Canada. Remote Sensing. 2025; 17(7):1245. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17071245

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chang, Qianyu, Simon Zwieback, and Aaron A. Berg. 2025. "The Predictive Skill of a Remote Sensing-Based Machine Learning Model for Ice Wedge and Visible Ground Ice Identification in Western Arctic Canada" Remote Sensing 17, no. 7: 1245. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17071245

APA Style

Chang, Q., Zwieback, S., & Berg, A. A. (2025). The Predictive Skill of a Remote Sensing-Based Machine Learning Model for Ice Wedge and Visible Ground Ice Identification in Western Arctic Canada. Remote Sensing, 17(7), 1245. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17071245

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop