Next Article in Journal
Factors Influencing Building Information Modeling (BIM) Adoption Intention Among Multiple Stakeholders to Promote the Sustainable Development of the Construction Industry: Insights from the Technology–Organization–Environment (TOE) Theoretical Framework
Previous Article in Journal
Understanding User Perceptions of Gardening Apps Supporting Sustainability
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Heterogeneous Environmental Regulations and Green Total Factor Productivity: A Study on China’s Animal Husbandry Sector

1
School of Economics and Management, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China
2
School of Economics and Management, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot 010022, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2026, 18(8), 3701; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18083701
Submission received: 1 March 2026 / Revised: 1 April 2026 / Accepted: 7 April 2026 / Published: 9 April 2026

Abstract

The rapid expansion of China’s livestock husbandry has boosted the supply of meat, eggs, and dairy products, while concurrently giving rise to environmental pollution issues. Research on the effects of various environmental regulations on the green total factor productivity (GTFP) of the livestock sector and their underlying mechanisms is still lacking, despite the Chinese government’s implementation of corresponding environmental regulatory policies to address this practical challenge. As a key instrument for fostering green economic transformation, examining the relationship between environmental regulation and the green total factor productivity (GTFP) of animal husbandry is crucial for the sector’s sustainable development. In order to estimate the GTFP of China’s livestock sector for the years 2010–2022, this study uses the super-slack-based measure (Super-SBM) methodology. It conducts an empirical analysis to examine the mechanisms through which different environmental regulations influence livestock GTFP, alongside an investigation of regional heterogeneity. The results show that different environmental regulations have different effects on animal husbandry GTFP, with notable regional differences. Specifically, incentive-based environmental regulations enhance livestock GTFP by facilitating technological innovation; however, the level of regional economic development negatively moderates the association between incentive-based environmental regulations and livestock GTFP. The findings confirm that incentive-based environmental regulations are successful in encouraging livestock GTFP through technical innovation. They further emphasize that regions should formulate context-specific environmental regulatory policies to balance environmental protection and industrial development, thereby supporting the green and sustainable growth of China’s livestock industry.
Keywords: environmental regulation; animal husbandry; green total factor productivity (GTFP); Super-SBM model environmental regulation; animal husbandry; green total factor productivity (GTFP); Super-SBM model

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, X.; Chen, H.; Guo, H.; Zhang, L. Heterogeneous Environmental Regulations and Green Total Factor Productivity: A Study on China’s Animal Husbandry Sector. Sustainability 2026, 18, 3701. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18083701

AMA Style

Yang X, Chen H, Guo H, Zhang L. Heterogeneous Environmental Regulations and Green Total Factor Productivity: A Study on China’s Animal Husbandry Sector. Sustainability. 2026; 18(8):3701. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18083701

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Xinglong, Huaiyao Chen, Hengxing Guo, and Lei Zhang. 2026. "Heterogeneous Environmental Regulations and Green Total Factor Productivity: A Study on China’s Animal Husbandry Sector" Sustainability 18, no. 8: 3701. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18083701

APA Style

Yang, X., Chen, H., Guo, H., & Zhang, L. (2026). Heterogeneous Environmental Regulations and Green Total Factor Productivity: A Study on China’s Animal Husbandry Sector. Sustainability, 18(8), 3701. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18083701

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop