Next Article in Journal
Exploring the Integration of the Land, Water, and Energy Nexus in Sustainable Food Systems Research through a Socio-Economic Lens: A Systematic Literature Review
Previous Article in Journal
Adherence to the EAT-Lancet Dietary Recommendations for a Healthy and Sustainable Diet—The Case of the Brazuca Natal Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sustainability
Volume 15
Issue 23
10.3390/su152316527
sustainability-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
Correction to Sustainability 2021, 13(20), 11443.
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Surma et al. Assessing Employee Engagement in a Post-COVID-19 Workplace Ecosystem. Sustainability 2021, 13, 11443

by
Martyna Joanna Surma
1,*,
Richard Joseph Nunes
1,
Caroline Rook
2 and
Angela Loder
3
1
Department of Real Estate and Planning, Henley Business School, University of Reading, Whitenights, Reading RG6 6UD, UK
2
Department of Leadership, Organisations and Behaviour, Henley Business School, University of Reading, Greenlands, Henley-on-Thames RG9 2AU, UK
3
International WELL Building Institute, New York, NY 10001, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(23), 16527; https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316527
Submission received: 17 November 2023 / Accepted: 23 November 2023 / Published: 4 December 2023
Browse Figures
Versions Notes
The authors would like to make the following corrections to the published paper [1]. The changes are as follows:
(1)
Replacing Figure 5 (wrong version):
Sustainability 15 16527 g001
Figure 5. Matrix of metrics considering the new workplace ecosystem scenario.
Figure 5. Matrix of metrics considering the new workplace ecosystem scenario.
Sustainability 15 16527 g001
With
Sustainability 15 16527 g002
Figure 5. Matrix of metrics considering the new workplace ecosystem scenario.
Figure 5. Matrix of metrics considering the new workplace ecosystem scenario.
Sustainability 15 16527 g002

Reference

  1. Surma, M.J.; Nunes, R.J.; Rook, C.; Loder, A. Assessing Employee Engagement in a Post-COVID-19 Workplace Ecosystem. Sustainability 2021, 13, 11443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Surma, M.J.; Nunes, R.J.; Rook, C.; Loder, A. Correction: Surma et al. Assessing Employee Engagement in a Post-COVID-19 Workplace Ecosystem. Sustainability 2021, 13, 11443. Sustainability 2023, 15, 16527. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316527

AMA Style

Surma MJ, Nunes RJ, Rook C, Loder A. Correction: Surma et al. Assessing Employee Engagement in a Post-COVID-19 Workplace Ecosystem. Sustainability 2021, 13, 11443. Sustainability. 2023; 15(23):16527. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316527

Chicago/Turabian Style

Surma, Martyna Joanna, Richard Joseph Nunes, Caroline Rook, and Angela Loder. 2023. "Correction: Surma et al. Assessing Employee Engagement in a Post-COVID-19 Workplace Ecosystem. Sustainability 2021, 13, 11443" Sustainability 15, no. 23: 16527. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316527

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop