The authors would like to make the following corrections to the published paper [1]. The changes are as follows:
(1)
There is a copyediting mistake in the paper, which affects the article’s readability and understanding.
A correction has been made in Section 2.1.1: “To better navigate and understand these differences, this research uses the discourse typology developed by Calisto-Friant et al. (2020), which has also been used to analyze the EU’s CE policies [64], CE discourses in Norway [65,66], the European plastics strategy [67] and competing discourses on the CE in Australiaindustry practices in Italy and the Netherlands [68]”.
This has been changed to:
“To better navigate and understand these differences, this research uses the discourse typology developed by Calisto-Friant et al. (2020), which has also been used to analyze the EU’s CE policies [64], CE discourses in Norway [65,66], the European plastics strategy [67] and competing discourses on the CE in Australia [68]”.
(2)
A correction has been made in Section 4.3: “Future research should further analyze these and other policy options and approaches to addressing the CE 95 for plastics”.
This has been changed to:
“Future research should further analyze these and other policy options and approaches to addressing the CE transition for plastics”.
Reference
- Calisto Friant, M.; Lakerveld, D.; Vermeulen, W.J.V.; Salomone, R. Transition to a Sustainable Circular Plastics Economy in The Netherlands: Discourse and Policy Analysis. Sustainability 2022, 14, 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).