Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies have developed rapidly since 2000. Numerous academic papers have been published regarding energy efficiency improvements for air-conditioning systems. This study reviewed 12 review papers and selected 85 specific cases of applications of AI for HVAC energy usage reduction. In addition to academic studies, 31,221 patents related to HVAC energy-saving equipment filed by 11 companies were investigated. In order to analyze the large amount of data, this study developed a resource description framework (RDF) as an analysis tool. This tool was used with a natural language processing (NLP) program to compare the contents of academic papers and patents. With the automated analysis program, this study aimed to link academic research and corporate research and development, mainly the enterprise patent applications, to analyze the reasons why AI can effectively save energy. This represents a complete analysis of the current status of academic and industrial development. Six methods were identified to save energy effectively, including model-based predictive control (MPC), thermal comfort control, model-free predictive control, control optimization, multi-agent control (MAC), and knowledge-based system/rule set (KBS/RS)-based control. The energy savings of these methods were quantified to be 8.8–25.5%. These methods are widely covered by the examined corporate patent applications. After using NLP to retrieve patent keywords, the landscapes of enterprise patents were constructed and the future research directions were identified. It is concluded that 10 topics, including novel neural network designs, smartphone-assisted machine learning, and transfer learning, can be used to increase the energy-saving effects of AI and enable sustainable air-conditioning systems.
1. Introduction
In a project supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology at Taiwan, the keywords ‘artificial intelligence’ (AI) and ‘heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning’ (HVAC) were searched for in the ScienceDirect database and IEEE Explore in August 2021. A total of 664 academic papers were identified. The main purpose of this study was to explore sustainable air-conditioning systems enabled by AI. This study first analyzed review papers to identify the technology gap.
A total of 14 review papers published between 2000 and 2020 were analyzed. The abstract information of these papers is presented as follows: smart buildings and HVAC equipment related papers, reviewed by Wong et al. [1]; a review of advanced control systems, especially multi-agent control systems (MACSs) for energy and comfort management in buildings, presented by Dounic and Caraiscos [2]; a review of AI applications for refrigeration, air-conditioning, and heat pump systems, presented by Mohanraj et al. [3]; a review of computing models developed for predicting building energy consumption by Zhao and Magoulès [4]; a review of the applications of artificial neural networks (ANNs), the support vector machine (SVM), and the hybrid method with genetic algorithms (GAs) or particle swarm optimization (PSO) for forecasting building energy consumption by Ahmad et al. [5]; a review of HVAC control methods, presented by Belic et al. [6]; a review of AI-based load demand forecasting for smart grids and buildings, presented by Raza and Khosravi [7]; a review of demand-side management with ANNs by Macedo et al. [8]; a review of AI methods including decision tree (DT) algorithms, hidden Markov models, machine learning (ML), multilayer perceptron (MLP), and SVM&R for smart control of HVAC equipment by Mulia et al. [9]; a review of AI-based methods for predicting building energy usage, reported by Wang and Srinivasan [10]; a review of state-of-the-art electric load forecasting technologies, reported by Mamun et al. [11]; a review of building occupancy detection systems and smart control, reported by Sun et al. [12]; a review of model-based predictive control (MPC) in institutional buildings by Cotrufo et al. [13]; and a review of AI-based methodologies used to enhance thermal comfort in indoor spaces, reported by Ngarambe et al. [14].
The following conclusions can be drawn on the basis of the aforementioned review papers:
- Three review papers report that MPC is an effective energy-saving method.
- One review paper indicated that MAC is an effective energy-saving method for multi-zone air-conditioning.
- Other review papers mainly discuss the prediction accuracy. Their primary conclusion is that combinations of several AI technologies can improve prediction accuracy.
On the basis of the aforementioned conclusions, this study identified the following research gaps.
- In addition to MPC and MAC, can other AI technologies be effectively applied to sustainable air-conditioning system?
- Lack of a comprehensive and quantitative analysis of HVAC energy savings by AI. In addition, not only energy-saving effects, but also the improvement in thermal comfort, should be included.
- Since 2020, numerous commercial HVAC products claim to use AI to improve their products. Do any differences exist between commercial developments and academic research? Not only are review papers not discussed, but research papers are rarely seen.
In order to fill these research gaps, a research framework was established in this study. Figure 1 illustrates the steps of this research framework.
Figure 1.
The research framework of this study. 14 review papers [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. 664 article & 85 specific cases [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99].
Referring to Figure 1, the results of step 1—review paper survey—are illustrated in Section 1. Section 2 and Section 3 illustrate the details of the academic study case collection and patent survey, respectively. An automatic program—a resource description framework (RDF)—was developed for data analysis of a large number of patents.
This study’s novelty is the first usage of an RDF to analyze patent data. In contrast to academic paper surveys, it is difficult to find review reports, especially for this specific topic, i.e., AI for HVAC energy saving. By comparison, the number of surveyed patents is much larger than that of surveyed papers. In this study, 31,221 surveyed patents were identified, compared to 664 surveyed papers, i.e., almost fifty times as many. The RDF can be used to construct a metadata model for data analysis and obtain useful information from both academic research and enterprise patents. Section 4 present the details.
Section 5 presents the results and discussions. In this section, Section 5.1 illustrates energy-saving effects using AI and Section 5.2 illustrates cost saving and thermal comfort improvement. Both of these are the results of step 2. The patent landscape is discussed in Section 5, and is derived from step 3. The metadata model is the base to draw the landscape. From Section 5.3.1, Section 5.3.2, Section 5.3.3, Section 5.3.4, Section 5.3.5, Section 5.3.6, Section 5.3.7, Section 5.3.8, Section 5.3.9, Section 5.3.10 and Section 5.3.11, the landscape of over thirty-thousand patents from 10 companies is constructed, thus completing step 4.
Finally, the RDF was used to establish interchangeability between the different contents of academic papers and patent claims. Through the information interchange, the differences between research papers and patents can be identified to obtain the key factors, and the final step can be completed. It is expected that the five steps of this research will fulfil the technology gaps identified in this study. Furthermore, the manner in which AI research should be changed in the future, and the areas that should be focused on to accelerate the commercialization of these technologies, are discussed in Section 6.
2. Academic Study Cases
This study required structured information to develop the RDF. Thus, while performing step 2, we manually re-examined 664 articles from a database and selected 85 study cases. These cases met the following four conditions:
- Specific description of the type of HVAC equipment used;
- Specification of the type of building in which the equipment was used;
- Use of AI technology;
- Quantitative presentation of energy-saving effects and other benefits.
2.1. Case List
All the study cases are listed in Table 1.
Table 1.
Study cases obtained from the reviewed academic papers.
2.2. Study Case Analytics
The studies listed in Table 1 were performed in 27 countries, and the distribution of these cases by country is illustrated in Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Global distribution of the 85 study cases.
As presented in Figure 2, the AI research cases were distributed worldwide. As summarized in Table 1, all cases clearly state the type of HVAC equipment targeted by the study, the type of building in which the equipment was installed, and which AI technology was applied. Among the aforementioned case studies, 70% focused on energy-saving improvements for chillers; 22% focused on air conditioners; 4% focused on other devices, such as ceiling radiant heating/cooling systems; and 4% focused on HVAC equipment with thermal storage systems. In 40% of the cases, energy savings were verified by experiments, and in 60% of the cases, energy savings were verified by simulation results. The targeted cases were classified according to the floor area of the buildings. Small buildings having a size less than 500 m2 were investigated in 50% of the research cases, medium-sized buildings with an area of 500–5000 m2 were investigated in 17% of the cases, and large buildings with an area larger than 5000 m2 were investigated in 24% of the cases. These statistics are illustrated in Figure 3.
Figure 3.
AI for sustainable air-conditioning systems: (a) HVAC equipment type, (b) method for verifying the energy-saving effect, and (c) HVAC equipment for different building sizes.
The ratio of the reviewed studies that verified energy-saving effects through numerical simulations or real experiments is 6:4. Such evenly distributed sampling helped clarify the key factors affecting energy savings by AI-based HVAC equipment.
3. Enterprise Patent Analysis
This study not only investigated the academic cases, but also analyzed the commercialization of AI. In 2020, many HVAC-related companies publicly declared that AI can effectively improve their products, and information relevant to such declarations is summarized in the following section.
3.1. AI-Based HVAC Product
Daikin presented an AI application (an app) to turn on and turn off air conditioners, select the target indoor temperature, and adjust fan speeds and fan mode. It claimed that, by using Daikin AI, the perfect indoor climate can be achieved in every room for every season and time of day. Additional information is available at https://homey.app/en-ca/app/nl.climate.daikin/Daikin-AI/ (accessed on 8 August 2021).
Gree Electric won the world’s first AI air-conditioning energy-saving certification from Intertek, which is a British quality assurance company. Intertek conducted a comprehensive evaluation of the energy-saving function of the Gree AI air conditioner according to the NZS 3823.1.1:2012 Australian standard. Energy savings of up to 55% could be achieved. Additional information is available at https://chinahqb.com/news/5420.html (accessed on 8 August 2021).
Google announced that it developed DeepMind, which is an AI platform, to reduce data center cooling bills by 40%. Google began using ML to operate data centers in 2014. Before 2016, DeepMind researchers began working with Google’s data center team to considerably improve the utility of data center systems. Using a system of NNs trained for different operating scenarios and parameters within data centers, they created an efficient and adaptive framework to understand data center dynamics and optimize energy efficiency. Additional information regarding the process for creating this network is available in a web report (https://deepmind.com/blog/article/deepmind-ai-reduces-google-data-centre-cooling-bill-40, accessed on 10 August 2021).
IBM announced that they could lower the electricity consumption and costs associated with cooling buildings by an average of 30%. Its website reported a new approach for operating a building’s cooling system using ML techniques and Internet of Things (IoT) data. By predicting HVAC energy efficiency and precooling, this approach paves the way for reducing overall building energy consumption, the carbon footprint, and operating electricity costs. Detailed information can be found at https://www.ibm.com/blogs/research/2018/07/reduce-energy-cooling/ (accessed on 10 August 2021).
Johnson Controls announced an AI application for constructing environments through ML. Its application enables systems to learn and improve automatically through exposure to additional data without explicit programming. Johnson Controls demonstrated this application in a smart building in Ireland. Using AI, ML, data analytics, and cloud technologies, electric costs could be reduced by 50%. Additional details are available at https://www.johnsoncontrols.com/insights/2019/bts/applying-artificial-intelligence-to-built-environments-through-machine-learning (accessed on 12 August 2021).
LG Electronics reported a new AI-based air conditioner with 30% increased energy efficiency compared with existing air conditioners. Public information is available at https://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/tech/2018/01/694_242681.html (accessed on 12 August 2021).
Midea presented an AI- and IoT-based air conditioner with power consumption of 1.5 hp. This Wi-Fi-connected, wall-mounted air conditioner achieved energy savings and could be programmed or controlled with a smartphone to manage the temperature and optimize energy usage. Detailed information on this air conditioner can be found at https://www.midea.com/sg/product/Air-Conditionesrs/AE-PRO-Premium-Multi-Split-(5-Ticks)/Midea-AI-Premium-Multi-Split-Series-Indoor-Unit1 (accessed on 12 August 2021).
Panasonic presented an AI-based air conditioner with the ‘ECO’ mode. This mode is used to learn about the room environment of occupants and maximize energy savings in each room by automatically adjusting to the optimal ECO level according to the heat load conditions and air-conditioning capacity. Additional information on this air conditioner can be found at https://aircon.panasonic.com/consumer/energy_efficiency.html (accessed on 12 August 2021).
Samsung developed AI autocooling technology. This technology automatically optimizes various modes by analyzing room conditions and energy usage patterns. On the basis of a set preferred temperature, it automatically switches to an appropriate mode. Samsung also announced the ‘SmartThings’ app. A user using this app on a smart phone can simply tell the AI what they want. The app then suggests the best settings for the air conditioner. Details on the aforementioned technology and the relevant air conditioner can be found at https://www.samsung.com/africa_en/air-conditioners/wall-mount/ar12tshcbwk-fa/ (accessed on 12 August 2021).
Siemens announced the delivery of an AI-based cooling solution for Tier IV data centers. A Tier IV data center is constructed to be completely fault-tolerant with redundancy for every component. These data centers have expected uptimes of 99.995%; thus, they have an annual downtime of 26.3 min. The cooling system for these data centers must not only be energy efficient but must also must be operated in a fault-tolerant mode. A study described in Table 1 focused on fault-tolerant operation. The aforementioned study reported that MPC can enable the fault-tolerant control of AHU VAV systems and can achieve 35% energy savings compared with the energy consumption in conventional fault-tolerant operation. The AI technology developed by Siemens was used in the first Tier IV-certified data center in Paris. Data center energy consumption can be reduced by up to 30% with this AI technology. The operation of the aforementioned data center was scheduled to begin in spring 2021. Additional information can be found at https://www.missioncriticalmagazine.com/articles/93416-siemens-delivers-ai-based-cooling-solution-for-tier-iv-data-center.
The authors of this article cooperated with Hitachi Taiwan (now merged with Johnson Controls). The research team applied an AI-based control to a split-type air conditioner with a cooling capacity of 2.2 kW and a dehumidifying capability of 1.4 L/h. The results revealed that fuzzy logic with PID control could not reduce energy consumption; however, MPC increased the energy efficiency rating by 9.12%. The dynamic energy efficiency index, namely the cooling season power factor (CSPF), was also used for evaluation. Fuzzy logic with PID control increased the CSPF by 3.46%, and MPC increased the CSPF by 7.37% [85]. More than 10 companies have claimed to use AI for sustainable air-conditioning system design. However, these companies have not revealed the technical information necessary for investigation. Therefore, patents were surveyed in this study to collect sufficient technical information.
3.2. Key Patent Description
Relevant patent applications by the aforementioned companies were investigated. In total, the aforementioned companies, except Hitachi, have applied for more than 100 AI-related patents. Therefore, we did not analyze Hitachi’s patents in the present study.
The collected patents were analyzed using an RDF that was developed in this study. Because the number of patents owned by one company may exceed 1000, the analysis was performed in an automated manner. The RDF-based patent survey method is described in the next section. The following sections describe the results of the patent survey and list the key patents held by each company. The patents are described in the alphabetical order of the applying companies.
3.2.1. Patents of Carrier
A total of 157 patents of Carrier were identified from the Derwent Innovation database using the following criteria: CTB = (artificial adj intelligence or machine adj learning or deep adj learning or genetic adj algorithm or expert adj system or knowledge adj base or regression adj tree or support adj vector adj machine or feature adj learning or neural adj network or evolutionary adj algorithm or Reinforce adj learning). Notably, the patent search was not limited to HVAC because this study aimed to obtain a better understanding regarding the extent of a company’s AI research and development. Thus, some of the listed patents may not be related to HVAC.
Key patents identified through automated analysis and manual inspection are listed in Table 2.
Table 2.
Key patents of Carrier identified in this study.
3.2.2. Patents of Daikin
Using the aforementioned search criteria, 87 patents of Daikin were identified in the Derwent Innovation database. The key patents of Daikin are listed in Table 3.
Table 3.
Key patents of Daikin identified in this study.
3.2.3. Patents of Google
Using the aforementioned search criteria, 5370 patents of Google and its parent company, namely Alphabet, were identified in the Derwent Innovation database. Notably, the patent search was not limited to HVAC because this study attempted to obtain a superior understanding of the extent of a company’s AI research and development. In particular, Google does not focus on HVAC but is a key player in the global development of AI technology. Therefore, some of the listed patents of Google may not be related to HVAC.
Key patents of Google identified using automated analysis and manual inspection are listed in Table 4.
Table 4.
Key patents of Google identified in this study.
3.2.4. Gree Electric Patents
Using the search criteria, 819 patents of Gree Electric were identified in the Derwent Innovation database. The key patents of Gree Electric were identified in Table 5.
Table 5.
Key patents of Gree Electric identified in this study.
3.2.5. Patents of IBM
A total 7959 IBM patents were identified. The key patents of IBM identified through automated analysis and manual inspection are listed in Table 6.
Table 6.
Key patents of IBM identified in this study.
3.2.6. Patents of Johnson Controls
A total of 119 patents of Johnson Controls were identified. The key patents of Johnson Controls identified through automated analysis and manual inspection are listed in Table 7.
Table 7.
Key patents of Johnson Controls identified by this study.
3.2.7. Patents of LG Electronics
A total 2922 patents of LG Electronics were identified. The key patents of LG Electronics identified after automated analysis and manual inspection are listed in Table 8.
Table 8.
Key patents of LG Electronics identified in this study.
3.2.8. Patents of Midea Group
A total of 1850 patents filed by the Midea Group were identified. Table 9 lists the key patents of the Midea Group identified through automated analysis and manual inspection.
Table 9.
Key patents of the Midea Group identified in this study.
3.2.9. Patents of Samsung
A total of 7149 patents of Samsung were identified. The key patents of Samsung identified through automated analysis and manual inspection are listed in Table 10.
Table 10.
Key patents of Samsung identified in this study.
3.2.10. Patents of Siemens
A total of 5440 patents of Siemens were identified. The key patents of Siemens identified through automated analysis and manual inspection are listed in Table 11.
Table 11.
Key patents of Siemens identified in this study.
3.2.11. Patents of Panasonic
A total of 912 patents of Panasonic were identified. The key patents of Panasonic identified through automated analysis and manual inspection are listed in Table 12.
Table 12.
Key patents of Panasonic identified in this study.
3.3. Enterprise Patent Analytics
The key patents held by 11 HVAC-related companies are presented. The company names are abbreviated in the remaining text as follows:
- Carrier (Ca)
- Daikin (Da)
- Google (Go)
- Gree (Gr)
- IBM (I company)
- Johnson Controls (J)
- LG Electric (L company)
- Midea (M)
- Samsung (Sa)
- Siemens (Si)
- Panasonic (Pa).
A total of 31,221 patents filed by the 11 companies were included in the enterprise patent analysis. The number of patents for each company is depicted in Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Total of 31,221 patents filed by 11 companies.
This study included all patents filed by the aforementioned companies. However, due to length constraints, all patents could not be included as references. Only the patents deemed critical after analysis are cited, and these patents are listed in Table 2, Table 3, Table 4, Table 5, Table 6, Table 7, Table 8, Table 9, Table 10, Table 11 and Table 12. Statistics for the countries in which the patent applications were submitted are presented in Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Patent applications by country.
As presented in Figure 5, the country with the most patent applications is China, followed by the United States and World Intellectual Property Organization (WO). Other patent applications are scattered within Europe and Asia, including India. As displayed in Figure 1 and Figure 4, research on, and patents for, AI-based HVAC applications are worldwide phenomena. By comparing global research and corporate patents, the keys for the development of AI technology in terms of academic research and commercialization can be identified.
4. RDF Development
It is not possible to manually analyze over 30,000 patents. A novel RDF for automated analysis was developed in this study. In addition to the developed RDF, a natural language program was developed to obtain keywords from the patent contents.
4.1. RDF-Based Analysis
The study cases listed in Table 1 indicate that academic papers on AI for HVAC energy savings have the following triad data structure:
HVAC Equipment–at–Which Type of Building–Uses–What Kind of AI Technology
This data structure is fundamental to the developed RDF for the structural extraction of knowledge from academic papers. Figure 6 illustrates the fundamentals of the RDF-based analysis.
Figure 6.
Ternary data structure as the fundamental factor of RDF for knowledge extraction.
As presented in Figure 6, the examined academic studies encompass three objects: HVAC equipment, buildings, and AI technology. Each object can be connected by (at, use). The other option is (with) for optional devices such as energy storage systems.
RDFs can also be used to describe relationships between objects. By making connections to energy-saving effects or other benefits, including cost savings or thermal comfort improvements, the schema can concisely extract knowledge from academic papers. In this study, the developed RDF was used to analyze patent contents. To achieve data interchangeability and comparative analysis, the data structure displayed in Figure 7 was developed, and a database was established.
Figure 7.
RDF data structure and database construction.
As presented in Figure 7, the RDF provides the following descriptions of types and properties:
- Type: the index of objects, namely H for HVAC equipment, A for AI technologies, and B for building types
- SubClassof: used to specify the parent category of a database
- SubPropertyof: used to specify optional categories of a database
- Domain: used to specify attributes
- Range: used to specify the range of an attribute.
With the ternary data structure displayed in Figure 7, different combinations of data can be analyzed. For example, the (H, B) combination can be used to analyze which type of HVAC equipment is most commonly used in which building. The (H, A) combination can be used to analyze which AI technology is most commonly used with which HVAC equipment. The combination of (H, B, A) with the energy-saving effects and other benefits reported in the 85 study cases can be used to analyze the current status of AI research for HVAC energy savings. Notably, the ternary data structure is interchangeable, which enables further analysis of the patents obtained by the 11 companies, as noted in the previous section.
For patent analysis, the constructed database shown in Figure 7 was used. The automated analysis method is presented in Figure 8.
Figure 8.
RDF-based automatic patent analysis method.
As displayed in Figure 8, patent content can be abstracted by a natural language processing (NLP) program. NLP can be used to extract keywords from patents. These words were compared with the database constructed by the study cases. If the HVAC equipment mentioned in a patent did not exist within the database, the patent file was examined manually to identify the type of HVAC equipment used. A similar process was used for AI technologies not within the database. The automatic analysis system can identify these files for manual confirmation of other possible AI technology innovations.
Because patent applications typically do not limit the scope of their usage, most patents do not state the type of building they are intended for. The patent automatic analysis system developed by this research automatically classifies AI-related patents into ‘all kinds of buildings’, as indicated by Figure 8.
4.2. NLP Program
An NLP program was developed to analyze the 31,221 patents collected in this study. This program can automatically extract keywords to identify patents that are highly relevant for AI for sustainable air-conditioning systems. Because not all of the collected patents were written in English, the developed program performed some automatic procedures, including hyphenation, reorganization, and sentence analysis for other languages, such as Chinese. This research used the term-frequency inverse document-frequency algorithm to construct the NLP program. This program outputs the keywords from unigram to pentagram for patent analysis.
5. Results and Discussion
The results described in the following text are based on RDF and NLP analyses. In the first step of the research framework, the academic cases were analyzed to obtain the energy-saving effects and other benefits of AI used in HVAC. Second, the ternary relationship established with the RDF was used to combine the AI technologies reported in academic papers into six effective methods. Third, the RDF was used to analyze the patents for the 11 companies, and the ternary structure diagram obtained from the patent analysis. The current status of AI applications in HVAC energy-saving technologies was analyzed by linking academic papers with corporate patent analysis and making recommendations for future sustainable air-conditioning system development.
5.1. HVAC Energy Savings by Using AI
The results obtained after the analysis of the study cases in Table 1 are presented in Figure 8. The 85 case studies reported energy savings for 14 refrigeration and air-conditioning installations in 17 types of buildings. A total of 15 AI technologies were discussed in the academic papers. In Figure 8, the energy-saving effects obtained through numerical simulation are indicated by the light green coordinate axis, whereas those obtained experimentally are indicated by the dark green coordinate axis.
Triplet data can clearly indicate the connections between different technology applications. For example, ANN technology is widely used in various air-conditioning devices in various buildings. Fuzzy algorithms are typically used for single air conditioners in small buildings or AHUs in central air-conditioning systems to improve performance. The MACS is most commonly used for the coordinated control of multi-zone systems.
By linking the aforementioned AI applications with the reported energy-saving effects, modes of below 30% and below 21.4% were obtained for the simulated and experimental energy savings, respectively. Some extremely high energy savings were observed. For example, two experimental results demonstrated energy savings of 75.22% and 82%. Triplet data revealed that MPC is used in factories and is only activated for a single pump, if necessary; thus, a high energy-saving effect can be achieved. The energy savings of 75.22% were obtained because of the fuzzy use of air conditioning combined with ventilation system control. In the maximum economy mode, ventilation was used as much as possible without turning on the air conditioning; thus, energy conservation was high. Moreover, some cases had HVAC equipment connected to additional devices, such as energy recovery systems or thermal storage systems. These cases are indicated in the grey oval box on the leftmost side of Figure 9.
Figure 9.
Sustainable air-conditioning systems enabled by AI technologies identified on the basis of the academic study case analysis.
5.2. Cost Savings and Thermal Comfort Improvement
Figure 10 illustrates the effective methods and other benefits of AI technologies, including thermal comfort improvements and energy cost savings. Only two experimental energy cost saving reports were identified; thus, the results were only compiled for simulated energy cost saving research.
Figure 10.
Six methods for applying AI for air-conditioning systems and other benefits.
As displayed in Figure 9 and Figure 10, all AI technologies can be linked by six methods. These six methods are described in the following text:
- Method 1. MPC is conducted with different NN and ML structures to learn historical data for constructing a model, which is used to control HVAC equipment to achieve energy savings.
- Method 2. Thermal comfort control (Comfort) involves using an ANN and RL to learn human behavior and predict comfort levels to control HVAC equipment and save energy. Some studies have reported using fuzzy inference engines to construct member functions and estimate thermal comfort level, including the PMV.
- Method 3. Model-free trial-and-error control (MFPC) does not require historical data. Using deep Q-learning or RL, the method can determine an action according to the status and reward function of the controlled system.
- Method 4. Control optimization uses GA or fuzzy algorithms to tune the parameters of the PID controller to improve the control response.
- Method 5. The MACS implements distributed AI for multizone air-conditioning control. The distributed AI may use ANN or fuzzy algorithms for decentralized control.
- Method 6. The KBS/rule set (RS) uses DT or other classifiers to extract knowledge or rules for energy-saving control.
Method 1 uses predictive control to save energy effectively; this result is consistent with the conclusions of previous review papers. By using ANN, MLP, or SVM&R, energy-saving control methods can learn from historical data to construct a control model. ANN is the core technology of ML. Programs do not need to be written; the neuron structure can learn from data, and the machine can automatically output predicted values to control systems. MPC involves the three steps of constructing a model, outputting the prediction results, and controlling the system; thus, this AI technology was used in the most energy-saving data reports. In the 85 research cases, 33% of the 121 data reports used MPC.
As presented in Figure 9, on the left side of the MPC-related-technology group, 40 cases were identified and the median energy-saving effect was 17.4%. The quantitative results are similar to the conclusions of previous review papers. In addition to data on energy savings, multiple data reports include energy cost savings ranging from 6% to 30.9%.
Method 2 is thermal comfort control. The median energy-saving effect was 12%. Although these energy savings were relatively low, AI effectively improved the comfort of occupants. The data reveal that the occupant comfort data input to an ANN can be controlled by a single output. Research and fuzzy control can reduce temperature shocks by 60%, which improves comfort and saves energy. Evaluation by a quantitative index, PMV, reveals that AI-based thermal comfort control can improve comfort by 15% to 43%.
Because not all buildings or HVAC equipment have historical data available, studies conducted since 2015 used MFPC. MFPC does not require historical data and instead uses RL or deep Q-learning to learn from the control process; it has satisfactory performance. The median energy savings was 25.5%, the highest energy-saving ratio among the six methods. However, fewer data are available for MFPC than for first two methods; thus, more research is necessary to prove that it is effective for energy saving.
By integration with existing HVAC equipment controllers, AI technologies can be used to adjust the controller parameters for effective energy savings. Method 3 combines GA and fuzzy technologies; the median energy savings achieved was 10.7%. Method 4 is distributed AI for multi-zone control. The specific technology for achieving energy conservation was MACS. The median energy reduction was 12%. The final method is the KBS/RS. This method uses DT or a similar classifier to cooperate with human experts to build a knowledge database or control rules to save energy. The median energy reduction was 8.8%.
This research collected AI technology research papers from 2000 to 2020 and identified six methods that can effectively reduce energy consumption. The developed RDF was used to analyze patents. The patent keywords were systematically linked to the six methods to examine whether the current state of academic development is consistent with the current development of enterprise products. From this, the results of the fourth step of this study were generated, as illustrated in the following section.
5.3. Enterprise Patent Landscapes
As described in Section 3.2, this study analyzed 31,221 patents held by 11 companies. The analysis method is described in Section 4.1. The analysis result also produces the triply connected diagram presented in Figure 8; however, the analysis result for academic papers was connected to energy-savings data, whereas the result of the patent analysis was connected to the six methods.
After using NLP to retrieve patent keywords, patents that were not in the database were closely examined. These reviewed patents have content beyond the scope of academic research and were marked as key patents, cited as references, and organized in Section 3.2.1, Section 3.2.2, Section 3.2.3, Section 3.2.4, Section 3.2.5, Section 3.2.6, Section 3.2.7, Section 3.2.8, Section 3.2.9, Section 3.2.10 and Section 3.2.11. The following subsection describes the RDF analysis results and patent landscapes for each company.
5.3.1. Patent Landscape of Carrier
Carrier is a well-known chiller manufacturer and holds 157 AI-related patents. The patents primarily claim heating/cooling or HVAC systems used in multizone air-conditioning or various types of buildings. Among the 157 patents, 48% made this claim. These heating and cooling or HVAC systems for all types of buildings were linked to AI technologies. Of the patents, 15.9% mainly used the KBS for energy-saving control, 12.1% used ANN for energy savings, and 7.6% of patents used MPC. Of the other AI patents, the most common technology was ML, which accounted for 5.0% of Carrier’s patents; the remaining AI methods accounted for less than 1%. To avoid overcrowding of the triplet connection diagram, the poorly represented data were discarded. The generated landscape was connected to the aforementioned six AI methods that effectively save energy, as shown in Figure 11.
Figure 11.
Patent landscape of Carrier.
Carrier’s patent claims mostly include methods 1, 2, and 6; however, Carrier also uses the KBS to effectively build a knowledge database and manage large-scale systems for energy usage reduction. Carrier also proposed a novel method: the use of an AI-assisted chat bot to enable general users to query the database, understand the relevant control rules, or assist in establishing of control rules. This method can combine human intelligence and AI to improve energy-saving performance. A review of the literature revealed no similar research result reports; thus, this method was identified as a novel method and is represented by a golden yellow square in the lower-right corner of Figure 11.
5.3.2. Patent Landscape of Daikin
Daikin is a well-known manufacturer of air conditioners in Japan. The company holds 87 AI-related patents. Daikin patents mostly describe the use of air conditioners, chillers, or cooling towers in all types of buildings. These patents also describe multi-zone air conditioning. The main AI technology used was ANNs, which accounted for 45.9% of all Daikin patents, followed by MPC, MAC, and RL, which accounted for 20.7%, 9.2%, and 5.7% of Daikin’s patents, respectively. The relevant patents were used to draw a landscape map, as presented in Figure 12.
Figure 12.
Patent landscape of Daikin.
Daikin’s innovations use an ANN as the core to implement smart interfaces, and they have been successfully commercialized. Their AI app was discussed in Section 3.1. Moreover, Daikin has also described an image identification method used to identify the heat source distribution in the air-conditioning area. Some patents also cover fault diagnosis and failure prediction. Only one academic study about fault-tolerant operation was identified; thus, fault-tolerant operation is not yet mainstream in the literature, but is frequently noted in the content of patents. Thus, fault tolerance is classified as an innovative application. The mixture of green and gold indicates that the application is mentioned by both academic research and patents, as in the lower-right corner of Figure 12.
5.3.3. Patent Landscape of Google
Google holds 5370 AI-related patents; of these, only a few are related to HVAC. The HVAC-related patents include smart thermostats for all types of buildings and cooling systems for data centers. The investigation of Google patents was primarily intended to achieve a better understanding of mainstream AI research. The survey results revealed that 32.7% of patents involve ANNs, followed by ML (accounting for 14.8%) and MPC (accounting for 13.9%). The patent landscape of Google is presented in Figure 13.
Figure 13.
Google’s patent landscape.
Google’s patent claims are closely related to methods 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6. Google also filed 98 patents related to RL. The main appeal of these patents is continuous control by using DL or RL, which is consistent with this research. Model-free predictive control can also be used to save energy; however, this method accounts for only 1.8% of Google’s total patents. Thus, Google does not seem to support method 3.
Innovations proposed by Google are mainly related to the identification and correction of data. All AI methods require data input. The accuracy of this data significantly affects the performance of AI models. Most data used in academic research are guaranteed to be correct. However, in real-world HVAC applications, data may be erroneous. To overcome this problem, Google proposes combining extrinsic information, including weather forecasts, prices, and neighborhood or home information. This method is implemented in the NEST smart thermostat, which can compare a home with neighboring homes. The ability to identify and eliminate incorrect data is the main innovative method proposed by Google, as presented in the lower-right corner of Figure 13.
5.3.4. Patent Landscape of Gree
Gree is a well-known air conditioner manufacturer in China that holds 870 AI-related patents mainly for air conditioners for all kinds of buildings, which account for 51.7% of the patent claims, followed by multizone air-conditioning, which account for 25.2%. Thus, more than 76% of Gree’s patents are focused on air conditioners. The main AI technology used is MPC, which accounts for 51.3% of the patents. ANNs account for 24.8% of the patents, and DL or RL for MFPC account for 8.8% of the patents.
Gree’s innovations are primarily focused on MPC. In addition to the collection and control of environmental parameters such as temperature and humidity, the company also incorporates air quality prediction models. In addition to temperature adjustments, control methods are also incorporated into the three-dimensional ventilation model. Using image or voice recognition, the location of indoor personnel and air-conditioning needs can be confirmed. Subsequently, the air supply of the air conditioner can be adjusted to use air supply and ventilation for cooling instead of activating the air conditioner, thus saving energy.
For air conditioner fault diagnosis, Gree’s patents specifically mention frosting mode detection. Frosting of the air conditioner evaporator reduces the efficiency of the air conditioner; thus, although frosting is not a malfunction, it affects the energy efficiency of the air conditioner in a similar manner to a fault condition. AI technology can also be used to predict and identify the occurrence of frost and automatically reverse the vapor cycle to overcome this problem. Gree’s landscape and primary innovations are presented in Figure 14.
Figure 14.
Patent landscape of Gree.
5.3.5. Patent Landscape of IBM
IBM is famous for AI research and has applied AI to cooling systems for data centers. IBM has a total of 7959 related patents; however, only 0.38% of these patents are related to cooling systems in data centers. The eight patents relevant to air-conditioning systems are applicable to all types of buildings. The most common AI method in IBM patents is ML, which accounts for 16.5% of the aforementioned patents, followed by ANNs (accounting for 15.0% of the aforementioned patents), and MPC (accounting for 11% of the aforementioned patents). Notably, in the RDF analysis, 5.3% of IBM patents are related to the KBS, and these patents are primarily related to data center cooling systems. The patents also mention s-curves, which are planned curves for energy management, and describe the identification of energy usage patterns and management of multiple energy resources. IBM’s proposed related innovations and its patent landscape are illustrated in Figure 15.
Figure 15.
Patent landscape of IBM.
The identified innovations of IBM are spiking NNs and plug-and-play control systems. Spiking NNs are innovative NNs that can simulate the current pulse mode of human neurons, and learning systems based on spiking NNs are more anthropomorphic than are learning systems based on other types of NNs. Plug-and-play control systems are an invention related to self-learning controllers. In combination with ML and pattern recognition engines, the control system can automatically recognize connected sensors, use ML to understand the sensed information pattern, and automatically define its physical sensing quantities. This method is useful for the practical application of AI in HVAC equipment or for building a BMS. It can reduce personnel requirements and errors caused by manual logins.
5.3.6. Patent Landscape of Johnson Controls
Johnson Controls is a well-known manufacturer of chillers and controllers. The company has 119 AI-related patents; 67.2% are related to heating/cooling systems in all types of buildings. The main mentioned AI technology is MPC (accounting for 30.3% of patents), followed by ANNs (16.8%) and ML (10.9%). Moreover, Johnson Controls has applied for numerous patents for fuzzy techniques for controller optimization, DL, and RL to realize MFPC. It has also filed KBS-related patents for equipment scheduling control. The landscape of the Johnson Controls’ patents is displayed in Figure 16.
Figure 16.
Patent landscape of Johnson Controls.
The patents proposed by Johnson Controls are almost completely consistent with the six AI energy-saving methods proposed in this study. The novel methods include reliable data streams, failure prediction, and transfer learning techniques. Failure prediction has also been proposed by other companies. Ensuring data reliability is a newer concept in Johnson Controls’ patents. Transfer learning is another notable technology that enables the transfer of an ANN model from one building to another building model for energy-saving control. If each HVAC product must learn each building’s features before effective operation, commercial applications of AI will be difficult to achieve. Therefore, transfer learning must be developed to transfer ANN models to other environments.
In addition to Johnson Controls, transfer learning has been promoted by Google, Gree, Samsung, Siemens, and Panasonic. Transfer learning is a crucial innovation for realizing the large-scale applications and commercialization of AI. Several studies related to transfer learning have been conducted. Thus, this method is represented in green and gold in the bottom-right corner of Figure 16.
5.3.7. Patent Landscape of LG
LG is a well-known South Korean air conditioner manufacturer. In addition to air conditioners, LG produces other electronic products. LG holds 2977 AI-related patents. Of these patents, 3% are directly related to air conditioners and heating/cooling systems. The most common AI technology in these patents is ANNs (accounting for 8.1% of the patents), followed by MPC (5.4%) and ML (2.8%). In addition, LG has applied for various AI patents for methods based on DL, RL, the KBS, GA, and fuzzy logic. The patent landscape of LG is depicted in Figure 17.
Figure 17.
Patent landscape of LG.
Innovations of LG in ANNs are mainly related to 5G networking environment. However, many of these concepts can also be applied to HVAC equipment. The most noteworthy innovation is the application of MPC for lifespan prediction of accessories to maintain normal operation of the peripheral accessories for HVAC equipment. This maintenance also contributes to improved energy efficiency.
5.3.8. Patent Landscape of Midea
Midea is a well-known Chinese air conditioner manufacturer. It holds 181 AI-related patents, 56 (30.8%) of which are related to the use of air conditioners in all types of buildings. The most common AI technology used is ANNs (accounting for 12.7% of the patents), followed by ML (12.2%), and MPC (8.3%). Among the patents, the notable novel method was the use of image sensors to determine the resistance of insulation (ROI) of an occupant’s clothing. The patent landscape of Midea is presented in Figure 18.
Figure 18.
Patent landscape of Midea.
5.3.9. Patent Landscape of Samsung
Samsung is the largest business group in South Korea and sells products including HVAC devices. The group holds 7149 AI-related patents and applies for innovative AI patents. Most of these patents are related to ANNs (accounting for 1754 patents (24.5%)), followed by MPC and ML (6.7%, and 4.9%, respectively). The patent landscape of Samsung is displayed in Figure 19.
Figure 19.
Patent landscape of Samsung.
The notable innovation in Figure 19 is virtual data generation. This technology is similar to the generative adversarial network (GAN) used by Google. The technology can use existing data to generate substantial virtual data. Although this technology has been called the deep fake technique when combined with DL, its purpose is not to create fake data, but to learn real data and generate a larger amount of virtual data used for ANN training. Historical data are typically not available for HVAC applications; thus, many AI applications are challenging. Virtual data generation with GAN can effectively solve this problem; thus, the GAN is a crucial and innovative technology for AI development.
5.3.10. Patent Landscape of Siemens
Siemens is an internationally renowned controller manufacturer with 5440 AI-related patents. The main AI technology related to the patents of Siemens is ANNs (accounting for 17.8% of the patents of Siemens), followed by MPC, ML, and the KBS (accounting for 9.9%, 9.4%, and 5.3% of the patents of Siemens, respectively). Using triplet data analysis, the patent landscape of Siemens was obtained in Figure 20.
Figure 20.
Patent landscape of Siemens.
Siemen’s noteworthy innovative method is the universal model. The relevant patent proposes a method of establishing a universal control model for multiple energy systems using a numerical simulation. Siemens also proposed a battery-based energy storage system to store electricity from the grid during off-peak hours using a battery. This energy can then be used to power a chiller during peak hours. The method was effective because AI can predict future weather and electricity prices. Siemen’s patented method also mentions battery lifetime and energy storage costs. The patent establishes a universal model for identifying the lowest energy costs.
5.3.11. Patent Landscape of Panasonic
In addition to air conditioners, Panasonic is a well-known manufacturer of electronic products. It holds 912 AI-related patents, with patents related to ANNs accounting for the largest proportion of these patents (accounting for 23.6%), followed by those related to ML (accounting for 12.5%) and MPC (accounting for 7.2%). The main appeal of the methods described in the aforementioned patents is that the air conditioner can be used in all kinds of buildings. The patent landscape of Panasonic is displayed in Figure 21.
Figure 21.
Patent landscape of Panasonic.
Panasonic’s innovative proposition is the prediction model sharing method. This method uses a model whose accuracy has been verified, and which uses random number corrections to obtain a distributed prediction model. The model can be used to predict different physical phenomena.
This discussion investigated the patent landscape to illustrate the correlation between the patents owned by 11 companies and the six effective AI energy-saving methods observed in academic research. The next section presents a comparison of the current statuses of academic research and enterprise patents. This comparison was conducted to identify effective methods for rapid AI commercialization.
5.4. Difference between Academic and Commercial Research
We investigated the differences between the current statuses of academic research and enterprise patents. Figure 22 illustrates the difference in the typical thought processes governing relevant academic research and enterprise patents.
Figure 22.
Difference in the thought processes governing academic research and commercial product development related to the use of AI technologies in HVAC systems.
Academic research focuses on specific topics, such as selected HVAC equipment applied in a specific type of building. The focus of research is typically the exploration of diverse technologies. The final result is usually the result of an experiment on energy savings, comfort improvements, or other benefits.
Specific targets related to energy consumption must be achieved in commercial product development. For example, an energy-saving effect must reach a specific percentage before a technology can be incorporated into a product. Patents for products are typically filed before product development. For a product to be patented, the AI technology used must be effective and patentable. Patentable innovations include new products, new processes, software, business methods, and some types of biological materials. By contrast, artistic creations, mathematical algorithms or models, abstract intellectual or mental concepts or processes, plans or schemes, and principles or theories cannot be patented. In addition to patentable subject matter, a successful patent filing requires the method to be novel, inventive, and useful. Moreover, the innovation must not have been used previously (known as prior art).
The final results for enterprise research and development are high value-added HVAC products. Table 13 lists the AI-based HVAC products investigated in this research.
Table 13.
AI-based HVAC products surveyed in this study.
The products in Table 13 include air conditioners, chillers, and controllers for heating or cooling systems. Figure 23 presents a comparison of the energy savings of the AI methods used in academic research and the investigated commercial products.
Figure 23.
Energy savings of the (a) six AI methods used in academic research and (b) investigated commercial products.
As presented in Figure 23a, the six AI methods in academic research have average energy savings of 8.8–25.5%. Commercial products have average energy savings of 36.4%. Although these data are only claims by manufacturers and are not proven by a rigorous quantitative analysis, the aforementioned numbers still represent the energy savings expected from commercial products. These savings are 10% greater than those typically achieved in academic studies.
In accordance with the product development process presented in the lower part of Figure 23b, the energy-saving data comparison in Figure 23 indicates that companies must select AI methods with high energy savings and use relevant patents for enhancing energy savings to meet market expectations, such as expectations for AI-based HVAC products.
5.5. Keys for Accelerating AI Commercialisation in HVAC Systems
A comprehensive investigation of more than 30,000 patents revealed that most patents are related to MPC (10,688), followed by the KBS/RS (3648) and MACS (2666), as shown in Figure 24. A patent application is an expensive procedure; thus, AI technologies involved in more patent applications are believed to be more effective by companies. Related technologies are also patentable and may be critical for research and development aiming to accelerate the commercial applications of AI.
Figure 24.
Effective and patentable AI technologies for commercial products by the number of related patents.
In addition to the number of patents, the number of citations of related patents was analyzed. Analysis of patent citations can be used to measure the quality of patents. The results of the aforementioned analysis are presented in Figure 25.
Figure 25.
Analysis of patent citations with respect to the six AI methods.
A comparison of Figure 24 and Figure 25 indicates that MPC, the MACS, and the KBS/RS are the methods that companies believe to be most effective. Most identified patents involved one of these three methods, and patents related to these three methods have high citation counts. Thus, AI-related patents with high quality are filed to protect high value-added AI-based HVAC products, and these patents typically include one of the three methods.
Considering the information depicted in Figure 22, the patent application content and innovations claimed by 11 companies indicate that high value-added HVAC products are associated with the following four elements:
- Energy saving for sustainable development
- Cost savings
- Thermal comfort improvements
- Easy implementation.
These four elements are derived from the academic papers and innovations claimed by patents. Most studies in Table 1 describe how AI can save energy, reduce costs, and improve thermal comfort. However, as presented in Table 2, Table 3, Table 4, Table 5, Table 6, Table 7, Table 8, Table 9, Table 10, Table 11 and Table 12, some innovations emphasize easy implementation. Typically, few historical data are available for HVAC equipment in buildings. However, most AI technologies require historical data for training to build models or export rules to operate successfully. Therefore, innovation and invention must first focus on overcoming the historical data requirement to create sustainable air-conditioning systems.
This study linked the four elements and six AI methods with the patents from 11 companies. This produced the results of the final step. The process to apply AI for HVAC equipment to save energy, save cost, and improve thermal comfort is proposed. It is also noted that ease of implementation is also an important consideration for AI. The results are summarized in Table 14, Table 15, Table 16, Table 17, Table 18 and Table 19.
Table 14.
AI-enabled MPC technology for sustainable air-conditioning systems.
Table 15.
AI-enabled thermal comfort control technology for sustainable air-conditioning systems.
Table 16.
AI-enabled MFPC technology for sustainable air-conditioning systems.
Table 17.
AI-enabled control optimization for sustainable air-conditioning systems.
Table 18.
AI-enabled MACS and distributed AI technology for sustainable air-conditioning systems.
Table 19.
AI enabled KBS/RS-based control technology for sustainable air-conditioning systems.
Table 14, Table 15, Table 16, Table 17, Table 18 and Table 19 present a summary of the technological development in MPC, thermal comfort control, MFPC, optimization, MACS, and KBS, respectively. Table 17 is particularly noteworthy. Because mathematical theories cannot be patented, mathematical innovation cannot be identified by analyzing patents. Thus, we can only infer that some HVAC products should be optimized using AI theory. The main theories are the GA and fuzzy logic. Moreover, although mathematical theories cannot be patented, the 1113 patents related to control optimization seem mostly claim mathematical theories as technical methods and propose energy-saving technical solutions. Therefore, the development of new mathematical theories is still recommended because of the limitations of patent applications. Further conclusions are presented in the next section.
6. Conclusions and Future Prospects
The following conclusions were obtained in this study by analyzing the data of 85 academic cases and 31,221 patents:
- Six methods of effectively applying AI for sustainable air-conditioning system were identified by the academic research results. Numerous patent applications were organized with an RDF, and the results were successfully linked to the six methods. Thus, we analyzed the six methods not only from academic data, but also from patent application statistics to verify the effectiveness of AI enabled technologies. The six methods were MPC, thermal comfort control, MFPC, control optimization, MAC, and KBS/RS-based control.
- According to an analysis of academic cases, as shown in Figure 9, the median energy savings of MPC were approximately 17.4%. MFPC had the highest energy savings of 25.5%, and the lowest energy savings were achieved by the KBS/RS (only 8.8%). However, differences in the number of cases investigated limit this conclusion. For example, we investigated 40 studies related to MPC but only 10 related to the KBS/RS. Thus, energy-saving ratio data can only be used as a reference and not as the main basis for comparison.
- The focus of this research was to understand the keys for accelerating the development of commercialization. Thus, patent analysis was conducted to compare the aforementioned six methods. The RDF method was used to analyze more than 30,000 patents held by 11 companies. Patent applications are expensive; thus, methods related to more patents are the most promising for AI development.
- MPC is the AI technology most favored by enterprises for sustainable air condition systems. A total of 16,888 patents related to ANN and different NN architectures were identified, including the basic MLP method mentioned in academic papers and innovative methods such as BPNN, WNN, or the patent-protected spiking NN. The implementation framework of MPC is presented in Table 14. MPC implementations can learn from data to construct a system model. With ML, the control system can use the system input to make predictions automatically. Then, these predictions can be used to control HVAC equipment in advance to achieve energy savings for sustainable development.
- The KBS/RS is the second most favored AI technology by enterprises for HVAC systems. The implementation framework of the KBS/RS is presented in Table 19. For industrial applications, such as cooling systems in data centers, commercialized AI technologies involving KBS/RS-based control are typically used. Compared with MPC, in which an ANN is used to learn automatically and achieve predictive control, the KBS/RS constructs a database or infers a set of rules for controlling HVAC equipment. With a database to query or rules to follow, industrial control systems can save energy and have high reliability.
- The MACS is the third most favored AI technology by enterprises for sustainable air-conditioning systems. The implementation framework of the MACS is presented in Table 18. Because of the popularization of the Internet, 5G, and IoT, in addition to the development of high-performance chips, the MACS can be used to implement distributed AI on remote sensors and controllers. These intelligent devices can learn about occupants’ room environments and reduce energy consumption in each room by automatically adjusting to an optimal level based on heat load conditions and air-conditioning capacity.
- Improving energy efficiency is key to accelerating the commercial applications of AI for HVAC equipment. According to academic research results, the six methods exhibited different energy savings (8.8–25.5%). However, as summarized in Table 13, AI-enabled HVAC products should be able to achieve an average reduction in energy usage of 36.4%. Academic research results should be improved by at least 10% to achieve parity with industry products.
- Academic research results indicate an improvement in the PMV index of 15–60% using AI methods. One special case used MFPC to predict and reduce comfort violation by 98%, resulting in 2% PPD. Most enterprise patents use smart interfaces to communicate with occupants, or use visual or thermal images to confirm heat sources or occupant locations. Ventilation control is then used to improve thermal comfort. In summary, academic achievements and industry innovations indicate that AI can improve occupant comfort by nearly 50%, communicate with occupants to confirm their comfort, and ultimately reduce occupant dissatisfaction to less than 3%.
- Energy cost savings are also a crucial factor in promoting commercialization. Academic research results indicate that cost savings of 6–30% can be achieved using AI technologies in HVAC systems. Patent applications emphasize the need to increase the operating cost of additional devices when reducing energy costs. For example, HVAC equipment can be equipped with energy storage devices to store energy during off-peak electricity generation hours, and then use these energy storage devices during peak hours when electricity costs are expensive, to achieve the goal of reduced energy costs. The reductions in electricity should be considered alongside the lifetime cost of the battery lifetime; these two costs should offset each other.
- Patent innovation is key to the commercialization of AI for HVAC systems. Easy-to-implement AI technologies are required for HVAC systems. AI implementations usually require substantial historical data for ANN training. However, HVAC equipment typically does not record data. To overcome this problem, patent innovations have proposed prediction-sharing models or universal models. Academic research and patents have proposed transfer learning to solve the training data problem. The objective is to design AI technology that is plug-and-play for HVAC control.
This study is the first usage of an RDF to analyze patents and compare them with academic research. The following 10 topics are proposed by innovative patents and suggested for future academic research:
- Novel NN designs: Notable NN designs are spiking NNs and long short-term memory (LSTM).
- Smartphone-assisted ML: Small air-conditioning systems used in small and medium-sized buildings are intended to provide a comfortable environment for occupants. Smartphone-assisted ML can communicate with occupants through their smartphones to predict loads and future energy consumption.
- Transfer learning technology development: Large-scale air-conditioning systems used in all types of buildings may not have historical data for AI training. Transfer learning technology can transfer learning results for one building to another building, and help to make AI easy to implement.
- A universal model: As AI becomes more commercially popular, multiple building usage records can be collected. If the industry can anonymously share these building data in an open manner for academic research, a universal model may be found.
- Fault diagnosis and failure prediction, including accessory failure predictions: The failure of HVAC-related accessories, such as filters and belts, has not yet been studied in the literature; however, these failures affect the efficiency of air-conditioning devices. Academics should invest more time in the fault diagnosis of HVAC-related accessories.
- Explainable AI (XAI): XAI can not only conduct predictions but also indicate the basis of its predictions; thus, XAI can improve the commercial applications of AI. Currently, XAI patent applications are rare; however, they are important for different types of applications, especially industrial applications, and are worthy of academic investment.
- KBS interactive interface: The KBS/RS uses a database or fixed rules to query the AI control system. In the future, academic research can focus on KBS interactive interfaces or automatic rule inference systems that can reduce the requirement for expert personnel to establish a database or control rules.
- High-performance AI chip: The high-performance chip is the foundation for realizing distributed AI in distributed air conditioners. This kind of chip can enable remote controllers to continue to work with no connection to a cloud server.
- Stability of trial-and-error control: A total of 16 studies support the applications of MFPC, which exhibits high energy savings. However, the industry has not yet supported the development of this technology because the AI model itself is unpredictable. Because of the use of trial and error in MFPC, the control is relatively unpredictable. Methods for increasing the stability are a possible focus of future development.
- Thermal comfort coach mode: Sustainable air-conditioning system design not only considers energy saving, but also personnel comfort. Current patent applications focus on thermal image recognition and ventilation control. A novel patent application relates to personnel clothing ROI detection. In the future, the development of the thermal comfort coach mode is recommended. This mode may be combined with behavioral change to increase acceptance by users. A slightly uncomfortable environment would further increase energy savings for sustainable development of human beings.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, D.L.; Methodology, D.L.; Software, D.L. and L.C.; Validation, D.L.; Formal analysis, D.L.; Investigation, D.L. and L.C.; Resources, D.L.; Data curation, D.L. and L.C.; Writing—original draft preparation, L.C.; Writing—review and editing, D.L.; Visualization, L.C.; Supervision, D.L.; Project administration, D.L.; Funding acquisition, D.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of this work by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, R.O.C. through the contract number 110-2221-E-027-061-MY3.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in reference number [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99].
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Nomenclature
| AHU | Air handling unit |
| AI | Artificial intelligence |
| ANN | Artificial neural network |
| BEMS | Building energy management system |
| BLE | Bluetooth low energy |
| BPNN | Back propagation neural network |
| CAV | Constant air volume |
| CNN | Convolutional neural network |
| CQ | Characteristic quantity |
| CSPF | Cooling seasonal power factor |
| DCAC | Data center air conditioning |
| DL | Deep learning |
| DT | Decision tree |
| GA | Genetic algorithm |
| GAN | Generative adversarial network |
| HVAC | Heating ventilation, and air-conditioning |
| IoT | Internet of things |
| KBS | Knowledge based system |
| LSTM | Long short-term memory |
| M2M | Machine to machine |
| MACS | Multiagent control system |
| MFPC | Model free predictive control |
| ML | Machine learning |
| MLP | Multilayer perceptron |
| MPC | Model-based predictive control |
| MTC | Machine type communication |
| NARX | Nonlinear autoregressive network with exogenous inputs |
| NLP | Natural language processing |
| NN | Neural network |
| PD | Proportional-differential |
| PI | Proportional-integral |
| PID | Proportional-integral-differential |
| PMV | Predicted mean vote |
| PPD | Percentage of people dissatisfied |
| PSO | Particle swarm optimization |
| RBF | Radial basis function |
| RDF | Resource description framework |
| RH | Relative humidity |
| RL | Reinforcement learning |
| RMSE | Root mean square error |
| RNN | Recurrent neural network |
| ROI | Resistance of insulation |
| RS | Rule set |
| SVM&R | Supporting vector machine & regression |
| TPH | Temperature, pressure, and humidity |
| VAV | Variable air volume |
| VRF | Variable refrigerant flow |
| WNN | Wavelet-based neural network |
Symbol or Abbreviations
| A | AI technique type |
| B | Building type |
| Ca | Carrier company |
| Da | Dakin company |
| Go | |
| Gr | Gree electric company |
| H | HVAC equipment type |
| I | IBM company |
| J | Johnson Controls |
| KD | Differential constant |
| KI | Integral constant |
| KP | Proportional constant |
| L | LG electric company |
| M | Midea company |
| Pa | Panasonic company |
| R2 | R-squared value |
| Sa | Samsung company |
| Si | Siemens company |
References
- Wong, J.K.W.; Li, H.; Wang, S.W. Intelligent building research: A review. Autom. Constr. 2005, 14, 143–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Dounis, A.I.; Caraiscos, C. Advanced control systems engineering for energy and comfort management in a building environment—A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2009, 13, 1246–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mohanraj, M.; Jayaraj, S.; Muraleedharan, C. Applications of artificial neural networks for refrigeration, air-conditioning and heat pump systems—A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16, 1340–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhao, H.; Magoulès, F. A review on the prediction of building energy consumption. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16, 3586–3592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ahmad, A.S.; Hassan, M.Y.; Abdullah, M.P.; Rahman, H.A.; Hussin, F.; Abdullah, H.; Abdullah, H.; Saidur, R. A review on applications of ANN and SVM for building electrical energy consumption forecasting. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 33, 102–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Belic, F.; Hocenski, Z.; Sliskovic, D. HVAC control methods—A review. In Proceedings of the 2015 19th International Conference on System Theory, Control and Computing (ICSTCC), Cheile Gradistei, Romania, 14–16 October 2015; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 679–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Raza, M.Q.; Khosravi, A. A review on artificial intelligence based load demand forecasting techniques for smart grid and buildings. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 50, 1352–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Macedo, M.N.Q.; Galo, J.J.M.; de Almeida, L.A.L.; de C. Lima, A.C. Demand side management using artificial neural networks in a smart grid environment. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 41, 128–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mulia, M.T.; Supangkat, S.H.; Hariyanto, N. A review on building occupancy estimation methods. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on ICT For Smart Society (ICISS), Tangerang, Indonesia, 18–19 September 2017; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wang, Z.; Srinivasan, R.S. A review of artificial intelligence based building energy use prediction: Contrasting the capabilities of single and ensemble prediction models. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 75, 796–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Al Mamun, A.; Sohel, M.; Mohammad, N.; Sunny, S.H.; Dipta, D.R.; Hossain, E. A Comprehensive Review of the Load Forecasting Techniques Using Single and Hybrid Predictive Models. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 134911–134939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sun, K.; Zhao, Q.; Zou, J. A review of building occupancy measurement systems. Energy Build. 2020, 216, 109965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Cotrufo, N.; Saloux, E.; Hardy, J.M.; Candanedo, J.A.; Platon, R. A practical artificial intelligence-based approach for predictive control in commercial and institutional buildings. Energy Build. 2020, 206, 109563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ngarambe, J.; Yun, G.Y.; Santamouris, M. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) methods in the prediction of thermal comfort in buildings: Energy implications of AI-based thermal comfort controls. Energy Build. 2020, 211, 109807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Clark, G.; Mehta, P. Artificial intelligence and networking in integrated building management systems. Autom. Constr. 1997, 6, 481–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Alcalá, R.; Casillas, J.; Cordón, O.; González, A.; Herrera, F. A genetic rule weighting and selection process for fuzzy control of heating, ventilating and air conditioning systems. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2005, 18, 279–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kolokotsa, D. Comparison of the performance of fuzzy controllers for the management of the indoor environment. Build. Environ. 2003, 38, 1439–1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Terziyska, M.; Todorov, Y.; Petrov, M. Fuzzy-neural model predictive control of a building heating system. IFAC Proc. Vol. 2006, 39, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lee, K.H.; Braun, J.E. Reducing peak cooling loads through model-based control of zone temperature setpoints. In Proceedings of the 2007 American Control Conference, New York, NY, USA, 9–13 July 2007; pp. 5070–5075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Dalamagkidis, K.; Kolokotsa, D.; Kalaitzakis, K.; Stavrakakis, G.S. Reinforcement learning for energy conservation and comfort in buildings. Build. Environ. 2007, 42, 2686–2698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ma, Y.; Borrelli, F.; Hencey, B.; Packard, A.; Bortoff, S. Model predictive control of thermal energy storage in building cooling systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Shanghai, China, 15–18 December 2009; pp. 392–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Huang, G.; Wang, S.; Xu, X. A robust model predictive control strategy for improving the control performance of air-conditioning systems. Energy Convers. Manag. 2009, 50, 2650–2658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Komareji, M.; Stoustrup, J.; Rasmussen, H.; Bidstrup, N.; Svendsen, P.; Nielsen, F. Simplified optimal control in HVAC systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Control Applications, St. Petersburg, Russia, 8–10 July 2009; pp. 1033–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Li, M.H.; Ren, Q.C. Optimization for the chilled water system of HVAC systems in an intelligent building. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Computational and Information Sciences, ICCIS, Chengdu, China, 17–19 December 2010; pp. 889–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ahilan, C.; Kumanan, S.; Sivakumaran, N. Design and implementation of an intelligent controller for a split air conditioner with energy saving. Adv. Model. Anal. C 2010, 65, 21–40. [Google Scholar]
- Cheng, C.-C.; Lee, D. Smart sensors enable smart air conditioning control. Sensors 2014, 14, 11179–11203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ma, Y.; Anderson, G.; Borrelli, F. A distributed predictive control approach to building temperature regulation. In Proceedings of the American Control Conference, San Francisco, CA, USA, 29 June–1 July 2011; pp. 2089–2094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chinnakani, K.; Krishnamurthy, A.; Moyne, J.; Gu, F. Comparison of energy consumption in HVAC systems using simple ON-OFF, intelligent ON-OFF and optimal controllers. In Proceedings of the IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, Detroit, MI, USA, 24–28 July 2011; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Široký, J.; Oldewurtel, F.; Cigler, J.; Prívara, S. Experimental analysis of model predictive control for an energy efficient building heating system. Appl. Energy 2011, 88, 3079–3087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Prívara, S.; Široký, J.; Ferkl, L.; Cigler, J. Model predictive control of a building heating system: The first experience. Energy Build. 2011, 43, 564–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Čongradac, V.; Kulić, F. Recognition of the importance of using artificial neural networks and genetic algorithms to optimize chiller operation. Energy Build. 2012, 47, 651–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Klein, L.; Kwak, J.Y.; Kavulya, G.; Jazizadeh, F.; Becerik-Gerber, B.; Varakantham, P.; Tambe, M. Coordinating occupant behavior for building energy and comfort management using multi-agent systems. Autom. Constr. 2012, 22, 525–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Huang, H.; Chen, L.; Mohammadzaheri, M.; Hu, E. A new zone temperature predictive modeling for energy saving in buildings. Procedia Eng. 2012, 49, 142–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Jahedi, G.; Ardehali, M.M. Wavelet based artificial neural network applied for energy efficiency enhancement of decoupled HVAC system. Energy Convers. Manag. 2012, 54, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wallace, M.; McBride, R.; Aumi, S.; Mhaskar, P.; House, J.; Salsbury, T. Energy efficient model predictive building temperature control. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2012, 69, 45–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ma, Y.; Borrelli, F.; Hencey, B.; Coffey, B.; Bengea, S.; Haves, P. Model predictive control for the operation of building cooling systems. IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol. 2012, 20, 796–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sourbron, M.; Verhelst, C.; Helsen, L. Building models for model predictive control of office buildings with concrete core activation. J. Build. Perform. Simul. 2013, 6, 175–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ma, Y.; Vichik, S.; Borrelli, F. Fast stochastic MPC with optimal risk allocation applied to building control systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Maui, HI, USA, 10–13 December 2012; pp. 7559–7564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Aswani, A.; Master, N.; Taneja, J.; Culler, D.; Tomlin, C. Reducing transient and steady state electricity consumption in HVAC using learning-based model-predictive control. Proc. IEEE 2012, 100, 240–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Purdon, S.; Kusy, B.; Jurdak, R.; Challen, G. Model-free HVAC control using occupant feedback. In Proceedings of the Conference on Local Computer Networks, LCN, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 21–24 October 2013; pp. 84–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Salsbury, T.; Mhaskar, P.; Qin, S.J. Predictive control methods to improve energy efficiency and reduce demand in buildings. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2013, 51, 77–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhao, J.; Lam, K.P.; Ydstie, B.E. Energyplus model-based predictive control (EPMPC) by using matlab/simulink and MLE. In Proceedings of the BS 2013: 13th Conference of the International Building Performance Simulation Association, Chambery, France, 26–28 August 2013; pp. 2466–2473. [Google Scholar]
- Radecki, P.; Hencey, B. Online thermal estimation, control, and self-excitation of buildings. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Firenze, Italy, 10–13 December 2013; pp. 4802–4807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Powell, K.M.; Cole, W.J.; Ekarika, U.F.; Edgar, T.F. Dynamic optimization of a campus cooling system with thermal storage. In Proceedings of the 2013 European Control Conference, ECC, Zurich, Switzerland, 17–19 July 2013; pp. 4077–4082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kim, S.H. Building demand-side control using thermal energy storage under uncertainty: An adaptive Multiple Model-based Predictive Control (MMPC) approach. Build. Environ. 2013, 67, 111–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Teng, L.; Wang, Y.; Chen, C.; Cai, W.; Li, H. Application of T-S fuzzy controllers on an HVAC system. In Proceedings of the 2014 7th International Conference on Information and Automation for Sustainability: “Sharpening the Future with Sustainable Technology”, ICIAfS, Colombo, Sri Lanka, 22–24 December 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Jazizadeh, F.; Ghahramani, A.; Becerik-Gerber, B.; Kichkaylo, T.; Orosz, M. User-led decentralized thermal comfort driven HVAC operations for improved efficiency in office buildings. Energy Build. 2014, 70, 398–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Beghi, A.; Cecchinato, L.; Rampazzo, M.; Simmini, F. Energy efficient control of HVAC systems with ice cold thermal energy storage. J. Process Control. 2014, 24, 773–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- West, S.R.; Ward, J.K.; Wall, J. Trial results from a model predictive control and optimisation system for commercial building HVAC. Energy Build. 2014, 72, 271–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Dong, B.; Lam, K.P. A real-time model predictive control for building heating and cooling systems based on the occupancy behavior pattern detection and local weather forecasting. Build. Simul. 2014, 7, 89–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Klaučo, M.; Drgoňa, J.; Kvasnica, M.; Di Cairano, S. Building temperature control by simple MPC-like feedback laws learned from closed-loop data. IFAC Proc. Vol. (IFAC-PapersOnline) 2014, 19, 581–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hazyuk, I.; Ghiaus, C.; Penhouet, D. Model Predictive Control of thermal comfort as a benchmark for controller performance. Autom. Constr. 2014, 43, 98–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Moon, J.W. Comparative performance analysis of the artificial-intelligence-based thermal control algorithms for the double-skin building. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2015, 91, 334–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bengea, S.C.; Li, P.; Sarkar, S.; Vichik, S.; Adetola, V.; Kang, K.; Lovett, T.; Leonardi, F.; Kelman, A.D. Fault-tolerant optimal control of a building HVAC system. Sci. Technol. Built Environ. 2015, 21, 734–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Feng, J.; Chuang, F.; Borrelli, F.; Bauman, F. Model predictive control of radiant slab systems with evaporative cooling sources. Energy Build. 2015, 87, 199–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Deng, K.; Sun, Y.; Li, S.; Lu, Y.; Brouwer, J.; Mehta, P.G.; Zhou, M.; Chakraborty, A. Model Predictive Control of Central Chiller Plant With Thermal Energy Storage Via Dynamic Programming and Mixed-Integer Linear Programming. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 2015, 12, 565–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Killian, M.; Mayer, B.; Kozek, M. Cooperative fuzzy model predictive control for heating and cooling of buildings. Energy Build. 2016, 112, 130–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mayer, B.; Killian, M.; Kozek, M. A branch and bound approach for building cooling supply control with hybrid model predictive control. Energy Build. 2016, 128, 553–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lin, H.; Wang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Sun, Q.; Wennersten, R. The energy-saving potential of an office under different pricing mechanisms—Application of an agent-based model. Appl. Energy 2017, 202, 248–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wei, T.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, Q. Deep Reinforcement Learning for Building HVAC Control. In Proceedings of the Design Automation Conference, Austin, TX, USA, 18–22 June 2017; p. 17241501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Jafarinejad, T.; Erfani, A.; Fathi, A.; Shafii, M.B. Bi-level energy-efficient occupancy profile optimization integrated with demand-driven control strategy: University building energy saving. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2019, 48, 101539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Javed, A.; Larijani, H.; Wixted, A. Improving Energy Consumption of a Commercial Building with IoT and Machine Learning. IT Prof. 2018, 20, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Radhakrishnan, N.; Srinivasan, S.; Su, R.; Poolla, K. Learning-Based hierarchical distributed HVAC scheduling with operational constraints. IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol. 2018, 26, 1892–1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sala-Cardoso, E.; Delgado-Prieto, M.; Kampouropoulos, K.; Romeral, L. Predictive chiller operation: A data-driven loading and scheduling approach. Energy Build. 2020, 208, 109639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Du, Y.; Zandi, H.; Kotevska, O.; Kurte, K.; Munk, J.; Amasyali, K.; Mckee, E.; Li, F. Intelligent multi-zone residential HVAC control strategy based on deep reinforcement learning. Appl. Energy 2021, 281, 116117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bernard, T.; Kuntze, H.B. Energy and HVAC: Sensor-Based Management of Energy and Thermal Comfort. Sens. Appl. 2008, 2, 103–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wang, S.; Jin, X. Model-based optimal control of VAV air-conditioning system using genetic algorithm. Build. Environ. 2000, 35, 471–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Liang, J.; Du, R. Thermal comfort control based on neural network for HVAC application. In Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Conference on Control Applications, Toronto, ON, Canada, 28–31 August 2005; pp. 819–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Huang, W.; Lam, H.N. Using genetic algorithms to optimize controller parameters for HVAC systems. Energy Build. 1997, 26, 277–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Erez, P.; Ben, J.M.; Casillas, J.; On, O.C. Fuzzy Control of HVAC Systems Optimized by Genetic Algorithms. Appl. Intell. 2003, 18, 155–177. [Google Scholar]
- Soyguder, S. Intelligent system based on wavelet decomposition and neural network for predicting of fan speed for energy saving in HVAC system. Energy Build. 2011, 43, 814–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Khayyam, H.; Kouzani, A.Z.; Hu, E.J.; Nahavandi, S. Coordinated energy management of vehicle air conditioning system. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2011, 31, 750–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Atthajariyakul, S.; Leephakpreeda, T. Neural computing thermal comfort index for HVAC systems. Energy Convers. Manag. 2005, 46, 2553–2565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Moon, J.W.; Kim, J.J. ANN-based thermal control models for residential buildings. Build. Environ. 2010, 45, 1612–1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Yang, I.; Yeo, M.; Kim, K. Application of artificial neural network to predict the optimal start time for heating system in building. Energy Convers. Manag. 2003, 44, 2791–2809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Beltran, A.; Erickson, V.L.; Cerpa, A.E. ThermoSense: Occupancy thermal based sensing for HVAC control. BuildSys 2013. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM Workshop on Embedded Systems For Energy-Efficient Buildings, Roma, Italy, 11–15 November 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chen, Y.; Norford, L.K.; Samuelson, H.W.; Malkawi, A. Optimal control of HVAC and window systems for natural ventilation through reinforcement learning. Energy Build. 2018, 169, 195–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Fayazbakhsh, M.A.; Bagheri, F.; Bahrami, M. Gray-box model for energy-efficient selection of set point hysteresis in heating, ventilation, air conditioning, and refrigeration controllers. Energy Convers. Manag. 2015, 103, 459–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Aguilera, J.J.; Kazanci, O.B.; Toftum, J. Thermal adaptation in occupant-driven HVAC control. J. Build. Eng. 2019, 25, 100846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ruano, A.E.; Ferreira, P.M. Neural network based HVAC predictive control. IFAC Proc. Vol. 2014, 47, 3617–3622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Castilla, M.; Álvarez, J.D.; Ortega, M.G.; Arahal, M.R. Neural network and polynomial approximated thermal comfort models for HVAC systems. Build. Environ. 2013, 59, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Garnier, A.; Eynard, J.; Caussanel, M.; Grieu, S. Predictive control of multizone HVAC systems in non-residential buildings. IFAC Proc. Vol. (IFAC-PapersOnline) 2014, 19, 12080–12085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Homod, R.Z.; Mohamed Sahari, K.S.; Almurib, H.A.F.; Nagi, F.H. RLF and TS fuzzy model identification of indoor thermal comfort based on PMV/PPD. Build. Environ. 2012, 49, 141–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hussain, S.; Gabbar, H.A.; Bondarenko, D.; Musharavati, F.; Pokharel, S. Comfort-based fuzzy control optimization for energy conservation in HVAC systems. Control. Eng. Pract. 2014, 32, 172–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kirubakaran, V.; Sahu, C.; Radhakrishnan, T.K.; Sivakumaran, N. Energy efficient model based algorithm for control of building HVAC systems. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2015, 121, 236–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lee, Y.M.; Horesh, R.; Liberti, L. Optimal HVAC control as demand response with on-site energy storage and generation system. Energy Procedia 2015, 78, 2106–2111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Javed, M.; Li, N.; Li, S. Personalized thermal comfort modeling based on Support Vector Classification. In Proceedings of the Chinese Control Conference, CCC, Dalian, China, 26–28 July 2017; pp. 10446–10451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Valladares, W.; Galindo, M.; Gutiérrez, J.; Wu, W.C.; Liao, K.K.; Liao, J.C.; Lu, K.-C.; Wang, C.-C. Energy optimization associated with thermal comfort and indoor air control via a deep reinforcement learning algorithm. Build. Environ. 2019, 155, 105–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Katić, K.; Li, R.; Verhaart, J.; Zeiler, W. Neural network based predictive control of personalized heating systems. Energy Build. 2018, 174, 199–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lee, D.; Lin, C.; Lai, C.; Huang, T. Energy & Buildings Smart-valve-assisted model-free predictive control system for chiller plants. Energy Build. 2021, 234, 110708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lee, D. Artificial intelligence implementation framework development for building energy saving. Int. J. Energy Res. 2020, 44, 11908–11929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Nam, K.J.; Heo, S.K.; Li, Q.; Loy-Benitez, J.; Kim, M.J.; Park, D.S.; Yoo, C. A proactive energy-efficient optimal ventilation system using artificial intelligent techniques under outdoor air quality conditions. Appl. Energy 2020, 266, 114893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Yang, S.; Wan, M.P.; Ng, B.F.; Dubey, S.; Henze, G.P.; Chen, W.; Baskaran, K. Experimental study of model predictive control for an air-conditioning system with dedicated outdoor air system. Appl. Energy 2020, 257, 113920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Yu, K.H.; Chen, Y.A.; Jaimes, E.; Wu, W.C.; Liao, K.K.; Liao, J.C.; Lu, K.-C.; Sheu, W.-J.; Wang, C.-C. Optimization of thermal comfort, indoor quality, and energy-saving in campus classroom through deep Q learning. Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 2021, 24, 100842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Li, W.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, T.; Ren, J. Experimental study of an indoor temperature fuzzy control method for thermal comfort and energy saving using wristband device. Build. Environ. 2021, 187, 107432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Dey, M.; Rana, S.P.; Dudley, S. Automated terminal unit performance analysis employing x-RBF neural network and associated energy optimisation—A case study based approach. Appl. Energy 2021, 298, 117103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gupta, A.; Badr, Y.; Negahban, A.; Qiu, R.G. Energy-efficient heating control for smart buildings with deep reinforcement learning. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 34, 101739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chaouch, H.; Çeken, C.; Arı, S. Energy management of HVAC systems in smart buildings by using fuzzy logic and M2M communication. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 44, 102606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lee, D.; Tsai, F.P. Air conditioning energy saving from cloud-based artificial intelligence: Case study of a split-type air conditioner. Energies 2020, 13, 2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Guo, C. Temperature Control Strategy Utilizing Neural Network Processing of Occupancy and Activity Level Sensing. U.S. Patent US6726113B2, 27 April 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Ferrari, A.; Higley, J.; Rucco, M.; Smith, F. Predicting the Impact of Flexible Energy Demand on Thermal Comfort. U.S. Patent US2021019643A1, 21 January 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Ferrari, A.; Higley, J.; Rucco, M.; Smith, F. Mining and Deploying Profiles in Smart Buildings. CN112204477A, 8 January 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Alessandrelli, D.; Ferrari, A.; Higley, J.; Smith, F.; Sofronis, C. Building Management System Having Knowledge Base. U.S. Patent US2019287000A1, 19 September 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Govindavaram, S.; Kuenzi, A.; Nallaperumal, P. Anonymous Chat Method and System Incorporating Machine-Learning Capabilities. U.S. Patent US2019297120A1, 26 September 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Kawakita, H.; Takagi, S.; Tsutsumi, H. Operation Control Device for Air Conditioning Equipment. AU669460B2, 6 June 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Ueda, T. Data Transmission and Apparatus, Data Processing Apparatus and a Neural Network Which Utilize Phase Shifted, Modulated, Convolutable Pseudo Noise. U.S. Patent US5423001A, 6 June 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Ota, S.; Hirai, K.; Sunayama, T.; Yagi, A.; Akita, K.; Suzuki, T.; Kosuke, H. Air Conditioning System. JP2018123998A, 9 August 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Manabu, Y.; Tadashi, N. Machine Learning Device for Determining Operation Condition of Precooling Operation or Preheating Operation of air Conditioner. WO2020189544A1, 24 September 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Fujita, N. Heat Source System, Target Operation Capacity Estimation Method and Target Operation Capacity Estimation Program. JP2020183816A, 12 November 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Hanada, T.; Ueda, H. Information Processing Method, Information Processing Device, and Program. JP2021002776A, 7 January 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Naotoshi, F.; Hiroshi, N.; Yasunori, O. Machine Learning Device, Air conditioning System, and Machine Learning Method. WO2020218563A1, 29 October 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Naotoshi, F.; Yasunori, O. Air-Conditioning System, Machine Learning Device, and Machine Learning Method. WO2020218219A1, 29 October 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Youichi, H.; Asuka, K.; Takuya, K.; Keita, K.; Takehiro, N. Air Conditioning Control System, Air Conditioning Machine, and Machine Learning Device. WO2021039548A1, 4 March 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, C.X.; Nishimura, T.; Yamaguchi, H.; Tono, T. Machine Learning Device. JP2020174343A, 22 October 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Maeda, C.; Narikiyo, Y. Remaining Value Calculation System for Air Conditioner and Assistance System for Air Conditioner. WO2021065882A1, 8 April 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Kates, L. System and Method for Zone Heating and Cooling. U.S. Patent US7163156B2, 16 January 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Vanhoucke, V. Multi-Frame Prediction for Hybrid Neural Network/Hidden Markov Models. U.S. Patent US8442821B1, 14 May 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Fadell, A.M.; Sloo, D.; Rogers, M.; Sharan, R.; Matas, M.; Matsuoka, Y. Temperature Controller with Model-Based Time to Target Calculation and Display. U.S. Patent US10082306B2, 25 September 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Matsuoka, Y.; Plitkins, M.; Sloo, D.; Stefanski, M.D. Systems and Methods for Signature-Based Thermostat Control. U.S. Patent US2015168003A1, 18 June 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Matsuoka, Y. Methods and Systems for Identification and Correction of Controlled System Data. U.S. Patent US10002184B2, 19 June 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Urbach, S.R.; Zomet, A. Privacy-Aware Personalized Content for The Smart Home. U.S. Patent US10453098B2, 22 October 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Fadell, A.M.; Honjo, S.; Matsuoka, Y.; Rogers, M.L.; Sloo, D.; Veron, M. Smart-Home Environment Networking Systems and Methods. U.S. Patent US2018322405A1, 8 November 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Xie, W. Air-Conditioner Control Method and Control System. CN107461890A, 12 December 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, G.; Tian, Y.; Wu, J. Air Conditioner Air Outlet Control Method and Terminal. CN107860100A, 30 March 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Gu, Z.; Jin, H.; Li, Q.; Peng, Y.; Zeng, Q. Air Conditioner Operation Mode Adjusting Method and Device and Air Conditioner. CN111380161A, 7 July 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Ai, S.; Hu, Z.; Jia, J.; Li, M.; Song, D.; Wu, W. Creating Method for Air Conditioner Control Model Based on Neural Network, Control Method and Air Conditioner. CN111256315A, 9 June 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Fang, M.; Gao, X.; Guo, Y.; Lei, L.; Song, Z.; Wang, X. Air Conditioner Control Method and Device, Storage Medium and Air Conditioner. CN109595765A, 9 April 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, C.; Feng, D.; Lian, Y.; Ma, S.; Qin, P.; Wan, H. Air Conditioner Control Method and Device and Air Conditioner. CN109140665A, 4 January 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, C.; Feng, D.; Lian, Y.; Ma, S.; Qin, P.; Wan, H. Control Method and Control Device for Intelligent Device. CN110553354A, 10 December 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Li, C.; Li, S.; Tan, Z.; Zhang, S. Information Processing Method and Device, Storage Medium and Electronic Device. CN110727728A, 24 January 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, H.; Gao, D.; Wan, H.; Xiao, L. Method and Device For Controlling Air Purifier. CN110857807A, 3 March 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Lian, C.; Liang, B.; Liang, Z.; Liao, M.; Tao, M.; Tian, Y. Air Conditioner Intelligent Control Method, Computer Readable Storage Medium and Air Conditioner. CN110966714A, 7 April 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, C.; Deng, J.; Li, S.; Luo, X.; Song, D.; Tan, J. Home Appliance Energy-Saving Model Construction Method Based on Genetic Algorithm, Control Method and Home Appliance. CN109902826A, 18 June 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Guo, Q.; Kou, Z.; Luo, J.; Xie, J.; Zeng, Y.; Zhou, W. Method and Device for Determining Frosting State of Air Conditioner. CN111156657A, 15 May 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Lian, C.; Liang, B.; Liang, Z.; Liao, M.; Tao, M.; Tian, Y. Air Conditioner Running State Control Method and Device, Processor and Air Conditioner Equipment. CN110736229A, 31 January 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, C.; Deng, J.; Li, S.; Luo, X.; Song, D.; Tan, J. Control Method and Equipment. CN109882996A, 14 June 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Bai, J.; Chen, Z.; Lu, J.; Yan, Z. Control Method and System for Intelligent Equipment in Multiple Regions. CN111025923A, 17 April 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Jia, J.; Li, M.; Song, D.; Wu, W.; Zhao, P. Air Conditioner Fault Prediction Method and Device, Storage Medium and Air Conditioner. CN111578444A, 25 August 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Lian, C.; Liang, B.; Liang, Z.; Liao, M.; Tian, Y.; Wu, J. Control Method and Device of Air Conditioner. CN110726220A, 24 January 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Guo, Y.; Huang, Z.; Lu, Y. Equipment Control Method and System and Network Side Equipment. CN111010321A, 14 April 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Li, B.; Wang, H.; Wang, J.; Wang, Z.; Wen, H. Air Conditioner Air Supply Control Method Based on Three-Dimensional Space, Computer Readable Storage Medium and Air Conditioner. CN110966734A, 7 April 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Liao, H.; Wang, H.; Wang, J.; Wang, Z.; Wen, H.; Zou, Q. Intelligent Air Supply Method and Device of Air Conditioner and Air Conditioner. CN110173866A, 27 August 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, C.; Chen, Y.; Li, S.; Song, D. Self-Adaptive Adjustment Method and Device of Air Conditioner Running State. CN110836525A, 25 February 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, C.; Deng, J.; Li, S.; Luo, X.; Song, D.; Tan, J. Air Conditioning Control Method and Device. CN111765604A, 13 October 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, C.; Deng, J.; Li, S.; Luo, X.; Song, D.; Tan, J. Control Method and Device for Air Conditioner. WO2020199648A1, 8 October 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, W.; Deng, C.; Huang, Z.; Lao, Z.; Li, Z.; Wu, J. Air conditioner Control Method and Device, Storage Medium and Processor. CN109631245A, 16 April 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, Z.; Fu, S.; Li, H.; Liu, Y.; Wang, P. Air Conditioner Energy Efficiency Index Determination Method and Device, Computer Equipment and Storage Medium. CN111928430A, 13 November 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Zhan, Q. Method and Device for Controlling Air Conditioner, Air Conditioner, Storage Medium and Processor. CN111637596A, 8 September 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Han, Y.; Shi, W.; Wang, B.; Xiang, L.; Yuan, Z.; Zhang, Y. Linkage Control Method and Device for Air Conditioner and Ventilator. CN111895608A, 6 November 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, Z.; Fu, S.; Wang, P. Method, System and Device for Controlling Air Conditioning Unit and Air Conditioning Unit. CN111780353A, 16 October 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Jing, Y.; Wang, Q. Hotel Air Conditioner Control Method and Device and Hotel Air Conditioner. CN112361544A, 12 February 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, Z.; Li, H.; Lin, Q.; Mou, G.; Su, Y.; Wang, P. Multi-Split Air Conditioner Energy Consumption Metering Method and System. CN111473471A, 31 July 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, N.; Wu, Z.; Xia, Y.; Xie, Q.; Zhang, J. Intelligent Air Conditioner Control Method and Device, Computer Equipment and Storage Medium. CN112378056A, 19 February 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Jing, Y.; Li, T.; Wang, Q. Gymnasium Air Conditioner Control Method and Device, Controller and Air Conditioning System. CN112178861A, 5 January 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Jing, Y.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, S. Control Method and Device of Kitchen Air Conditioner, Controller and Electric Appliance System. CN112361542A, 12 February 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Jia, J.; Li, R.; Wu, W.; Yang, C.; Zhou, L. Method and Device for Determining Energy Consumption Coefficient, Storage Medium and Electronic Device. CN112413862A, 26 February 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Hou, Q.; Wang, N. Fresh Air Control Method, Computer Device and Computer Readable Storage Medium. CN112344535A, 09 February 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Yi, M. Energy Saving Control for Data Center. U.S. Patent US2012197828A1, 2 August 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Hamann, H.F.; Lloyd, R.; Min, W. Knowledge-Based Models for Data Centers. U.S. Patent US20120284216A1, 8 November 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, B.; Ploennigs, J.; Schumann, A.; Sinn, M. Computer-Based Extraction of Complex Building Operation Rules for Products and services. U.S. Patent US9483735B2, 1 November 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, B.; Ploennigs, J.; Schumann, A.; Verscheure, O. Estimating Energy Savings from Building Management System Point Lists. U.S. Patent US9927467B2, 27 March 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, B.; Ploennigs, J.; Schumann, A.; Sinn, M. Computer-Based Extraction of Complex Building Operation Rules for Products and Services. U.S. Patent US2017032254A1, 3 May 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Hurley, S.; Mccleary, D.; Wilson, B. Initialization of Radial Base Function Neural Network Nodes for Reinforcement Learning Incremental Control System. U.S. Patent US2019309979A1, 10 October 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Bandyopadhyay, S.; Trivedi, S. Smart Transducer Plug and Play Control System and Method. U.S. Patent US10591174B2, 17 March 2020. [Google Scholar]
- House, J.M.; Seem, J.E. Systems and Methods for Estimating a Return Time. U.S. Patent US9739496B2, 22 August 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Turney, R.D. Predictive Building Control System with Neural Network Based Constraint Generation. CN110753886A, 4 February 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Park, Y.; Sinha, S.R. Building Management System with Simulation and User Action Reinforcement Machine Learning. U.S. Patent US10921010B2, 16 February 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, Y.M.; Murugesan, S.; Park, Y.; Ramamurti, V. Building Management Autonomous HVAC Control Using Reinforcement Learning with Occupant Feedback. U.S. Patent US10852023B2, 1 December 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Locke, R.; Sinha, S.R. Building Management System with Artificial Intelligence for Unified Agent Based Control of Building Subsystems. U.S. Patent US10901373B2, 26 January 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Amores, J.; Jin, Z.Y.; Lee, Y.M.; Murugesan, S. Automatic Threshold Selection of Maching Learning/Deep Learning Model for Anomaly Detection of Connected Chillers. U.S. Patent US2019383510A1, 19 December 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Schuster, K.C.; Vitullo, S.R. Building Management System and Methods for Predicting Catastrophic Hvac Equipment Failures. U.S. Patent US2019338972A1, 7 November 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Joshi, T.S.; Khalate, S.S.; Mittal, D. Predictive Diagnostics System with Fault Detector for Preventative Maintenance of Connected Equipment. U.S. Patent US10969775B2, 6 April 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Amores, J.; Jin, Z.; Lee, Y.M.; Murugesan, S. Adaptive Selection of Machine Learning/Deep Learning Model with Optimal Hyper-Parameters for Anomaly Detection of Connected Chillers. U.S. Patent US2019384239A1, 19 December 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Marcy, V.H.O.; Turney, R.D. Hvac Control System with Model Driven Deep Learning. U.S. Patent US2019354071A1, 21 November 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Li, J.; Turney, R.D. HVAC Control System with Cost Target Optimization. U.S. Patent US11009252B2, 18 May 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Pourmohammad, S.; Schuster, K.C.; Verink, C.J. Analysis System with Machine Learning Based Interpretation. U.S. Patent US2020380387A1, 3 December 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Marcy, V.H.O.; Pang, Z.; Turney, R.D. Variable Refrigerant Flow, Room Air Conditioner, and Packaged Air Conditioner Control Systems with Cost Target Optimization. U.S. Patent US11002457B2, 11 May 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Chakraborty, S.; Kumari, A.; Mitra, M.; Ray, S. Building Management System with Apparent Indoor Temperature and Comfort Mapping. US2019338975A1, 8 March 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Park, Y.; Sinha, S.R. Building Management System with Space Graphs. WO2020018147A1, 23 January 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Albinger, D.R.; Boettcher, A.J.; Curtis, D.M.; Drees, K.H.; Galvez, M.; Goyal, S. Building System with a Time Correlated Reliability Data Stream. U.S. Patent US2020162354A1, 21 May 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, Y.M.; Llopis, J.A.; Murugesan, S. Building Management System with Dynamic Energy Prediction Model Updates. U.S. Patent US2021116874A1, 30 November 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Albinger, D.R.; Boettcher, A.J.; Curtis, D.M.; Drees, K.H.; Galvez, M.; Goyal, S. Building System with Performance Identification Through Equipment Exercising and Entity Relationships. U.S. Patent US2020162280A1, 21 May 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Beaty, R.C.; Fread, J.W.; Schlagenhaft, S.A.; Willmott, G. Central Plant Control System with Subplant Rank Generator. U.S. Patent US2020409756A1, 31 December 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Elbsat, M.N.; Risbeck, M.J.; Wenzel, M.J. Building HVAC System with Modular Cascaded Model. U.S. Patent US2021041127A1, 11 February 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Brown, J.J.; Ellerman, R.D.M.; Jacobs, R.R.; Moore, C.T.; Toner, V.M. User Experience System for Improving Compliance of Temperature, Pressure, and Humidity. U.S. Patent US2021080139A1, 18 March 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Jiang, Z.; Lee, Y.M. Transfer Learning of Deep Neural Network for Hvac Heat Transfer Dynamics. U.S. Patent US2020356857A1, 12 November 2020. [Google Scholar]
- SuHwan, K.; Song Taek, O.; Su, R.L.; Kim, I.H. Air Conditioning System and Control Method Thereof. U.S. Patent US20180209668-A1, 1 December 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Cha, J.Y.; Kim, K.S.; Yang, J.H. Air-Conditioner and Method for Controlling the Same. WO2007032594A2, 22 March 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Wei, L. Control Method of Inverter Air Conditioner at Night. CN102478291A, 30 May 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Lian, K. Refrigeration Control Method of Air Conditioner. CN1173134C, 27 October 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Song, Y. Artificial Intelligence Air Conditioner System and Method of Controlling an Air Conditioner System. U.S. Patent US10401882B2, 3 September 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Woohyun, C.; Yunsik, P.; Lagyoung, K. Artificial Intelligence Air Purifier and Method for Controlling the Same. WO2017055112A1, 6 April 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Han, D.; Song, J.; Song, T. Artificial Intelligence Air Conditioner and Control Method Thereof. U.S. Patent US10871302B2, 22 December 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, J.S.; Kim, S.T.; Lee, J.W.; Shin, Y.J. A Method of Air Conditioner. KR20180134206A, 16 December 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Heungkyu, L.; Jae, H.L.; Woohyun, C. Method for Operating Air Conditioner. KR20190026519A, 14 March 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Han, D.; Kwon, Y.T.; Park, Y.S. Air-Conditioner Based on Parameter Learning Using Artificial Intelligence, Cloud Server, and Method of Operating and Controlling Thereof. U.S. Patent US2019309970A1, 10 October 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Han, D.; Song, T. Air Conditioner 12345. U.S. Patent US2019309978A1, 12 April 2019. [Google Scholar]
- An, C.W. Method for Controlling an Air Conditioner. KR20070088839A, 30 August 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Dongkyu, L. Artificial Intelligence Device. KR20190096310A, 19 August 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Jonghoon, C. Air Conditioner 09876. KR20190098098A, 21 August 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, B.O.; Sim, S.Y. Method for Air Conditioning and Air Conditioner Based on Thermal Comfort. KR20190090739A, 2 August 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Han, D.; Kwon, Y.T.; Park, Y.S. Air-Conditioner Based on Parameter Learning Using Artificial Intelligence, Cloud Server, and Method of Operating and Controlling Thereof. U.S. Patent US2021041121A1, 11 February 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, J.; Kim, S.; Kim, T. Artificial Intelligence-Based Air Conditioner. WO2020262733A1, 30 December 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, J.; Kim, S.; Kim, T. Artificial Intelligence-Based Air Conditioner. WO2021006406A1, 14 January 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Han, D.; Kwon, Y.T.; Park, Y.S. Cloud Server and Air Conditioner Based on Parameter Learning Using Artificial Intelligence, and Method for Driving and Controlling Air Conditioner. EP3748248A1, 9 December 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, Y. Method for Predicting Filter of Air Purifier Using Machine Learning. US2020088621A1, 19 March 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, X. Control method of air conditioner, air conditioner and storage medium. CN107576022A, 12 January 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Mao, Z.; Shang, J.; Yan, J. Multi-Split Air-Conditioning System and Its Energy-Saving Control Method, Device and Storage Medium. CN107830607A, 23 March 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Mao, Z. Multi-Split Air Conditioning System, Energy-Saving Control Method and Device of Multi-Split Air Conditioning System and Storage Medium. CN107894076A, 10 April 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Tang, Z. Running State Control Method and Device, Purifier and Storage Medium. CN107906703A, 13 April 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Qiu, Y. Method and Device for Estimating Power of Outdoor Air Fan of Air Conditioner and Computer Readable Storage Medium. CN109442680A, 8 March 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Liao, N.; Xie, W.; Yan, J. Machine-Learning-Based Air Conditioner Control Method and Device As Well As Air Conditioner. CN108361927A, 3 August 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, X.; Ma, R.; Ou, Z.; Zhou, H. Method and System for Providing Air Conditioning. CN111954784A, 17 November 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Feng, J.; Huang, Z.; Li, S.; Tao, K.; Zhu, H. Control Method for Air Conditioner, Air Conditioner and Storage Medium. WO2020098405A1, 22 May 2020. [Google Scholar]
- He, J. Air Supply Method for Air Conditioner, Air Conditioner, and Computer Readable Storage Medium. CN110749063A, 4 February 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Sun, J.M. Energy Management System and Method for Energy Management Using Group Management Control. KR20130010694A, 10 May 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, J.; Park, G.; Seo, J.; Seo, S.; Song, K. Method for Controlling Activation of Air Conditioning Device and Apparatus Therefor. US10775067B2, 15 September 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Hwang, J.; Joo, Y.J.; Kang, H.C.; Kim, M.K.; Lee, S.W.; Nam, K.I. Air Conditioner and Method for Control Thereof. KR20190109640A, 26 September 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Gwon, S.H.; Kim, M.K.; Kim, T.; Ock, H.W.; Shin, D.J.; Song, H.S. Air Conditioner and Method for Controlling the Air Conditioner Thereof. KR20190134936A, 5 December 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Hwang, T.H.; Jeong, M.R.; Kang, J.Y.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, Y.S.; Park, J.H. Electronic Device and Method for Controlling the Electronic Device Thereof. KR20200047205A, 7 May 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, K.; Lee, J.; Park, G.; Song, K. Electronic Device and Control Method Thereof. U.S. Patent US2020217544A1, 9 July 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Cho, H.J.; Hwang In, H.; Ji, Y.H.; Kim, H.J.; Kim, S.H. Electric Apparatus and Operation Method of the Electric Apparatus. KR20210033769A, 29 March 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Gwon, S.-H.; Kim, M.-K.; Kim, T.; Ock, H.-W.; Shin, D.-J.; Song, H.-S. Air Conditioner and Control Method Thereof. CN112136006A, 25 December 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Ahmed, O.; Klein, S.A.; Mitchell, J.W. HVAC Distribution System Identification. CA2159774A1, 7 July 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Mcintosh, I.B.D. Model Based Fault Detection and Diagnosis Methodology for Hvac Subsystems. CA2344908A1, 20 January 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Osman, A. Application of Microsystems for a Building System Employing a System Knowledge Base. CN101288031A, 18 July 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Ahmed, O.; Pienta, W.T. Data Center Thermal Performance Optimization Using Distributed Cooling Systems. U.S. Patent US8346398B2, 1 January 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Copley, J.M. Building Automation System Using a Predictive Model. EP2911018A1, 26 August 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Ahmed, O.; Cowan, R.J.; Raymundo, R.; Walker, J.J. Variable Air Volume Modeling for an HVAC System. U.S. Patent US10386800B2, 20 August 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Mallya, T.; Raizada, S.; Saini, B.K. Intelligent Heat, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning System. WO2017076433A1, 5 November 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Song, Z.; Srivastava, S.; Wang, Y. Adaptive Demand Response Method Using Batteries with Commercial Buildings for Grid Stability and Sustainable Growth. U.S. Patent US10614146B2, 7 April 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Raveendran, V.; Spieckermann, S.; Sudhakaran, V.; Thangiah, L. System, Device and Method for Energy and Comfort Optimization in a Building Automation Environment. WO2019063079A1, 4 April 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Koitz, I.; Rautavaara, M. Smart Room Allocation. EP3349159A1, 18 July 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Ahmed, O.; Cowan, R.J.; Raymundo, R.; Walker, J.J. Variable Air Volume Modeling for an HVAC System. U.S. Patent US10935944B2, 2 March 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Jiang, N.; Tian, Z.; Wang, D.; Zhang, T. Method and Apparatus for Controlling Integrated Energy System, and Computer-Readable Storage Medium. WO2021062749A1, 8 April 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Jiang, N.; Tian, Z.; Wang, D.; Zhang, T. Optimization Method and Apparatus for Integrated Energy System and Computer Readable Storage Medium. WO2021062748A1, 8 April 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Jiang, N.; Tian, Z.; Wang, D.; Zhang, T. Integrated Energy System Simulation Method, Apparatus and Computer-Readable Storage Medium. WO2021062753A1, 8 April 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Fujita, T.; Miichi, N.; Ono, M. Thermal Comfort Device and Control Content Determination Method. JP2018123989A, 9 August 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Ni, M.; Sasaki, T.; Sugimoto, H. Air-Conditioning Control Method and Air-Conditioning Control Device. U.S. Patent US2019178514A1, 7 September 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Attrapadung, N.; Hanaoka, G.; Kato, R.; Matsuda, T.; Nishida, N.; Oba, T. Prediction Model Sharing Method and Prediction Model Sharing System. CN109670626A, 23 April 2019. [Google Scholar]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).














































