Next Article in Journal
Agri-Food Trade Competitiveness: A Review of the Literature
Previous Article in Journal
Controversy over the Use of “Shade Covers” to Avoid Water Evaporation in Water Reservoirs
Previous Article in Special Issue
SuPerPave® Mix Design Method of Recycled Asphalt Concrete Applied in the European Standards Context
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Greenways as Integrated Systems: A Proposal for Planning and Design Guidelines Based on Case Studies Evaluation

Department of Civil, Environmental Engineering and Architecture (DICAAR), University of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2021, 13(20), 11232; https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011232
Submission received: 4 August 2021 / Revised: 30 September 2021 / Accepted: 5 October 2021 / Published: 12 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Smart and Sustainable Streets)

Abstract

Greenways (GWs) can play a key role in the context of policies and strategies for sustainable territorial development because they contribute to the development of integrated plans and interventions for environmental safeguarding and socio-economic growth. As is generally understood, in their modern conception, GWs are not only develop soft mobility, but they also represent supporting elements of a new concept of development and use of territory, attentive to its particular characteristics and the needs of resident populations. Beginning with a critical analysis of the most significant case studies of greenways, the authors propose a system of design and evaluation guidelines useful in identifying specific GW-related actions. The identified actions are divided into two categories, which are tangible and intangible actions. The first category corresponds with concrete actions that are directly implemented through different design and construction phases; the second category corresponds with processes activated in the design phase and are concretized after the “commissioning” of the path and has repercussions on the sphere of place identity. These categories are often difficult to distinguish between because many actions can be considered to be both tangible and intangible.
Keywords: greenways; green infrastructures; active mobility; urban sustainability; landscape regeneration; project evaluation; design guidelines greenways; green infrastructures; active mobility; urban sustainability; landscape regeneration; project evaluation; design guidelines

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pinna, F.; Saiu, V. Greenways as Integrated Systems: A Proposal for Planning and Design Guidelines Based on Case Studies Evaluation. Sustainability 2021, 13, 11232. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011232

AMA Style

Pinna F, Saiu V. Greenways as Integrated Systems: A Proposal for Planning and Design Guidelines Based on Case Studies Evaluation. Sustainability. 2021; 13(20):11232. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011232

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pinna, Francesco, and Valeria Saiu. 2021. "Greenways as Integrated Systems: A Proposal for Planning and Design Guidelines Based on Case Studies Evaluation" Sustainability 13, no. 20: 11232. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011232

APA Style

Pinna, F., & Saiu, V. (2021). Greenways as Integrated Systems: A Proposal for Planning and Design Guidelines Based on Case Studies Evaluation. Sustainability, 13(20), 11232. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011232

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop