1. Introduction
Forensic science relies on one simple principle, and that is the scientific and impartial collection, preservation, and analysis of the evidence. The gathering of the physical evidence from the crime scene to the court room requires analytical methods which are accurate, reproducible, and as non-destructive as possible. Traditional forensics face some disadvantages; chemical enhancement techniques lead to destructive and irreversible alteration of the evidence, the inability of traditional imaging techniques to distinguish materials with similar spectra, along with contamination due to extensive sample preparation [
1,
2].
HSI, initially employed for remote sensing and military applications in the 1970s and 1980s [
3], has evolved into a fundamental component of forensic sciences. This analytical method utilizes the interplay between electromegnetic radiation and matter, which means that materials reflect, absorb, and emit electromagnetic energy at distinct wavelengths determined by their unique chemical structure. HSI obtains hundreds of narrow-band images to create the three-dimensional dataset known as the hyperspectral data cube (hypercube for short) [
4,
5]. The importance of this feature from the forensic perspective is very high. Objects that have a visual resemblance to each other, like questioned document ink and hidden traces of blood stains on complex backgrounds, can be discriminated based on their distinctive spectral signatures. Although traditional RGB imaging acquires the data in three spectral bands, HSI provides high-resolution spectral images with a number of bands ranging from 200 nm to 400 nm, which provides an excellent chance to characterize the material [
6]. The recent advancements between 2025–2026 have brought about an enormous boost in terms of HSI due to sensor miniaturization, portable and handheld HSI technologies, high-speed data collection, and the use of AI-based spectral analysis. Specifically, the transformer-based deep-learning architectures, graph neural networks, self-supervised learning, and explainable AI have tremendously advanced the process of hyperspectral image classification in terms of understanding the complex relationships between spectra and spatial features with a reduced reliance on large annotated datasets. This advancement in technology has resulted in the expansion of HSI from its usual laboratory applications into other fields including biomedical imaging, agriculture, food quality inspection, environmental monitoring, and forensic science. Therefore, HSI is emerging as a potential technology for the next generation of forensic examinations [
7,
8,
9,
10]. Over the last years, there have been observed numerous advances in the employment of HSI in forensics. The first investigations in this area were conducted by Edelman et al. [
11] years ago. Since then, a lot of scientists have proven the potentiality of the technique in different areas, including the analysis of blood stains and biological fluids, questioned documents investigation, fingerprints visualization, GSR detection, trace evidence analysis, and PMI estimation [
12,
13,
14]. To demonstrate the achievements of forensics technology throughout the years, a timeline of the key accomplishments is given in
Figure 1.
Considering the above-mentioned comprehensive set of applications of forensic sciences where HSI plays a crucial role, one can easily conclude the diversity of this advanced approach for solving various forensics problems. The key advantage of using HSI over many classical methods lies in its ability to conduct an investigation without destruction or invasion. This means not only preservation of evidence integrity but also availability of subsequent testing [
19]. Furthermore, due to providing spatial and spectral information, HSI allows detecting and analyzing diverse types of evidence.
Figure 2 illustrates some examples of important domains where HSI has already been successfully implemented, including blood stain analysis, document forensics, fingerprint identification, gunshot residue analysis, trace evidence examination, biological fluid identification, estimation of postmortem interval, and determination of bruise age.
Even though numerous works have been produced on the topic of HSI-enabled forensic investigations, there is still a lack of thorough and well-structured comparison of various HSI methods used in forensics. The review articles written in this area usually analyze HSI applications for particular fields of forensic investigation without mentioning any comparative analysis of instruments involved, data processing techniques, machine-learning algorithms applied, and problems connected with the transition from one field to another. This paper aims at conducting such a comparative analysis.
1.1. Objectives of This Review
The main objectives of this review are to: (i) present an in-depth understanding of the fundamental aspects, instrumentation, and data processing involved in the implementation of HSI in forensic science; (ii) thoroughly assess the most recent developments in the application of HSI technology to nine forensic areas of importance, such as blood stain, document, fingerprint, GSR, trace, biological fluid, postmortem interval, bruise age estimation, and multidisciplinary forensics; (iii) critically review traditional chemometric methods, machine-learning models, and new deep-learning frameworks used for the forensic HSI analysis; (iv) highlight the existing problems, limitations, and gaps in research concerning the forensic investigation using HSI technology; and (v) outline future research directions in this area, which include explainable artificial intelligence, transformer networks, graph neural networks (GNNs), mobile HSI systems, and forensic imaging protocols.
1.2. Literature Search and Selection Methodology
The review has been carried out based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA 2026) protocol in order to make sure that there is transparency, replicability, and systematic nature of the literature search process. The literature search was completed using seven major scientific databases including Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, IEEE Xplore, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and Google Scholar. The period of time considered in the search range is from January 2010 to June 2026; however, some landmark papers prior to the date have been considered to give the historical background.
The search protocol consisted of combining Boolean operators along with keywords connected to the topic of the study, which are “HSI”, “Near-Infrared Spectroscopy”, “Forensic Science”, “Crime Scene”, “Bloodstain”, “Fingerprint”, “Document Examination”, “GSR”, “Trace Evidence”, “Biological Fluids”, “Postmortem Interval”, “Bruise”, “Machine Learning”, “Deep Learning”, and “Artificial Intelligence”.
The articles selected for analysis were supposed to meet the following criteria: (i) published in reputable journals or high-quality conferences; (ii) published in English language; (iii) concerning the use of HSI or other spectral imaging technologies for forensic purposes; and (iv) presenting experimental evidence or results from development and review studies. The papers that were duplicate records, irrelevant to the topic under consideration, insufficient in methodology details and validation, using overlapping data sets, and not published in English language were omitted. After eliminating duplicates, all identified papers were screened based on titles and abstracts and further analyzed for their compliance with the defined eligibility criteria. In the case of an eligible article, the relevant information about the application of forensic technology, imaging method, spectral range, imaging system, pre-processing, feature extraction, machine/deep-learning algorithm used, performance measures, used data set, and limitations of the paper was extracted and comparatively analyzed. The entire process of literature identification, screening, eligibility, and selecting process is illustrated in
Figure 3. Overall, 1028 documents were retrieved from database searching. Of 1028 retrieved records, 218 duplicates were removed and the title and abstract of 810 articles were screened. Overall, 58 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and have been included in this qualitative synthesis.
Quality Evaluation
The quality of each included study was evaluated based on criteria such as clarity of the experimental design, appropriateness of HSI acquisition details, dataset details, preprocessing method employed, validation scheme, evaluation metrics used, reproducibility of the results, and forensic relevance.
3. Data Processing and Chemometric Methods
3.1. Preprocessing
The preprocessing stage plays an important role in hyperspectral data processing since it enhances data quality through the elimination of instrumental distortions, noise reduction, enhancement of spectra, and normalization before applying any other algorithms. Preprocessing is executed between acquisition and extraction phases, as shown in
Figure 5.
First of all, dark current subtraction and radiometric calibration of acquired data with white reference enable transforming data into reflectance values. Moreover, data normalization can be conducted to mitigate the effect of different background-related influences and illumination conditions. Also, noise reduction is a common practice for improving data quality.
Different preprocessing methods can be found in the literature, among which there are Standard Normal Variate (SNV) normalization, Multiplicative Scatter Correction (MSC), Savitzky–Golay (SG) filtering, and derivatives (first and second order) [
29,
30]. These algorithms help to increase spectral discrimination and reduce the impact of scattering and baseline effects on data. Finally, such preprocessing approaches as binning and spatial filtering can be used to enhance images and decrease computations.
3.2. Dimensionality Reduction
Due to the high dimensionality of hyperspectral images (over 200 bands per pixel), there arises a need to perform dimensionality reduction prior to classification. PCA is universally used to project the data into an alternative lower dimensional space characterized by orthogonal axes maximizing variance. MNF transformation is used when there is spectral correlation of noise. ICA technique is employed when independence of sources is of importance [
31,
32]. These techniques prove useful not only for visualization (false color imagery) but also in preparing data for further classification.
3.3. Classifiers and Machine Learning
Forensic HSI applications heavily rely on classification methods. The traditional chemometric algorithms used for classification purposes include PLS-DA, Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), and Soft Independent Modeling of Class Analogy (SIMCA). SVMs have proven themselves as an efficient tool for forensic HSI in particular, owing to their superior generalization ability in relation to high-dimensional spectra [
33,
34].
In more recent studies, deep-learning models were also employed to solve forensic HSI problems. In this regard, CNN was tested in 1D (spectral), 2D (spatial), and 3D (spectral–spatial) variants for such applications as blood stain classification, ink differentiation, and drugs identification. As reported by Książek et al., the use of 2D CNN model resulted in an overall classification accuracy of 98–100% under controlled settings [
35]. The development of RNNs and transformer-based architectures can be considered a part of ongoing research. Unsupervised machine-learning models such as k-means, hierarchical agglomerative clustering, and self-organizing maps are used in field conditions when there are no references [
36,
37].
3.4. Emerging Deep-Learning Architectures for HSI Analysis
Current trends in HSI analysis involve the transition from traditional CNN models to more advanced deep-learning approaches such as ViT models, GNN models, spectral–spatial attention models, contrastive learning methods, self-supervised learning techniques, and explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). Although CNN models have shown great promise in capturing spectral and spatial local feature representations, the small receptive fields of such models limit their ability to extract information regarding long-range spectral relations and spatial relationships. As a result, advanced models have been developed that surpass the shortcomings of the traditional models and have outperformed other techniques in remote sensing and biomedical HSI applications. The current developments will be instrumental in developing forensic HSI.
Within such emerging methods, the Vision Transformer (ViT) model has emerged as a prominent choice for HSI classification. Unlike CNN-based methods, which use convolution operations, the ViT architecture uses the multi-head self-attention method to capture the long-range interactions between both spectral and spatial features. More recent transformer-based models have further incorporated multiscale feature extraction and spectral tokens along with convolutional attention mechanism that allows for effective capturing of global context information without sacrificing local spectral properties. Such models have shown significant improvement in terms of classification performance, robustness, and reducing spectral redundancy on several benchmark HSI datasets. The potential of such models in forensic analysis will aid in the detection of blood stain, questioned documents, latent fingerprint, biological fluid, gunshot residue, and trace evidence, especially in difficult environmental scenarios [
38,
39]. On the downside, transformer-based models usually require a large dataset and high computational power; therefore, transfer learning and lightweight transformers are among the areas of future research.
GNNs constitute yet another major advancement in the field of hyperspectral image analysis. As in the case of GNNs, the pixels or superpixels are modeled using nodes in graphs based on their spectral–spatial associations, thereby making the processing of non-Euclidean nature of HSIs more feasible. Unlike CNNs, GNNs can preserve neighborhood information well and are able to capture long-range spectral interactions, which are crucial for complicated scenes. Graph Transformer Networks have been proposed very recently where the combination of graph learning with transformers is used for the sake of enhancing spectral–spatial representation and classification performance on benchmark HSI datasets [
40,
41]. These types of techniques can hold great potential for heterogeneous forensic evidence analysis in cases of latent fingerprints, biological stains, gun shot residues, trace evidence, and mixed materials on complex surfaces. But there still exist some limitations due to the computational complexities associated with graph creation and lack of forensic HSI datasets.
Another set of recent trends in HSI analysis includes spectral–spatial attention mechanism, contrastive learning, self-supervised learning, and explainable AI approaches which are proven to be promising for increasing efficiency of HSI analysis. Attention mechanism, including channel attention, spatial attention, and gated self-attention, allows us to adaptively weight discriminative spectral features, excluding redundant information at the same time, thus providing high classification accuracy with small computational costs. Meanwhile, contrastive learning and self-supervised learning have become promising alternatives for minimizing the necessity for using manually annotated datasets and obtaining robust representations based on unlabeled hyperspectral images. Such techniques would be especially beneficial in forensic science in which acquiring annotated datasets is a complex task. Moreover, techniques allowing interpretability of decision-making of the AI model, like SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM), attention visualization, and saliency maps, provide better interpretability and thus increase judicial validity of the results obtained with help of AI technologies in forensics [
38,
40,
42].
Even though there have been significant advancements in these sophisticated deep-learning algorithms for the purpose of remote sensing, agriculture, food quality assurance, and biomedicine, their use in forensic hyperspectral imaging has not gained much traction yet. The vast majority of forensic analyses still uses classical machine-learning algorithms or even CNNs due to the unavailability of large public datasets, non-standardized data acquisition methodologies, and need for computationally light models that can be used in a real forensic laboratory environment. Future work in this field should concentrate on developing new lightweight transformer models, graph neural networks, self-supervised feature learning, multimodal foundation models, and explainable AI approaches for forensic HSI specifically. These innovations will help to significantly enhance the performance of HSI systems in analyzing blood stains, examining questioned documents, enhancing latent fingerprints, identifying gunshot residues, classifying trace evidences, detecting biological fluids, and estimating postmortem interval.
12. Cross-Domain Comparative Analysis
It is important to evaluate the comparative performance of HSI in various domains of forensic science to have a more accurate idea about the efficacy of the technology used. Even if each study shows relatively high accuracy rates in its domain of investigation, inter-domain comparison enables a better understanding of the pros and cons of HSI applications in forensic science.
Table 7 shows the main applications of HSI in forensics, along with the spectral range used, popular machine-learning algorithms, performance levels, maturity levels, and current challenges.
Figure 6 shows an overview of the reported accuracy of HSI in the different forensic application domains. The most developed areas in forensic HSI are blood stain examination, document examination, and biological fluid examination where several studies have been reported that achieve classification accuracies greater than 95%. These high accuracies are primarily due to the presence of distinguishable spectral signatures, controlled acquisition environment in laboratory settings, and well-defined preprocessing and chemometric methodologies.
Alternatively, newly proposed applications such as gunshot residue analysis, PMI estimation, bruise age estimation, and trace evidence examination are less mature forensic HSI areas. Their accuracies are somewhat lower because their spectral signatures are greatly dependent on the substrate composition, environmental effects, aging processes, and the lack of annotated forensic data sets. Most importantly, the prediction of PMI depends on many biological and environmental factors.
The comparative analysis of the machine-learning approaches also demonstrates that the traditional chemometric models like PCA, Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), and SVMs are popular due to their strong performance in smaller forensic datasets. New deep-learning models like CNNs provide better results by using the spectral and spatial information together but need more annotated datasets and computational capabilities as well as standardization of the imaging protocol to work properly. The novel architecture of ViTs, GNNs, spectral–spatial attention networks, and self-supervised learning show great potential for model generalization but have not been widely used in forensic HSI yet.
There are some issues that affect all forensic areas equally and include unavailability of benchmark data, variability because of different imaging devices and lighting, lack of standardization of the acquisition protocol, lack of external validation, and low interpretability of the machine-learning models for forensic purposes. To address these issues and facilitate the use of HSI in forensics, standardized spectral libraries, multi-center forensic datasets, and explainable artificial intelligence should be implemented.
15. Conclusions
In this review, a complete study of HSI for forensic purposes has been carried out via the critical evaluation of over 50 publications related to forensic science from nine major fields. Based on the results obtained, it can be stated that HSI has become an advanced non-destructive technique able to provide spectral and spatial data during a forensic investigation. For instance, mature forensic science applications such as document examination, blood stain analysis, and biological fluids identification achieved up to 99% of classification accuracy. Emerging techniques like fingerprint enhancement, GSR detection, trace evidence analysis, and PMI estimation continue to develop significantly. Moreover, the role of machine-learning and deep-learning methods in further increasing the precision of HSI analysis was emphasized. SVM, PLS-DA, and CNN algorithms became popular in this respect. Nevertheless, a number of important issues still need to be addressed. Namely, the need for standards and forensic spectral database development, high price of necessary hardware, and legal questions about the admission of HSI data in courts should be mentioned. Thus, future works should concentrate on the development of portable HSI, explainable AI, multi-modality analytical approaches, and spectral library standardization.