Next Article in Journal
Ion Dynamics at the Carbon Electrode/Electrolyte Interface: Influence of Carbon Nanotubes Types
Previous Article in Journal
Gradation Design and Parameter Determination of Warm-Mix-Agent-Modified Asphalt Mixture
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Shear Bond Strength and Bracket Base Morphology of New and Rebonded Orthodontic Ceramic Brackets

1
Private Practice, San Antonio, TX 78212, USA
2
Dental Materials Research Laboratory, University at Buffalo School of Dental Medicine, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA
3
Department of Orthodontics, University at Buffalo School of Dental Medicine, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(5), 1865; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15051865
Submission received: 5 February 2022 / Revised: 20 February 2022 / Accepted: 24 February 2022 / Published: 2 March 2022

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to (1) to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of two ceramic brackets when new and when rebonded following various bracket base conditioning methods, and (2) to determine bond failure mode relative to bracket base morphology. 100 Symetri ClearTM (SC) and 100 Radiance Plus® (RP) ceramic brackets were bonded to bovine incisors and divided into five groups: one group served as controls and four had brackets rebonded following conditioning by: no surface treatment, sealant, sandblasting, and flame then steam. SBS, adhesive remnant index, and bracket base morphology were evaluated. SBS showed no statistical difference between new and rebonded with no surface treatment or sealant (SC brackets) and with sealant or flame and steam (RP brackets). When comparing SC to RP, SBS was higher with SC, no surface treatment, and sandblasted groups. All groups had varying amounts of adhesive left on the tooth, with the sandblasted group having the most. SEM analysis showed that sandblasting damaged the retention features of bracket bases. In conclusion, when rebonded, the SBS of SC brackets that had no surface treatment and both SC and RP brackets that had sealant showed no significant differences to new brackets. Sandblasting damaged the retention features of SC and RP bracket bases, resulting in low SBS.
Keywords: ceramics; laser-etched bracket base; dental debonding ceramics; laser-etched bracket base; dental debonding

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Urichianu, M.; Makowka, S.; Covell, D., Jr.; Warunek, S.; Al-Jewair, T. Shear Bond Strength and Bracket Base Morphology of New and Rebonded Orthodontic Ceramic Brackets. Materials 2022, 15, 1865. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15051865

AMA Style

Urichianu M, Makowka S, Covell D Jr., Warunek S, Al-Jewair T. Shear Bond Strength and Bracket Base Morphology of New and Rebonded Orthodontic Ceramic Brackets. Materials. 2022; 15(5):1865. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15051865

Chicago/Turabian Style

Urichianu, Mihai, Steven Makowka, David Covell, Jr., Stephen Warunek, and Thikriat Al-Jewair. 2022. "Shear Bond Strength and Bracket Base Morphology of New and Rebonded Orthodontic Ceramic Brackets" Materials 15, no. 5: 1865. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15051865

APA Style

Urichianu, M., Makowka, S., Covell, D., Jr., Warunek, S., & Al-Jewair, T. (2022). Shear Bond Strength and Bracket Base Morphology of New and Rebonded Orthodontic Ceramic Brackets. Materials, 15(5), 1865. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15051865

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop