The authors wish to make the following correction to this paper [1]. Due to duplication of the same diagrams in Figures 15 and 16, replace:
- Figure 16. Variation in the compressive strength of testing samples manufactured at pressing pressure of: (a) 10; (b) 20; (c) 30; (d) 40 MPa. Samples carbonated by static method during 900 s, depending on the content of Ca(OH)2 and concentration of СО2, %: 1—10; 2—20; 3—30; 4—40; 5—50; 6—60; 7—65.
with
- Figure 16. Variation in the compressive strength of testing samples manufactured at pressing pressure of: (a) 10; (b) 20; (c) 30; (d) 40 MPa. Samples carbonated by static method during 900 s, depending on the content of Ca(OH)2 and concentration of СО2, %: 1—10; 2—20; 3—30; 4—40; 5—50; 6—60; 7—65.
The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused to the readers by these changes.
Reference
- Lyubomirskiy, N.; Bakhtin, A.; Fic, S.; Szafraniec, M.; Bakhtina, T. Intensive ways of producing carbonate curing building materials based on lime secondary raw materials. Materials (Basel) 2020, 13, 2304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).