Skip to Content
Current OncologyCurrent Oncology
  • Review
  • Open Access

3 November 2026

23 Pages

Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Risk Stratification: Current Evidence and Emerging Approaches

,
,
,
,
,
and
1
Doctoral School, “Victor Babeş” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timişoara, Eftimie Murgu Square No. 2, 300041 Timişoara, Romania
2
ENT Department, Emergency City Hospital, 400139 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
3
Department V Internal Medicine I, University Clinic of Hematology, “Victor Babeş” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timişoara, Eftimie Murgu Square No. 2, 300041 Timişoara, Romania
4
Hematology Department, Municipal Emergency Clinical Hospital, Timişoara, Romania
This article belongs to the Section Head and Neck Oncology

Simple Summary

Plasma Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) DNA is an established biomarker that complements TNM staging in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. This review discusses the potential contribution of circulating Epstein–Barr virus DNA (EBV DNA) and emerging approaches, including quantitative imaging, artificial intelligence, molecular and multiomics profiling, and functional tumor models, to improve risk stratification in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treatment.

Abstract

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma is characterized by marked biological and clinical heterogeneity that is only partly captured by conventional anatomical staging. This narrative review examines how circulating biomarkers, radiomics, artificial intelligence (AI), molecular profiling, and functional tumor models may complement tumor-node-metastasis (TNM)-based risk stratification in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Relevant literature was identified through searches of PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar, primarily covering 2016–2026, with earlier landmark studies retained when relevant. Plasma Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) DNA is an established prognostic biomarker that complements anatomical staging, while longitudinal measurements provide information on treatment response and recurrence risk. Radiomics and AI offer additional possibilities for prognostic modeling, although their use in treatment selection remains investigational. Genomic, epigenomic, transcriptomic, single-cell, spatial, proteomic, and phosphoproteomic studies characterize tumor and microenvironmental heterogeneity. Organoids, xenografts, humanized models, and engineered three-dimensional systems provide complementary platforms for functional investigation.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.