Next Article in Journal
Predictors of Adjuvant Treatment for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma at the Population Level
Previous Article in Journal
The Prioritization Preferences of Pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review Members and the Canadian Public: A Stated-Preferences Comparison
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Patterns of Practice with Third-Line Anti-EGFR Antibody for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

1
Cross Cancer Institute and University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
2
BC Cancer Agency and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2016, 23(5), 329-333; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.23.3030
Submission received: 8 July 2016 / Revised: 9 August 2016 / Accepted: 12 September 2016 / Published: 1 October 2016

Abstract

Background: Therapy with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody improves outcomes for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) in the first-, second-, and third-line trial settings. In British Columbia, the use of EGFR inhibitors (EGFRIS) is confined to third-line therapy, which might lower the proportion of patients who receive this therapy. The objective of the present study was to describe EGFRI treatment patterns when those agents are limited to the third-line setting. The results will inform decisions about optimal use of EGFRI agents, including earlier in the course of therapy for metastatic disease. Methods: All patients with newly diagnosed mcrc who were referred to BC Cancer Agency clinics in 2009 were included in the study. Prognostic and treatment information was prospectively collected; KRAS test results were determined by chart review. Results: The study included 443 patients with a median age of 66 years. For the 321 patients who received systemic therapy, median survival was 22.3 months. Of the 117 patients who were treated with 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan, and who were potentially eligible for egfri therapy, 90% (105 patients) were tested for KRAS status. Of the 60 patients with KRAS wild-type tumours, 82% (49 patients) received egfri therapy. Conclusions: When EGFRI therapy is limited to the third-line setting, only a small proportion of patients receive such therapy, with death and poor performance status preventing its use in the rest. Availability of EGFRI in earlier lines of therapy could increase the proportion of patients treated with all active systemic agents.
Keywords: EGFR inhibitors; third-line therapy; metastatic colorectal cancer EGFR inhibitors; third-line therapy; metastatic colorectal cancer

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ho, M.Y.; Renouf, D.J.; Cheung, W.Y.; Lim, H.J.; Speers, C.H.; Zhou, C.; Kennecke, H.F. Patterns of Practice with Third-Line Anti-EGFR Antibody for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Curr. Oncol. 2016, 23, 329-333. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.23.3030

AMA Style

Ho MY, Renouf DJ, Cheung WY, Lim HJ, Speers CH, Zhou C, Kennecke HF. Patterns of Practice with Third-Line Anti-EGFR Antibody for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Current Oncology. 2016; 23(5):329-333. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.23.3030

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ho, M.Y., D.J. Renouf, W.Y. Cheung, H.J. Lim, C.H. Speers, C. Zhou, and H.F. Kennecke. 2016. "Patterns of Practice with Third-Line Anti-EGFR Antibody for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer" Current Oncology 23, no. 5: 329-333. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.23.3030

APA Style

Ho, M. Y., Renouf, D. J., Cheung, W. Y., Lim, H. J., Speers, C. H., Zhou, C., & Kennecke, H. F. (2016). Patterns of Practice with Third-Line Anti-EGFR Antibody for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Current Oncology, 23(5), 329-333. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.23.3030

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop