Next Article in Journal
Costs of Cervical Cancer Treatment: Population-Based Estimates from Ontario
Previous Article in Journal
Canadian Recommendations for the Management of Breakthrough Cancer Pain
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Current Oncology
Volume 23
Issue 2
10.3747/co.23.2773
curroncol-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Formal Evaluation of PYNK: Breast Cancer Program for Young Women—The Patient Perspective

by
L. Cohen
1,
J. Hamer
1,
C. Helwig
1,
K. Fergus
2,
A. Kiss
3,
R. Mandel
1,
B. Dawson
1,
A. Landsberg
1,
K. Shein
1,
N. Kay
1 and
E. Warner
1,*
1
Division of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada
2
Sunnybrook Odette Canc Ctr, Patient & Family Support Program, Div Psychol, Toronto, ON, Canada
3
Univ Toronto, Sunnybrook Res Inst, Dept Res Design & Biostat, Toronto, ON, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2016, 23(2), 102-108; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.23.2773
Submission received: 2 January 2016 / Revised: 4 February 2016 / Accepted: 5 March 2016 / Published: 1 April 2016

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the present study was to assess patient satisfaction with PYNK: Breast Cancer Program for Young Women so as to determine how the program might be improved and to provide feedback to donors. Methods: All PYNK patients who had consented to have their information entered in our database and who supplied us with their e-mail address were invited to complete a 58-item online questionnaire consisting of multiple choice and open-ended questions. Domains included demographics, provision of written and spoken information, support, infertility risk, research awareness, attitudes toward discharge, and general feedback. Results: Of 120 PYNK patients approached, 61 (51%) participated. More than 90% were satisfied or very satisfied with the timing, usefulness, and clarity of spoken and written information given, and 69% found the service and support provided by the nurse navigator to be the most helpful component of the program. Of those who had received systemic therapy, 93% recalled a health care provider initiating a discussion of the risk of treatment-related infertility, and 67% were referred to a fertility clinic. On the negative side, 11%–27% were unaware of various services provided by pynk, and 11% were unaware of PYNK’s ongoing research. One third of patients were unhappy or ambivalent about the prospect of discharge from the program. Conclusions: Patient satisfaction with this novel program for young women with breast cancer is high. This study highlights the critical role that the nurse navigator plays in patient support and dissemination of information. In contrast to other reported surveys of young cancer patients, PYNK patients are routinely given the opportunity to undergo fertility preservation.
Keywords: breast cancer; young women; support groups; oncofertility; psychosocial interventions; nurse navigator breast cancer; young women; support groups; oncofertility; psychosocial interventions; nurse navigator

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cohen, L.; Hamer, J.; Helwig, C.; Fergus, K.; Kiss, A.; Mandel, R.; Dawson, B.; Landsberg, A.; Shein, K.; Kay, N.; et al. Formal Evaluation of PYNK: Breast Cancer Program for Young Women—The Patient Perspective. Curr. Oncol. 2016, 23, 102-108. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.23.2773

AMA Style

Cohen L, Hamer J, Helwig C, Fergus K, Kiss A, Mandel R, Dawson B, Landsberg A, Shein K, Kay N, et al. Formal Evaluation of PYNK: Breast Cancer Program for Young Women—The Patient Perspective. Current Oncology. 2016; 23(2):102-108. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.23.2773

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cohen, L., J. Hamer, C. Helwig, K. Fergus, A. Kiss, R. Mandel, B. Dawson, A. Landsberg, K. Shein, N. Kay, and et al. 2016. "Formal Evaluation of PYNK: Breast Cancer Program for Young Women—The Patient Perspective" Current Oncology 23, no. 2: 102-108. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.23.2773

APA Style

Cohen, L., Hamer, J., Helwig, C., Fergus, K., Kiss, A., Mandel, R., Dawson, B., Landsberg, A., Shein, K., Kay, N., & Warner, E. (2016). Formal Evaluation of PYNK: Breast Cancer Program for Young Women—The Patient Perspective. Current Oncology, 23(2), 102-108. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.23.2773

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop