Next Article in Journal
Correction: Roll et al. Conceptualization and Validation of the Occupation Insecurity Scale (OCIS): Measuring Employees’ Occupation Insecurity Due to Automation. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 2589
Previous Article in Journal
Putting Indigenous Cultures and Indigenous Knowledges Front and Centre to Clinical Practice: Katherine Hospital Case Example
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

What Can Public Health Administration Learn from the Decision-Making Processes during COVID-19?

by
Andrew Joyce
1,*,
Emma Risely
1,
Celia Green
2,
Gemma Carey
2 and
Fiona Buick
3
1
Centre for Social Impact, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn 3122, Australia
2
Centre for Social Impact, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia
3
School of Business, University of New South Wales, Canberra 2612, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2024, 21(1), 4; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21010004
Submission received: 7 November 2023 / Revised: 8 December 2023 / Accepted: 18 December 2023 / Published: 20 December 2023

Abstract

Human decision-making is prone to biases and the use of heuristics that can result in making logical errors and erroneous causal connections, which were evident during COVID-19 policy developments and potentially contributed to the inadequate and costly responses to COVID-19. There are decision-making frameworks and tools that can improve organisational decision-making. It is currently unknown as to what extent public health administrations have been using these structured organisational-level decision-making processes to counter decision-making biases. Current reviews of COVID-19 policies could examine not just the content of policy decisions but also how decisions were made. We recommend that understanding whether these decision-making processes have been used in public health administration is key to policy reform and learning from the COVID-19 pandemic. This is a research and practice gap that has significant implications for a wide range of public health policy areas and potentially could have made a profound difference in COVID-19-related policy responses.
Keywords: decision-making processes; COVID-19; public health; administration; organisational capacity decision-making processes; COVID-19; public health; administration; organisational capacity

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Joyce, A.; Risely, E.; Green, C.; Carey, G.; Buick, F. What Can Public Health Administration Learn from the Decision-Making Processes during COVID-19? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2024, 21, 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21010004

AMA Style

Joyce A, Risely E, Green C, Carey G, Buick F. What Can Public Health Administration Learn from the Decision-Making Processes during COVID-19? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2024; 21(1):4. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21010004

Chicago/Turabian Style

Joyce, Andrew, Emma Risely, Celia Green, Gemma Carey, and Fiona Buick. 2024. "What Can Public Health Administration Learn from the Decision-Making Processes during COVID-19?" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 21, no. 1: 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21010004

APA Style

Joyce, A., Risely, E., Green, C., Carey, G., & Buick, F. (2024). What Can Public Health Administration Learn from the Decision-Making Processes during COVID-19? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 21(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21010004

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop