Next Article in Journal
Implementing Low-Cost, Community-Based Exercise Programs for Middle-Aged and Older Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: What Are the Benefits for Glycemic Control and Cardiovascular Risk?
Previous Article in Journal
Association between Childhood Diarrhoeal Incidence and Climatic Factors in Urban and Rural Settings in the Health District of Mbour, Senegal
Open AccessArticle

Collaborative Visual Analytics: A Health Analytics Approach to Injury Prevention

1
Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon
2
School of Interactive Arts and Technology, Simon Fraser University, Surrey, BC V3T 0A3, Canada
3
The BC Injury Research and Prevention Unit, BC Children’s Hospital, Vancouver, BC V6H 3V4, Canada
4
Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6H 3V4, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: David C. Schwebel
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14(9), 1056; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14091056
Received: 29 July 2017 / Revised: 24 August 2017 / Accepted: 5 September 2017 / Published: 12 September 2017
Background: Accurate understanding of complex health data is critical in order to deal with wicked health problems and make timely decisions. Wicked problems refer to ill-structured and dynamic problems that combine multidimensional elements, which often preclude the conventional problem solving approach. This pilot study introduces visual analytics (VA) methods to multi-stakeholder decision-making sessions about child injury prevention; Methods: Inspired by the Delphi method, we introduced a novel methodology—group analytics (GA). GA was pilot-tested to evaluate the impact of collaborative visual analytics on facilitating problem solving and supporting decision-making. We conducted two GA sessions. Collected data included stakeholders’ observations, audio and video recordings, questionnaires, and follow up interviews. The GA sessions were analyzed using the Joint Activity Theory protocol analysis methods; Results: The GA methodology triggered the emergence of ‘common ground’ among stakeholders. This common ground evolved throughout the sessions to enhance stakeholders’ verbal and non-verbal communication, as well as coordination of joint activities and ultimately collaboration on problem solving and decision-making; Conclusions: Understanding complex health data is necessary for informed decisions. Equally important, in this case, is the use of the group analytics methodology to achieve ‘common ground’ among diverse stakeholders about health data and their implications. View Full-Text
Keywords: group analytics; health analytics; human computer interaction; distributed cognition; collaborative visual analytics; problem solving and decision-making group analytics; health analytics; human computer interaction; distributed cognition; collaborative visual analytics; problem solving and decision-making
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Al-Hajj, S.; Fisher, B.; Smith, J.; Pike, I. Collaborative Visual Analytics: A Health Analytics Approach to Injury Prevention. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 1056.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop