Next Article in Journal
Linear Interval Approximation of Sensor Characteristics with Inflection Points
Next Article in Special Issue
FedBranched: Leveraging Federated Learning for Anomaly-Aware Load Forecasting in Energy Networks
Previous Article in Journal
A Novel IoT-Enabled Healthcare Monitoring Framework and Improved Grey Wolf Optimization Algorithm-Based Deep Convolution Neural Network Model for Early Diagnosis of Lung Cancer
Previous Article in Special Issue
On Coverage of Critical Nodes in UAV-Assisted Emergency Networks
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Two-Stage Multi-Agent EV Charging Coordination Scheme for Maximizing Grid Performance and Customer Satisfaction

1
Department of Electrical Engineering, Mirpur University of Science & Technology (MUST), Mirpur 10250, Pakistan
2
James Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
3
Artificial Intelligence Research Center (AIRC), College of Engineering and Information Technology, Ajman University, Ajman P.O. Box 346, United Arab Emirates
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2023, 23(6), 2925; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23062925
Submission received: 15 January 2023 / Revised: 14 February 2023 / Accepted: 23 February 2023 / Published: 8 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Machine Learning Techniques for Energy Efficient IoT Networks)

Abstract

Advancements in technology and awareness of energy conservation and environmental protection have increased the adoption rate of electric vehicles (EVs). The rapidly increasing adoption of EVs may affect grid operation adversely. However, the increased integration of EVs, if managed appropriately, can positively impact the performance of the electrical network in terms of power losses, voltage deviations and transformer overloads. This paper presents a two-stage multi-agent-based scheme for the coordinated charging scheduling of EVs. The first stage uses particle swarm optimization (PSO) at the distribution network operator (DNO) level to determine the optimal power allocation among the participating EV aggregator agents to minimize power losses and voltage deviations, whereas the second stage at the EV aggregator agents level employs a genetic algorithm (GA) to align the charging activities to achieve customers’ charging satisfaction in terms of minimum charging cost and waiting time. The proposed method is implemented on the IEEE-33 bus network connected with low-voltage nodes. The coordinated charging plan is executed with the time of use (ToU) and real-time pricing (RTP) schemes, considering EVs’ random arrival and departure with two penetration levels. The simulations show promising results in terms of network performance and overall customer charging satisfaction.
Keywords: charging cost; electric vehicles; power loss; voltage deviation; waiting time charging cost; electric vehicles; power loss; voltage deviation; waiting time

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Amin, A.; Mahmood, A.; Khan, A.R.; Arshad, K.; Assaleh, K.; Zoha, A. A Two-Stage Multi-Agent EV Charging Coordination Scheme for Maximizing Grid Performance and Customer Satisfaction. Sensors 2023, 23, 2925. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23062925

AMA Style

Amin A, Mahmood A, Khan AR, Arshad K, Assaleh K, Zoha A. A Two-Stage Multi-Agent EV Charging Coordination Scheme for Maximizing Grid Performance and Customer Satisfaction. Sensors. 2023; 23(6):2925. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23062925

Chicago/Turabian Style

Amin, Adil, Anzar Mahmood, Ahsan Raza Khan, Kamran Arshad, Khaled Assaleh, and Ahmed Zoha. 2023. "A Two-Stage Multi-Agent EV Charging Coordination Scheme for Maximizing Grid Performance and Customer Satisfaction" Sensors 23, no. 6: 2925. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23062925

APA Style

Amin, A., Mahmood, A., Khan, A. R., Arshad, K., Assaleh, K., & Zoha, A. (2023). A Two-Stage Multi-Agent EV Charging Coordination Scheme for Maximizing Grid Performance and Customer Satisfaction. Sensors, 23(6), 2925. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23062925

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop