Next Article in Journal
Random Access for Underwater Acoustic Cellular Systems
Previous Article in Journal
An Intraoperative Visualization System Using Hyperspectral Imaging to Aid in Brain Tumor Delineation
Article

A Review of Depth and Normal Fusion Algorithms

1
Center for Vision, Automation and Control, Austrian Institute of Technology, Vienna 1210, Austria
2
Institute of Computer Graphics and Vision, Graz University of Technology, Graz 8010, Austria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2018, 18(2), 431; https://doi.org/10.3390/s18020431
Received: 11 November 2017 / Revised: 21 December 2017 / Accepted: 26 January 2018 / Published: 1 February 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Physical Sensors)
Geometric surface information such as depth maps and surface normals can be acquired by various methods such as stereo light fields, shape from shading and photometric stereo techniques. We compare several algorithms which deal with the combination of depth with surface normal information in order to reconstruct a refined depth map. The reasons for performance differences are examined from the perspective of alternative formulations of surface normals for depth reconstruction. We review and analyze methods in a systematic way. Based on our findings, we introduce a new generalized fusion method, which is formulated as a least squares problem and outperforms previous methods in the depth error domain by introducing a novel normal weighting that performs closer to the geodesic distance measure. Furthermore, a novel method is introduced based on Total Generalized Variation (TGV) which further outperforms previous approaches in terms of the geodesic normal distance error and maintains comparable quality in the depth error domain. View Full-Text
Keywords: depth reconstruction; surface normals; optimization; Total Generalized Variation; primal-dual algorithm; computational imaging; least squares depth reconstruction; surface normals; optimization; Total Generalized Variation; primal-dual algorithm; computational imaging; least squares
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Antensteiner, D.; Štolc, S.; Pock, T. A Review of Depth and Normal Fusion Algorithms. Sensors 2018, 18, 431. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18020431

AMA Style

Antensteiner D, Štolc S, Pock T. A Review of Depth and Normal Fusion Algorithms. Sensors. 2018; 18(2):431. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18020431

Chicago/Turabian Style

Antensteiner, Doris, Svorad Štolc, and Thomas Pock. 2018. "A Review of Depth and Normal Fusion Algorithms" Sensors 18, no. 2: 431. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18020431

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop