Next Article in Journal
Toxicological Effects of Phthalate Plasticizers in Zebrafish Models: A Review
Previous Article in Journal
Melamine-Based Porous Organic Frameworks as Adsorbent Materials for the Removal of Organic Dyes from Wastewater
Previous Article in Special Issue
Phenolic Profile, Antioxidant Capacity, and Alpha-Glucosidase Inhibitory Activity of High-Oil Corn Doubled-Haploid Hybrids from Mexico
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Influence of Harvesting Method on Essential Oil Composition, Antioxidant Activity, and Operational Efficiency in Anatolian Sage (Salvia fruticosa Mill.)

by
Sadiye Ayşe Çelik
Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Field Crops, Division of Medicinal Plants, Selçuk University, Konya 42130, Turkey
Molecules 2026, 31(12), 2023; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31122023 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 16 March 2026 / Revised: 1 May 2026 / Accepted: 2 May 2026 / Published: 9 June 2026

Abstract

Salvia fruticosa Mill. (Anatolian sage) is an important medicinal and aromatic plant widely valued for its essential oil and phenolic compounds. Harvesting practices may influence both biomass yield and the chemical quality of plant raw materials. This study evaluated the effects of manual and machine harvesting on selected physical characteristics, essential oil composition, mineral content, and antioxidant-related phytochemical properties of S. fruticosa cultivated under Central Anatolian conditions, together with the operational performance of both harvesting methods. Manual harvesting resulted in higher fresh and dry biomass yields and a greater essential oil content (2.03%) compared with machine harvesting (1.57%). Mineral analysis showed that Ca, Zn, Cu, and B concentrations were higher in manually harvested samples, whereas K and Mg contents were slightly higher in machine-harvested plants. Essential oil characterization demonstrated that 1,8-cineole was the dominant compound and its proportion differed markedly between harvesting methods, reaching 43.07% in manual harvesting and 21.77% in machine harvesting. Antioxidant activity determined by the DPPH assay was 0.093 mg TE mL−1 for manual harvesting and 0.096 mg TE mL−1 for machine harvesting. Additional phytochemical analyses revealed total phenolic contents of 134.6 and 129.3 mg GAE g−1 extract, total flavonoid contents of 22.7 and 25.2 mg QE g−1 extract and FRAP values of 382 and 336 µmol Fe2+ g−1 extract for manual and machine harvesting, respectively. These findings indicate that harvesting technique affects certain compositional parameters but causes only limited changes in the overall antioxidant potential of S. fruticosa extracts.
Keywords: Salvia fruticosa; Anatolian sage; harvesting method; essential oil composition; phenolic compounds; antioxidant activity Salvia fruticosa; Anatolian sage; harvesting method; essential oil composition; phenolic compounds; antioxidant activity

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Çelik, S.A. Influence of Harvesting Method on Essential Oil Composition, Antioxidant Activity, and Operational Efficiency in Anatolian Sage (Salvia fruticosa Mill.). Molecules 2026, 31, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31122023

AMA Style

Çelik SA. Influence of Harvesting Method on Essential Oil Composition, Antioxidant Activity, and Operational Efficiency in Anatolian Sage (Salvia fruticosa Mill.). Molecules. 2026; 31(12):2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31122023

Chicago/Turabian Style

Çelik, Sadiye Ayşe. 2026. "Influence of Harvesting Method on Essential Oil Composition, Antioxidant Activity, and Operational Efficiency in Anatolian Sage (Salvia fruticosa Mill.)" Molecules 31, no. 12: 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31122023

APA Style

Çelik, S. A. (2026). Influence of Harvesting Method on Essential Oil Composition, Antioxidant Activity, and Operational Efficiency in Anatolian Sage (Salvia fruticosa Mill.). Molecules, 31(12), 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31122023

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop