Next Article in Journal
Entropic Analysis of Geographical Subzones for the Maule Mw8.8 (2010) Earthquake
Previous Article in Journal
Divergence and Model Adequacy, a Semiparametric Case Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cyber Risk Management of API-Enabled Financial Crime in Open Banking Services
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Beyond Positive Response Rates: Capturing Information Richness in Workplace AI Acceptance Using Belief Structure TOPSIS

1
Faculty of Computer Science, Bialystok University of Technology, Wiejska 45A, 15-351 Bialystok, Poland
2
Department of Operations Research, University of Economics in Katowice, 1 Maja 50, 40-287 Katowice, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Entropy 2026, 28(7), 759; https://doi.org/10.3390/e28070759
Submission received: 4 June 2026 / Revised: 24 June 2026 / Accepted: 26 June 2026 / Published: 2 July 2026

Abstract

This study applies the Belief Structure TOPSIS (B-TOPSIS) method to analyse cross-country attitudes toward AI-driven workplace practices across the EU27. The proposed approach preserves the full distribution of survey responses, explicitly incorporates uncertainty, and evaluates alternatives based on their distance from ideal and anti-ideal belief structures. Using data from Special Eurobarometer 554, we construct individual B-TOPSIS indexes for eight AI-related workplace applications and an aggregated B-TOPSIS index capturing overall acceptance. The results reveal systematic cross-country differentiation. Activities such as gathering applicant information, allocating work, and processing employee data generally receive moderate acceptance. Safety-focused applications are widely supported, whereas ethically sensitive practices, such as employee monitoring and automated dismissal, face low acceptance. Additionally, sensitivity analysis based on Monte Carlo simulation and stochastic dominance demonstrates that the obtained rankings remain highly stable under alternative assumptions regarding utility functions, confirming the robustness of the proposed framework. A comparison with rankings derived from total positive responses, commonly used in EU reports, shows that although the two approaches are strongly correlated, they are not interchangeable. By retaining the complete response structure, the proposed method captures differences in response intensity that are obscured by conventional summary measures. The findings highlight the multidimensional and conditional nature of workplace AI acceptance in the EU and demonstrate the value of belief-structure-based approach for analysing survey data.
Keywords: multi-criteria analysis; survey data; information; belief structure; B-TOPSIS; uncertainty; workplace algorithms; artificial intelligence multi-criteria analysis; survey data; information; belief structure; B-TOPSIS; uncertainty; workplace algorithms; artificial intelligence

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Roszkowska, E.; Wachowicz, T. Beyond Positive Response Rates: Capturing Information Richness in Workplace AI Acceptance Using Belief Structure TOPSIS. Entropy 2026, 28, 759. https://doi.org/10.3390/e28070759

AMA Style

Roszkowska E, Wachowicz T. Beyond Positive Response Rates: Capturing Information Richness in Workplace AI Acceptance Using Belief Structure TOPSIS. Entropy. 2026; 28(7):759. https://doi.org/10.3390/e28070759

Chicago/Turabian Style

Roszkowska, Ewa, and Tomasz Wachowicz. 2026. "Beyond Positive Response Rates: Capturing Information Richness in Workplace AI Acceptance Using Belief Structure TOPSIS" Entropy 28, no. 7: 759. https://doi.org/10.3390/e28070759

APA Style

Roszkowska, E., & Wachowicz, T. (2026). Beyond Positive Response Rates: Capturing Information Richness in Workplace AI Acceptance Using Belief Structure TOPSIS. Entropy, 28(7), 759. https://doi.org/10.3390/e28070759

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop