sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Sustainability Accounting in the Global Context

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 August 2023) | Viewed by 7406

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Business School, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 4SE, UK
Interests: sustainability; sustainability reporting and corporate governance

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Business and Law, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth P01 3DE, UK
Interests: corporate disclosure; social and environmental responsibility; integrated reporting; corporate governance; reporting quality
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Guangzhou International Institute of Finance, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China
Interests: sustainability; sustainable development; financial econometrics; behavioral finance; national accounts

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In the challenging context of the 21st century, understanding sustainability accounting has become increasingly important for businesses, investors, governments and policy makers. Research has a key role in providing new insights. Despite the steadily increasing volume of research in social accounting, there remain many topics to investigate, with a specific focus on the global context.

We are interested in seeing more research that examines the role of accounting in advancing social and environmental issues, including evaluations of social and environmental reporting practices and their motivation, the role of accountants in driving CSR activities (e.g., in the preparation of CSR reports, investigating CSR expenditure patters, the provision of assurance services over CSR reports, the existence of CSR committees). Further research can focus on evaluating the credibility of CSR disclosures through assurance services and investigating the cost of assurance. This shall create opportunities for accounting professionals who have valuable resource skills that are transferable to CSR reports. There is also a scope to better interrogate the developing global financial architecture (which resulted in the recent health pandemic and financial crisis), and its potential inferences for researching auditing practices of non-financial information in different national and international contexts.

There is a need to continuously formulate and review policies and standards of corporate governance, especially when considering the significant changing environment for corporate governance in the information age and technological advances, impacting the nature of auditable social information in the process. In this context, considering new regulations should provide for the regulation of corporate boards in terms of improved stakeholder rights and more transparency vis-à-vis roles and responsibilities. Moreover, research on corporate governance has focused on listed firms; small- and medium-sized firms also play a substantial role in sustainability. Therefore, future research needs to be directed to these companies and examine the role that corporate governance mechanisms of these companies could play in improving social and environmental conditions.

Future research needs to investigate the existence and appropriateness of government legislation such as carbon taxes and carbon disclosure in the global context, as means of reducing the environmental impact of business activities.

On the other side, investigating reasons that allow firms to be socially irresponsible in the global context would be an interesting field of research. A focus beyond business practices and a critical review of engagement practices are needed in order to improve corporate reporting and accountability within societies. There is a scarcity of critical theory that brings critical attention to challenges facing sustainability accounting, including but not limited to climate change issues, human rights, and food security.

Finally, we are interested in further research that considers cultural contextual analysis in relation to the implementation of sustainability accounting. Future research could benefit from more attention to cultural specificities that impact the implementation of sustainability accounting in the global context.

Dr. Habiba Al-Shaer
Dr. Khaldoon Albitar
Prof. Dr. Zhenghui Li
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • sustainability
  • sustainability and stakeholder engagement
  • socially responsibly investment
  • sustainable development and economic growth
  • environmental issues and innovation
  • advancing environmental practices
  • integrated reporting
  • sustainability and assurance
  • climate change
  • human right
  • food security issues
  • modern slavery
  • carbon activities
  • social dimensions
  • stakeholders’ reactions
  • sustainability and social media

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

17 pages, 780 KiB  
Article
The Role of Privatisation in Sustaining Auditor Independence: Evidence from the Developing Markets
by Abdul Rahman Al Natour, Naim Salameh Al-Qadi, Rasmi Meqbel, Hala Zaidan, Hamzah Al-Mawali and Manaf Al-Okaily
Sustainability 2023, 15(8), 6350; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086350 - 7 Apr 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1430
Abstract
This paper investigates the role of structural ownership reforms in sustaining auditor independence through split-share structure reform (SSSR). Studying a sample of 1826 Chinese listed firms over the SSSR period in China, the results showed that auditor independence sustainability was less pronounced in [...] Read more.
This paper investigates the role of structural ownership reforms in sustaining auditor independence through split-share structure reform (SSSR). Studying a sample of 1826 Chinese listed firms over the SSSR period in China, the results showed that auditor independence sustainability was less pronounced in local state-owned enterprises (LSOEs) compared with non-state-owned Enterprises (NSOEs). Nevertheless, after the SSSR, there is a significant enhancement in sustaining auditor independence. In particular, auditor independence sustainability is pronounced by providing an unqualified audit opinion, including an ‘emphasis of matter paragraph’ instead of issuing a modified audit opinion. This study contributes to the literature in two ways. First, it gives an empirical investigation into auditor independence sustainability efforts by the Chinese government through the SSSR. Second, it helps regulators and policy-makers in China and other emerging markets in evaluating the SSSR efforts to improve auditor independence. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability Accounting in the Global Context)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 317 KiB  
Article
Macro Uncertainty Impacts on ESG Performance and Carbon Emission Reduction Targets
by Maha Alandejani and Habiba Al-Shaer
Sustainability 2023, 15(5), 4249; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054249 - 27 Feb 2023
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 3594
Abstract
This study examines the impact of three macro uncertainty factors: economic policy uncertainty (EPU), political instability (PIS), and cultural uncertainty avoidance (UA), on corporate environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance and carbon emission reduction targets. Additionally, we examine whether these macro factors are [...] Read more.
This study examines the impact of three macro uncertainty factors: economic policy uncertainty (EPU), political instability (PIS), and cultural uncertainty avoidance (UA), on corporate environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance and carbon emission reduction targets. Additionally, we examine whether these macro factors are affected by the profitability of the company. Using an unbalanced sample of companies located in the USA, China, and the UK during the period 2013–2020, results show that during times of economic uncertainty, companies are more likely to engage in ESG activities, including establishing emission reduction targets. Companies in countries with lower levels of political stability (PS) exhibit greater levels of social and environmental engagements, and companies operating in societies that tolerate risks, including the risk associated with climate change, are more likely to have better ESG performance and be committed to emission reduction targets. The results also suggest that profitable companies are more likely to deal with uncertain environments successfully, as they have the required resources to invest in ESG. The study suggests several practical implications for managers and policymakers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability Accounting in the Global Context)
22 pages, 802 KiB  
Article
The Effect of Apparent and Intellectual Sustainability Independence on the Credibility Gap of the Accounting Information
by Madher E. Hamdallah, Salem Al-N’eimat, Anan F. Srouji, Manaf Al-Okaily and Khaldoon Albitar
Sustainability 2022, 14(21), 14259; https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114259 - 1 Nov 2022
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 1671
Abstract
This study aims to recognize the sustainability independence of the Jordanian Association of Certified Public Accountants (JACPA/JCPA) and its impact on the credibility gap of the accounting information of companies operating in Jordan. This study demonstrates the effects of the apparent and intellectual [...] Read more.
This study aims to recognize the sustainability independence of the Jordanian Association of Certified Public Accountants (JACPA/JCPA) and its impact on the credibility gap of the accounting information of companies operating in Jordan. This study demonstrates the effects of the apparent and intellectual sustainability independence on the credibility gap of accounting information. A total of 93 online questionnaires were analyzed using multiple regressions. The results revealed an impact of the apparent independence of the JCPA on the quality of the information credibility gap related to service fees, and no statistically significant impact for both consulting and accounting service fees was found. This study also concludes research regarding the impact of intellectual independence of the JCPA on the information credibility gap regarding the code of professional ethics and the commitment of auditing offices to their customers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability Accounting in the Global Context)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop