Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (181)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = spray drift

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
25 pages, 4990 KB  
Article
Evaluation of Spray Application Techniques and Air Induction Nozzles as Spray Drift Mitigation Measures in Vineyards
by Georgios Bourodimos, Michael Koutsiaras, Vasilis Psiroukis, Aikaterini Kasimati and Spyros Fountas
AgriEngineering 2026, 8(4), 132; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering8040132 - 1 Apr 2026
Viewed by 370
Abstract
Spray drift is one of the most significant challenges in the application of Plant Protection Products (PPPs), as it contributes to water, soil, and food contamination and is highly associated with health risks to agricultural workers, bystanders, and rural residents. Spray drift is [...] Read more.
Spray drift is one of the most significant challenges in the application of Plant Protection Products (PPPs), as it contributes to water, soil, and food contamination and is highly associated with health risks to agricultural workers, bystanders, and rural residents. Spray drift is defined as the fraction of PPP that is carried away from the target area by air currents during application. Factors such as high wind speeds, low relative humidity, and elevated temperatures increase the risk of drift by promoting droplet evaporation and off-target movement. Technological advancements in spraying equipment, such as low-drift and air induction nozzles, have been shown to significantly reduce drift potential. Air induction nozzles mix air with the spray liquid, creating larger droplets that are less susceptible to drift. The primary objective of this study was to quantify the spray drift reduction achieved using cost-effective and easily applicable drift mitigation techniques that do not require specialized and expensive equipment compared to conventional application methods in vineyards under Southern European conditions. Field measurements followed the ISO 22866:2005 protocol, using a conventional axial fan air-assisted sprayer that is commonly used by vineyard farmers in Greece. This study was conducted on Savatiano vines, the most widely cultivated winemaking variety in the Attica region, characterized by its low height. The spraying techniques evaluated as spray drift mitigation measures were one-sided spraying applications of the outer vineyard row; one-sided spraying applications of the two last rows; spraying with closed air assistance on the outer rows; and finally, spraying with the use of air induction nozzles. Results indicated that each technique produced varying amounts of sedimenting drift over distance. Spraying without air assistance consistently generated the lowest levels of drift at almost all distances. While air induction nozzles initially increased drift deposition within the first 4 m, they significantly reduced drift beyond 5 m. These findings demonstrate that simple operational adjustments to conventional vineyard sprayers, particularly reducing or switching off air assistance in outer rows, can substantially decrease spray drift without requiring additional investment in specialized equipment. Overall, spraying without air support achieved the greatest drift reduction across all distances from the vineyard, followed by air induction nozzles, which were equally effective at further distances (past 5 m) but less so near the application area. The results provide practical guidance for vineyard growers seeking low-cost strategies to minimize agricultural input losses, environmental contamination, and improve the sustainability of pesticide applications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Agricultural Mechanization and Machinery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1545 KB  
Article
A Practical Formulation Strategy for Spray-Applied Waterborne 2K Wood Coatings: Emulsion Design, Hardener Selection, and Rheology Tuning
by Guanlai Li, Yitong Niu and Azniwati Abd Aziz
Coatings 2026, 16(4), 416; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings16040416 - 31 Mar 2026
Viewed by 467
Abstract
Waterborne two-component (2K) coatings are attractive for spray-applied wood finishing because crosslinking can provide durable films while reducing VOC emissions; however, practical use is often limited by short post-mixing workability, viscosity drift after activation, and restricted film-forming feasibility under ambient conditions. This study [...] Read more.
Waterborne two-component (2K) coatings are attractive for spray-applied wood finishing because crosslinking can provide durable films while reducing VOC emissions; however, practical use is often limited by short post-mixing workability, viscosity drift after activation, and restricted film-forming feasibility under ambient conditions. This study established a stepwise formulation strategy by sequentially screening emulsion Tg distribution, neutralizer–pH conditions, methacrylic acid (MAA) content, hardener type, and rheology packages. Increasing shell Tg progressively raised minimum film-forming temperature, whereas gel time increased sharply beyond an intermediate range, defining a practical trade-off between ambient film formation and post-mixing workability. Neutralizer identity strongly affected the gel time–pH response, and a practical condition around pH 6.6 was selected for subsequent screening. Increasing MAA reduced particle size but also increased viscosity and, above 3 wt%, caused pronounced foaming after activation. Hardener screening showed that film-forming viability had to be satisfied before viscosity stability could be used for ranking; an HDI/IPDI-based hardener gave the lowest viscosity drift among the film-forming candidates. Final validation showed stable appearance and largely unchanged film properties from 0 to 7 h after mixing, with the first measurable deviations appearing at 8 h. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section High-Energy Beam Surface Engineering and Coatings)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

21 pages, 3792 KB  
Article
Dynamics of Droplet Spectra and Physicochemical Properties Under Different Adjuvants and Spraying Pressures
by Sérgio Basílio, Marconi Ribeiro Furtado Júnior, Cleyton Batista de Alvarenga, Edney Leandro de Vitória, Beatriz Costalonga Vargas, Salvatore Privitera, Sebastian Lupica, Antonio Trusso Sfrazzetto, Emanuele Cerruto and Giuseppe Manetto
Agronomy 2026, 16(6), 672; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16060672 - 23 Mar 2026
Viewed by 401
Abstract
Droplet size is a key factor in minimizing spray drift. Different types of adjuvants and sprayer operating pressures can affect the droplet size distribution in various ways. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of commercial adjuvants, namely, acids and surfactant (AS), silicone [...] Read more.
Droplet size is a key factor in minimizing spray drift. Different types of adjuvants and sprayer operating pressures can affect the droplet size distribution in various ways. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of commercial adjuvants, namely, acids and surfactant (AS), silicone surfactant (SS), organosilicone surfactant (OS), mineral oil (MO and MO2), and copolymer (CP) adjuvants, on the droplet spectra and physicochemical properties of aqueous solutions. Hydrogen potential (pH), volumetric mass (VM), electrical conductivity (EC), surface tension (ST), contact angle (CA), and droplet spectra were measured. The droplet spectrum variables, including volumetric diameters (Dv0.1, Dv0.5, and Dv0.9), the Relative Span Factor (RSF), and percentages of the total volume of droplets with a diameter smaller than 100 µm (V100) and larger than 500 µm (V500), were determined using a laser diffraction particle analyzer (Malvern Spraytec). Spraying tests were carried out using the AXI 11003 flat fan nozzle at pressures of (0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5) MPa. The increase in pressure increased the V100 and the RSF, with greater sensitivity observed for SS. Adjuvants such as AS, MO2 and OS showed a more balanced trend, with a smaller increase in fine droplets and a greater reduction in coarse droplets. The principal component analysis (PCA) revealed that the droplet spectrum variables were the ones that best explained the variation among the solutions. A negative correlation was identified between EC and other physicochemical properties, such as pH, ST, and CA. Therefore, these properties alone did not determine the atomization pattern. The study demonstrates that optimizing spray quality and minimizing drift require a combined consideration of adjuvant physicochemical properties and their interaction with operational pressure. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 9120 KB  
Article
Experimental Study on the Airflow Field Distribution Characteristics of a Multi-Outlet Air-Assisted Orchard Sprayer with Variable Inlet Area
by Fan Feng, Yanlong Zhang, Zhichong Wang, Hanjie Dou, Yanlei Liu, Yue Zhong, Changyuan Zhai and Jianjun Hao
Agronomy 2026, 16(4), 450; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16040450 - 14 Feb 2026
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 441
Abstract
Multi-outlet air-assisted sprayers are increasingly used for directional and zoned airflow to match varying canopy structures. In this study, a self-developed multi-outlet orchard air-assisted sprayer was investigated. Airflow velocity and direction were tested at different inlet areas, heights, and downstream horizontal distances using [...] Read more.
Multi-outlet air-assisted sprayers are increasingly used for directional and zoned airflow to match varying canopy structures. In this study, a self-developed multi-outlet orchard air-assisted sprayer was investigated. Airflow velocity and direction were tested at different inlet areas, heights, and downstream horizontal distances using a three-dimensional ultrasonic anemometer. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and regression modeling were applied to elucidate the effects of these three factors on airflow velocity, horizontal angle (θ), and elevation angle (Φ). The results showed that a stable alternating “primary jet–interaction zone” structure was formed in the spatial airflow field under all operating conditions, indicating that the fundamental airflow pattern was mainly governed by the sprayer layout. Varying the inlet area did not alter the basic airflow structure; however, the intensity and directional stability of the primary jets were significantly modified. Larger inlet openings produced higher airflow velocities, with a maximum near-field velocity of 19.7 m s−1, whereas smaller inlet openings resulted in faster far-field attenuation and more pronounced diffusion. Increasing the inlet area caused the θ distribution peak to converge toward 0°, thereby improving axial coherence and directional stability. In contrast, decreasing the inlet area shifted Φ toward more negative values, with Φ reaching approximately −20° in the far field; moreover, far-field differences in Φ were more pronounced. Under the minimum inlet opening area condition (S1), the airflow velocity within the region 80–100 cm from the outlet can be stably maintained above 3 m/s, with a relatively uniform velocity distribution. This is beneficial for improving droplet deposition uniformity within the canopy and reducing droplet drift in non-target areas. Based on the experimental data, a regression model for mean airflow velocity was established (R2 = 0.873), demonstrating good predictive performance and indicating that inlet-opening regulation is feasible. These findings provide a basis for airflow matching and spray-parameter optimization for different canopy structures. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Precision Pesticide Spraying Technology and Equipment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 746 KB  
Article
Evaluation of DJI AGRAS T30, Airplane, and Ground Sprayer Spray Deposition on Tassel-Stage Corn
by Livia Ianhez Pereira, Xiao Li, Ryan Langemeier, Justin McCaghren, Simerjeet Virk and Andrew J. Price
Agronomy 2026, 16(4), 446; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16040446 - 13 Feb 2026
Viewed by 548
Abstract
Mid- to late-season crop protection in tall crops like corn often relies on aerial spraying, including with unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). However, information on UAV spray consistency remains limited. This study compared spray depositions from a DJI Agras T30 UAV, airplane, and ground [...] Read more.
Mid- to late-season crop protection in tall crops like corn often relies on aerial spraying, including with unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). However, information on UAV spray consistency remains limited. This study compared spray depositions from a DJI Agras T30 UAV, airplane, and ground sprayer on tassel-stage corn to simulate fungicide applications, while assessing the influences of key UAV operational parameters and the use of drift reducing agent (DRA). At the Alabama site, UAV applications without DRA increased spray dye concentration by 145.8% on upper leaves and 51.1% on ear leaves compared with airplane applications at 18.7 L ha−1. DRA 1 reduced upper leaf deposition, but both DRAs improved ear leaf deposition relative to no DRA and airplane treatments. UAVs without DRA and airplanes showed similar variability in dye concentration, while DRA use enhanced deposition uniformity. At the Georgia site, no treatment differences were found on ear leaves, but UAV and ground sprayer treatments produced higher upper leaf deposits than airplane application. Increasing UAV swath by 1.5 m at 2.4 m height reduced deposition, while a 4.6 m swath increased it, regardless of altitude. Overall, results suggest that downwash from UAV propellers enhances spray deposition within the crop canopy, and DRAs further improve this effect and influence spray uniformity. Additional studies on UAV spray parameters and droplet size are needed to better understand downdraft influence. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 4614 KB  
Article
Construction of a CFD Simulation and Prediction Model for Pesticide Droplet Drift in Agricultural UAV Spraying
by Qingqing Zhou, Songchao Zhang, Meng Huang, Chen Cai, Haidong Zhang, Yuxuan Jiao and Xinyu Xue
Agronomy 2026, 16(1), 129; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16010129 - 5 Jan 2026
Viewed by 884
Abstract
This study employed a combined approach of computational fluid dynamics (CFD), numerical simulations, and wind tunnel tests to investigate droplet drift characteristics and develop prediction models in order to address the issues of low pesticide utilization rates and high drift risk, associated with [...] Read more.
This study employed a combined approach of computational fluid dynamics (CFD), numerical simulations, and wind tunnel tests to investigate droplet drift characteristics and develop prediction models in order to address the issues of low pesticide utilization rates and high drift risk, associated with droplet drift during agricultural unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) spraying, as well as the unreliable results of field experiments. Firstly, a numerical model of the rotor wind field was established using the multiple reference frame (MRF) method, while the realizable k-ε turbulence model was employed to analyze the flow field. The model’s reliability was verified through wind field tests. Next, the Euler–Lagrange method was used to couple the wind field with droplet movement. The drift characteristics of two flat-fan nozzles (FP90-02 and F80-02) were then compared and analyzed. The results showed that the relative error between the simulated and wind tunnel test values was within 20%. Centrifugal nozzle experiments were carried out using single-factor and orthogonal designs to analyze the effects of flight height, rotor wind speed, flight speed, and droplet size on drift. The priority order of influence was found to be “rotor wind speed > flight height > flight speed”, while droplet size (DV50 = 100–300 µm) was found to have no significant effect. Based on the simulation data, a multiple linear regression drift prediction model was constructed with a goodness of fit R2 value of 0.9704. Under the verification condition, the relative error between the predicted and simulated values was approximately 10%. These results can provide a theoretical basis and practical guidance for assessing drift risk and optimizing operational parameters for agricultural UAVs. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

37 pages, 1846 KB  
Review
Visualization Techniques for Spray Monitoring in Unmanned Aerial Spraying Systems: A Review
by Jungang Ma, Hua Zhuo, Peng Wang, Pengchao Chen, Xiang Li, Mei Tao and Zongyin Cui
Agronomy 2026, 16(1), 123; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16010123 - 4 Jan 2026
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1025
Abstract
Unmanned Aerial Spraying Systems (UASS) has rapidly advanced precision crop protection. However, the spray performance of UASSs is influenced by nozzle atomization, rotor-induced airflow, and external environmental conditions. These factors cause strong spatiotemporal coupling and high uncertainty. As a result, visualization-based monitoring techniques [...] Read more.
Unmanned Aerial Spraying Systems (UASS) has rapidly advanced precision crop protection. However, the spray performance of UASSs is influenced by nozzle atomization, rotor-induced airflow, and external environmental conditions. These factors cause strong spatiotemporal coupling and high uncertainty. As a result, visualization-based monitoring techniques are now essential for understanding these dynamics and supporting spray modeling and drift-mitigation design. This review highlights developments in spray visualization technologies along the “droplet–airflow–target” chain mechanism in UASS spraying. We first outline the physical fundamentals of droplet formation, liquid-sheet breakup, droplet size distribution, and transport mechanisms in rotor-induced flow. Dominant processes are identified across near-field, mid-field, and far-field scales. Next, we summarize major visualization methods. These include optical imaging (PDPA/PDIA, HSI, DIH), laser-based scattering and ranging (LD, LiDAR), and flow-field visualization (PIV). We compare their spatial resolution, measurement range, 3D reconstruction capabilities, and possible sources of error. We then review wind-tunnel trials, field experiments, and point-cloud reconstruction studies. These studies show how downwash flow and tip vortices affect plume structure, canopy disturbance, and deposition patterns. Finally, we discuss emerging intelligent analysis for large-scale monitoring—such as image-based droplet recognition, multimodal data fusion, and data-driven modeling. We outline future directions, including unified feature systems, vortex-coupled models, and embedded closed-loop spray control. This review is a comprehensive reference for advancing UASS analysis, drift assessment, spray optimization, and smart support systems. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Trends in Agricultural UAV Application—2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 3005 KB  
Article
Methodological Advancement in Resistive-Based, Real-Time Spray Deposition Assessment with Multiplexed Acquisition
by Ayesha Ali, Lorenzo Becce, Andreas Gronauer and Fabrizio Mazzetto
AgriEngineering 2026, 8(1), 3; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering8010003 - 1 Jan 2026
Viewed by 571
Abstract
The use of agrochemicals remains indispensable for ensuring fruit production; however, their excessive or inefficient application poses significant environmental and health concerns. Rapid detection of spray deposition is crucial for assessing sprayer performance, improving precision application, and reducing drift and chemical waste. In [...] Read more.
The use of agrochemicals remains indispensable for ensuring fruit production; however, their excessive or inefficient application poses significant environmental and health concerns. Rapid detection of spray deposition is crucial for assessing sprayer performance, improving precision application, and reducing drift and chemical waste. In this context, real-time monitoring technologies represent a promising tool to promote sustainable and efficient crop protection practices. This study refines previous experiences with an array of resistive sensors to quickly measure spray deposition. First, a multi-point calibration curve is introduced to improve the sensors’ accuracy. Furthermore, a multiplexed acquisition system (Sciospec ISX-5) is employed to enable time-resolved measurements of the whole sensor array. The method is validated by spectrophotometry and weight measurements. Wind tunnel trials with fluorescein (FLU) and fluorescein + potassium chloride (FLU + KCl) tracing solutions were conducted. The conductivity of the latter was higher than the former, without biasing the measurement. Both tracers showed good correlation between deposition and conductivity (R2 = 0.997 for FLU and 0.995 for FLU + KCl), and the maximum deviation from the spectrophotometric estimates was <10%. Time-resolved measurement showed the build-up of deposition over time, potentially indicating the dimensional composition of the sprayed cloud. The improved workflow provides array-wide, sequential deposition measurements, enabling faster on-site acquisition and efficient analysis. The results demonstrate strong potential for scaling the method to field applications, supporting its further development into real-time deposition mapping tools that could guide precision spraying, optimize agrochemical use, and reduce environmental drift. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 22575 KB  
Article
Effect of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles on the Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Coffea arabica L. Exposed to Glyphosate
by Leyner Tucto-Vela, Jegnes Benjamín Meléndez-Mori, Eyner Huaman, Amilcar Valle-Lopez and Manuel Oliva Cruz
Nanomaterials 2026, 16(1), 39; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano16010039 - 27 Dec 2025
Viewed by 1652
Abstract
Glyphosate is widely used for weed control in coffee but can induce physiological alterations due to its lack of selectivity, and indirect spray drift can cause adverse effects, potentially increasing biological impacts upon exposure. In this study, we evaluated the attenuating effect of [...] Read more.
Glyphosate is widely used for weed control in coffee but can induce physiological alterations due to its lack of selectivity, and indirect spray drift can cause adverse effects, potentially increasing biological impacts upon exposure. In this study, we evaluated the attenuating effect of foliar-applied zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) on C. arabica var. Geisha seedlings exposed to simulated spray concentrations of glyphosate (3.6 and 17.9 g ae L−1). Exposure caused a marked reduction in chlorophyll content, stomatal conductance, and net photosynthesis, while simultaneously promoting an increase in H2O2, MDA, and proline accumulation, reflecting a pronounced redox imbalance and oxidative damage associated with the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS). In contrast, the application of ZnO NPs improved photosynthetic efficiency, increased chlorophyll content, stabilized stomatal aperture, and reduced H2O2 and MDA levels in both leaves and roots. Moreover, it enhanced nutrient accumulation, ensuring greater membrane integrity and more efficient ion transport systems under glyphosate exposure. Overall, the ZnO NPs exhibited a notable protective effect by reducing glyphosate-induced phytotoxicity and strengthening the physiological tolerance of C. arabica. These findings support their potential as a sustainable tool to protect coffee crops from glyphosate exposure. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Nanotechnology in Agriculture)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 5031 KB  
Article
Effects of Formulation on Spray Nozzle Performance for Applications from Unmanned Aerial Spraying Systems (UASSs)
by Qi Liu, Ding Ma, Haiyan Zhang, Lei Liang, Long Zhang, Yuxiang Wang and Yubin Lan
Agronomy 2026, 16(1), 76; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16010076 - 26 Dec 2025
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 427
Abstract
The atomization performance of the nozzle is a critical factor influencing the pesticide application efficiency and drift behavior of agricultural unmanned aerial spraying systems (UASSs). However, the underlying atomization mechanisms of such nozzles have not yet been fully elucidated. In this study, a [...] Read more.
The atomization performance of the nozzle is a critical factor influencing the pesticide application efficiency and drift behavior of agricultural unmanned aerial spraying systems (UASSs). However, the underlying atomization mechanisms of such nozzles have not yet been fully elucidated. In this study, a Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) system was employed to evaluate the liquid sheet breakup mode, breakup length, droplet size distribution, and velocity distribution of a fan-shaped nozzle used in UASSs. Experiments were conducted under a series of spray pressures (ranging from 0.10 to 0.50 MPa, with an increment of 0.05 MPa) using sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate (SDS) surfactant solutions at four concentrations (0%, 0.2%, 0.5%, and 1.0%). The results demonstrated that both the SDS surfactant and spray pressure significantly influenced the liquid sheet breakup process and atomization behavior. High concentrations of surfactant solution had a pronounced effect on the surface tension of the spraying liquid, delaying the onset of liquid sheet breakup, enlarging the overall droplet size distribution, and reducing the droplet velocity components along the X-axis and Y-axis. Conversely, higher spray pressures facilitated liquid sheet breakup, decreased the overall droplet size, and increased the droplet velocity distribution. This study provides fundamental experimental data for quantifying the effects of solution surface tension and spray pressure on the atomization performance of fan-shaped nozzles. These data provide systematic support for the evaluation of nozzle atomization performance. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 1381 KB  
Review
Sprayer Boom Balance Control Technologies: A Survey
by Songchao Zhang, Tianhong Liu, Chen Cai, Chun Chang, Zhiming Wei, Longfei Cui, Suming Ding and Xinyu Xue
Agronomy 2026, 16(1), 33; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16010033 - 22 Dec 2025
Viewed by 896
Abstract
The operational efficiency and precision of boom sprayers, as critical equipment for protecting field crops, are vital to global food security and agricultural sustainability. In precision agriculture systems, achieving uniform pesticide application fundamentally depends on maintaining stable boom posture during operation. However, severe [...] Read more.
The operational efficiency and precision of boom sprayers, as critical equipment for protecting field crops, are vital to global food security and agricultural sustainability. In precision agriculture systems, achieving uniform pesticide application fundamentally depends on maintaining stable boom posture during operation. However, severe boom vibration not only directly causes issues like missed spraying, double spraying, and pesticide drift but also represents a critical bottleneck constraining its functional realization in cutting-edge applications. Despite its importance, achieving absolute boom stability is a complex task. Its suspension system design faces a fundamental technical contradiction: effectively isolating high-frequency vehicle vibrations caused by ground surfaces while precisely following large-scale, low-frequency slope variations in the field. This paper systematically traces the evolutionary path of self-balancing boom technology in addressing this core contradiction. First, the paper conducts a dynamic analysis of the root causes of boom instability and the mechanism of its detrimental physical effects on spray quality. This serves as a foundation for the subsequent discussion on technical approaches for boom support and balancing systems. The paper also delves into the evolution of sensing technology, from “single-point height measurement” to “point cloud morphology perception,” and provides a detailed analysis of control strategies from classical PID to modern robust control and artificial intelligence methods. Furthermore, this paper explores the deep integration of this technology with precision agriculture applications, such as variable rate application and autonomous navigation. In conclusion, the paper summarizes the main challenges facing current technology and outlines future development trends, aiming to provide a comprehensive reference for research and development in this field. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 2810 KB  
Article
Investigation of Airflow Attenuation in Orchard Air-Assisted Spraying Based on Crown Characteristics
by Chao Zhang, Hongping Zhou, Shuping Fang and Bo Cao
Agriculture 2026, 16(1), 7; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16010007 - 19 Dec 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 430
Abstract
Airflow regulation is essential for optimizing pesticide deposition in orchard spraying. This study developed an airflow attenuation model for a five-port air-assisted sprayer by integrating jet dynamics with crown resistance characteristics. The tree crown was modeled as a porous medium with calibrated resistance [...] Read more.
Airflow regulation is essential for optimizing pesticide deposition in orchard spraying. This study developed an airflow attenuation model for a five-port air-assisted sprayer by integrating jet dynamics with crown resistance characteristics. The tree crown was modeled as a porous medium with calibrated resistance coefficients, and airflow attenuation was described using momentum conservation theorems, with initial conditions derived from jet decay profiles at the outlet. Validation included free-space airflow measurements and field trials in three fruit tree species. In free-space tests, the model showed a maximum relative error of 22.31% and a mean error of 12.26%. Field tests yielded a maximum error of 25.92%, with mean errors of 14.85% and 15.76% at 2300 and 2800 rpm, respectively. The model provides a theoretical basis for intelligent airflow control aimed at improving deposition and reducing drift. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Crop Protection, Diseases, Pests and Weeds)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 9152 KB  
Article
Effect of Airflow Settings of an Orchard Sprayer with Two Individually Controlled Fans on Spray Deposition in Apple Trees and Off-Target Drift
by Grzegorz Doruchowski, Waldemar Świechowski, Ryszard Hołownicki, Artur Godyń and Andrzej Bartosik
Agriculture 2025, 15(23), 2520; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15232520 - 4 Dec 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 741
Abstract
Air-assisted sprayers are widely used in orchards to ensure deep canopy penetration and effective pesticide coverage, yet excessive or misdirected airflow often causes spray drift and ground losses. This study evaluated spray deposition efficiency, drift, and environmental performance of a novel double-tower orchard [...] Read more.
Air-assisted sprayers are widely used in orchards to ensure deep canopy penetration and effective pesticide coverage, yet excessive or misdirected airflow often causes spray drift and ground losses. This study evaluated spray deposition efficiency, drift, and environmental performance of a novel double-tower orchard sprayer (DIVENT) equipped with two independently driven axial fans allowing separate airflow adjustment on each side. Field experiments were conducted in apple orchards under crosswind conditions using the following three airflow emission scenarios (air volume to the LEFT/RIGHT side of sprayer): symmetrical (100%/100%), compensating crosswind (30%/100%), and one-sided (0%/100%). Measurements of spray deposition within the canopy, ground losses, and off-target deposition drift were performed using fluorescent tracer, and power consumption was recorded to estimate fuel use and CO2 emissions. The compensating airflow setting significantly improved spray targeting, reducing both in-orchard ground losses and off-target drift by up to 60%, while maintaining uniform canopy coverage comparable to the conventional symmetrical mode. The one-sided emission scenario achieved the highest drift reduction (67.8%) and the lowest power and CO2 emissions, though at the cost of reduced canopy deposition. Overall, the study demonstrates that independent fan control allows effective adaptation of spraying to weather and canopy conditions, providing substantial environmental and energy benefits without compromising spray efficiency. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Agricultural Technology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 4692 KB  
Article
Spray Deposition, Drift and Equipment Contamination for Drone and Conventional Orchard Spraying Under European Conditions
by Artur Godyń, Waldemar Świechowski, Grzegorz Doruchowski, Ryszard Hołownicki, Andrzej Bartosik and Konrad Sas
Agriculture 2025, 15(23), 2467; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15232467 - 28 Nov 2025
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1475
Abstract
In Europe, there is a growing interest in crop spraying using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs, drones), although current legislation imposes significant limitations on this technique. Spraying of orchard crops with drones remains particularly challenging due to the risks of spray drift and insufficient [...] Read more.
In Europe, there is a growing interest in crop spraying using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs, drones), although current legislation imposes significant limitations on this technique. Spraying of orchard crops with drones remains particularly challenging due to the risks of spray drift and insufficient deposition uniformity. This study evaluated spray deposition within tree canopies (in two application terms), airborne and sediment drift losses, and contamination of the spraying equipment. The performance of a medium-sized drone (ABZ Innovation L10, maximum take-off weight 29 kg) was compared at flight speeds of 1.8, 2.7, and 3.6 m·s−1 with that of a conventional orchard sprayer (Munckhof axial sprayer with column attachment, operating at 1.7 m·s−1). A fluorescent tracer (BF7G, 1200 g·ha−1) was used in all trials, with spray volume rates of 27 or 40 L·ha−1 for the drone and 400 L·ha−1 for the sprayer. In most cases, deposition within the tree canopy was significantly lower for the drone. Poor uniformity of spray distribution was observed, especially between the upper and lower surfaces of collector plates with attached filter papers and between the top and bottom canopy zones. Airborne drift increased significantly with higher drone flight speeds, while sediment drift decreased. At 1.8 m·s−1, both drift types were comparable to those from the conventional sprayer. Drone surface contamination was several times lower than that of the ground sprayer, even when accounting for differences in equipment surface area. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Agricultural Technology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 3020 KB  
Article
Orchard Variable-Rate Sprayer Using LiDAR-Based Canopy Volume Measurement
by Chao Zhang, Qiujie Li, Pengcheng Yuan and Hongping Zhou
Agronomy 2025, 15(12), 2709; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15122709 - 25 Nov 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 989
Abstract
This study developed and evaluated a LiDAR-based variable-rate orchard sprayer to address the inefficiency of traditional constant-rate application. The system dynamically adjusts pesticide output in real-time using a canopy volume calculation model and an adaptive delayed-spray mechanism, synchronized with LiDAR scans and travel [...] Read more.
This study developed and evaluated a LiDAR-based variable-rate orchard sprayer to address the inefficiency of traditional constant-rate application. The system dynamically adjusts pesticide output in real-time using a canopy volume calculation model and an adaptive delayed-spray mechanism, synchronized with LiDAR scans and travel speed. Experimental results demonstrated effective performance: the canopy volume estimation achieved a low overall error of 2.84%, enabling precise spray decision-making. The dosage control system showed an average error of 8.78%, and the adaptive system responded within 160 ms, distinguishing target gaps as small as 75 mm. Deposition tests confirmed uniform coverage within the canopy and minimal drift. The system proves to be a practical solution for significantly reducing pesticide use, operational costs, and environmental impact, marking a substantial advancement in precision orchard management. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Precision Pesticide Spraying Technology and Equipment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop