Treatment and Risk Assessment of Algae in Water

A special issue of Water (ISSN 2073-4441). This special issue belongs to the section "Wastewater Treatment and Reuse".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 December 2020) | Viewed by 7206

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Water Research Australia (Position domiciled at Melbourne Water), Level 2, 250 Victoria Square, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
Water Research Centre, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
Interests: cyanobacteria; algae; cyanotoxins; water treatment; reuse; real-time monitoring

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

A wide range of algal and cyanobacterial species and their harmful metabolites are being increasingly detected in water bodies worldwide. Harmful algal bloom events are exacerbated by climate change and human activities. The harmful effects resulting from the presence of algal and cyanobacterial cells include the following: (a) production of varying concentrations of cyanotoxins, for instance microcystins, saxitoxins, cylindrospermopsin, anatoxins, and b-N-methylamino-L-alanine (BMAA), with recorded human health effects, such as severe cases of gastrointestinal and skin diseases, liver failure, and cancer and potential links between Alzheimer's disease and motor neurone disease (MND), as well as mortalities; and (b) production of unpleasant taste and odor (T&O) compounds, for example geosmin and 2-methylisoborneol (MIB), in water, leading to customer complaints and dissatisfaction with the aesthetic quality of distributed water. The resulting conditions and production of harmful compounds represent significant challenges to the production of safe drinking water; therefore, their removal is a priority to ensure public safety. While current standard microscopic taxonomy identification methods provide valuable information about cell numbers, these methods are incapable of providing real-time information about the fate of cells during treatment. Hence, in this Special Issue, we are seeking publication of innovative research work focusing on the following: (1) development of methods to identify critical control points for the breakthrough and accumulation of cells in water supply systems using a combination of conventional and novel methods, such as real-time fluorescence measurement, cell integrity, and next-generation sequencing methods; and (2) assessing the impact of conventional and new treatment processes to prevent breakthrough incidents and the benefits of these analyses for improved management purposes. We are looking for novel treatment approaches coupling new and traditional analytical methods for improved cyanobacteria and algae management within plants.

Dr. Arash Zamyadi
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Water is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • cyanobacteria
  • algae
  • cyanotoxins
  • taste and odour
  • water treatment
  • advanced treatment
  • reuse
  • management strategy

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

14 pages, 4956 KiB  
Article
Isolation and Identification of Two Algae-Lysing Bacteria against Microcystis aeruginosa
by Jing Yang, Kai Qiao, Junping Lv, Qi Liu, Fangru Nan, Shulian Xie and Jia Feng
Water 2020, 12(9), 2485; https://doi.org/10.3390/w12092485 - 05 Sep 2020
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 2812
Abstract
Algae blooms present an environmental problem worldwide. In response to the outbreak of harmful algal blooms in cyanobacteria, the role of biological control has drawn wide attention, particularly for algicidal bacteria. The mechanism underlying algicidal activity was determined in our study. Algae-lysing bacteria [...] Read more.
Algae blooms present an environmental problem worldwide. In response to the outbreak of harmful algal blooms in cyanobacteria, the role of biological control has drawn wide attention, particularly for algicidal bacteria. The mechanism underlying algicidal activity was determined in our study. Algae-lysing bacteria used were separated from water and sediment collected from the Fenhe scenic spot of Taiyuan. Genetic and molecular identification was conducted by polymerase chain reaction amplification based on 16S rDNA gene. These bacterial strains were identified as Raoultella planticola and Aeromonas sp. The algae-lysing characteristics were evaluated on Microcystis aeruginosa. For the two algicidal bacteria, the high inoculation ratio (>8%) of bacteria strains contributed to the lytic effect. M. aeruginosa could be completely removed by these strains at different cell ages. However, the time used decreased with an increase in cell age. The removal rate was increased while M. aeruginosa was in the lag and logarithmic phases. The earlier bacteria strains could be inoculated, the sooner all algae could be removed. Both algicidal substances were protein, which could destroy the photosynthetic systems and break the cell of M. aeruginosa. The algicidal bacteria strain has important theoretical and practical significance for economic and feasible algae removal and provides good germplasm resources and technical support for the control of cyanobacterial bloom. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Treatment and Risk Assessment of Algae in Water)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 811 KiB  
Article
Impact of Hydrogen Peroxide and Copper Sulfate on the Delayed Release of Microcystin
by Arash Zamyadi, Katherine E. Greenstein, Caitlin M. Glover, Craig Adams, Erik Rosenfeldt and Eric C. Wert
Water 2020, 12(4), 1105; https://doi.org/10.3390/w12041105 - 13 Apr 2020
Cited by 20 | Viewed by 3801
Abstract
Algicides, like hydrogen peroxide and copper sulfate, are commonly applied to recreational waters and drinking water sources to mitigate cyanobacterial blooms. In this work, the effects of hydrogen peroxide and copper sulfate were evaluated in two natural bloom samples (collected from Canadian and [...] Read more.
Algicides, like hydrogen peroxide and copper sulfate, are commonly applied to recreational waters and drinking water sources to mitigate cyanobacterial blooms. In this work, the effects of hydrogen peroxide and copper sulfate were evaluated in two natural bloom samples (collected from Canadian and American waterbodies) and one lab-cultured Microcystis aeruginosa suspended in Colorado River water. Five algicide to dissolved organic carbon (DOC) dose ratios were evaluated during an initial exposure period of 24 h. One dose ratio (0.4 H2O2:DOC or 0.25 CuSO4:DOC) was then evaluated during stagnation after quenching (hydrogen peroxide) or extended exposure (copper sulfate) for up to 96 or 168 h. During the initial hydrogen peroxide exposure, the CA bloom had no release of intracellular microcystins (MCs) and the USA bloom only released MC at 4 H2O2:DOC. The reverse occurred with copper sulfate, where the CA bloom released MCs at 0.6 CuSO4:DOC but the USA bloom had no detectable extracellular MCs. Extracellular MC was released from the lab-cultured Microcystis at the lowest hydrogen peroxide and copper sulfate doses. In the hydrogen peroxide stagnation experiment, intracellular MC decreased in the USA bloom after 168 h despite the low dose applied. Similarly, the extended copper sulfate exposure led to intracellular MC decreases in both bloom samples after 168 h, despite showing no impact during the initial 24 h monitoring period. The lab-cultured Microcystis was again less resistant to both algicides, with releases observed after less than 2 h of stagnation or exposure. The damage to cells as measured by pigments during these experiments did not match the MC data, indicating that blooms with depressed pigment levels can still be a risk to nearby drinking water sources or recreational activities. These results provide insight on the timeline (up to one week) required for monitoring the potential release of MCs after algicide application. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Treatment and Risk Assessment of Algae in Water)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop