water-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Soil Erosion Measurement Techniques and Field Experiments, 2nd Edition

A special issue of Water (ISSN 2073-4441). This special issue belongs to the section "Soil and Water".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 20 May 2025 | Viewed by 7160

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Agricultural, Food and Forest Sciences, University of Palermo, 90128 Palermo, Italy
Interests: hydrology; hydraulics; soil erosion; sedimentology; soil; rivers; soil and water conservation; environmental science
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Agricultural, Food and Forest Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
Interests: hydrology; hydraulics; soil erosion; sedimentology; soil; rivers; soil and water conservation; environmental science
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Soil erosion is a process during which soil particles are first detached from the soil surface and then transported by erosive agents such as rainfall, overland flow and channelized flows in rills, ephemeral gullies and gullies. Accelerated soil erosion affects both natural and anthropogenic environments, and it is responsible for land productivity decrease due to the removal of soil organic matter and plant nutrients. The negative effects of soil erosion include in-site effects such as the degradation of soil structure, loss of organic matter and nutrient content, and reduction in cultivable soil layer. Erosion also determines off-site damage due to soil particles entering the water system such as sedimentation into channels, loss of reservoir storage, eutrophication of waterways and contamination due to fertilizer and chemical pesticides.

The accurate and repeatable measurements of erosion processes are required both for understanding and realizing correct modeling. Experiments provide an opportunity to investigate the extent to which the concepts used in models are a truly valid description of the erosion processes occurring.

The Special Issue will collect papers dealing with experimental sites for measuring soil erosion at different spatial (plot, hillslope, basin) scales and field experiments which aim to study the soil erosion processes (interrill, rill and gully erosion).

Papers describing the new methods and procedures for measuring soil erosion processes (e.g., three-dimensional photo reconstruction techniques, measurement of erosion features using aerial and terrestrial acquisition platforms, tracers) are welcomed.

Prof. Dr. Vito Ferro
Dr. Alessio Nicosia
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Water is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • soil erosion
  • sediment yield
  • erosion plot
  • basin
  • interrill erosion
  • rill erosion
  • gully erosion

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Related Special Issue

Published Papers (6 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

25 pages, 4326 KiB  
Article
Spatial Distribution, Temporal Behaviour, and Trends of Rainfall Erosivity in Central Italy Using Coarse Data
by Francesca Todisco, Alessio Massimi Alunno and Lorenzo Vergni
Water 2025, 17(6), 801; https://doi.org/10.3390/w17060801 - 11 Mar 2025
Viewed by 384
Abstract
This study examines the spatio-temporal dynamics of rainfall erosivity, R, in the Umbria region (central Italy), based on a 20-year dataset of 30 min precipitation records from 54 stations. Using the RUSLE2 framework, models of varying complexity were evaluated to estimate the R-factor: [...] Read more.
This study examines the spatio-temporal dynamics of rainfall erosivity, R, in the Umbria region (central Italy), based on a 20-year dataset of 30 min precipitation records from 54 stations. Using the RUSLE2 framework, models of varying complexity were evaluated to estimate the R-factor: the original model (Model A), and models based solely on event rainfall depth he or daily rainfall depth hd. All the models show consistency in the spatial and temporal patterns of the R-factor: higher erosivity is observed in the southern and northwestern areas, while summer contributes the most to annual erosivity due to the high average intensity of rainfall events. Trend analyses indicate stationarity across most stations. Compared to Model A (mean R-factor: 1840 MJ mm ha−1 h−1 y−1), the models based on he underestimate the R-factor by about 15%, whereas the R-factor derived from the hd-dependent model is almost equivalent. The estimate from Model A is also approximately 20% higher than that of a previous study conducted on a more limited dataset. The most likely reason for this difference appears to be the formula used for estimating the R-factor. The study highlights the practicality of simplified models, which offer a viable alternative in contexts where high-resolution precipitation data are unavailable. It also demonstrates the benefits of denser station networks and longer observation periods, particularly in regions characterised by complex terrains. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 4151 KiB  
Article
137Cs-Based Assessment of Soil Erosion Rates in a Morphologically Diverse Catchment with Varying Soil Types and Vegetation Cover: Relationship with Soil Properties and RUSLE Model Predictions
by Aleksandar Čupić, Ivana Smičiklas, Miloš Manić, Mrđan Đokić, Ranko Dragović, Milan Đorđević, Milena Gocić, Mihajlo Jović, Dušan Topalović, Boško Gajić and Snežana Dragović
Water 2025, 17(4), 526; https://doi.org/10.3390/w17040526 - 12 Feb 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 785
Abstract
This study assessed soil erosion intensity and soil properties across the Crveni Potok catchment in Serbia, a region of diverse morphology, geology, pedology, and vegetation. Soil samples were collected using a regular grid approach to identify the underlying factors contributing to erosion and [...] Read more.
This study assessed soil erosion intensity and soil properties across the Crveni Potok catchment in Serbia, a region of diverse morphology, geology, pedology, and vegetation. Soil samples were collected using a regular grid approach to identify the underlying factors contributing to erosion and the most vulnerable areas. Based on 137Cs activities and the profile distribution (PD) model, severe erosion (>10 t ha−1 y−1) was predicted at nearly 60% of the studied locations. The highest mean erosion rates were detected for the lowest altitude range (300–450 m), Rendzic Leptosol soil, and grass-covered areas. A significant negative correlation was found between the erosion rates, soil organic matter, and indicators of soil structural stability (OC/clay ratio and St), indicating that the PD model successfully identifies vulnerable sites. The PD and RUSLE (revised universal soil loss equation) models provide relatively similar mean erosion rates (14.7 t ha⁻1 y⁻1 vs. 12.7 t ha⁻1 y⁻1) but significantly different median values (13.1 t ha−1 y−1 vs. 5.5 t ha−1 y−1). The model comparison revealed a positive trend. The observed inconsistencies were interpreted by the models’ spatiotemporal frameworks and RUSLE’s sensitivity to input data quality. Land use stands out as a significant factor modifying the variance of erosion rate, highlighting the importance of land management practices in mitigating erosion. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 4269 KiB  
Article
Temporal Changes in the Average Contribution of Land Uses in Sediment Yield Using the 137Cs Method and Geochemical Tracers
by Negin Ghaderi Dehkordi, Abdulvahed Khaledi Darvishan, Mohamad Reza Zare and Paolo Porto
Water 2025, 17(1), 73; https://doi.org/10.3390/w17010073 - 31 Dec 2024
Viewed by 664
Abstract
The study highlights the increasing significance of understanding sediment sources and their contributions within a watershed, particularly in relation to different land use types. As the demand for effective source apportionment grows, this research aims to quantify how various land uses—specifically rangeland, rainfed [...] Read more.
The study highlights the increasing significance of understanding sediment sources and their contributions within a watershed, particularly in relation to different land use types. As the demand for effective source apportionment grows, this research aims to quantify how various land uses—specifically rangeland, rainfed agriculture, irrigated agriculture, and orchards—contribute to sediment yield over time. To achieve this, the researchers employed geochemical tracers and 137Cs to assess sediment contributions in a small sub-basin located in western Iran. The methodology involved creating a working unit map by overlaying land use maps from 1967 and 2021 with a slope map of the region. A total of 75 and 31 soil samples were systematically collected across different land uses to ensure a representative analysis of 137Cs and geochemical methods, respectively. The study utilized specific models to calculate the average contributions of each land use type. For non-agricultural lands, a diffusion and migration model was applied, while agricultural lands were analyzed using a mass balance type II model. The FingerPro program in R software 4.2.2 facilitated the selection of suitable tracers and allowed for the determination of sediment source contributions through a multivariate mixed model algorithm. The findings revealed significant changes in sediment yield contributions over the past 60 years. In 2021, rainfed agriculture accounted for 72.26% of sediment yield, down from 85.49% six decades earlier. Conversely, irrigated agriculture showed an increase from 1.80% to 15.06%. Rangeland and orchard contributions remained relatively stable but low, at approximately 8% and 4%, respectively. The total erosion rate for the sub-basin was estimated at 526.87 t y−1, with rainfed agriculture being responsible for the majority at 450.43 t y−1. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

11 pages, 2108 KiB  
Article
Research on Sediment Deposition Characteristics and the Vegetation Restoration of Ecological Riverbanks in the Deep Waterway Regulation Scheme of Yangtze River
by Jinpeng Li, Xuexia Wang and Lei Wu
Water 2024, 16(16), 2350; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16162350 - 21 Aug 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1108
Abstract
In order to explore the sediment deposition characteristic of ecological riverbanks associated with vegetation restoration in the deep waterway regulation scheme of Yangtze River, two kinds of typical ecological riverbanks and a traditional riprap riverbank (TRR) in engineering areas were investigated. The vegetation [...] Read more.
In order to explore the sediment deposition characteristic of ecological riverbanks associated with vegetation restoration in the deep waterway regulation scheme of Yangtze River, two kinds of typical ecological riverbanks and a traditional riprap riverbank (TRR) in engineering areas were investigated. The vegetation community characteristics, sediment aggregate compositions, nutrient contents, total organic carbon (TOC), sediment microbial biomass carbon (MBC), sediment microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN), and sediment microbial biomass phosphorus (MBP) were determined. The results indicated that the ecological restoration effect of the lattice gabion ballasted vegetation mat riverbank (LGBVR) was best, followed by the mesh grid riverbank (MGR), and that of the TRR was relatively poor. In different ecological riverbanks, the sediment aggregated compositions were not significantly varied. The sediment contents of NH4+-N, available phosphorus (AP), and TOC in ecological riverbank areas were relatively higher than those of the TRR. In the LGBVR, the sediment contents of MBC were relatively higher than those of the others. The sediment deposition characteristics and ecological restoration effects in the study area should be monitored for a long time. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2656 KiB  
Article
The Contradictory Issue of the Impact of Antecedent Soil Moisture to Interrill Erosion in Clay Soil: A Two-Year Field Study
by Yu-Da Chen and Chia-Chun Wu
Water 2024, 16(15), 2076; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16152076 - 23 Jul 2024
Viewed by 954
Abstract
The impact of antecedent soil moisture content on soil erosion has been a contradictory issue in erosion research, as well as process-based soil loss estimation models. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of antecedent soil moisture content on the [...] Read more.
The impact of antecedent soil moisture content on soil erosion has been a contradictory issue in erosion research, as well as process-based soil loss estimation models. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of antecedent soil moisture content on the loss of clay soil through two-year runoff plot experiments under natural rainfall. Volumetric soil moisture sensors were used to monitor soil moisture changes, and readings were used along with rainfall records to quantify the antecedent soil moisture conditions. The results of this study show that the impact of antecedent soil moisture on interrill erosion is conditional, and the impact only exists in erosion events with a low Rainfall–Runoff Erosivity Index. The coefficient of determination between antecedent soil moisture content and soil loss per the Rainfall–Runoff Erosivity Index (Soil Loss/EI30) varies from 0.222 to 0.758, depending on the rainfall duration and Rainfall–Runoff Erosivity. The results of this study also suggest that accumulative rainfall within 48 h (Pp48) prior to an effective erosion event is strongly correlated with Soil Loss/EI30, particularly when the duration of an effective erosion event is either 3~7 h or 10~30 h. Hence, Pp48 can be considered as a replacement for antecedent soil moisture in process-based soil loss simulation models. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

37 pages, 9617 KiB  
Review
The Importance of Measuring Soil Erosion by Water at the Field Scale: A Review
by Alessio Nicosia, Francesco Giuseppe Carollo, Costanza Di Stefano, Vincenzo Palmeri, Vincenzo Pampalone, Maria Angela Serio, Vincenzo Bagarello and Vito Ferro
Water 2024, 16(23), 3427; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16233427 - 28 Nov 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2323
Abstract
Water erosion is a significant global threat due to the high soil loss rate and all its consequent implications. Technologies to predict erosion are strongly related to measurements and vice versa. Measurements can simply provide empirical evidence of the erosion process and are [...] Read more.
Water erosion is a significant global threat due to the high soil loss rate and all its consequent implications. Technologies to predict erosion are strongly related to measurements and vice versa. Measurements can simply provide empirical evidence of the erosion process and are hard to extrapolate in time and space. Measurements were used to develop some erosion models, such as the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE), and also for their calibration and validation. Several measurement techniques are used to collect soil erosion data at different spatial and temporal scales, but they cannot be considered fully accurate in any experimental condition. Each technique exhibits advantages and disadvantages, so extensive knowledge of their feasibility, accuracy, and limitations is required to correctly plan experiments and use the performed measurements. In this paper, recent scientific developments on the measurement of rainfall erosivity, soil loss at the plot scale, and rill and gully erosion using close-range photogrammetry are presented. Further considerations are made on the quality of soil erosion measurements and the usefulness and importance of measuring plot soil loss. Our critical analysis highlighted that the techniques reported in the literature are a solid basis, which, however, should be developed to improve their range of applicability and data quality. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop