Inequality in Immunization 2025

A special issue of Vaccines (ISSN 2076-393X). This special issue belongs to the section "Vaccines and Public Health".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 September 2025) | Viewed by 9201

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail
Guest Editor
Department of Data and Analytics, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
Interests: health inequality; monitoring; immunization
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail
Guest Editor
Department of Data and Analytics, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
Interests: health systems; inequalities; social determinants of health
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Data and Analytics, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
Interests: health inequalities; immunization; health policy
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail
Guest Editor
Immunization Analysis & Insights (IAI), World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
Interests: immunization; vaccine delivery
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance, Geneva, Switzerland
Interests: immunization; monitoring evaluation and learning
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail
Guest Editor
United Nations Children's Fund, New York, NY 10017, USA
Interests: immunization inequalities; urban immunization; primary health care strengthening

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Significant progress has been made in improving access to immunization worldwide, particularly for children. However, the benefits of increased vaccine access are not evenly distributed within or across countries. Research and monitoring have identified persistent and emerging gaps in both childhood and adult immunization, influenced by factors such as socioeconomic status, place of residence, and gender. These have been examined in previous Special Issues of Vaccines in 2023 and 2024, which showcased advancements in our understanding of immunization inequalities and presented options for immunization delivery that offer promise in addressing disparities. Emerging challenges like vaccine refusal and hesitancy exacerbate vaccine inequalities during times of reform, stability, and crisis. In the latest Special Issue on Inequality in Immunization, the third in our series, we aim to expand the existing body of evidence. We welcome research and review articles that explore immunization inequalities and articles that effectively address these inequities in meaningful and lasting ways. Understanding and bridging gaps in immunization may serve as a catalyst for health systems’ reform and resilience on the path to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals and beyond.

Dr. Ahmad Reza Hosseinpoor
Dr. Devaki Nambiar
Dr. Nicole Bergen
Dr. M. Carolina Danovaro
Dr. Hope L. Johnson
Dr. Ibrahim Dadari
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Vaccines is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • health inequalities
  • immunization
  • vaccine inequality
  • events affecting vaccinology
  • monitoring

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (9 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

28 pages, 1351 KB  
Article
Strengthening Primary Health Care Through Implementation Research: Strategies for Reaching Zero-Dose Children in Low- and Middle-Income Countries’ Immunization Programs
by Boniface Oyugi, Karin Kallander and A. S. M. Shahabuddin
Vaccines 2025, 13(10), 1040; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13101040 - 9 Oct 2025
Abstract
Introduction: Despite global improvements in immunization, major gaps persist. By 2024, an estimated 14.3 million infants, predominantly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), remained zero-dose (ZD), never having received even the first DTP vaccine. In 2022, 33 million children missed their measles vaccination [...] Read more.
Introduction: Despite global improvements in immunization, major gaps persist. By 2024, an estimated 14.3 million infants, predominantly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), remained zero-dose (ZD), never having received even the first DTP vaccine. In 2022, 33 million children missed their measles vaccination (22 million missed the first dose, 11 million missed the second dose), highlighting entrenched structural, behavioral, and systemic barriers that continue to exclude marginalized populations. Addressing these inequities requires innovative, context-adapted approaches that strengthen primary health care (PHC) and extend services to the hardest-to-reach populations. Objectives: This study aims to document and synthesize implementation research (IR) projects on immunization programs in LMICs, identifying key enablers and effective strategies that reduce inequities, improve outcomes, and support efforts to reach ZD children. Methods: We conducted a retrospective multiple-case study of 36 IR projects across 13 LMICs, embedded within an evidence review framework and complemented by policy analysis. Data were drawn from systematic document reviews and validation discussions with project leads. A total of 326 strategies were extracted, coded using a structured codebook, and mapped to the WHO–UNICEF PHC Levers for Action. Descriptive analysis synthesized patterns across service delivery and policy outcomes, including coverage gains, improved microplanning, community engagement, and system integration. Results: Of the 326 immunization strategies identified, most (76.1%) aligned with operational PHC levers, particularly monitoring and evaluation (19.3%), workforce development (18.7%), and models of care (12%). Digital technologies (11.7%) were increasingly deployed for real-time tracking and oversight. Core strategic levers comprised 23.9% of strategies, with community engagement (8.9%) and governance frameworks (7.7%) emerging as critical enablers, though sustainable financing (4%) and private-sector engagement (0.9%) were rarely addressed. While the majority of projects focused on routine immunization (n = 32), only a few directly targeted ZD children (n = 3). Interventions yielded improvements in both service delivery and policy outcomes. Improvements in microplanning and data systems (23.5%) reflected the increased uptake of digital dashboards, GIS-enabled tools, and electronic registries. Community engagement (16.2%) emphasized the influence of local leaders and volunteers in building trust, while health system strengthening (15.7%) invested in cold chain, supervision, and workforce capacity. Coverage gains (10.6%) were achieved through delivery innovations, though sustainable financing remained a critical problem (3.4%). Conclusions: Reaching ZD children requires equity-driven strategies that combine digital innovations, community engagement, and resilient system planning. Sustained progress depends on strengthening governance, financing, and research. Embedding IR in immunization programs generates actionable evidence, supports context-specific strategies, and reduces equity gaps, offering practical insights that complement health system research and advance the Immunization Agenda 2030. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Inequality in Immunization 2025)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 814 KB  
Article
Economic Inequalities in Immunization Coverage Among One-Year-Olds and Coverage Gains from Closing the Inequality Gap in 10 Low- and Middle-Income Countries in the Western Pacific Region, 1994–2021
by Ana Mendez-Lopez, Roland Dilipkumar Hensman, Shanlong Ding and Kidong Park
Vaccines 2025, 13(10), 1032; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13101032 - 3 Oct 2025
Viewed by 799
Abstract
Background: Immunization coverage has increased substantially in the Western Pacific Region, saving millions of lives and supporting disease elimination efforts. However, gaps in coverage and inequitable vaccine access persist, leaving millions unvaccinated. Wealth-based inequalities remain a critical barrier to achieving equitable immunization coverage [...] Read more.
Background: Immunization coverage has increased substantially in the Western Pacific Region, saving millions of lives and supporting disease elimination efforts. However, gaps in coverage and inequitable vaccine access persist, leaving millions unvaccinated. Wealth-based inequalities remain a critical barrier to achieving equitable immunization coverage and maximizing the health benefits of vaccination programs. Methods: We analyzed full immunization coverage among 1-year-olds in 10 middle-income countries of the Western Pacific Region using data from the WHO Health Inequalities Data Repository. National and wealth quintile-specific coverage rates and within-country inequalities were assessed using absolute and relative measures (difference, ratio, slope index of inequality, and relative index of inequality). Trends over time were examined in countries with longitudinal data (n = 5), identifying pro-rich or pro-poor changes based on shifts in quintile-specific coverage. We also calculated the population attributable risk (PAR) and fraction (PAF) to estimate the potential increase in national coverage if wealth-based inequalities were eliminated. Findings: Substantial gaps in immunization coverage persist across all countries studied (n = 10), but with substantial between- and within-country disparities. Coverage was higher among the richest quintiles in half of the countries, with the rest showing no significant disparities. Trends in inequalities were mixed: Cambodia, Mongolia, and Viet Nam experienced pro-poor improvements over time; the Philippines saw widening pro-rich inequalities; and Lao PDR showed little change. Population attributable risks (PAR) showed that eliminating wealth-based inequalities could increase national coverage significantly in five countries (Fiji, Lao PDR, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, and Tonga), with relative gains that could increase national coverage by up to 50% while achieving equity gains. Conclusions: Addressing wealth-based inequalities in immunization could drive substantial gains in national coverage across the Western Pacific Region. Sustained, equity-oriented approaches are essential to achieving universal vaccine access and ensuring no population is left behind. Inequality patterns can guide equity-focused policies to reach underserved and disadvantaged populations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Inequality in Immunization 2025)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 1696 KB  
Article
A Quantitative Exploration of the Relationship Between Healthcare Accessibility and Mass Media in Nigeria Using the Levesque Framework of Healthcare Access
by Chelsea Gordon, Teresa Paslawski, Thilina Bandara, Shannon Floer and Tayyab Shah
Vaccines 2025, 13(9), 981; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13090981 - 18 Sep 2025
Viewed by 832
Abstract
Background/Objectives: This study investigates the relationship between maternal media access and childhood immunization status in Nigeria using the Levesque Framework for Healthcare Access. Methods: Utilizing data from the 2021 MICS-NICS survey, the study analyzes sociodemographic and media/ICT variables through logistic regression [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: This study investigates the relationship between maternal media access and childhood immunization status in Nigeria using the Levesque Framework for Healthcare Access. Methods: Utilizing data from the 2021 MICS-NICS survey, the study analyzes sociodemographic and media/ICT variables through logistic regression and geospatial mapping. Results: The results indicate that region is the strongest predictor of immunization status, with significant disparities in access to media and healthcare services across Nigeria. Television exposure was associated with improved immunization outcomes, while mobile phone ownership was not. Conclusions: The findings emphasize the importance of equitable media access and tailored health communication strategies to improve healthcare accessibility. The study highlights the need for region-specific interventions and continued monitoring of media access trends to support universal health coverage goals. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Inequality in Immunization 2025)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 3081 KB  
Article
School Entry Vaccination Checks Allow Mapping of Under-Vaccinated Children in Zambia
by Megan P. Powell, Webster Mufwambi, Alvira Z. Hasan, Aliness M. Dombola, Christine Prosperi, Rodgers Sakala, Kelvin Kapungu, Gershom Chongwe, Prachi Singh, Qiulin Wang, Stella Chewe, Francis D. Mwansa, Constance Sakala, Elicah Kamiji, Patricia Bobo, Kennedy Matanda, Joan Manda, Amy K. Winter, Molly Sauer, Andrea C. Carcelen, Shaun A. Truelove, William J. Moss and Simon Mutemboadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Vaccines 2025, 13(9), 924; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13090924 - 29 Aug 2025
Viewed by 714
Abstract
Background: Geographic information systems (GIS) are a promising tool for mapping vaccination coverage and identifying missed communities, yet their use in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) remains limited. In settings without standardized addresses such as schools or outreach sites, innovative methods are needed [...] Read more.
Background: Geographic information systems (GIS) are a promising tool for mapping vaccination coverage and identifying missed communities, yet their use in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) remains limited. In settings without standardized addresses such as schools or outreach sites, innovative methods are needed to collect and analyse spatial data. Schools offer a unique platform for identifying under-vaccinated children missed by routine or campaign efforts. Methods: During a pilot school vaccination screening program in Zambia, GIS reference maps of health facility catchment areas were developed from hand-drawn sketch maps, catchment area shapefiles, and coordinates of prominent landmarks. These maps were iteratively refined with input from local health staff. In caregiver interviews, data collectors used the maps to identify the child’s zone of residence within the health facility catchment area. Vaccination status was extracted from paper registries used during screening. Geographic heat maps were generated in ArcGIS to visualize under-vaccination by zone. Results: Of 535 children screened across 25 zones, 29% were under-vaccinated. Under-vaccination varied by zone, with clusters of missed children identified, for example, 50% of children in Kabushi Zone 6 were under-vaccinated, compared with much lower rates elsewhere. Conclusions: Pairing school-based vaccination checks with GIS mapping offers a scalable approach to identifying missed communities in LMICs. This method enables spatial analysis without household visits, supporting targeted immunization planning where traditional data systems fall short. However, because the study was limited to children enrolled in five purposively selected schools, out-of-school children and those in other schools were not represented. This selection bias may underestimate the true extent of under-vaccination, and future evaluations should incorporate broader and more representative populations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Inequality in Immunization 2025)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 803 KB  
Article
Decentralized Immunization Monitoring: Lessons Learnt from a Pilot Implementation in Kumbotso LGA, Kano State, Nigeria
by Adam Attahiru, Yahaya Mohammed, Fiyidi Mikailu, Hyelshilni Waziri, Ndadilnasiya Endie Waziri, Mustapha Tukur, Bashir Sunusi, Mohammed Nasir Mahmoud, Nancy Vollmer, William Vargas, Yusuf Yusufari, Gustavo Corrêa, Heidi W. Reynolds, Teemar Fisseha, Talatu Buba Bello, Moreen Kamateeka, Adefisoye Oluwaseun Adewole, Musa Bello, Imam Wada Bello, Sulaiman Etamesor, Joseph J. Valadez and Patrick Ngukuadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Vaccines 2025, 13(7), 664; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13070664 - 20 Jun 2025
Viewed by 1459
Abstract
Background: Immunization coverage in Nigeria is low, with many children missing out on important lifesaving vaccines. To enable a better understanding of contextual factors towards increasing uptake, we piloted a Decentralized Immunization Monitoring (DIM) approach in the Kumbotso local government area (LGA) of [...] Read more.
Background: Immunization coverage in Nigeria is low, with many children missing out on important lifesaving vaccines. To enable a better understanding of contextual factors towards increasing uptake, we piloted a Decentralized Immunization Monitoring (DIM) approach in the Kumbotso local government area (LGA) of Kano state, Nigeria, to identify wards with low vaccination rates and understand why this is happening. The findings were used to improve routine immunization (RI) programs and reduce the number of unvaccinated children and children yet to receive their first dose of diphtheria–pertussis–tetanus (DPT) vaccine, referred to as Zero-Dose children (ZD). Methods: This study adopted a cross-sectional design approach using the Behavioural and Social Drivers of Vaccination (BeSD) framework and the Lot Quality Assurance Sampling (LQAS). The study population comprised caregivers of children aged 0–11 months and 12–23 months across the 11 wards in Kumbotso District, Kano State, Nigeria, using a segmentation sampling approach. The study covered 209 settlements selected using probability proportionate to size (PPS) sampling from the wards. Univariate and bivariate analyses were performed to show patterns and relations across variables. Results: Out of 418 caregivers surveyed, 98.1% were female. Delayed vaccination was experienced by 21.9% of children aged 4.5–11 months, while the prevalence of ZD was estimated at 26.8% amongst the older cohort (12–23 months). A total of 71.4% of the delayed group and 89.1% of the ZD group remained unvaccinated. Caregiver education, rural residence, and home births correlated with delayed/ZD status (p < 0.05). Logistic regression associated higher caregiver education with reduced delayed vaccination odds (OR:0.34, p < 0.001) and urban residence with lower ZD odds (OR:1.89, p = 0.036). The antigen coverages of BCG (81.5%), DPT3 (63.6%), and measles 1 (59.7%) all surpassed the national dropout thresholds. Kumbotso, Unguwar Rimi, and Kureken Sani wards were all identified as underperforming and therefore targeted for intervention. Negative vaccine perceptions (50% delayed, 53.6% ZD) and distrust in health workers (46.4% delayed, 48.2% ZD) were significant barriers, though the caregiver intent to vaccinate was protective (OR: 0.27, p < 0.001). The cost of accessing immunization services appeared to have a minor effect on coverage, as the majority of caregivers of delayed and ZD children reported spending less than 200 Naira (equivalent to USD 0.15) on transport. Conclusions: This pilot study highlighted the utility of LQAS and BeSD in identifying low-performing wards, barriers, and routine immunization gaps. Barriers included low caregiver education, rural residence, and negative vaccine perceptions/safety. Caregiver education and urban residence were protective factors against delayed and ZD vaccination, suggesting social and systemic barriers, particularly in rural and less educated populations. Antigen-specific coverage showed disparities, with dropouts for multi-dose vaccines exceeding the national thresholds of 10%. Targeted measures addressing education, trust, and systemic issues are needed. Findings emphasize decentralized monitoring, community engagement, and context-specific strategies to reduce ZD children and ensure equitable vaccination in Nigeria. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Inequality in Immunization 2025)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 605 KB  
Article
Women’s Empowerment and Gender-Related Factors Associated with Maternal Tetanus Protection in 39 Low- and Middle-Income Countries
by Katherine Kirkby, Luisa Arroyave, Franciele Hellwig, M. Carolina Danovaro-Holliday, Nasir Yusuf, Shirin Heidari, Stephanie Shendale, Aluísio J. D. Barros and Ahmad Reza Hosseinpoor
Vaccines 2025, 13(6), 610; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13060610 - 6 Jun 2025
Viewed by 838
Abstract
Background: Tetanus is a vaccine-preventable disease, and therefore vaccination of women of reproductive age or during pregnancy is recommended alongside childhood tetanus vaccination. Gender-related factors related to social empowerment have been established as determinants of health service utilization; however, these social determinants have [...] Read more.
Background: Tetanus is a vaccine-preventable disease, and therefore vaccination of women of reproductive age or during pregnancy is recommended alongside childhood tetanus vaccination. Gender-related factors related to social empowerment have been established as determinants of health service utilization; however, these social determinants have not yet been explored directly with tetanus vaccination. In response, the aim of this study was to assess overall and country-specific gender-related barriers to maternal tetanus vaccine coverage. Methods: We used data from Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) in 39 countries implemented between 2013 and 2022. Women’s empowerment was measured through three domains of the Survey-based Women’s emPowERment index (SWPER), as well as other gender-related variables. To assess the association between measures of women’s empowerment and gender-related factors and maternal tetanus immunization coverage, we used multilevel logistic models with pooled data from the 39 countries to analyze overall patterns, and we used multivariable logistic regression for each country-specific dataset to analyze country-level associations. Results: There were notable variations in the factors associated with tetanus vaccination across countries. Overall, we observed that higher levels of women’s empowerment, as measured through social independence and decision-making autonomy using the SWPER index, were associated with higher odds of maternal tetanus protection, with adjusted odds ratios of 1.23 (95%CI: 1.10–1.37) and 1.20 (95%CI: 1.02–1.40), respectively. However, women’s empowerment related to attitude to violence was not. Higher household wealth was also associated with higher odds of maternal tetanus protection overall. Conclusions: Women’s empowerment can improve the uptake of maternal tetanus vaccine. Addressing gender-related barriers may enhance vaccination coverage and contribute to the elimination of maternal and neonatal tetanus as a public health problem. However, these barriers vary from country to country, necessitating country-specific investigations to formulate tailored recommendations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Inequality in Immunization 2025)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research

12 pages, 852 KB  
Perspective
Advancing Inequality Monitoring in Immunization: Reflecting on 10 Years of WHO Contributions
by Nicole Bergen, Katherine Kirkby, Anne Schlotheuber and Ahmad Reza Hosseinpoor
Vaccines 2025, 13(10), 1044; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13101044 - 10 Oct 2025
Abstract
Major immunization programs and initiatives have prioritized the advancement of equity in immunization. Over the past decade, the World Health Organization has made contributions to understanding inequalities in immunization, including global analyses of immunization inequality as well as tools for knowledge dissemination and [...] Read more.
Major immunization programs and initiatives have prioritized the advancement of equity in immunization. Over the past decade, the World Health Organization has made contributions to understanding inequalities in immunization, including global analyses of immunization inequality as well as tools for knowledge dissemination and capacity strengthening. This article provides an overview of these contributions, highlighting key findings of scholarly reports and journal articles and identifying areas for further research and development to expand monitoring efforts and enhance their impact. Global analyses have primarily drawn from household survey data to explore inequalities related to economic status, education, gender, and geography. Reports and articles address childhood immunization, COVID-19 vaccine indicators, and maternal tetanus protection. Inequalities were reported across all dimensions, with variation by country and income grouping. Time trends generally suggest persistent, though narrowing, inequalities. Areas for further development include the following: increasing awareness and political support for advancing equity in immunization; expanding the collection, availability, and use of disaggregated immunization data; continuous capacity building of inequality monitoring, especially at national and subnational levels; adapting inequality monitoring practices to changing contexts and priorities; strengthening the links between data/evidence and action/impact; and building on existing partnerships and collaborations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Inequality in Immunization 2025)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1240 KB  
Perspective
Designing for Equity: An Evaluation Framework to Assess Zero-Dose Reduction Efforts in Southern Madagascar
by Guillaume Demare, Elgiraud Ramarosaiky, Zavaniarivo Rampanjato, Nadine Muller, Beate Kampmann and Hanna-Tina Fischer
Vaccines 2025, 13(8), 834; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13080834 - 5 Aug 2025
Viewed by 734
Abstract
Despite growing global momentum to reduce the number of children who never received a dose of any vaccine, i.e., zero-dose (ZD) children, persistent geographic and social inequities continue to undermine progress toward universal immunization coverage. In Madagascar, where routine vaccination coverage remains below [...] Read more.
Despite growing global momentum to reduce the number of children who never received a dose of any vaccine, i.e., zero-dose (ZD) children, persistent geographic and social inequities continue to undermine progress toward universal immunization coverage. In Madagascar, where routine vaccination coverage remains below 50% in most regions, the non-governmental organization Doctors for Madagascar and public sector partners are implementing the SOAMEVA program: a targeted community-based initiative to identify and reach ZD children in sixteen underserved districts in the country’s south. This paper outlines the equity-sensitive evaluation design developed to assess the implementation and impact of SOAMEVA. It presents a forward-looking evaluation framework that integrates both quantitative program monitoring and qualitative community insights. By focusing at the fokontany level—the smallest administrative unit in Madagascar—the evaluation captures small-scale variation in ZD prevalence and program reach, allowing for a detailed analysis of disparities often masked in aggregated data. Importantly, the evaluation includes structured feedback loops with community health workers and caregivers, surfacing local knowledge on barriers to immunization access and program adoption. It also tracks real-time adaptations to implementation strategy across diverse contexts, offering insight into how routine immunization programs can be made more responsive, sustainable, and equitable. We propose eight design principles for conducting equity-sensitive evaluation of immunization programs in similar fragile settings. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Inequality in Immunization 2025)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2725 KB  
Systematic Review
Effects of Pneumococcal Vaccination in Children Under Five Years of Age in the Democratic Republic of Congo: A Systematic Review
by Marcellin Mengouo Nimpa, Abel Ntambue, Christian Ngandu, M. Carolina Danovaro-Holliday, André Bita Fouda, Aimé Mwana-Wabene Cikomola, Jean-Crispin Mukendi, Dieudonné Mwamba, Adèle Daleke Lisi Aluma, Moise Désiré Yapi, Jean Baptiste Nikiema, Boureima Hama Sambo and Daniel Katuashi Ishoso
Vaccines 2025, 13(6), 603; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13060603 - 31 May 2025
Viewed by 1436
Abstract
Background: In the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) was introduced in 2011 through a three-dose schedule, targeting infants as part of the Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI), to reduce pneumococcal-related morbidity and mortality. The aim of this [...] Read more.
Background: In the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) was introduced in 2011 through a three-dose schedule, targeting infants as part of the Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI), to reduce pneumococcal-related morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to determine the proportion of pneumonia and meningitis cases and deaths prevented in children under five following the introduction of this vaccine. Methods: This is a systematic review. We synthesized findings from studies carried out in the DRC between 2011 and 2023. We searched scientific articles, published and unpublished doctoral theses and conference proceedings. Only papers written in French or English and those reporting the results of original analytical studies were selected. We assessed the direct effect of PCV13 by calculating the proportion of infections avoided, using Odds Ratios or prevalence ratios related to infection or pneumococcal carriage. Results: Four studies were included in this review. Regarding pneumococcal carriage, when children received three PCV13 doses, the prevalence of carriage was reduced by 93.3% (95% CI: 86.3 to 96.6%), while a single dose did not significantly reduce the prevalence of carriage compared with children who had not received any dose. Concerning pneumonia prevention, three doses of PCV13 prevented 66.7% (95% CI: 37.2 to 82.2) of cases among vaccinated children. The proportion of meningitis attributable to S. pneumoniae prevented was 75.0% (95% CI: 6% to 93.3%) among children vaccinated with PCV13. S. pneumoniae serotypes 19F and 23F were the most frequent causes of invasive pneumonia in children. Serotypes 35B/35C, 15B/C, 10A and 11A/D were the most frequently identified causes of morbidity in Congolese children. In 2022, with PCV13 vaccination coverage at 79.0%, an estimated 113,359 cases of severe pneumonia and 17,255 pneumonia-related deaths were prevented in the DRC, with 3313 cases and 1544 deaths attributable to pneumococcal meningitis prevented. Conclusions: There is clear, but scattered, evidence of reduced colonization by S. pneumoniae and hospital admissions due to pneumococcal pneumonia and meningitis. The results also show that S. pneumoniae serotypes 35B/35C, 15B/C, 10A and 11A/D not included in PCV13 were the main cause of pneumococcal disease in unvaccinated or under-vaccinated children. These data support the need to continue improving vaccination coverage among children who are unvaccinated or incompletely vaccinated with PCV13 to reduce the burden of pneumococcal infections in the DRC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Inequality in Immunization 2025)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop