Pharmacy

Background: Topical Corticosteroids (TCS) are potent therapeutic agents associated with severe local and systemic adverse effects if misused. In Jordan, the unauthorized supply of TCS for cosmetic purposes and the mismanagement of dermatological conditions remain significant public health concerns. This study utilized a repeated-measures simulated patient (SP) methodology to evaluate community pharmacists’ stewardship of TCS across a spectrum of clinical risks. Methods: A national cross-sectional study was conducted across 380 randomly selected community pharmacies in Jordan. Each pharmacy received four covert visits (N = 1520) corresponding to four distinct clinical scenarios representing different risk levels: cosmetic whitening, acne management, fungal infection, and pediatric diaper rash. The primary outcome was appropriate Practice, defined as the refusal to dispense unsafe medication or the provision of evidence-based alternatives. Results: Stewardship behavior varied significantly by clinical context (p < 0.001). Pharmacists demonstrated a hierarchy of safety, adhering to guidelines most strictly in the Pediatric scenario (82.1% appropriate refusal) but frequently abandoning safety standards in the Cosmetic scenario (30.0% appropriate refusal). Notably, 70.0% of pharmacists dispensed potent steroids for facial whitening, and 26.1% voluntarily offered to compound unauthorized steroid mixtures (Khaltat). In the acne scenario, 52.1% dispensed the contraindicated TCS, while only 37.9% appropriately switched the patient to an evidence-based alternative. In the fungal scenario, 60.0% failed to visually inspect the lesion, leading to a 40.0% rate of inappropriate TCS dispensing. Multivariable regression indicated that pharmacists working in chain pharmacies (aOR: 2.15, 95% CI: 1.68–2.75) and those holding advanced degrees (PharmD/MSc) (aOR > 1.38) were significantly more likely to practice appropriate TCS stewardship. High workload (>200 prescriptions/day) was a significant barrier to safety (aOR: 0.55). Conclusions: Community pharmacists in Jordan exhibited selective TCS stewardship, demonstrating high vigilance for pediatric safety, but widespread illegal practice regarding cosmetic misuse and differential diagnosis that may be unethical. The study results warrant the need for further urgent research to understand why these practices are occurring and how best to address them.

This study aims to describe oral contraceptive knowledge among adolescents and young women, and to examine individuals’ characteristics associated with oral contraceptive knowledge. A cross-sectional survey was administered using an online panel. Females aged 16 to 24 were recruited. Oral contraceptive knowledge was measured using nine items with six domains, including oral contraceptive use, efficacy, indication, mechanism of action, risks, and side effects. A summated score was created, with a score of 9 indicating highest level of knowledge. Multivariable regression was used to examine significant socio-demographics and clinical characteristics. Among the 700 included responses, largest proportion of respondents were White (45.43%) and were covered by public insurance (43.14%). A total of 446 (63.71%) respondents expressed at least slight interest in using over-the-counter oral contraceptives. Overall, the mean score of knowledge was 4.08 out of 9. Most did not correctly answer questions about side effects, the mechanism of action and appropriate use. Similar patterns were observed among those who were interested in over-the-counter oral contraceptives (mean = 4.11). Adolescents and young women had a low level of oral contraceptive knowledge. With a high proportion of individuals interested in over-the-counter oral contraceptives, additional information support is needed to support informed contraception choice and use.

The use of Connected Medical Devices (CMDs) is growing significantly throughout the world. Although they are not dispensed in pharmacies and are not part of the pharmacy-only drug dispensing system, clinical pharmacists must be able to support patients in the use of these new technologies, which are central to their care. The aim of this study is to identify the role of the community pharmacist in supporting patients who use CMDs, using the case of connected watches in electrophysiology. Semi-structured interviews were conducted between 15 February and 20 April 2024 by a pharmacy student. The questionnaires were drafted in collaboration with a pharmacist, a cardiac electrophysiologist, a methodologist specializing in the evaluation of medical devices, and an ethical philosopher specializing in the support and acceptability of new technologies. The aim of these questionnaires was to study the use of connected watches and support for patients who own them. A total of 4 cardiac electrophysiologists and 10 cardiac electrophysiology patients were interviewed, and then 6 pharmacists were also questioned about the roles identified by physicians and patients. This study identified a major need on the part of specialist physicians for clinical pharmacist support in helping patients use connected watches. Patients expressed a high level of confidence in their pharmacists to support them, and in the motivation of pharmacists’ ability to take up these challenges. A number of challenges remain, such as the effective integration of this support into pharmacy practice, remuneration, and the organization of collaboration between clinical pharmacists and hospital electrophysiologists.