Network

Dynamic Spectrum Access (DSA) has emerged as a viable solution to address spectrum scarcity in shared-spectrum networks. In response, the FCC established the Citizens Broadband Radio Service (CBRS) to manage and facilitate shared use of the federal and non-federal spectrum in a three-tiered access and authorization framework. However, due to the open nature of spectrum access and the usually limited coverage of the monitoring infrastructure, enforcing access rights in a shared-spectrum network becomes a daunting challenge. In this paper, we stipulate the use of crowdsourcing as a viable approach to engaging volunteers in spectrum monitoring in order to enforce spectrum access rights robustly and reliably. The success of this approach, however, hinges strongly on ensuring that spectrum access enforcement is carried out by reliable and trustworthy volunteers within the monitored area. To this end, a hybrid spectrum monitoring framework is proposed, which relies on opportunistically recruiting volunteers to augment the otherwise limited infrastructure of trusted devices. Although a volunteer’s participation has the potential to enhance monitoring significantly, their mobility may become problematic in ensuring reliable coverage of the monitored spectrum area. To ensure continued monitoring, inspite of volunteer mobility, deep learning-based models are used to predict the likelihood that a volunteer will be available within the monitoring area. Three models, namely LSTM, GRU, and Transformer, are explored to assess their feasibility and viability to predict a volunteer’s availability likelihood over an extended time interval, in a given spectrum monitoring area. Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) such as GRU and LSTM are effective for tasks involving sequential data, where both spatial and temporal patterns matter, which is the focus of volunteer availability prediction in spectrum monitoring. Transformers, on the other hand, excel at handling long range dependencies and contextual understanding. Furthermore, their parallel processing capabilities allows faster training and inference compared to RNN-based models like GRU and LSTM. A simulation-based study is developed to assess the performance of these models, and carry out a comparative analysis of their ability to predict volunteers’ availability to monitor the spectrum reliably. To this end, a real-world trace dataset of volunteers’ location, collected over five years, is used. The simulation results show that the three models achieve high prediction accuracy of volunteers’ availability, ranging from 0.82 to 0.92. The results also show that a GRU-based model outperforms LSTM and Transformer-based models, in terms of accuracy, Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), geodesic distance, and execution time. Full article