Linguistic Practices in Heritage Language Acquisition

A special issue of Languages (ISSN 2226-471X).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 April 2024) | Viewed by 12318

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Languages, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
Interests: language teaching; linguistic diversity; language contact; multilingualism
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Humanities and Arts, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel
Interests: computer-mediated communication; socio-cultural aspects of immigration; language teaching; linguistic diversity
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue aims to explore and analyze the linguistic practices involved in the acquisition and maintenance of heritage languages (HLs). It delves into the multifaceted aspects of how individuals acquire, use, and preserve their HLs in various sociolinguistic contexts. The focus is on understanding the intricate interplay between linguistic practices and HL development, which occur both in formal and informal settings.

The Special Issue covers a broad range of topics within the domain of HL acquisition and usage. It encompasses studies that investigate:

  • Sociolinguistic dynamics (examining the influence of social factors, such as family environment, peer group participation, and community structures, on HL acquisition);
  • Language variation and change (analyzing various patterns observed in HLs’ language use, including phonological, morphosyntactic, and lexical features);
  • Language maintenance and shift (investigating factors contributing to changes in verbal and socio-cultural behavior in heritage speakers, including generational differences, language attitudes, and language ideologies);
  • Pedagogical approaches (assessing effective teaching methodologies and strategies for HL learners in formal and domestic educational settings);
  • Bilingualism and multilingualism (exploring the interaction between HLs and other languages in the linguistic repertoire of individuals, including its impact on language practices);
  • Identity and HL use (investigating the role of HLs in shaping cultural and linguistic identities, and how this influences language practices);
  • Technology and language learning (examining the use of technology such as digital resources and language learning applications in supporting HL acquisition);
  • Language policy and planning (addressing the role of governmental and institutional policies in the promotion or suppression of HLs).

This Special Issue seeks to contribute to the existing body of knowledge on HL acquisition by providing new insights into the complex dynamics involved in the acquisition and maintenance of lesser-explored languages. It also aims to explore effective pedagogical approaches facilitating HL acquisition and maintenance. It endeavors to empower HL 

communities by shedding light on tested strategies of language maintenance and revitalization, and by examining the impact of societies’ language policies on HLs. It is the goal of the editors to encourage interdisciplinary collaboration by bringing together scholars from linguistics, education, sociology, anthropology, and related fields to exchange ideas and perspectives on HL acquisition.

The Special Issue will make a significant contribution to the existing literature in the following ways: It will identify and fill gaps in the current body of literature on HL acquisition (Bauckus, Kresin 2019, Montrul 2015, Montrul, Polinsky 2021, Polinsky 2018). By focusing on specific linguistic practices, the Special Issue will provide a more granular understanding of how HLs are acquired and maintained. We will provide a platform for empirical studies and case analyses that present concrete data and examples of linguistic practices in HL acquisition. This empirical foundation will enrich and substantiate theoretical discussions in the field (cf. Brehmer, Mehlhorn 2018, Mehlhorn, Brehmer 2018). By examining the sociolinguistic dynamics influencing HL acquisition, the Special Issue will provide a more nuanced understanding of how social factors shape language practices within HL communities. This complements broader sociolinguistic research (cf. Kresin 2017, Peterson, Sippola 2022, Wiley et al. 2014). The Special Issue will contribute to the study of linguistic variation and change by focusing on specific features within heritage languages (Aalberse et al. 2019). This fine-grained analysis will complement broader studies of language change across communities.

Through the exploration of effective pedagogical approaches, the Special Issue will offer practical insights for educators and language professionals working with HL learners (Brüggemann 2021, Carreira, Kagan 2018, Dubinina 2019). This will bridge the gap between research and classroom practice. By investigating the impact of policies on HLs, the Special Issue will offer recommendations for more inclusive and effective language policies (Kagan et al. 2021, Wiese et al. 2022). This can inform the development of policies that support linguistic diversity. By exploring the role of heritage languages in shaping cultural and linguistic identities, the Special Issue will provide a deeper understanding of how language practices intersect with broader identity formation processes. The Special Issue will also investigate the role of technology in heritage language acquisition, providing insights into how digital resources can be effectively used to support language learning.

References

Aalberse, S., Backus, A., & Muysken, P. (2019). Heritage Languages: A Language Contact Approach. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Bauckus, S., & Kresin, S. (Eds.) (2018). Connecting across. Languages and Cultures: A Heritage Language Festschrift in Honor of Olga Kagan. Bloomington: Slavica.

Brehmer, B., & Mehlhorn, G. (Hrsg.) (2018). Herkunftssprachen. Tübingen: Narr.

Brehmer, B., & Treffers-Daller, J. (Eds.) (2020). Lost in Transmission: The Role of Attrition and Input in Heritage Language Development. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Brüggemann, N. (2021) Grundlagen und Prinzipien der Entwicklung eines Curriculums für herkunftssprachliche Lerner. Slavic Language Education, 1, 20–46.

Carreira, M. M., & Kagan, O. (2018). Heritage language education: A proposal for the next fifty years. Foreign Language Annals, 51, 152–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12331.

Colomer, L., & Catalani, A. (2020). Heritage Discourses in Europe: Responding to Migration, Mobility, and Cultural Identities in the Twenty-First Century. York: Arc Humanities Press.

Dubinina, I. (Ed.) (2019). In memory of Olga Kagan. Heritage Language Journal, 16 (2). Special issue.

Ivanova-Sullivan, T. (2014). Theoretical and Experimental Aspects of Syntax-Discourse Interface in Heritage Grammars. Leiden: Brill.

Kagan, O., Carreira, M. M., & Chik, C. H. (Eds.) (2017). The Routledge Handbook of Heritage Language Education: From Innovation to Programme Building. London: Routledge.

Kagan, O., Minkov, M., Protassova, E., Schwartz, M. (2021). What kind of speakers are these? Placing heritage speakers of Russian on a continuum. In: Slavkov, N., Melo-Pfeifer, S. M., & Kerschhofer-Puhalo, N. (Eds.) The Changing Face of the “Native Speaker”: Perspectives from Multilingualism and Globalization (153–176). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Kresin, S. (2017). Slavic and East European language programs and heritage language communities. East/West: Journal of Ukrainian Studies, IV(1), 11–32.

Mehlhorn, G., & Brehmer, B. (Hrsg.) (2018). Potenziale von Herkunftssprachen. Sprachliche und außersprachliche Einflussfaktoren. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.

Montrul, S. (2015). The Acquisition of Heritage Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Montrul, S., & Polinsky, M. (Eds.) (2021). The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Peterson, E., & Sippola, E. (2022). Heritage languages in full circle : From the Nordic to the Americas and back again. Bergen Language and Linguistics Studies, 12(2), 1–5.

Polinsky, M. (2018) Heritage Languages and Their Speakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wiese, H., Alexiadou, A., Allen, S., Bunk, O., Gagarina, N., Iefremenko, K., Martynova, M., Pashkova, T., Rizou, V., Schroeder, C., Shadrova, A., Szucsich, L., Tracy, R., Tsehaye, W., Zerbian, S., & Zuban, Y. (2022). Heritage speakers as part of the native language continuum. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.717973.

Wiley, T.G., Peyton, J.K., Christian, D., Moore, S.C.K., & Liu, N. (Eds.) (2014). Handbook of Heritage, Community, and Native American Languages in the United States: Research, Policy, and Educational Practice. New York: Routledge.

Tentative Completion Schedule

Abstract Submission Deadline: 15 October 2023

Notification of Abstract Acceptance: 15 November 2023

Full Manuscript Deadline: 15 April 2024

Dr. Ekaterina Protassova
Dr. Maria Yelenevskaya
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Languages is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • diasporic communities
  • heritage language acquisition and maintenance
  • family language policy
  • minority linguistic education
  • Baltic languages
  • Finno-Ugric languages
  • Slavic languages
  • German
  • Hebrew
  • Somalian
  • Spanish

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (11 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

20 pages, 2504 KiB  
Article
Tundra Nenets: A Heritage Language in Its Own Land? Linguistic Identity and Language Loss
by Polina Berezovskaya
Languages 2024, 9(11), 348; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9110348 - 14 Nov 2024
Viewed by 919
Abstract
Through fieldwork conducted between 2014 and 2016 in Arkhangelsk, Naryan-Mar, Krasnoye, and Saint Petersburg, this paper investigates the endangered status of Tundra Nenets, an underrepresented and understudied Samoyedic minority language in northern Russia. Criteria for assessing language endangerment are applied to Tundra Nenets [...] Read more.
Through fieldwork conducted between 2014 and 2016 in Arkhangelsk, Naryan-Mar, Krasnoye, and Saint Petersburg, this paper investigates the endangered status of Tundra Nenets, an underrepresented and understudied Samoyedic minority language in northern Russia. Criteria for assessing language endangerment are applied to Tundra Nenets while also taking into consideration the interplay between language identity, reactive ethnicity, negative attitudes, and state politics. The personal story of NC, a Tundra Nenets woman, serves as a case study and exemplifies the impact of decades of marginalization, stigmatization, and discrimination on the cultural and linguistic identity. NC’s narrative illustrates how negative attitudes are exacerbating the decline of Tundra Nenets, further threatening its survival. Because of its absence from schools and institutions, Tundra Nenets seems to be turning into a heritage language in its own homeland. This paper studies the complex interplay between identity, language, and societal pressures, illustrating the broader challenges faced by the Tundra Nenets and other minority communities in maintaining their linguistic and cultural heritage. While the situation remains dire and political action is called for, efforts in boosting language awareness, documentation, and revitalization offer potential pathways for the preservation of Tundra Nenets, drawing on successful examples from other endangered language communities. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Linguistic Practices in Heritage Language Acquisition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 926 KiB  
Article
Methodological Approaches to Online Serbian Heritage Language Instruction
by Ana Krstić and Branimir Stanković
Languages 2024, 9(11), 335; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9110335 - 28 Oct 2024
Viewed by 620
Abstract
In this paper, we propose adequate methodological approaches for Serbian as a heritage language based on the critical analysis of the existing Serbian Ministry of Education’s Curriculum for Serbian as a foreign language. This curriculum is recommended for use in Serbian heritage language [...] Read more.
In this paper, we propose adequate methodological approaches for Serbian as a heritage language based on the critical analysis of the existing Serbian Ministry of Education’s Curriculum for Serbian as a foreign language. This curriculum is recommended for use in Serbian heritage language education; however, it has been shown to be insufficiently effective in the classroom. The methods in question should benefit heritage speakers the most, such as communication-based methods and form-focused instruction, which enhance metalinguistic awareness. Additionally, we suggest an integrative model of teaching as we believe that cross-cultural approaches positively impact both types of students. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Linguistic Practices in Heritage Language Acquisition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 698 KiB  
Article
Influence of Family Language Policies on Language Proficiency across Generations: A Study of Russian-Speaking Families in Germany
by Olia Blacher and Bernhard Brehmer
Languages 2024, 9(10), 320; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9100320 - 3 Oct 2024
Viewed by 895
Abstract
This study investigates the influence of selected aspects of family language policies (FLPs) on language proficiency across three generations of Russian-speaking families in Germany using data from a sample of 18 families. The data were collected via questionnaires and a cloze test was [...] Read more.
This study investigates the influence of selected aspects of family language policies (FLPs) on language proficiency across three generations of Russian-speaking families in Germany using data from a sample of 18 families. The data were collected via questionnaires and a cloze test was used to measure proficiency in Russian. Multiple regression analysis and Dunn’s test were employed to analyze the influence of the selected components of FLP and assess differences in language proficiency between family members. The findings highlight a significant generational shift in language proficiency: parents exhibited the highest proficiency in Russian, followed by grandparents, with children showing the least proficiency and greater variation in their language skills. This pattern reflects the dynamics of language practices in families where older generations predominantly use Russian, whereas children display a greater inclination towards German or enhanced bilingualism. Additionally, this study underscores the positive influence of literacy skills in both Russian and German, reading in Russian, and a positive attitude towards maintaining cultural ties through reading on Russian language proficiency. Although attendance of Russian language lessons was positively correlated with the proficiency scores of children, the statistical models were only partially successful in accounting for their overall impact on proficiency, indicating that other unexplored factors may also play a significant role. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Linguistic Practices in Heritage Language Acquisition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 399 KiB  
Article
Life Trajectories of the Russophone Speakers in Germany: 30 Years of Observation
by Katharina Meng and Ekaterina Protassova
Languages 2024, 9(10), 314; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9100314 - 29 Sep 2024
Viewed by 684
Abstract
This article presents a multifaceted portrait of immigrants to Germany from the post-Soviet states. The article traces the paths of two families over the course almost of a third of a century after immigration, focusing on language use and integration into the new [...] Read more.
This article presents a multifaceted portrait of immigrants to Germany from the post-Soviet states. The article traces the paths of two families over the course almost of a third of a century after immigration, focusing on language use and integration into the new environment. In-depth interviews conducted at various stages of the integration process and age-appropriate tests served as research material. The content, text, and lexical analyses, as well as a linguistic biography method, were used. The research included four generations of Russian Germans and Jews in each family. Russophones in Germany have not had an easy time integrating but, ultimately, have a positive attitude toward their adoptive country. The results show that the German language became the primary means of communication outside the family and partly within the family where Russian dominates among the second and third generations. The oldest generation (great-grandfathers and great-grandmothers) were fluent in German to some extent; those who moved at the age of 20–40 learned it sufficiently for their jobs; their children studied in German preschools and schools and became completely bilingual; and the great-grandchildren were born in Germany. The younger generations have fully integrated into German society, although strong connections with locals exist among the older generations too. Proficiency in the Russian language is still maintained even among the great-grandchildren’s generation, although not to the same extent as among the generation of young parents. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Linguistic Practices in Heritage Language Acquisition)
15 pages, 364 KiB  
Article
Maintaining the Indigenous Udmurt Language beyond the Community: An Autoethnographic Analysis
by Svetlana Edygarova
Languages 2024, 9(9), 286; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9090286 - 23 Aug 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 877
Abstract
In this article, I emphasize the importance of maintaining and transmitting indigenous languages to the next generations, and I explore the motivations and difficulties of indigenous language speakers to do so when living far away from their native language community. The article is [...] Read more.
In this article, I emphasize the importance of maintaining and transmitting indigenous languages to the next generations, and I explore the motivations and difficulties of indigenous language speakers to do so when living far away from their native language community. The article is an autoethnographic analysis that amplifies the insider’s perspective and reflects on my own thoughts, perceptions, and emotional reactions regarding my language use practices. Specifically, I analyze the use of the Udmurt language with my children and the process of writing a blog in Udmurt. As a researcher of the Udmurt language, I use my previous sociolinguistic studies in the analysis and place it within the broader context of indigenous peoples from Russia. Indigenous languages often involve the use of multiple languages simultaneously, including language mixing, which is entirely natural. In societies with a monolingual language ideology, such practices are seen as signs of linguistic incompetence, leading to feelings of shame or inferiority among indigenous speakers. This negatively impacts the preservation of indigenous languages. Raising sociolinguistic and emotional awareness about how indigenous languages function and sharing personal experiences, including negative ones, can help overcome these challenges. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Linguistic Practices in Heritage Language Acquisition)
16 pages, 352 KiB  
Article
Preserving the Latvian Language Abroad: Personal Narratives and Institutional Support
by Pauls Balodis
Languages 2024, 9(8), 279; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9080279 - 19 Aug 2024
Viewed by 784
Abstract
Despite the widespread distribution of Latvians globally, the importance of heritage language for cultural connectivity remains underexplored. This study explores the preservation of the Latvian language among diaspora communities, employing linguistic autoethnography, participant observation, and communication analysis to examine the interplay between individual [...] Read more.
Despite the widespread distribution of Latvians globally, the importance of heritage language for cultural connectivity remains underexplored. This study explores the preservation of the Latvian language among diaspora communities, employing linguistic autoethnography, participant observation, and communication analysis to examine the interplay between individual experiences and institutional support in maintaining cultural identity. Drawing from the author’s bilingual Latvian–Lithuanian background and based on the example of a mixed Latvian–Lithuanian family living in Finland, the study highlights the role of the family strategy in using languages at home, the role of grandparents, as well as heritage tourism, music, and arts in strengthening cultural ties. Through linguistic autoethnography, the article captures the essence of personal and collective efforts to sustain the Latvian language. Participant observation in diasporan activities and analysis of communicative practices reveal how diasporan Latvians actively engage in preserving their linguistic heritage. The Latvian Language Agency’s initiatives, including supporting language schools abroad, publishing educational resources, and organizing summer camps, are critically examined. The study advocates for a unified approach that combines personal commitment and structured support, emphasizing the crucial role of both in the vibrancy of the Latvian language abroad. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Linguistic Practices in Heritage Language Acquisition)
15 pages, 342 KiB  
Article
Guardians of the Circassian Heritage Language: Exploring a Teacher’s Agency in the Endeavour of Endangered Language Maintenance
by Mila Schwartz and Miriam Shogen
Languages 2024, 9(8), 275; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9080275 - 15 Aug 2024
Viewed by 1223
Abstract
The Circassian language is the heritage language (HL) of a small minority group in Israel. Since its classification as an endangered language around the globe, the focus has been put on effective maintenance programs. Changes in education methods within Circassian communities were inevitable. [...] Read more.
The Circassian language is the heritage language (HL) of a small minority group in Israel. Since its classification as an endangered language around the globe, the focus has been put on effective maintenance programs. Changes in education methods within Circassian communities were inevitable. In Israel, the Circassian Maintenance Program is crucial in primary schools, where formal literacy instruction in the Circassian language begins in fifth grade. This study examined the agentic role of the Circassian literacy teacher in engaging students in learning their heritage language and its maintenance, as expressed in her attitudes, beliefs and knowledge and her classroom strategies. This three-month-long ethnographic data collection was conducted at the teacher’s study centre “Nal” (i.e., a treasure in Circassian). Data was gathered through classroom observations and semi-structured interviews with a Circassian HL teacher to understand her attitudes, beliefs and knowledge and to identify strategies to encourage student engagement in HL learning. In general, the teacher showed expertise in the HL and authentic use of it, as well as cultural and religious competence, adaptability, and flexibility. In addition, she encouraged children’s agency and autonomy and provided individualised support, integration of technology and reflective practice. The results indicated that a sense of identity, unity and belonging to the community are all held together by the pillar of HL knowledge. By engaging her students in translanguaging practices, the teacher promoted their awareness of language patterns, vocabulary and grammar in both Circassian and other languages of their wide linguistic repertoire (Hebrew, Arabic and English). Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Linguistic Practices in Heritage Language Acquisition)
26 pages, 5336 KiB  
Article
“I’m Silently Correcting Your Pronunciation of Sauna”: Language Attitudes and Ideologies in Finnish America
by Kayleigh Karinen
Languages 2024, 9(7), 247; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9070247 - 12 Jul 2024
Viewed by 1308
Abstract
This study examines attitudes and ideologies associated with the Finnish language and identity among successive generations of Finnish Americans in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan and Northern Minnesota, where Finnish is a postvernacular heritage language (HL). Employing ethnographic approaches including participant observation, narrative [...] Read more.
This study examines attitudes and ideologies associated with the Finnish language and identity among successive generations of Finnish Americans in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan and Northern Minnesota, where Finnish is a postvernacular heritage language (HL). Employing ethnographic approaches including participant observation, narrative interviews, and the study of material analyzed using thematic analysis, I describe prevailing ideologies shaping perceptions of Finnishness. My findings highlight a pronounced pride and attachment to Finnish identity, which discursively and ideologically shape a sense of belonging and serve as a foundation for Finnish American identity formation. However, tensions emerge, particularly regarding the perceived pronunciation of Finnish words such as “sauna” and Finnish last names, indicating ideologies related to authenticity and purity. The evolution of terms like “Finlander” suggests generational change and reflects a history of friction with individuals not identifying as Finnish within the studied postvernacular speech communities. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Linguistic Practices in Heritage Language Acquisition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 716 KiB  
Article
Family Language Policy in the Estonian Diaspora in Finland: Language Ideology and Home Language Education
by Larissa Aksinovits and Anna Verschik
Languages 2024, 9(7), 225; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9070225 - 21 Jun 2024
Viewed by 1016
Abstract
The article deals with family language policy (FLP) among Estonian families in Finland. The focus is on language beliefs concerning maintenance of Estonian and Estonian home language (HL) classes provided by municipalities free of charge. Using the classical three-component model of FLP by [...] Read more.
The article deals with family language policy (FLP) among Estonian families in Finland. The focus is on language beliefs concerning maintenance of Estonian and Estonian home language (HL) classes provided by municipalities free of charge. Using the classical three-component model of FLP by Spolsky (language beliefs, language management, language practices), the analysis concentrates on language beliefs (the importance of Estonian and HL education) and management (real actions that enable children’s involvement in HL classes). The data were collected from eight Estonian families via semi-structured interviews. The caregivers have higher education and stable incomes. All participants emphasized the importance of proficiency in Estonian for their ethnolinguistic identity and the beneficial aspects of HL classes. However, we found discrepancies between beliefs and actual behavior: the children do not attend Estonian HL classes because of complicated logistics and, according to the caregivers, poor language teaching methods (this claim is not supported by any evidence). Such discrepancies between beliefs and management have been attested in various recent studies of other minorities. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Linguistic Practices in Heritage Language Acquisition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

31 pages, 1926 KiB  
Article
Heritage Hebrew in Finland: Insights from Multilingual Families
by Gali Bloch
Languages 2024, 9(6), 216; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9060216 - 13 Jun 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1312
Abstract
This study addresses the research gap in heritage Hebrew in Nordic countries, focusing on the perspectives of Hebrew-speaking immigrant parents in Finland. The objective is to understand family language policies and the use of Hebrew within multilingual families, exploring factors influencing parental decisions [...] Read more.
This study addresses the research gap in heritage Hebrew in Nordic countries, focusing on the perspectives of Hebrew-speaking immigrant parents in Finland. The objective is to understand family language policies and the use of Hebrew within multilingual families, exploring factors influencing parental decisions on heritage Hebrew transmission to the children. Employing a mixed qualitative–quantitative approach and the FLP analysis method, the research explores language management and the dynamic use of Hebrew within families, examining factors that influence heritage Hebrew maintenance in Finland. A survey of 36 families revealed a shift away from Hebrew towards the majority languages in Finland, with approximately a third of the children having poor or non-existent oral Hebrew skills. Despite the emphasis on Hebrew literacy by many parents, the reported proficiency levels were low, with slightly over 10% of children demonstrating good or excellent reading and writing skills, while 43% were entirely illiterate in the language. A third of respondents cited challenges in accessing Hebrew education, attributing it as the primary reason for the children’s illiteracy, as only 26.3% of children received external Hebrew teaching. While the connection between the birth order of the children and their heritage Hebrew skills presented diverse patterns, the survey revealed a notable shift towards Finnish as the primary communication language among siblings. A unique connection was found between parents’ birthplace and language choices, indicating reduced Hebrew transmission among repatriated parents. These insights contribute to understanding heritage Hebrew dynamics in Finland, with potential implications for informing policies supporting language transmission in similar contexts and practical application in multilingual families worldwide. Furthermore, by analyzing the dynamics of maintaining heritage Hebrew in Finland and investigating the language policies of immigrant Israeli families in the Nordic context, this study expands the theoretical understanding and contributes to the advancement of the fields of heritage languages and family language policies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Linguistic Practices in Heritage Language Acquisition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 411 KiB  
Article
Language Policy and Practices in an Ethiopian University towards Multilingualism
by Keresa Kumera Chali and Andrea Parapatics
Languages 2024, 9(6), 198; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9060198 - 28 May 2024
Viewed by 1291
Abstract
The study explores an Ethiopian higher education institution’s language policy and practices, explicitly focusing on multilingualism. Thе rеsеarch highlights a discrеpancy between languagе policy and classroom rеalitiеs. Despite English being officially designated as the primary instructional medium of higher education institutions, the prevalent [...] Read more.
The study explores an Ethiopian higher education institution’s language policy and practices, explicitly focusing on multilingualism. Thе rеsеarch highlights a discrеpancy between languagе policy and classroom rеalitiеs. Despite English being officially designated as the primary instructional medium of higher education institutions, the prevalent environment for teaching and learning is multilingual, incorporating Afaan Oromoo, Amharic, and other languages alongside English. This disparity challеngеs thе monolingual languagе еducation policy mandatеd by thе Ethiopian constitution. The study employs a mixed-methods approach to offer a comprehensive perspective on the issue, stressing the necessity for a more holistic understanding of the situation. Furthеrmorе, thе rеsеarch indicatеs that thе Ethiopian constitution lacks еxplicit provisions addressing multilingualism within highеr еducation institutions, rеvеaling a gap in thе lеgal framework. This misalignmеnt calls for potential policy adjustmеnts to bеttеr accommodatе thе multilingual nature of highеr еducation. Bеyond thе classroom, both instructors and studеnts frеquеntly usе Afaan Oromoo, Amharic, and othеr hеritagе languagеs in thеir intеractions, furthеr еmphasizing thе importancе of undеrstanding thеsе languagе dynamics in thе Ethiopian highеr еducation contеxt. Ovеrall, this study undеrscorеs thе nееd for a closеr еxamination of languagе practicеs and thеir implications, offеring insights into promoting morе inclusivе еducation and informеd languagе policiеs within Ethiopian highеr еducation institutions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Linguistic Practices in Heritage Language Acquisition)
Back to TopTop