Land Governance Technology and Institutional Reform for Achieving Sustainable Development Goals with Environmental and Social Aspects (Second Edition)

A special issue of Land (ISSN 2073-445X). This special issue belongs to the section "Land Use, Impact Assessment and Sustainability".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 March 2026) | Viewed by 3185

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Water and Environment, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710054, China
Interests: hydraulic engineering; hydrology and water resources; environmental engineering
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Water and Environment, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710054, China
Interests: basin hydrological simulation; urban river water pollution control; water resources system analysis and optimal allocation
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor Assistant
School of Architecture, Chang’an University, Xi'an 710064, China
Interests: landscape architecture; urban planning and design; urban ecological environment

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

As a key carrier of the interaction between humans and nature, the land use system is in line with the Sustainable Development Goals (Sustainable Development Goals, SDGs) proposed by the United Nations to improve agricultural land production capacity, promote industrial land intensive and transformational use, build safe and inclusive towns, and prevent land pollution. The seven goals, namely restoration of ecosystems and prevention of land degradation, poverty eradication and realization of land property rights security, are closely related. These goals can be summarized into three goals: efficient and intensive use of land, protection and improvement of land ecological environment, and social acceptance. The ability to predict and manage current and future opportunities and risks across economic, environmental, and societal dimensions, while prioritizing environmental conservation and efficiency optimization, aligns with the public governance strategies put forth by sovereign nations in areas such as energy conservation, technological innovation, and rural revitalization. These strategies resonate with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) proposed by the United Nations, which emphasize intensive production, human rights protection, and ecological environmental optimization. Achieving carbon neutrality and peak carbon emissions are integral aspects of these strategies.

Under the complex international background that human beings continue to face climate change and energy crisis, there are still many challenges in terms of cultivated land protection, land management in flood risk areas, transformation and upgrading of industrial land, and land ecological restoration. It is worth noting that when solving this series of major issues, we need to divide the land environment into ecological environment and social environment for analysis. On the one hand, improper human activities destroy land resources, water resources, and ecosystem services as ecological public goods, bringing about a series of problems such as flood disasters, extreme weather, land salinization and desertification, and fossil energy pollution. The resulting negative externalities urgently need to be eliminated through technological transformation, forward-looking planning, and ecological restoration. On the other hand, issues related to the provision of social public goods such as labor rights, healthcare, income inequality, and data security are also significant points of concern. Promoting the optimization of the social environment also urgently demands effective utilization of social resources, including credit resources, human rights protection, and the business environment, by individuals, businesses, and governments.

Based on the analysis above, there is a need to increase investment in research and development of sustainable land use technologies, fostering technological innovation, and developing technologies and models with independent intellectual property rights. Relevant institutions should strengthen land use planning and management, establish more stringent land use policies, restrict unsustainable land use practices, and guide and incentivize sustainable land use. Greater emphasis should be placed on environmental impact assessments of sustainable land use, quantitatively evaluating its environmental effects to provide a scientific basis for improving and optimizing technologies. Efforts should also be intensified in the ecological restoration of damaged lands to promote the regeneration and optimal allocation of land resources, thereby enhancing the stability and resilience of ecosystems. We call upon researchers to analyze and simulate the supply of public goods such as land governance technologies and related systems from the perspectives of disaster prevention, green innovation, social governance, and international collaborative regulation.

The focal point of this Special Issue is the realization of environmental governance objectives under the backdrop of climate change. This encompasses aspects such as flood hazard defense, land planning, hydrological modeling, remote sensing positioning, carbon emission reduction technologies, and the technological and institutional transformations resulting from multiple stakeholders involved in the development of standards and regulatory frameworks for the provision of public goods related to land, energy, and carbon emission trading. Indeed, the inclusive development of man, nature, and society is one of the key issues of common concern in the fields of environmental science, geographical science, economic science, public management science, and legal science. We look forward to, through academic discourse and environmental governance, particularly in the realm of land environmental governance, synthesizing guiding experiences in technology and governance models across different countries, regions, and cultural contexts. This Special Issue therefore welcomes relevant and interdisciplinary original research articles and review articles. While the emphasis will be on empirical articles, articles with editorial style or those proposing methodological innovations will also be considered.

Prof. Dr. Pingping Luo
Prof. Dr. Jiqiang Lyu
Prof. Dr. Van-Thanh-Van Nguyen
Dr. Mohd Remy Rozainy Mohd Arif Zainol
Guest Editors

Prof. Lili Liu
Guest Editor Assistant

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Land is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • arid hydrology
  • carbon research
  • carbon emission rights trading
  • cultivated land protection
  • economic analysis
  • environmental economics
  • environmental law
  • environmental management
  • environmental modelling
  • environmental social governance
  • human rights protection in host country
  • industrial land transformation and upgrading
  • land ecological restoration
  • land management
  • sustainable land use
  • urban flood
  • urban rural planning

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Related Special Issue

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

28 pages, 3087 KB  
Article
Where Does Resilience Come from? Assessing the Impact of High-Standard Farmland Construction on Agricultural Economic Resilience
by Zihe Liu, Haoyang Wen, Jiabin Xu, Jingjing Wang and Zhaoda Cui
Land 2026, 15(6), 1026; https://doi.org/10.3390/land15061026 - 10 Jun 2026
Viewed by 131
Abstract
Enhancing agricultural economic resilience is a key strategy for coping with external shocks, ensuring national food security, and advancing agricultural modernization. Using panel data from 30 Chinese provinces covering the period 2005–2022, this study constructs an evaluation framework for agricultural economic resilience from [...] Read more.
Enhancing agricultural economic resilience is a key strategy for coping with external shocks, ensuring national food security, and advancing agricultural modernization. Using panel data from 30 Chinese provinces covering the period 2005–2022, this study constructs an evaluation framework for agricultural economic resilience from three dimensions—resistance, recovery, and renewal. A continuous difference-in-differences (DID) model is employed to examine the effects and underlying mechanisms of the high-standard farmland construction (HSFC) policy on agricultural economic resilience. The results show that: (1) HSFC significantly improves agricultural economic resilience, and this finding remains robust after a series of robustness checks, including parallel trend tests and the instrumental variables approach. (2) Mechanism analysis reveals that HSFC enhances agricultural economic resilience primarily through four channels: improving infrastructure, promoting mechanization, facilitating scale management, and enhancing the agro-ecological environment. (3) Heterogeneity analysis indicates that the policy effects are more pronounced in agriculture-dominated provinces, paddy-dominated regions, and areas with high exposure to natural risks. These findings provide empirical evidence supporting the further advancement of HSFC in China and offer a “Chinese solution” for building resilient agricultural systems through land-use policies in the context of an increasingly complex global environment. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

31 pages, 1233 KB  
Article
Dilemmas and Exits: Compliance Risks and Future Paths for Land-Based Emission Reduction Projects in China
by Siwei Wang and Wei He
Land 2026, 15(6), 895; https://doi.org/10.3390/land15060895 - 22 May 2026
Viewed by 198
Abstract
Between 2024 and 2025, Chinese land-based emission reduction projects frequently faced quality reviews and sanctions from Verra, a leading international standards-setting body. In addition to project stagnation and the withdrawal of carbon credits, China’s reputation as a host country in international efforts to [...] Read more.
Between 2024 and 2025, Chinese land-based emission reduction projects frequently faced quality reviews and sanctions from Verra, a leading international standards-setting body. In addition to project stagnation and the withdrawal of carbon credits, China’s reputation as a host country in international efforts to reduce carbon emissions was severely damaged. These cases stem from a deeper social phenomenon: non-state actors like Verra have acquired rule-making power, and exercising this power has substantial implications for other entities, manifesting in the carbon emissions reduction field as tensions over the interests and reputations of project proponents and related parties. With non-state actors breaking the previous monopoly on rule-making power held solely by state actors, creating a “dualistic” confrontation, coordinating the relationship between the two becomes crucial, as promoting positive interaction becomes crucial. Otherwise, the dilemma of “compliant domestically, non-compliant internationally” and “international standards being difficult to implement domestically” will arise, as seen in these cases. This study used two cases of sanctions imposed by Verra on Chinese land-related projects as starting points. Then, taking China’s independent development of a methodology for silt-retention dam carbon sink projects to mitigate international sanctions as a third case. Following a research approach of “case analysis, in-depth investigation of bottlenecks, overcoming difficulties,” this study systematically examines the shortcomings and necessary efforts of both sides by exploring the various problems arising from the clash and conflict of rules between non-state actors and state actors. To address this issue, this study constructs a nested theoretical framework comprising two two-tiered theoretical structures. This study argues that both Verra and the government of China should work together to promote the legitimacy of emission reduction project standards and their effectiveness within host countries. The solutions proposed in this study can also provide experience and a reference for developing countries in addressing the expansion of power by non-state actors and the disconnect between domestic rules. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 432 KB  
Article
Does Government Embedment Enhance Villagers’ Willingness to Mutually Supervise Rural Residential Land Utilization?
by Sirui Chen, Hong Tang and Zhongjian Yang
Land 2025, 14(12), 2387; https://doi.org/10.3390/land14122387 - 6 Dec 2025
Viewed by 560
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to clarify the impact of government embedment on villagers’ willingness to engage in mutual supervision of rural residential land utilization. It also examines the role of local elders’ involvement in this process, with the goal of improving [...] Read more.
The purpose of this study is to clarify the impact of government embedment on villagers’ willingness to engage in mutual supervision of rural residential land utilization. It also examines the role of local elders’ involvement in this process, with the goal of improving the regulatory framework for rural residential land utilization. The data used in this study are sourced from a field survey of 450 rural households in Sichuan Province, China. Data analysis was conducted using Logit, Probit, and moderation effect models, among others. The results show the following: (1) Organizational Embedment significantly enhances villagers’ willingness to participate in mutual supervision, with government-established regulatory bodies and dedicated management personnel effectively incentivizing oversight participation. (2) Due to social risks in actual supervision, Ideological Embedment fails to effectively stimulate supervisory behavior. (3) The effects of Government Embedment vary significantly across villages in different geographic locations. (4) The involvement of local elders enhances the effectiveness of Government Organizational Embedment, with their role in rural residential land governance leaning more toward practical implementation than conceptual dissemination. The findings of this study are as follows: Against the backdrop of government administrative embedment in rural residential land governance, the involvement of local elders has played a significant role in enhancing effectiveness. Efforts should continue to focus on strengthening organizational oversight of rural residential land utilization, reinforcing communication between the government and villagers, and deepening collaboration with local elders to encourage active villager participation in the supervision and management of rural residential land use. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 7414 KB  
Article
Comprehensive Urban Assessment and Major Function Verification Based on City Examination: The Case of Hubei Province
by Dingyu Wang, Yan Zhang, Qiang Niu, Yijie Wan and Lei Wu
Land 2025, 14(9), 1719; https://doi.org/10.3390/land14091719 - 25 Aug 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1402
Abstract
China’s major function-oriented zoning (MFOZ) serves as a crucial policy instrument for functional regulation of land use, playing a significant role in the latest territorial spatial planning. Studies on the implementation of MFOZ have been conducted since its release in 2012, but there [...] Read more.
China’s major function-oriented zoning (MFOZ) serves as a crucial policy instrument for functional regulation of land use, playing a significant role in the latest territorial spatial planning. Studies on the implementation of MFOZ have been conducted since its release in 2012, but there is a lack of comprehensive methods to assess the effectiveness of its implementation. In China, the newly initiated City Examination provides novel technical support for verifying MFOZ planning, addressing the gap in comprehensive evaluation methodologies and channels. This study proposes a comprehensive urban assessment framework and a major function classification approach based on City Examination data, enabling the identification of implementation deviations in MFOZ planning based on the current urban conditions reflected by City Examination. The methodology incorporates dimensionality reduction, multi-indicator clustering, entropy-weighted overlays, and natural break classification techniques and examines the degree of strategic deviation in China’s MFOZ through a comprehensive and systematic assessment. Due to the timeliness and long-term nature City Examination data, the method allows for the long-time dynamic tracking and evaluation of the real-time progress in MFOZ. Empirical analysis of Hubei Province revealed that 77.9% of its urban development aligns with the 2011 MFOZ scheme while demonstrating discernible deviation types and hierarchical discrepancies, with geographically clustered patterns observed among cities exhibiting such deviations. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop