jcm-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Maxillomandibular Growth, Reconstruction and Rehabilitation: Orthodontic, Prosthodontic and Surgical Interventions from Childhood to Adulthood

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Dentistry, Oral Surgery and Oral Medicine".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 20 September 2026 | Viewed by 2936

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail
Guest Editor
National Medical Institute of the Ministry of Interior and Administration, Wołoska 137, 02-507 Warsaw, Poland
Interests: artificial intelligence; bone regeneration; temporomandibular joint disorders; maxillofacial radiology; oral and maxillofacial surgery; orthodontics and orthognathic surgery; dental prostheses and implants

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Hospital of the Ministry of Interior, Wojska Polskiego 51, 25-375 Kielce, Poland
Interests: artificial intelligence; bone regeneration; temporomandibular joint disorders; maxillofacial radiology; oral and maxillofacial surgery; oral and maxillofacial infections
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue focuses on maxillomandibular growth, reconstruction, and rehabilitation, exploring orthodontic, prosthodontic, and surgical interventions from childhood to adulthood. It explores the normal and abnormal growth patterns of the maxilla and mandible, aiming to gain a deeper understanding of craniofacial development. Surgical techniques for reconstruction after trauma or disease, along with prosthodontic rehabilitation methods, are covered. By integrating these aspects, the issue provides comprehensive strategies to address maxillomandibular problems at different life stages, improving patients' oral function and quality of life.​

Dr. Kamila Chęcińska
Dr. Maciej Sikora
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • maxillomandibular growth
  • orthodontics
  • prosthodontics
  • surgical interventions
  • childhood
  • adulthood
  • reconstruction
  • rehabilitation

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

19 pages, 5344 KB  
Article
CBCT Volumetric Changes in Combined Nasal Cavity and Paranasal Sinuses Following RAMPA-ROA Therapy: A Retrospective Cohort Study with Reference to Longitudinal Growth Data
by Yasushi Mitani, Yuko Okai-Kojima, Mohammad Moshfeghi, Tonogi Morio, Shouhei Ogisawa and Bumkyoo Choi
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(7), 2605; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15072605 - 29 Mar 2026
Viewed by 405
Abstract
Background: The interrelationship between craniofacial morphology and respiratory function is a central focus of orthodontic and dentofacial orthopedic research. This study aimed to evaluate the volumetric changes in the sinonasal complex (combined nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses) following Right Angle Maxillary Protraction Appliance [...] Read more.
Background: The interrelationship between craniofacial morphology and respiratory function is a central focus of orthodontic and dentofacial orthopedic research. This study aimed to evaluate the volumetric changes in the sinonasal complex (combined nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses) following Right Angle Maxillary Protraction Appliance (RAMPA) therapy using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and to compare these outcomes with established longitudinal growth benchmarks. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on 60 pediatric patients (24 males, 36 females; mean age: 86.60 ± 24.22 months) with radiologically clear paranasal sinuses at baseline (T1). Participants underwent RAMPA therapy for an average of 8.38 months. Volumetric quantification of the entire sinonasal complex—including the nasal cavity and all four paranasal sinuses (maxillary, ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal)—was performed to ensure methodological alignment with existing normative growth data. Results: Total sinonasal volume increased significantly from 27,741.63 ± 10,675.85 mm3 at T1 to 32,248.00 ± 10,084.07 mm3 at T2 (p < 0.001), representing a mean gain of 4506.37 mm3 (16.24%). Notably, the annualized growth velocity under RAMPA therapy (6453 mm3/year) exceeded the physiological increment of age-matched normative data (~5418 mm3/year) by approximately 1.2 times. Despite a constricted baseline at T1 compared to normative values, the treatment group demonstrated a rapid “catch-up” growth trajectory. Conclusions: RAMPA therapy induces rapid and significant volumetric expansion of the sinonasal complex in pediatric patients, demonstrating a potent “acceleration effect” that surpasses natural physiological maturation. These findings suggest that orthopedic midfacial remodeling can effectively restructure the upper respiratory environment, bridging the gap between pathological constriction and normative developmental benchmarks in patients with maxillary hypoplasia. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 917 KB  
Article
Longitudinal Skeletal and Dental Changes in Untreated Children with Angle Class I and III Malocclusions: A Retrospective Cephalometric Cohort Study
by Joud A. S. Aljabr and Nabeel Almotairy
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(22), 8037; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14228037 - 13 Nov 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1476
Abstract
Background: Class III malocclusion presents complex craniofacial growth patterns, yet longitudinal evidence remains limited compared with Class I malocclusion. This study compared skeletal and dental changes in children with untreated Angle Class I and Class III malocclusions. Methods: Forty-eight untreated children (24 Angle [...] Read more.
Background: Class III malocclusion presents complex craniofacial growth patterns, yet longitudinal evidence remains limited compared with Class I malocclusion. This study compared skeletal and dental changes in children with untreated Angle Class I and Class III malocclusions. Methods: Forty-eight untreated children (24 Angle Class I and 24 Angle Class III) from the AAOF Craniofacial Growth Legacy Collections were included. Lateral cephalograms were taken at ages 4–5 (T0), 7–8 (T1), 10–11 (T2), and 13–14 (T3). Because the radiographs originated from heterogeneous mid-20th-century X-ray equipment with unknown magnification factors, only angular measurements were used. Cephalometric tracing was conducted using WebCeph™ software with good-to-excellent intra-examiner reliability (κ = 0.71–0.98). Growth changes were assessed using three-way repeated-measures ANOVA, with effect sizes (ηp2), mean differences (MDs), and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) calculated. Results: Significant differences in growth patterns were observed between the groups. Class III children showed greater FMA (MD = 6.0°, 95% CI [2.3, 9.7], p < 0.05) and gonial angles (MD = 8.1°, 95% CI [3.4, 12.8], p < 0.01) at T3, alongside a progressive decrease in ANB (MD = −2.6°, 95% CI [−5.5, −0.3], p < 0.01) and A–B mandibular angles (MD = −9.5°, 95% CI [−13.1, −5.9], p < 0.05). Class III children also exhibited significant upper incisor proclination and lower incisor retroclination (p < 0.001) compared to Class I children. No sex-related differences were observed, except for an SNA angle increase among Class I males (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Distinct craniofacial growth trajectories were observed between malocclusion classes, with Class III children showing progressive sagittal and vertical divergence from normal growth. The results highlight the need for early detection and monitoring of those at risk for pronounced Class III patterns. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

17 pages, 1344 KB  
Review
Virtual Surgical Planning (VSP) in Orthognathic Surgery for Non-Syndromic Cleft Patients: A Scoping Review of Trends and Clinical Outcomes
by Jacek Drążek, Filip Bliźniak, Karolina Lubecka, Joanna Wołoszyn, Mateusz Kęska, Maciej Chęciński, Mariusz Szuta and Maciej Sikora
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(2), 911; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15020911 - 22 Jan 2026
Viewed by 670
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Isolated cleft lips and/or palates often require orthognathic treatment. Traditional planning based on 2D images and plaster models limits precision; therefore, virtual surgical planning (VSP) and Computer-Aided Design and Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technologies are increasingly being used. The aim of this scoping [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Isolated cleft lips and/or palates often require orthognathic treatment. Traditional planning based on 2D images and plaster models limits precision; therefore, virtual surgical planning (VSP) and Computer-Aided Design and Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technologies are increasingly being used. The aim of this scoping review was to analyze the techniques, outcomes, and gaps in research on VSP in orthognathics for patients with isolated (non-syndromic) clefts. Methods: Searches were conducted in July 2025 in seven databases (including PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane) without language restrictions, in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines for scoping reviews. Of the 2836 records, 36 publications were eligible after deduplication and full-text screening, and their Level of Evidence (LoE) was assessed using the Oxford CEBM scale. A risk of bias assessment was also conducted according to JBI tools. Results: The identified studies primarily comprised LoE III and IV; there were no systematic reviews or randomized controlled trials (LoE I). Descriptions of bimaxillary procedures and LeFort I osteotomies dominated. The most commonly used software was ProPlan CMF, Dolphin 3D, and Rhinoceros, although other tools have emerged in recent years. The available studies suggest that VSP increases translational and rotational accuracy and facilitates individualized treatment, and bimaxillary procedures bring better functional and aesthetic outcomes in patients with severe maxillary hypoplasia. Conclusions: Despite the growing interest in VSP in orthognathics, the scientific evidence is limited and mostly of lower quality. Well-designed prospective studies are needed to assess the long-term stability, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness of modern technologies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop