Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
5.2
2.9
Journals
JCM
Special Issues
Orthodontics: State of the Art and Perspectives
jcm-logo
Submit to Special Issue Submit Abstract to Special Issue Review for JCM Propose a Special Issue

Journal Menu

► Journal Menu

Journal Browser

► Journal Browser
share announcement

Orthodontics: State of the Art and Perspectives

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Dentistry, Oral Surgery and Oral Medicine".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 August 2025 | Viewed by 2939

Special Issue Editors

Prof. Dr. Camelia Szuhanek

E-Mail
Guest Editor
Department of Orthodontics, Orthodontics Research Center ‘ORTHO CENTER’, “Victor Babeş” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timişoara, 300041 Timişoara, Romania
Interests: digital and interdisciplinary orthodontics; aligners; orthodontic implants
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals
Prof. Dr. Irina Nicoleta Zetu

E-Mail
Guest Editor
Orthodontics Discipline, Surgery I Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 16 Universitatii Street, 700115 Iasi, Romania
Interests: digital and interdisciplinary orthodontics; aligners; orthodontic implants
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

We are delighted to invite you to collaborate on our upcoming Special Issue, “Orthodontics: State of the Art and Perspectives”.

Recent advances in orthodontic diagnostics and treatment planning include digital applications, artificial intelligence, and 3D imaging for reconstruction techniques. These technologies will provide faster and more predictable treatments. We would like to invite orthodontist, dentists, and maxillo-facial surgeons to submit papers on the latest advances in interdisciplinary orthodontic treatment.

Topics include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • digital orthodontic diagnosis;
  • intraoral scanners;
  • facial scanners;
  • treatment planning and therapy;
  • aligners;
  • orthodontic implants;
  • orthognathic surgery cases;
  • interdisciplinary orthodontic treatment;
  • the dental rehabilitation of orthodontic patients.

Prof. Dr. Camelia Szuhanek
Prof. Dr. Irina Nicoleta Zetu
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • orthodontics
  • digital orthodontics
  • intraoral scanners
  • facial scanners
  • treatment planning
  • interdisciplinary treatment
  • orthodontic implants

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Download All Papers
Order results
Result details
Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

10 pages, 1253 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of Anteroposterior Inclinations of Maxillary Lateral Teeth and Canines Measured on Cephalometric Radiographs in Patients with Skeletal Class I and Class II—A Pilot Study
by Maciej Warnecki, Marek Nahajowski, Beata Kawala, Joanna Lis and Michał Sarul
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(12), 4323; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14124323 - 17 Jun 2025
Viewed by 97
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Routinely, clinicians planning the mechanics of orthodontic treatment for their patients do not take into account the inclinations of canine and lateral teeth. This is due to a lack of solid evidence in the area. Additionally, sound data is lacking on [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Routinely, clinicians planning the mechanics of orthodontic treatment for their patients do not take into account the inclinations of canine and lateral teeth. This is due to a lack of solid evidence in the area. Additionally, sound data is lacking on differences between tooth inclinations in patients presenting class II, subdivision 1 and class II, subdivision 2 relationships. This study is meant to investigate this matter. Methods: To conduct this study, cephalograms of 83 patients scheduled for orthodontic treatment were retrospectively selected from the records of the Department of Orthodontics at Wroclaw Medical University and analyzed. Patients were divided into three groups (class I, class II subdivision 1, class II subdivision 2). Inclinations of the long axes of canine and lateral teeth were measured in relation to the palatal plane. Results: We established that there exist statistically significant differences in inclination for some of the teeth assessed. Conclusions: Multiple correlations were found between tooth inclination and some cephalometric measurements, particularly the SNB angle. The canines and upper premolars undergo a natural distal tilt to compensate for the mandible’s retruded position. Clinicians planning treatment for skeletal class II patients should formulate treatment plans involving the distal tipping of lateral teeth with great care, as such patients may already exhibit distal inclinations of the lateral teeth. Patients with skeletal class II, division 2 may present greater demands in terms of proper orthodontic treatment mechanics compared to class II, division 1 patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Orthodontics: State of the Art and Perspectives)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 7671 KiB  
Article
Associations of Digital Measurements: Analysis of Orthopantomography Versus Lateral Cephalograms for Evaluation of Facial Asymmetry
by Andra-Alexandra Stăncioiu, Alexandru Cătălin Motofelea, Anca Adriana Hușanu, Lorena Vasica, Riham Nagib, Adelina Popa and Camelia Szuhanek
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(4), 1296; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14041296 - 15 Feb 2025
Viewed by 817
Abstract
Background/Objectives: This study aimed to compare the associations of digital measurements obtained from orthopantomographies (OPGs) or panoramic radiographs and lateral cephalograms in evaluating facial asymmetry in patients with different skeletal classes. The sample consisted of 128 Romanian patients (67 females, 61 males) [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: This study aimed to compare the associations of digital measurements obtained from orthopantomographies (OPGs) or panoramic radiographs and lateral cephalograms in evaluating facial asymmetry in patients with different skeletal classes. The sample consisted of 128 Romanian patients (67 females, 61 males) who sought orthodontic treatment. These measurements are an essential diagnostic tool for evaluating facial asymmetry in order to treat them. Methods: Lateral cephalograms and OPGs were obtained for each patient, and digital tracing was performed using the WebCeph program. Angular measurements (ANB, FMA, gonial angles) and linear measurements (ramus height, mandibular body length) were assessed on both imaging modalities. Results: Strong positive correlations were found between the gonial angle and ramus height measurements obtained from lateral cephalograms and OPGs (rs range: 0.800–0.946; p < 0.001). However, the mandibular body length showed weaker correlations between the two methods. Significant sex differences were observed, with males exhibiting larger craniofacial measurements compared to females (p < 0.05). The study population was quite young, as seen by the cohort’s median age of 21 years and interquartile range (IQR) of 16 to 29 years. Lateral Ceph: the FMA angle median value of 22° (IQR: 17–25), gonial angle median of 121° (IQR: 116–127), mandibular ramus height median value of 44 mm (IQR: 41–48 mm), and mandibular body length median value of 70 mm (IQR of 65 to 76 mm). OPG: gonial angles on the right and left sides yield medians of 121° (IQR: 116–127) and 122° (IQR: 117–127); the mandibular ramus height on the right and left sides shows medians of 44.0 mm (IQR: 40.0–47.0 mm) and 43 mm (IQR: 40–48 mm); and the mandibular body on the right side presents a median of 71 mm (IQR: 67–76 mm) and the left side has a median of 71 mm (IQR: 67–75 mm). Conclusions: The findings suggest that OPGs can be reliably used to measure the gonial angle and ramus height, providing results comparable to lateral cephalograms. However, caution should be exercised when predicting horizontal measurements from OPGs. The standardization of the OPG recording process and further research with larger sample sizes are required to establish standard panoramic norms for OPG parameters in the assessment of facial asymmetry. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Orthodontics: State of the Art and Perspectives)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
 
Displaying articles 1-2
Back to TopTop