Coping with Emotional Distress

A special issue of Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032). This special issue belongs to the section "Nursing".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 November 2025 | Viewed by 313

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Psychology, Universidad a Distancia de Madrid, A-6, 15, Collado Villalba, Madrid, Spain
Interests: aging; loneliness; ageism; self-perception of aging; self-perceived burden; guilt

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Psychology, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Avenida de Atenas, s/n, Alcorcon, Madrid, Spain
Interests: stress; cardiovascular risk; family processes

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Coping with emotional distress is a critical aspect of maintaining mental health and well-being across the lifespan. Emotional distress can manifest in various forms, including anxiety, depression, and other mental health disorders. This Special Issue aims to gather evidence-based research on the diverse aspects of coping with emotional distress, including theoretical frameworks, empirical studies, and intervention strategies.

The Need for Comprehensive Research

In the context of mental health, emotional distress is frequently assessed using outcome measures and assessment tools. However, the literature reveals a significant heterogeneity in coping strategies to deal with emotional distress. This heterogeneity can be seen as positive in addressing the multiple needs of clinical settings, but it often results in clinicians having conflicting or incomplete information when making patient care decisions. The lack of consistency and standardization in assessment and management procedures has hindered comparative research and meta-analyses, highlighting the need for more comprehensive and standardized approaches.

Research Areas

We invite contributions that cover a broad range of research areas related to coping with emotional distress. These include, but are not limited to:

  • Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: Comprehensive reviews of existing literature on coping mechanisms and their efficacy in reducing emotional distress.
  • Longitudinal Studies: Long-term studies examining the development and impact of emotional distress over time and the effectiveness of coping strategies in different life stages.
  • Cross-Sectional Studies: Studies that explore the prevalence and correlates of emotional distress in various populations, including cultural adaptations of assessment tools.
  • Intervention Studies: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and other intervention studies evaluating the effectiveness of different therapeutic approaches, such as cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), mindfulness-based interventions, and other psychological treatments.
  • Quantitative and Qualitative Studies: Both quantitative and qualitative research designs are welcome, including surveys, interviews, and mixed-methods approaches to understand the complex nature of emotional distress and coping mechanisms.
  • Cultural and Sociocultural Influences: Studies examining how cultural and sociocultural factors influence the experience and management of emotional distress.
  • Technology-Based Interventions: Research on the use of digital technologies, such as mobile apps and online platforms, in delivering mental health interventions and supporting coping strategies.
  • Psychometric Studies: Investigations into the psychometric properties of assessment tools and coping inventories to ensure their reliability and validity across different populations.

Importance of the Research

This Special Issue aims to contribute to the development of clinical practice and research by providing practical and universally accepted procedures for assessing and managing emotional distress. The findings from this issue will help in:

  • Improving Clinical Practice: By identifying effective coping strategies and therapeutic interventions, clinicians can make more informed decisions in patient care.
  • Enhancing Research Quality: Standardized and validated procedures will facilitate high-quality comparative research and meta-analyses, advancing our understanding of emotional distress and its management.
  • Promoting Mental Health: The dissemination of evidence-based recommendations will support public health initiatives aimed at reducing emotional distress and promoting mental well-being.

We look forward to receiving your contributions.

Prof. Dr. María del Sequeros Pedroso-Chaparro
Prof. Dr. Carlos Vara-Garciá
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Healthcare is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • anxiety
  • depression
  • emotional distress
  • coping mechanisms
  • mental health
  • resilience
  • stress
  • suicide

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

20 pages, 781 KiB  
Article
The Impact of Maladaptive Coping Styles on Psychological Outcomes in Tuberculosis Patients
by Ion Papava, Ana-Maria Cristina Daescu, Liana Dehelean, Ana-Cristina Bredicean, Adrian Cosmin Ilie, Sorin Ursoniu, Mariana Bondrescu, Ion Radu, Andrei Daescu, Alexandru-Ioan Gaitoane and Cristian Oancea
Healthcare 2025, 13(9), 1042; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13091042 - 1 May 2025
Viewed by 122
Abstract
Background/Objective: Tuberculosis (TB) is associated with significant psychological distress, including anxiety and depression, which may be influenced by coping styles. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between coping mechanisms, psychological outcomes, and sociodemographic factors in TB patients. Methods: A total of 100 [...] Read more.
Background/Objective: Tuberculosis (TB) is associated with significant psychological distress, including anxiety and depression, which may be influenced by coping styles. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between coping mechanisms, psychological outcomes, and sociodemographic factors in TB patients. Methods: A total of 100 TB patients admitted to the Victor Babeș Clinical Hospital of Infectious Diseases and Pneumophtisiology, Timișoara, were assessed using the COPE questionnaire for coping styles and the GAD7 and PHQ9 scales for anxiety and depression. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test analyzed the changes in the psychological scores between admission and discharge. Results: Multinomial and linear regression analyses identified the predictors of coping styles based on psychological and sociodemographic factors. Anxiety and depression significantly improved during hospitalization (PHQ9: p < 0.001, GAD7: p < 0.001). Social-support-focused coping showed the largest depression reduction (PHQ9: from 13 to 4), while avoidant coping had the lowest residual distress (PHQ9 = 0.5, GAD7 = 0). Age and marital status were significant predictors of problem-focused coping, with older and married patients being more likely to adopt this strategy (β = 0.08, p = 0.008). Coping styles significantly influence psychological outcomes in TB patients. Problem-focused coping was associated with better psychological recovery, while social-support-focused coping was linked to persistent distress. Conclusions: Integrating mental health screening into TB care and tailoring interventions to coping styles may enhance psychological resilience and potentially support treatment adherence, a relationship that should be further explored in future research. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Coping with Emotional Distress)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop