Mental Health, Innovative Therapies and Assessment in Adolescents and Young Adults and Related Contexts

A special issue of Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032). This special issue belongs to the section "Nursing".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 September 2025 | Viewed by 1545

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Personality, Evaluation and Psychological Treatment, Faculty of Psychology, University of Granada, 18011 Granada, Spain
Interests: resilience; suicide; clinical psychology; mental health; methodology of assessment and evaluation; psychological therapy

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Educational Sciences, University of Jaén, 23071 Jaén, Spain
Interests: developmental psychology; resilience; mental health; qualitative methodology; disability; developmental disorders

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Adolescence is a particularly complex developmental period, with a variety of biological and psychosocial changes and the potential for various adverse situations that can lead to the onset or development of mental disorders, some of which carry a high risk of dramatic outcomes such as suicide. However, there are also classic psychosocial interventions that appear to be effective in minimizing psychopathological disorders and their associated outcomes. In addition, several innovative psychosocial interventions or therapies based on contextual models have begun to be developed, with clear evidence of effectiveness and efficiency.

In this context, screening and assessment measures are often used to evaluate the characteristics of adolescents and young adults with mental disorders before initiating a psychosocial intervention, and to determine whether these patients have experienced significant changes in their improvement process. These assessment procedures can influence the intensity and duration of the intervention used. Researchers and mental health professionals use these measures to evaluate the efficacy and effectiveness of treatment intervention (classical or innovative) in qualitative observational studies, as well as in empirical, quasi-experimental, randomized controlled trials or review studies, which can also provide interesting information about the state of the art in mental health or psychosocial interventions for adolescents or young adults.

To date, the existing scientific literature has offered a wide variety of therapeutic models and interventions, which can be seen as a richness in the processes of assessment and psychosocial intervention for this population. However, mental health professionals have conflicting or incomplete information when making decisions about the care of this group. In addition, the lack of age-appropriate and culturally sensitive interventions has hindered comparative research and meta-analysis. This undoubtedly leads to the need for improved theoretical models and tools based on adolescent psychopathology that are more appropriate to different cultural contexts and adapted to this specific age group. Further research into other models of diagnosis or assessment of mental health in young people, together with appropriate methodological adaptation of outcome measures, would benefit adolescents and young people, health professionals and researchers, and allow comparisons and meta-analyses of high-quality randomized controlled trials. Concrete actions would also be developed to arrive at more innovative psychosocial interventions or to compare classical and innovative interventions and test their efficiency and effectiveness in this clinical population.

Therefore, we are pleased to invite you to present early detection measures and evidence-based assessments that can be applied to adolescents or young people to make psychosocial or psychopathological diagnoses, develop intervention programmes or innovative therapies that can help researchers and practitioners to improve the mental health of these groups.

This Special Issue welcomes original research articles and reviews and areas of research may include, but are not limited to:

  • Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of existing assessment tools or those related to transdiagnosis in mental health;
  • Methodological studies (cross-sectional or longitudinal) of the validation or cultural adaptation of existing mental health assessment tools in specific countries, measuring their psychometric properties;
  • Systematic reviews or meta-analyses of existing therapies or psychosocial intervention methods, or comparisons between traditional and innovative mental health therapies;
  • Empirical studies (cross-sectional or longitudinal) on the efficiency or effectiveness of traditional or innovative psychosocial intervention therapies or on aspects of interest in mental health;
  • Quantitative, qualitative or mixed-methods studies.

We look forward to receiving your contributions.

Prof. Dr. David Sánchez-Teruel
Prof. Dr. Mª Auxiliadora Robles-Bello
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Healthcare is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • adolescents
  • young adults
  • mental health
  • moderating factors
  • psychopathology
  • suicidality
  • resilience
  • assessment
  • methodological adaptation
  • psychological therapies

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

9 pages, 765 KiB  
Article
Adaptation and Validation of the DSM 5 Youth Anxiety Scale—Part I (YAM-5-I) in Colombian Adolescents
by Yenny Salamanca-Camargo, José Antonio Muela-Martínez, Lourdes Espinosa-Fernandez and Mª del Mar Díaz-Castela
Healthcare 2025, 13(8), 900; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13080900 - 14 Apr 2025
Viewed by 211
Abstract
Background/Objectives: In adolescence, anxiety disorders are the most prevalent, besides being highly comorbid, with a tendency to chronicity and persistence in adulthood; although there are different assessment measures with good psychometric properties, in Colombia there are no instruments that include the new international [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: In adolescence, anxiety disorders are the most prevalent, besides being highly comorbid, with a tendency to chronicity and persistence in adulthood; although there are different assessment measures with good psychometric properties, in Colombia there are no instruments that include the new international diagnostic classifications, aspects that may hinder accurate diagnosis and consequent care. This psychometric study aimed to adapt and validate the Anxiety Scale for Adolescents YAM-5, part I. Methods: A review of the items of the instrument was carried out, seeking to identify possible difficulties in the use of terms according to the culture; a sample of 536 adolescents linked to different public and private educational institutions from the five regions of the country was applied. The analysis of the instrument was based on the analysis of its reliability by means of Cronbach’s Alpha Coefficient, the construct validity by means of the Exploratory Factor Analysis using the principal components method, and, finally, the Confirmatory Factor Analysis using the Structural Equations technique. Results: An internal consistency of 0.93 and a structural validity with a construct of five correlated dimensions were identified, which best fitted the data collected. Conclusions: The structure examined provides high reliability and structural validity, highlighting benefits such as being of screening type, its low cost, and application aimed at non-clinical populations from the perspective of Colombian adolescents. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 385 KiB  
Article
Validation and Spanish Adaptation of the Resilience Scale ER-23 in a University Population
by Isabel Ramírez-Uclés, Julia Otero, F. Pablo Holgado-Tello, Lucas Muñoz-López and María B. Sánchez-Barrera
Healthcare 2025, 13(8), 886; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13080886 - 12 Apr 2025
Viewed by 295
Abstract
Background: Resilience has received considerable attention in recent years and is a psychological characteristic that favors positive adaptation to adversity. Objective: The objective of this work is to generate a Spanish adaptation of the Resilience Scale (ER, acronym in Spanish) and [...] Read more.
Background: Resilience has received considerable attention in recent years and is a psychological characteristic that favors positive adaptation to adversity. Objective: The objective of this work is to generate a Spanish adaptation of the Resilience Scale (ER, acronym in Spanish) and to study the dimensionality of the scale through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Methods: The ER was administered to 1058 young Spanish people. The original English version of the Resilience Scale (25 items) was translated into Spanish, and the translation was confirmed through a backtranslation. The original version consists of two major factors: personal competence and acceptance of oneself and life. Results: The results confirm the goodness of the psychometric characteristics of the scale (internal consistency and criterion validity) with 23 items and the original two-factor model proposed by the authors. There was a positive correlation between the ER-23 adaptation and the Connor–Davidson Resilience Questionnaire (2002) and subjective psychological well-being and a negative correlation between the ER-23 adaptation and anxiety. Conclusions: The ER-23 adaptation is a valid and reliable tool that can be used in future research in a university population. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 231 KiB  
Article
Validation of the Spanish Version of the Body Awareness Questionnaire (BAQ) and an Exploration of Its Relationship to Meditation and Embodiment Variables
by Laura C. Sánchez-Sánchez, Amanda Klysing, Ingela Steij Stålbrand and Tove Lundberg
Healthcare 2025, 13(6), 628; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13060628 - 14 Mar 2025
Viewed by 470
Abstract
Purposes: The Body Awareness Questionnaire (BAQ) has been considered the best available measure of body awareness, but it is not currently available in Spanish. Methods: To address this shortcoming, a sample of 281 Spanish participants completed a survey with a Spanish [...] Read more.
Purposes: The Body Awareness Questionnaire (BAQ) has been considered the best available measure of body awareness, but it is not currently available in Spanish. Methods: To address this shortcoming, a sample of 281 Spanish participants completed a survey with a Spanish version of the BAQ, as well as the Body Appreciation Scale (BAS-2), the Self-Compassion Scale-Short (SCS-S) and the New Sexual Satisfaction Scale-Short (NSSS-S). Results: Analysis of the Spanish BAQ showed good reliability: α = 0.82. Positive correlations with the BAS-2 and the SCS-S, and no significant correlation with the NSSS-S, support the convergent and discriminant validity of the Spanish BAQ. In conceptual validity, the Spanish BAQ further successfully discriminated between meditators and non-meditators, showing additional support for the conceptual validity of the measure. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) supported a two-factor structure, rather than a one-factor or four-factor version, as proposed for the original English version. Conclusions: The Spanish version of the BAQ has shown adequate reliability and validity and would be a good scale to continue exploring in clinical Spanish population samples, e.g., in patients with chronic pain, and non-clinical ones, e.g., after interventions in sexuality or sport. It could be an interesting questionnaire to assess outcomes of mindfulness-based interventions. Full article
Back to TopTop