Radioembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

A special issue of Current Oncology (ISSN 1718-7729). This special issue belongs to the section "Gastrointestinal Oncology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (10 February 2025) | Viewed by 12257

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, USA
Interests: hepatocellular carcinoma; cholangiocarcinoma; pancreas cancer; radioembolization; antiglycolytic therapy; tumor embolization; tumor ablation; vascular-targeted phototherapy
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer. Transarterial radioembolization (TARE), in which beta-emitting yttrium 90-loaded microspheres are injected intra-arterially into the tumor feeding artery, has been a well-established treatment option for HCC. TARE can be used as a palliative or curative treatment option depending on the stage and pattern of HCC and the dose used.

In this Special Issue, we welcome original research and review articles focused on different aspects of TARE when used in the treatment of HCC. These topics can include dosimetry for TARE, advanced imaging techniques used for dose calculation, the combination of TARE with other locoregional or systemic treatments, genetic factors influencing responses after TARE, immunological aspects of TARE, adjuvant treatments that improve the efficacy of TARE, surgical resection after TARE, and portal vein embolization using TARE, to name a select few. 

Dr. Hooman Yarmohammadi
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Current Oncology is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • radioembolization
  • hepatocellular carcinoma
  • combination therapy
  • immunotherapy
  • dosimetry

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (5 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

12 pages, 2670 KiB  
Article
An Evaluation of 90Y Bremsstrahlung SPECT Image Quality in the Presence of 99mTc: A Technical Perspective on Same-Day Radioembolization
by Grace Keane, Rob van Rooij, Marnix Lam, Arthur Braat, Maarten Smits and Hugo de Jong
Curr. Oncol. 2024, 31(12), 7511-7522; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31120554 - 26 Nov 2024
Viewed by 1050
Abstract
In same-day radioembolization, 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT, 90Y radioembolization, and post-treatment 90Y SPECT/CT procedures are conducted on the same-day, resulting in a dual-isotope environment of 90Y and 99mTc during post-treatment imaging. This study aimed to quantify the impact of 99mTc on 90Y bremsstrahlung-SPECT/CT image quality [...] Read more.
In same-day radioembolization, 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT, 90Y radioembolization, and post-treatment 90Y SPECT/CT procedures are conducted on the same-day, resulting in a dual-isotope environment of 90Y and 99mTc during post-treatment imaging. This study aimed to quantify the impact of 99mTc on 90Y bremsstrahlung-SPECT/CT image quality and to establish an optimised imaging protocol for both clinical practice, and with advanced reconstruction techniques. Utilising a NEMA IQ phantom, contrast recovery coefficients (CRCs) were measured to evaluate the 90Y image quality degradation caused by 99mTc. SPECT/CT scans of 90Y-only and 90Y with varying amounts of 99mTc were conducted using a standard protocol (90–120 keV energy window, high-energy collimator) and various dual-isotope protocols. The standard protocol resulted in a marked CRC reduction, with the largest sphere’s CRC decreasing from 0.21 (90Y-only) to 0.05 when 99mTc activity was 5% of 90Y. For an optimised protocol (160–200 keV energy window, high-energy collimator) CRC values were 0.16 for 90Y-only and 0.15 for 90Y+99mTc. The highest CRC values were achieved with an advanced Monte Carlo-based reconstruction, showing 0.58 for 90Y-only and 0.46 for 90Y+99mTc. Image quality degradation was noted in dual-isotope settings even when using an optimised protocol. Advanced reconstruction techniques markedly improved post-treatment image quality. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Radioembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 762 KiB  
Article
Outcomes of Y90 Radioembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients Previously Treated with Transarterial Embolization
by Ken Zhao, Sam Son, Anita Karimi, Brett Marinelli, Joseph P. Erinjeri, Erica S. Alexander, Vlasios S. Sotirchos, James J. Harding, Kevin C. Soares, Etay Ziv, Anne Covey, Constantinos T. Sofocleous and Hooman Yarmohammadi
Curr. Oncol. 2024, 31(5), 2650-2661; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31050200 - 8 May 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2138
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients previously treated with transarterial embolization (TAE). In this retrospective study, all HCC patients who received TARE from 1/2012 to 12/2022 for treatment of residual [...] Read more.
The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients previously treated with transarterial embolization (TAE). In this retrospective study, all HCC patients who received TARE from 1/2012 to 12/2022 for treatment of residual or recurrent disease after TAE were identified. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Univariate Cox regression was performed to determine significant predictors of OS after TARE. Twenty-one patients (median age 73.4 years, 18 male, 3 female) were included. Median dose to the perfused liver volume was 121 Gy (112–444, range), and 18/21 (85.7%) patients received 112–140 Gy. Median OS from time of HCC diagnosis was 32.9 months (19.4–61.4, 95% CI). Median OS after first TAE was 29.3 months (15.3–58.9, 95% CI). Median OS after first TARE was 10.6 months (6.8–27.0, 95% CI). ECOG performance status of 0 (p = 0.038), index tumor diameter < 4 cm (p = 0.022), and hepatic tumor burden < 25% (p = 0.018) were significant predictors of longer OS after TARE. TARE may provide a survival benefit for appropriately selected patients with HCC who have been previously treated with TAE. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Radioembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 263 KiB  
Article
Safety and Efficacy of Concurrent Atezolizumab/Bevacizumab or Nivolumab Combination Therapy with Yttrium-90 Radioembolization of Advanced Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma
by Alexander Villalobos, Howard Hussein Dabbous, Olivia Little, Olumide Babajide Gbolahan, Mehmet Akce, Meghan Allegra Lilly, Zachary Bercu and Nima Kokabi
Curr. Oncol. 2023, 30(12), 10100-10110; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30120734 - 25 Nov 2023
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2314
Abstract
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of combining yttrium-90 radioembolization (Y90-RE) with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, consecutive advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated between 2016 and 2022 with atezolizumab/bevacizumab or nivolumab within three-months pre- and post-Y90-RE were retrospectively evaluated. Tumor response and [...] Read more.
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of combining yttrium-90 radioembolization (Y90-RE) with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, consecutive advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated between 2016 and 2022 with atezolizumab/bevacizumab or nivolumab within three-months pre- and post-Y90-RE were retrospectively evaluated. Tumor response and treatment-related clinical/laboratory adverse events (AE) were assessed at 1 and 6 months, as well as differences in clinical and laboratory variables and median overall survival (OS) from initial treatment (whether it was Y90-RE or systemic therapy) between the two cohorts. A total of 19 patients (10 atezolizumab/bevacizumab; 9 nivolumab), comprising 84% males with median age 69 years, met the inclusion criteria. Compared to the atezolizumab/bevacizumab group, there were less males (100% vs. 67%; p = 0.02) and more ECOG ≥ 2 patients in the nivolumab group (0% vs. 33%; p = 0.02). Baseline characteristics or incidence of 6-month post-treatment any-grade AE (60% vs. 56%; p = 0.7), grade ≥ 3 AE (0% vs. 11%; p = 0.3), objective response (58% total, 60% vs. 56%; p = 0.7), and complete response (16% total; 10% vs. 22%; p = 0.8) were similar between the atezolizumab/bevacizumab and the nivolumab cohorts. Median OS was 12.9 months for the whole cohort, 16.4 months for nivolumab, and 10.7 months for atezolizumab/bevacizumab. Among patients with advanced unresectable HCC, the utilization of Y90-RE concurrently or within 90 days of nivolumab or atezolizumab/bevacizumab immunotherapy, appears to be well-tolerated and with a low incidence of severe AE. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Radioembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma)

Review

Jump to: Research

12 pages, 617 KiB  
Review
Radiation Segmentectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
by Muhamad Serhal, Farnaz Dadrass, Edward Kim and Robert J. Lewandowski
Curr. Oncol. 2024, 31(2), 617-628; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31020045 - 23 Jan 2024
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3152
Abstract
The application of trans-arterial radioembolization (TARE) with Yttrium-90, historically a palliative treatment option for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), is evolving. Radiation segmentectomy (RADSEG), the segmental delivery of an ablative radiation dose, is a treatment option for patients with earlier-stage HCC. This [...] Read more.
The application of trans-arterial radioembolization (TARE) with Yttrium-90, historically a palliative treatment option for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), is evolving. Radiation segmentectomy (RADSEG), the segmental delivery of an ablative radiation dose, is a treatment option for patients with earlier-stage HCC. This review presents an in-depth exploration of RADSEG, emphasizing its technical considerations, dosimetry advancements, and patient selection. The integration of RADSEG into the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) paradigm will be highlighted. RADSEG outcomes concerning safety and efficacy will be explored and compared with traditional locoregional cancer treatments like trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE), percutaneous thermal ablation, and surgical resection, with an eye on future directions and considerations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Radioembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 450 KiB  
Review
Update on Locoregional Therapies for Liver Cancer: Radiation Segmentectomy
by Farnaz Dadrass, Alex Sher and Edward Kim
Curr. Oncol. 2023, 30(12), 10075-10084; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30120732 - 23 Nov 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2825
Abstract
Over 900,000 people worldwide were diagnosed with liver cancer in 2022 alone, with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounting for 75–85% of cases. Treatment for HCC includes some combination of systemic therapies, surgery, liver transplantation, ablation, and intra-arterial therapies with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or transarterial [...] Read more.
Over 900,000 people worldwide were diagnosed with liver cancer in 2022 alone, with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounting for 75–85% of cases. Treatment for HCC includes some combination of systemic therapies, surgery, liver transplantation, ablation, and intra-arterial therapies with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or transarterial radioembolization (TARE). Currently, the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) guidelines have acknowledged liver transplantation, surgical resection, and thermal ablation as curative therapies in very early to early stage HCC (BCLC-0 and BCLC-A). While these modalities are the preferred curative treatments for a very early to early stage disease, there are challenges associated with these options, such as organ availability and patient eligibility. Current data shows the role of radiation segmentectomy as a curative therapeutic option for very early to early stage HCC that is unresectable and not amenable to ablation. As future data continues to elucidate the ability for radiation segmentectomy to achieve complete pathologic necrosis, the goal is for the BCLC staging model to acknowledge its role as a curative treatment in this patient population and incorporate it into the ever-evolving guidelines. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Radioembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop