Research on Seismic Performance of Reinforced Concrete Structures and Components—2nd Edition

A special issue of Buildings (ISSN 2075-5309). This special issue belongs to the section "Building Structures".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 July 2026 | Viewed by 2079

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
College of Architectural and Civil Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
Interests: prefabricated concrete structure; large-span space structure; structural vibration control and monitoring
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Earthquake disasters pose a continuous threat to human society. Enhancing the seismic performance of reinforced concrete structures is a core issue in the field of civil engineering. With the development of industrialized construction, diversified functional requirements and intelligent technologies, new opportunities and challenges emerge in traditional seismic research. This Special Issue aims to gather the latest achievements of global scholars in the research of seismic performance of reinforced concrete structures and precast concrete structures. The Special Issue includes, but is not limited to, the following content:

  • Seismic performance of RC structures and components.
  • Precast concrete structures and components.
  • Anti-collapse performance of RC structures.
  • Seismic retrofitting of structures and components
  • Seismic design code developments and related issues
  • Research and development of disaster resilient structures

Some related research papers have been published in the previous edition of this Special Issue, which can be accessed using the following link:

https://www.mdpi.com/journal/buildings/special_issues/0U8631C7ZX

Prof. Dr. Weijing Zhang
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Buildings is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • seismic performance
  • precast concrete structures
  • progressive collapse
  • earthquake resilient structures
  • structural walls
  • RC frame
  • experimental research
  • numerical modelling
  • seismic design

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Related Special Issue

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

19 pages, 3596 KB  
Article
Experimental Study on Mechanical Properties of Double-Stage Yield Buckling Restrained Braces
by Yangyang Zhang, Runyu Cheng and Wenlong Shi
Buildings 2026, 16(6), 1106; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16061106 - 11 Mar 2026
Viewed by 318
Abstract
With the growing demand for seismic resilience in urban building structures, the development of high-performance energy-dissipation components has become critical for enhancing structural safety and mitigating earthquake-induced damage. Traditional buckling restrained braces (BRBs) are typically designed to remain elastic under frequent earthquakes, limiting [...] Read more.
With the growing demand for seismic resilience in urban building structures, the development of high-performance energy-dissipation components has become critical for enhancing structural safety and mitigating earthquake-induced damage. Traditional buckling restrained braces (BRBs) are typically designed to remain elastic under frequent earthquakes, limiting their ability to dissipate early seismic energy input. To address this limitation, a novel friction-damped double-stage yield buckling restrained brace (FD-DYBRB) is proposed by integrating friction dampers (FDs) with a conventional BRB. The mechanical performance of both the traditional BRB and the proposed FD-DYBRB was investigated through cyclic loading tests. Additionally, to evaluate the performance differences among various configurations, a cross-shaped double-stage yield BRB was also tested for comparison. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed FD-DYBRB design is highly effective, exhibiting plump hysteretic curves and distinct double-stage yielding characteristics. Specifically, the FD-DYBRB possesses an initial stiffness ranging from 249.38 kN/mm to 250.31 kN/mm, which is comparable to traditional BRBs. Under small displacements, its equivalent damping ratio increases by approximately 7% for every 50 kN increase in friction force, achieving continuous early-stage energy dissipation. Furthermore, the proposed brace realizes full-process energy dissipation by maintaining stable average tensile and compressive capacities of 87.08 kN and 84.50 kN, respectively, even after the core plate fractures. Compared to the traditional BRB, the maximum dissipated energy of the FD-DYBRB increases by 23.55% to 54.75%, and its maximum equivalent damping ratio exceeds that of the cross-shaped DYBRB by 5%. These findings offer a reliable technical solution for improving the seismic performance of high-rise and long-span buildings, ultimately helping to mitigate structural damage and protect life and property during seismic events. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 3750 KB  
Article
Structural Performance of Full-Scale Cast-in-Place UHPC Moment Frames Under Pseudo-Static Cyclic Loading
by Daniel M. Ruiz, Daniel F. Lizarazo, Yezid A. Alvarado and Hermes Vacca
Buildings 2026, 16(5), 902; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16050902 - 25 Feb 2026
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 424
Abstract
Ultra-High-Performance Concrete (UHPC) reinforced with steel fibers has emerged as a promising alternative to conventional concrete, which exhibits limited tensile capacity and a low modulus of rupture and is prone to brittle damage under cyclic loading—a critical drawback in seismic applications. The increasing [...] Read more.
Ultra-High-Performance Concrete (UHPC) reinforced with steel fibers has emerged as a promising alternative to conventional concrete, which exhibits limited tensile capacity and a low modulus of rupture and is prone to brittle damage under cyclic loading—a critical drawback in seismic applications. The increasing demand for resilient, damage-tolerant construction materials in seismically active regions worldwide has intensified the need to evaluate the seismic performance of UHPC structural systems at the structural scale. However, the seismic behavior of full structural frames built entirely with cast-in-place UHPC remains largely unexplored. This study presents a full-scale experimental evaluation of single-story UHPC frames with two steel fiber volume fractions (1.0% and 1.5%) subjected to pseudostatic in-plane cyclic loading. A conventional reinforced concrete frame was tested for comparison. Key performance parameters—including hysteretic response, stiffness degradation, and energy dissipation—were assessed. The results suggest that the UHPC frames exhibited enhanced performance in comparison to the conventional frame across the measured parameters. The UHPC frame with 1.5% steel fiber content consistently outperformed both the 1.0% UHPC frame and the conventional reinforced concrete frame in terms of lateral strength, initial stiffness, and energy dissipation capacity, highlighting the critical role of fiber dosage in optimizing seismic performance. The 1.5% fiber UHPC frame reached approximately 59 kN in maximum lateral strength and 6.3 kN/mm in initial stiffness, representing increases of around 59% and 58%, respectively, relative to the conventional frame (~37 kN and 4.0 kN/mm). While stiffness degradation was observed in all specimens, the UHPC frames retained higher stiffness values throughout the test. At 5.5% drift, the 1.5% UHPC frame dissipated approximately 146,000 J, compared to 80,000 J for the conventional frame. These findings indicate that steel fiber-reinforced UHPC may improve the cyclic performance of frame structures and could serve as a viable alternative for earthquake-resistant construction. The results reported here should be interpreted as indicative trends rather than statistically generalizable conclusions. A key limitation of this study is that the experimental program focused solely on single-story frames under quasi-static loading; dynamic effects and multi-story behavior were not addressed. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 5550 KB  
Article
Seismic Behaviors of Double-Column Pier-Bearing System Based on Shaking Table Tests
by Haiqing Zhu, Jianxin Li and Yingqi Liu
Buildings 2026, 16(4), 786; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16040786 - 14 Feb 2026
Viewed by 301
Abstract
In recent years, with the widespread application of double-column pier bridges, their seismic performance has attracted increasing attention. However, traditional seismic performance analysis treats piers and bearings as separate research objects, lacking an integrated investigation, which fails to provide accurate guidance for practical [...] Read more.
In recent years, with the widespread application of double-column pier bridges, their seismic performance has attracted increasing attention. However, traditional seismic performance analysis treats piers and bearings as separate research objects, lacking an integrated investigation, which fails to provide accurate guidance for practical engineering projects. This paper aims to study the seismic performance of the double-column pier-bearing system based on shaking table tests. The results show that: (1) The sensitivity of the system’s seismic performance indicators to bearings, ranked from highest to lowest, is: acceleration amplitude, damping ratio, displacement amplitude, and natural vibration frequency. (2) The cumulative effect of long-duration earthquakes is significant. Even with a lower peak ground acceleration, the displacement response may be greater than that of short-duration earthquakes with a higher peak ground acceleration. (3) Wavelet transform can accurately identify that the natural vibration frequency of systems equipped with different bearings ranges from 0.5 to 1.2 Hz, and the damping ratio ranges from 3% to 9%. (4) When the bearing thickness is increased from 21 mm to 42 mm, the system displacement response decreases from 11.41 mm to 10.28 mm. (5) Adding a 2 mm thick polytetrafluoroethylene layer to the conventional laminated rubber bearing can reduce the displacement response by 19%. The research findings indicate that it is necessary to conduct a feasibility analysis of bearing selection based on site characteristics. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 9230 KB  
Article
Seismic Behavior of Precast Beam–Column Joint Assembled by High-Strength Bottom Reinforcement of U-Shaped Anchor
by Zhiqi Wang, Guangyao Zhang, Luming Li, Wenliang Ma, Zhipeng Xu, Yuxia Suo, Qinghui Liu, Wen Cheng and Xun Li
Buildings 2026, 16(2), 374; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16020374 - 16 Jan 2026
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 693
Abstract
This study proposes a high-strength bottom-bar interlocking and anchorage precast beam–column joint (HSRU-PBCJ), which utilizes high-strength longitudinal reinforcement combined with U-shaped anchorage at the beam bottom. Low-cycle reversed loading tests were conducted on two precast specimens and one cast-in-place specimen to evaluate their [...] Read more.
This study proposes a high-strength bottom-bar interlocking and anchorage precast beam–column joint (HSRU-PBCJ), which utilizes high-strength longitudinal reinforcement combined with U-shaped anchorage at the beam bottom. Low-cycle reversed loading tests were conducted on two precast specimens and one cast-in-place specimen to evaluate their seismic performance. Based on these results, parametric analyses were conducted through numerical simulations to investigate the effects of axial compression ratio, concrete strength, beam-end longitudinal reinforcement strength, and beam-end longitudinal reinforcement ratio on the seismic performance. The results indicate that the proposed joint exhibits stable and full hysteresis loops, cumulative energy dissipation comparable to that of the cast-in-place joint, and a 23.94–26.39% increase in equivalent viscous damping after yielding, achieving a displacement ductility coefficient of 4.14, which confirms its substantially improved seismic performance. The parametric study shows that maintaining a moderate axial compression ratio (≤0.6) enhances both load-bearing capacity and energy dissipation, whereas excessive values result in strength reduction. Increasing the beam-end longitudinal reinforcement strength significantly improves load-bearing capacity but may reduce energy dissipation. In addition, improving concrete strength and appropriately increasing the reinforcement ratio can further enhance both load-bearing capacity and energy dissipation, although a balance between seismic performance and economic considerations is recommended. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop