Letter to the Editor: Response to “The Pros and Cons of Myofunctional Therapy—Of Dubious Value”
Excerpt
pathology and dental hygiene should recognize myofunctional therapy as an expanded duty function that requires specialty training [...]
Share and Cite
Zimmerman, J.B. Letter to the Editor: Response to “The Pros and Cons of Myofunctional Therapy—Of Dubious Value”. Int. J. Orofac. Myol. Myofunct. Ther. 1984, 10, 6. https://doi.org/10.52010/ijom.1984.10.1.5
Zimmerman JB. Letter to the Editor: Response to “The Pros and Cons of Myofunctional Therapy—Of Dubious Value”. International Journal of Orofacial Myology and Myofunctional Therapy. 1984; 10(1):6. https://doi.org/10.52010/ijom.1984.10.1.5
Chicago/Turabian StyleZimmerman, Joseph B. 1984. "Letter to the Editor: Response to “The Pros and Cons of Myofunctional Therapy—Of Dubious Value”" International Journal of Orofacial Myology and Myofunctional Therapy 10, no. 1: 6. https://doi.org/10.52010/ijom.1984.10.1.5
APA StyleZimmerman, J. B. (1984). Letter to the Editor: Response to “The Pros and Cons of Myofunctional Therapy—Of Dubious Value”. International Journal of Orofacial Myology and Myofunctional Therapy, 10(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.52010/ijom.1984.10.1.5