Previous Issue
Volume 4, June
 
 

Poultry, Volume 4, Issue 3 (September 2025) – 2 articles

  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
25 pages, 554 KiB  
Article
Assessment of the Effects of Stocking Density on Laying Hens Raised in Colony Cages: Part II—Egg Production, Egg Quality, and Welfare Parameters
by Benjamin N. Alig, Kenneth E. Anderson, Dimitri M. Malheiros, Kari L. Harding and Ramon D. Malheiros
Poultry 2025, 4(3), 28; https://doi.org/10.3390/poultry4030028 (registering DOI) - 20 Jun 2025
Abstract
Stocking density is one of the major concerns in all production systems, which is why lawmakers, retailers, and consumers are increasingly concerned about this issue and its relation to animal welfare. The aim of this study was to identify if stocking density had [...] Read more.
Stocking density is one of the major concerns in all production systems, which is why lawmakers, retailers, and consumers are increasingly concerned about this issue and its relation to animal welfare. The aim of this study was to identify if stocking density had an effect on white egg layer production, egg quality, bird health, and welfare parameters. For this study, five stocking densities were evaluated in colony cages: 1342 cm2/hen, 897 cm2/hen, 671 cm2/hen, 535 cm2/hen, and 445 cm2/hen. Egg production and physical egg quality were measured. Hen health and welfare parameters including corticosterone levels, H/L, oxidative stress pathways, jejunum tight junction protein expression, bone health, gut histology, body condition, and cytokine expression were evaluated. The results from this indicated that higher stocking densities resulted in lower production but larger eggs, while feed efficiency remained unaffected. Furthermore, physical egg quality parameters also remained unaffected. When stress and welfare parameters were analyzed, this research identified that decreasing stocking density did not affect jejunum oxidative stress pathways, pro-inflammatory cytokine expression, bone health, or intestinal health. At the final sampling period (69 weeks), the highest stocking density demonstrated higher corticosterone concentrations and IL-10 expression compared to the lowest stocking density. Furthermore, feather scores were found to be poorer as density increased. Finally, the highest density had higher Hansen’s test scores compared to other densities, which indicates a greater fear response. In conclusion, it appears that decreasing stocking density may provide some benefits in production and welfare to commercial egg layers, particularly at the end of the laying cycle. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 235 KiB  
Article
Assessment of the Effects of Stocking Density on Laying Hens Raised in Colony Cages: Part I—The Effect of Density, Time of Day and Hen Age on Behavior and Aggression
by Benjamin N. Alig, Kenneth E. Anderson and Ramon D. Malheiros
Poultry 2025, 4(3), 27; https://doi.org/10.3390/poultry4030027 (registering DOI) - 20 Jun 2025
Abstract
The amount of space provided to laying hens has been an animal welfare topic of concern from consumers, special interest groups, and lawmakers. The freedom to perform normal behaviors is one component of animal welfare, and, therefore, the objective of this study was [...] Read more.
The amount of space provided to laying hens has been an animal welfare topic of concern from consumers, special interest groups, and lawmakers. The freedom to perform normal behaviors is one component of animal welfare, and, therefore, the objective of this study was to assess behavior at different stocking densities. Shaver White laying hens were housed in colony cages at five stocking densities. Video recordings of three cages/treatment were taken at 30, 46, and 62 weeks of age in the morning, afternoon, and night. At each age, a 20 min segment of video from each time of day was analyzed. Every minute was annotated to identify the behavior that hens spent the majority of their time performing. Data were averaged to calculate the percentage of hens engaged in each behavior per cage. The total count of aggressive bouts was recorded across the 20 min period. Data were analyzed with a general linear model utilizing the variables time of day, density, age, and the full factorial of interactions. Intermediate stocking densities displayed the lowest percentage of crouching (p = 0.009) and aggressive acts per hen (p < 0.0001). Hens stocked at 1341.93 cm2 walked the most (p < 0.0001). Hens were seen standing and preening (p < 0.0001) more in the morning, crouching and sham dust bathing (p < 0.0001) more in the afternoon, stretching less while feeding and drinking, and being more aggressive at night (p < 0.0001). Finally, as hens aged, they began to stand and crouch more (p < 0.0001) and preen (p = 0.013), walk (p < 0.0001), and demonstrate aggressive behaviors (p = 0.007) less. In conclusion, the majority of behaviors assessed were not influenced by stocking density. However, the different amounts of aggression between the treatments could indicate higher stress and frustration, which warrants more investigation. Full article
Previous Issue
Back to TopTop