Poultry, Volume 4, Issue 3 (September 2025) – 6 articles

Environmentally modified housing [EMH; windowless, insulated sidewalls and ceiling, thermostatically controlled ventilation fans) versus conventional housing [CVH; cross-ventilated, insulated ceiling, ceiling fans) improved broiler performance in the summer. The objective of this investigation was to determine whether social behaviors differed between two population densities (0.06 m²/chick [HD] or 0.07 m²/chick [LD]) in these houses. We used a randomized block statistical design, involving houses, population densities, observation times, and bird age. Behaviors were observed weekly, during the morning and the afternoon. Individual observers focused on the group of broilers in one of three defined 26.76 m² areas in each of the four pens in each house. Aggressive encounters, tail and back pecking, feather eating, thermoregulatory, preening, and flock mobility were recorded. Feather pecking, eating and aggressive encounters were expressed at greater rates in HD birds in CVH. A salt-deficient diet caused increased feather pecking and aggressive encounters, which decreased after correction of the mistake. Increased heat indices (HIs), HD, and greater light intensity in CVH influenced behaviors and mortality more severely than in EMH. In CVH and EMH, burrowing/thermoregulatory/resting activity increased with increasing HIs. Afternoon preening was elevated significantly in EMH. It was concluded that broilers reared in EMH were more comfortable and experienced improved welfare compared to those reared in CVH. Full article

Background: Reliable and non-invasive methods for assessing welfare in poultry are essential for improving evidence-based welfare monitoring and advancing management practices in commercial production systems. The iris-to-pupil (IP) ratio, previously validated by our group in primates and cattle, reflects autonomic nervous system balance and may serve as a physiological indicator of stress in laying hens. This study evaluated the utility of the IP ratio under field conditions across diverse commercial layer housing systems. Materials and Methods: In total, 296 laying hens (Lohmann Brown, n = 269; White Leghorn, n = 27) were studied across four locations in Canada housed under different systems: Guelph (indoor; pen), Spring Island (outdoor and scratch; organic), Ottawa (outdoor, indoor and scratch; free-range), and Toronto (outdoor and hobby; free-range). High-resolution photographs of the eye were taken under ambient lighting. Light intensity was measured using the light meter app. The IP ratio was calculated using NIH ImageJ software (Version 1.54p). Statistical analysis included one-way ANOVA and linear regression using GraphPad Prism (Version 5). Results: Birds housed outdoors had the highest IP ratios, followed by those in scratch systems, while indoor and pen-housed birds had the lowest IP ratios (p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses of birds in Ottawa and Spring Island farms confirmed significantly higher IP ratios in outdoor environments compared to indoor and scratch systems (p < 0.001). The IP ratio correlated weakly with ambient light intensity (r² = 0.25) and age (r² = 0.05), indicating minimal influence of these variables. Although White Leghorn hens showed lower IP ratios than Lohmann Browns, this difference was confounded by housing type; all White Leghorns were housed in pens. Thus, housing system but not breed was the primary driver of IP variation. Conclusions: The IP ratio is a robust, non-invasive physiological marker of welfare assessment in laying hens, sensitive to housing environment but minimally influenced by light or age. Its potential for integration with digital imaging technologies supports its use in scalable welfare assessment protocols. Full article

The objective of this study was to validate the energy matrix of guanidinoacetic acid (AGA) in broiler diets, assessing its effects on performance, carcass traits, organ development, and meat quality. The experiment was conducted at the UNOESC Xanxerê poultry facility using 480 COBB broilers in a completely randomized design with three treatments: positive control (standard energy level), negative control (75 kcal/kg reduction in metabolizable energy—ME), and negative control + AGA (600 mg/kg). Male broilers in the positive control and negative control + AGA groups showed improved feed conversion, higher weight gain, and greater feed intake (p < 0.001) compared to the negative control group. A significant difference in relative liver weight (p = 0.037) was observed between the positive and negative control groups. Birds supplemented with AGA had higher blood glucose levels and lower levels of cholesterol (p = 0.013), triglycerides (p = 0.005), total proteins (p < 0.001), and creatinine (p = 0.056). Regarding meat quality, the AGA-supplemented group showed higher crude protein content and greater lipid peroxidation in breast meat. In conclusion, the inclusion of AGA using an energy matrix reduced by 75 kcal/kg ME is feasible, maintaining performance and carcass characteristics while improving meat quality in broiler chickens. Full article

Nowadays, consumers are becoming increasingly concerned about the husbandry conditions under which animals are raised, particularly broilers, since broilers are one of the species whose welfare is most impaired in intensive farming systems. One of the primary means of communicating husbandry practices to consumers is through product labelling. Thus, a rising number of animal welfare labelling schemes for broilers are being developed and used across Europe by initiatives of both public and private stakeholders, including NGOs that advocate for animal welfare. This review aims to identify, analyze, and compare these labelling schemes with a focus on the main animal welfare provisions included in them, which contribute to enhanced animal welfare. The schemes were identified through web searches, so that we could visit their official websites, access their standards and regulations and study them in detail. We included in our research only those schemes whose criteria were publicly available. In total, 16 schemes were selected and analyzed. Although these schemes vary in their criteria, they all enhance the welfare standards of broiler production, primarily through incorporating environmental enrichment and/or access to the outdoors. Most schemes define and specify in detail the required animal welfare provisions, setting a clear application frame for the raising period of the birds. However, the welfare of animals during transport and slaughter is often overlooked. Full article

Stocking density is one of the major concerns in all production systems, which is why lawmakers, retailers, and consumers are increasingly concerned about this issue and its relation to animal welfare. The aim of this study was to identify if stocking density had an effect on white egg layer production, egg quality, bird health, and welfare parameters. For this study, five stocking densities were evaluated in colony cages: 1342 cm²/hen, 897 cm²/hen, 671 cm²/hen, 535 cm²/hen, and 445 cm²/hen. Egg production and physical egg quality were measured. Hen health and welfare parameters including corticosterone levels, H/L, oxidative stress pathways, jejunum tight junction protein expression, bone health, gut histology, body condition, and cytokine expression were evaluated. The results from this indicated that higher stocking densities resulted in lower production but larger eggs, while feed efficiency remained unaffected. Furthermore, physical egg quality parameters also remained unaffected. When stress and welfare parameters were analyzed, this research identified that decreasing stocking density did not affect jejunum oxidative stress pathways, pro-inflammatory cytokine expression, bone health, or intestinal health. At the final sampling period (69 weeks), the highest stocking density demonstrated higher corticosterone concentrations and IL-10 expression compared to the lowest stocking density. Furthermore, feather scores were found to be poorer as density increased. Finally, the highest density had higher Hansen’s test scores compared to other densities, which indicates a greater fear response. In conclusion, it appears that decreasing stocking density may provide some benefits in production and welfare to commercial egg layers, particularly at the end of the laying cycle. Full article

The amount of space provided to laying hens has been an animal welfare topic of concern from consumers, special interest groups, and lawmakers. The freedom to perform normal behaviors is one component of animal welfare, and, therefore, the objective of this study was to assess behavior at different stocking densities. Shaver White laying hens were housed in colony cages at five stocking densities. Video recordings of three cages/treatment were taken at 30, 46, and 62 weeks of age in the morning, afternoon, and night. At each age, a 20 min segment of video from each time of day was analyzed. Every minute was annotated to identify the behavior that hens spent the majority of their time performing. Data were averaged to calculate the percentage of hens engaged in each behavior per cage. The total count of aggressive bouts was recorded across the 20 min period. Data were analyzed with a general linear model utilizing the variables time of day, density, age, and the full factorial of interactions. Intermediate stocking densities displayed the lowest percentage of crouching (p = 0.009) and aggressive acts per hen (p < 0.0001). Hens stocked at 1341.93 cm² walked the most (p < 0.0001). Hens were seen standing and preening (p < 0.0001) more in the morning, crouching and sham dust bathing (p < 0.0001) more in the afternoon, stretching less while feeding and drinking, and being more aggressive at night (p < 0.0001). Finally, as hens aged, they began to stand and crouch more (p < 0.0001) and preen (p = 0.013), walk (p < 0.0001), and demonstrate aggressive behaviors (p = 0.007) less. In conclusion, the majority of behaviors assessed were not influenced by stocking density. However, the different amounts of aggression between the treatments could indicate higher stress and frustration, which warrants more investigation. Full article