Background: Adolescence is marked by heightened reward sensitivity and incomplete maturation of cognitive control, creating conditions that favor engagement in risky behaviors. Traditional self-report methods often overlook the fast, automatic processes—such as attentional biases, approach–avoidance tendencies, and associative schemas—that shape adolescent decision-making
[...] Read more.
Background: Adolescence is marked by heightened reward sensitivity and incomplete maturation of cognitive control, creating conditions that favor engagement in risky behaviors. Traditional self-report methods often overlook the fast, automatic processes—such as attentional biases, approach–avoidance tendencies, and associative schemas—that shape adolescent decision-making in real time.
Aims: This Perspective aims to synthesize recent (2018–2025) advances in the study of implicit measures relevant to adolescent risk behaviors, evaluate their predictive value beyond explicit measures, and identify translational pathways for prevention and early intervention.
Methods: A narrative synthesis was conducted, integrating evidence from eye-tracking, drift-diffusion modeling, approach–avoidance tasks, single-category implicit association tests, ecological momentary assessment (EMA), and passive digital phenotyping. Emphasis was placed on multi-method phenotyping pipelines and on studies validating these tools in adolescent populations.
Results: Implicit indices demonstrated incremental predictive validity for risky behaviors such as substance use, hazardous driving, and problematic digital engagement, outperforming self-reports in detecting context-dependent and state-specific risk patterns. Integrative protocols combining laboratory-based measures with EMA and passive sensing captured the influence of peer presence, affective state, and opportunity structures on decision-making. Mobile-based interventions, including approach bias modification and attention bias training, proved feasible, scalable, and sensitive to change in implicit outcomes. Acoustic biomarkers further enhanced low-burden state monitoring.
Conclusions: Implicit measures provide a mechanistic, intervention-sensitive complement to explicit screening, enabling targeted, context-aware prevention strategies in adolescents. Future priorities include multi-site validations, school-based implementation trials, and the use of implicit parameter change as a primary endpoint in prevention research.
Full article