Skip to Content
You are currently on the new version of our website. Access the old version .
HeritageHeritage
  • Review
  • Open Access

15 November 2026

56 Pages

Structural Control for the Seismic Protection of Cultural Heritage: State of the Art and Review of Full-Scale Applications

and
1
Department of Structural, Geotechnical and Building Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Turin, Italy
2
Responsible Risk Resilience Interdepartmental Centre (R3C), Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Turin, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Heritage2026, 9(11), 481;https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage9110481 
(registering DOI)
This article belongs to the Special Issue Architectural Heritage and Cultural Landscape

Abstract

Reducing the seismic vulnerability of heritage assets remains challenging, as cultural significance, uncertainties, ageing, and past alterations make it difficult to improve safety while respecting conservation principles. Structural control can complement traditional strengthening techniques by modifying vibration energy transmission and dissipation. This paper reviews structural control solutions and their application to the seismic protection of cultural heritage, defined as assets protected at international, national, or local levels. Passive, active, semi-active, and hybrid systems are first organised by control class and physical mechanism and interpreted through an energy-based perspective. Full-scale applications were identified through a documented search and coded by heritage designation, retained fabric, documentation level, and type of performance evidence. In the resulting corpus of 53 applications, passive seismic isolation prevails, while dissipative connections and mass dampers are less frequent, reflecting the documented corpus rather than professional practice. No feedback-controlled system was documented in scientific or technical literature, although two recent installations have been reported by stakeholders. Post-installation tests, monitoring and recorded earthquake responses cover a minority of cases. The review discusses compatibility with conservation requirements and practical limitations, concluding with a heritage-specific comparison of technologies and prioritised research needs. Applications to movable heritage assets are discussed separately for comparison.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.