Text Correction
There were several errors in the original publication [1].
1—Convergence in Equation (10) is approximate.
A correction has been made to Proposition 2, in the first text line after Equations (9) and (10):
where and is made of the first rows and columns of . Furthermore, using the symbol to denote approximate convergence in distribution as ,
2—Explicit reference to quantities and was missing.
A correction has been made to the text line before Equation (14):
To prove (10), first note that, since , is such that the ’s are individually but are correlated. We also exploit the fact that if , then see [36].
3—The distribution in Equation (16) was wrong.
A correction has been made to Equation (16) and the following three text lines:
where denotes the half-normal random variable.
Furthermore, , with ı a k-vector of ones, and , with to be defined below.
4—A comma was missing in the LHS of Equation (20).
A comma was added in the LHS of Equation (20):
5—The reference to k large was missing.
A correction has been made to the text line before Equation (23), and two text lines were added following Equation (23):
Finally, as and for k large enough
Of course, k is such that it cannot tend to ∞. The usual values of k are . This implies that convergence to the normal can only be approximate, leading to (10).
6—Remark 6 was missing.
Remark 6 was added:
Remark 6.
Simulations (available from the authors upon request) show that, as , the convergence of to the normal distribution is very fast as k increases. Even for (first-digit case) or (second-digit case), the approximation is highly accurate. Since the distribution of is asymmetric, a very slight skewness is still observed for small values of k; however, this vanishes as k increases. In practice, agreement with the asymptotic distribution is essentially perfect in the first two-digit case.
The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.
Reference
- Cerqueti, R.; Lupi, C. Some New Tests of Conformity with Benford’s Law. Stats 2021, 4, 745–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.