Next Article in Journal
Synthesis of RE3+ (RE = Ho, Tb, Pr)-Doped Alumina Ceramic Coatings by Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation of Aluminum: Investigation of Photocatalytic Performance
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of MoO3 Doping on the Microstructure and Magnetic Properties of Mn0.816Zn0.091Fe2.093MoxO4
Previous Article in Special Issue
Latest Developments in 3D-Printed Engineered Cementitious Composites: Technologies, Prospects, and Challenges
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Mechanical Behavior and Reliability of Engineering Ceramics

Ecole Mohammadia d’Ingénieurs (EMI), Université Mohammed V de Rabat, Avenue Ibn Sina, Rabat 10000, Morocco
Ceramics 2026, 9(4), 41; https://doi.org/10.3390/ceramics9040041
Submission received: 8 April 2026 / Accepted: 14 April 2026 / Published: 18 April 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mechanical Behavior and Reliability of Engineering Ceramics)

1. Introduction

Engineering ceramics are successfully used as structural or functional materials in a wide range of technical and biomedical applications [1,2,3,4,5] thanks to advantages such as durability, chemical stability and temperature resistance. However, they are prone to brittle fracture under mechanical or thermal stresses due to crack propagation from pre-existing flaws introduced during processing or surface machining, which serve as stress concentrators. Mechanical properties such as hardness, strength, elastic modulus and fracture toughness are incredibly important for engineering ceramics, depending on their applications. Wear and creep behavior are also key factors affecting material durability, as well as fatigue under static or cyclic stresses. Statistical analysis is necessary to estimate material reliability, often evaluated by the Weibull modulus that characterizes the flaw distribution [6,7]. Material properties depend strongly on the composition and microstructure, particularly the porosity and grain size [8,9], and this relationship must be well understood to optimize the performance of the materials.
Manufacturing processes play a key role in mechanical properties and behavior. For example, it has been shown that colloidal processing can eliminate agglomerates and organic inclusions [10], resulting in improved fracture strength. The development of new ceramic manufacturing processes, such as spark plasma sintering (SPS) [11,12], has significantly enhanced the strength of ceramic materials by increasing densification and reducing grain size. Recent advances in additive manufacturing and 3D printing processes of ceramic materials [13,14,15] has enabled complex shapes to be obtained that could not be produced by other technologies. Another aspect that influences the mechanical properties of engineering ceramics is surface preparation, such as surface texturing, which contributes to improving tribological performance [16,17].
Over recent decades, research has focused on material design by tailoring microstructures to obtain flaw-tolerant ceramics with enhanced fracture toughness. Different strategies have been applied based on crack shielding–toughening mechanisms such as crack bridging [18,19,20] and zirconia transformation toughening [21,22,23,24]. In particular, transformation toughening has been employed to increase the fracture toughness of a variety of zirconia-based ceramics and composites, including zirconia-toughened alumina (ZTA) [5] and tetragonal zirconia polycrystals (Y-TZPs), in which the metastable tetragonal phase is retained at room temperature by adding yttria (Y2O3), typically with a content of 3 mol% (3Y-TZPs) [25]. In these materials, stress-induced tetragonal-to-monoclinic (t-m) phase transformation, accompanied by volume expansion [26,27], may occur around a propagating crack tip. This leads to compressive stresses that prevent crack propagation and thus increase the material toughness [24,28,29]. However, the mechanical strength of zirconia ceramics is often limited by the phase transformation [30,31] and recent studies attempted to meet the challenge of obtaining zirconia ceramics that combined both high toughness and high strength, using different strategies to optimize the rate of the t-m phase transformation [32,33,34].
Among the ceramic materials recently developed, high-entropy ceramics (HECs), which are potentially useful as functional materials for thermoelectric, catalytic, dielectric and magnetic applications, are rapidly growing due to their wide range of properties and behaviors [35,36,37,38,39]. These materials, including carbides, borides and oxides, typically contain five or more elements and form a single-phase solid-solution crystal structure. The concept of HECs was applied to ultra-high-temperature ceramics (UHTCs), known for their high melting points (>3000 °C), to form multiple-component systems [40,41] with high mechanical performance, particularly in a high-temperature environment. The mechanical behavior of these materials, which has been scarcely studied, need to be understood to ensure their reliability.
Engineered cementitious composites (ECCs) are fiber-reinforced materials that can provide enhanced tensile strength, ultra-high ductility and crack resistance without steel reinforcement [42]. This is due to crack bridging by high-strength fibers which dissipate the fracture energy and prevent sudden brittle failure under tensile loads. The application of 3D printing technology to these materials has received great attention [43,44] as it reduces the construction time and cost. The challenges in the development of 3D-printed ECC materials include tailoring them to balance printability, buildability, mechanical strength, and durability.
The aim of this Special Issue is to bring together papers that advance recent understanding of the mechanical behavior and reliability of engineering ceramics, in relation to their microstructure and manufacturing processes.

2. Overview of the Contributions

This collection brings together 1 comprehensive review and 13 research papers that address different types of engineering ceramic materials, including zirconia-toughened ceramics and composites, high-entropy ceramics, and engineered cementitious composites. Their important mechanical properties or reliability are discussed in terms of composition, microstructure and manufacturing process. Here we present a brief overview of selected contributions that cover the key topics of this Special Issue. Five focused on zirconia-based ceramics and it was shown that optimizing the stress-induced t-m phase transformation rate increases their mechanical performance. In the case of Y-TZP ceramics, it is known that 3Y-TZPs may have high strength (>1 GPa) but only a moderate fracture toughness (4–6 MPa1/2) [45,46]. In their contributions, Kern and Osswald [47] and Imariouane et al. [48] showed that reducing the Y2O3 content in new alumina-doped Y-TZPs to 2 and 1.5 mol%, respectively, increased the t-m phase transformation rate significantly, which enabled the combination of high strength and relatively high toughness, which reached 8.5 MPa1/2 for 1.5Y-TZPs. In [48], it was also reported that the t-m phase transformation is beneficial for the impact resistance of zirconia-based ceramics. By comparing the impact behavior of 3Y-TZPs, 1.5Y-TZPs and a Ce-TZP composite, the authors showed that the higher the transformability, the greater the ability to absorb energy upon impact and the higher the impact resistance. The Ce-TZP composite exhibited the highest impact resistance due to a high phase transformation rate, with ductile behavior. In [49], the relationship between the composition, microstructure and mechanical properties of zirconia–magnesia–alumina composites (ZrO2–MgO–Al2O3) was investigated. It was shown that adjusting the material composition leads to the formation of metastable tetragonal and cubic zirconia phases and significantly improves the biaxial bending strength. In [50], the authors reported beneficial effects of the t-m phase transformation on the reliability of a zirconia–ceramic composite, stabilized with yttria and ceria and reinforced with alumina platelets (ZrO2CeYAl2O3), which exhibited a high Weibull modulus (16.8) and fatigue resistance. In [51], a finite element analysis was used to explore the influence of surface texturing on wear and friction in zirconia ceramic-on-ceramic hip implants, which are important for their durability. It was shown that using textured surfaces with dimples induced a significant wear reduction (17%), compared to smooth surfaces. This is particularly linked to the fact that dimples act as lubricant reservoirs and trap wear debris.
In the field of high-entropy ceramics, the creep behavior of (Co, Cu, Mg, Ni, Zn)O transition metal high-entropy oxide ceramics (TM-HEO) was reported in [52]. Samples with grain sizes ranging from coarse to nano-scale were deformed under compressive stresses (5 to 31 MPa) at temperatures between 600 and 850 °C. Shear-thickening superplastic transitions were identified and the results enabled the construction of mechanism maps that could predict the deformation behavior of TM-HEO for a wide range of deformation conditions. In [53], it was demonstrated that the combined action of adding Ni and SiC whiskers improved the fracture toughness of boride HECs, due to crack bridging. Moreover, adjusting the sintering temperature to promote densification increased their fracture strength. In [54], it was shown that the wear resistance of carbide UHTCs synthesized by SPS was improved by adding components to form a multiple-component system. The wear resistance of ternary (Ta, Nb, Hf)C and quaternary (Ta, Nb, Hf, Ti)C increased respectively by 29% and 49% compared to binary (Ta, Nb)C. This was attributed to high densification, high hardness and complete solid-solution formation in the quaternary system.
Tulliani’s review paper [55] was dedicated to recent advancements in 3D-printed engineered cementitious composites (3DP-ECCs). The author analyzes, in particular, the potential of 3D printing technologies and the mechanical properties and durability of the materials. They showed that 3D printing enables the design of complex structures, like Bouligand, knitted or tilted structures, that may improve fracture performance for specific applications. 3DP-ECCs exhibit anisotropic properties due to fiber alignment in the printing direction. In particular, the compressive strength and stress–strain relationships are different in the parallel and perpendicular directions to the printing direction. Among the parameters influencing mechanical properties of 3DP-ECC, the composition, the fiber-reinforcing index and the loading direction play a crucial role. Internal curing may also improve the mechanical strength of the materials.

3. Conclusions

The contributions compiled in this Special Issue provide recent research developments on mechanical behavior and properties of a variety of engineering ceramics including zirconia-toughened ceramics and composites, high-entropy ceramics, and engineered cementitious composites. They show that tailoring the microstructures and compositions of materials or using advanced manufacturing techniques as SPS or 3D printing may enhance the mechanical performance of materials depending on their applications.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Bengisu, M.; Bengisu, M. Engineering Ceramics; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2001; Volume 395. [Google Scholar]
  2. Somiya, S. Handbook of Advanced Ceramics: Materials, Applications, Processing, and Properties; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  3. Vaiani, L.; Boccaccio, A.; Uva, A.E.; Palumbo, G.; Piccininni, A.; Guglielmi, P.; Cantore, S.; Santacroce, L.; Charitos, I.A.; Ballini, A. Ceramic materials for biomedical applications: An overview on properties and fabrication processes. J. Funct. Biomater. 2023, 14, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cavalcanti, A.N.; Foxton, R.M.; Watson, T.F.; Oliveira, M.T.; Giannini, M.; Marchi, G.M. Y-TZP ceramics: Key concepts for clinical application. Oper. Dent. 2009, 34, 344–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chevalier, J.; Gremillard, L. Ceramics for medical applications: A picture for the next 20 years. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2009, 29, 1245–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Weibull, W. A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. J. Appl. Mech. 1951, 18, 293–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Peterlik, H. Relationship of strength and defects of ceramic materials and their treatment by Weibull theory. J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 2001, 109, S121–S126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rice, R.W. Grain size and porosity dependence of ceramic fracture energy and toughness at 22 °C. J. Mater. Sci. 1996, 31, 1969–1983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Watchman, J.B.; Cannon, W.R.; Matthewson, M.J. Mechanical Properties of Ceramics; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  10. Lange, F.F. Colloidal processing of powder for reliable ceramics. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 1998, 3, 496–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tokita, M. Progress of spark plasma sintering (SPS) method, systems, ceramics applications and industrialization. Ceramics 2021, 4, 160–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chuvil’deev, V.N.; Boldin, M.; Nokhrin, A.; Popov, A. Advanced materials obtained by spark plasma sintering. Acta Astronaut. 2017, 135, 192–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Travitzky, N.; Bonet, A.; Dermeik, B.; Fey, T.; Demut, I.F.; Schlier, L.; Schlordt, T.; Greil, P. Additive Manufacturing of Ceramic-Based Materials. Adv. Eng. Mat. 2014, 16, 729–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zocca, A.; Colombo, P.; Gomes, C.M.; Gunster, J. Additive Manufacturing of Ceramics: Issues, Potentialities, and Opportunities. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2015, 98, 1983–2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, H.; Peng, C.; Mu, B. A review: Ceramic additive manufacturing. Adv. Appl. Ceram. 2025, 124, 173–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, H.J.; Huang, J.D.; Wang, B.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J. Study on the tribological behavior of laser surface texturing on silicon nitride ceramic under water lubrication. Lubricants 2025, 13, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xu, J.; Ji, M.; Li, L.; Wu, Y.; Yu, Q.; Chen, M. Improving wettability, antibacterial and tribological behaviors of zirconia ceramics through surface texturing. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 3702–3710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Vekinis, G.; Ashby, M.F.; Beaumont, P.W.R. R-Curve behavior of alumina ceramics. Acta Metall. Mater. 1990, 38, 1151–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gilbert, C.J.; Cao, J.J.; Moberlychan, W.J.; Dejonghe, L.C.; Ritchie, R.O. Cyclic fatigue and resistance-curve behavior of an in situ toughened silicon carbide with Al-B-C additions. Acta Mater. 1996, 44, 3199–3214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Becher, P.F. Microstructural design of toughened ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1991, 74, 255–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Garvie, R.C.; Hannik, R.H.J.; Pascoe, R.T. Ceramic steel. Nature 1975, 258, 703–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Knehans, R.; Steinbrech, R.; Schaarwachter, W. Increase of crack resistance during slow crack growth in Al2O3 bend specimens. J. Mater. Sci. 1983, 18, 265–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Heuer, A.H. Transformation toughening in ZrO2-containing ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1987, 70, 689–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Evans, A.G. Perspective on the development of high-toughness ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1990, 73, 187–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kelly, J.R.; Denry, I. Stabilized zirconia as a structural ceramic: An overview. Dent. Mater. 2008, 24, 289–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Stam, G.T.h.M.; Van der Giessen, E.; Meijers, P. Effect of transformation-induced shear strains on crack growth in zirconia-containing ceramics. Int. J. Solids Struct. 1994, 31, 1923–1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Budianski, B.; Hutchinson, J.W.; Lambropoulos, C. Continuum theory of dilatant transformation toughening in ceramics. Int. J. Solids Struct. 1983, 19, 337–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Green, D.J.; Hannink, R.H.J.; Swain, M.V. Transformation Toughening of Ceramics; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  29. Hannink, R.H.J.; Kelly, P.M.; Muddle, B.C. Transformation toughening in zirconia containing ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2000, 83, 461–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Swain, M. Inelastic deformation of Mg-PSZ and its significance for strength toughness relationship of zirconia toughened ceramics. Acta Metall. 1985, 33, 2083–2091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Swain, M.V. Grain size dependence of toughness and transformability of 2 mol% YTZP ceramics. J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 1986, 5, 1159–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Casellas, D.; Feder, A.; Llanes, L.; Anglada, M. Fracture toughness and mechanical strength of Y-TZP/PSZ ceramics. Scr. Mater. 2001, 45, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kern, F.; Gadow, R. Alumina toughened zirconia from yttria coated powders. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2012, 32, 3911–3918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Imariouane, M.; Saâdaoui, M.; Denis, G.; Reveron, H.; Chevalier, J. Low-yttria doped zirconia: Bridging the gap between strong and tough ceramics. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2023, 43, 4906–4915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gild, J.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Harrington, T.; Jiang, S.; Hu, T.; Quinn, M.C.; Mellor, W.M.; Zhou, N.; Vecchio, K.; Luo, J. High-entropy metal diborides: A new class of high-entropy materials and a new type of ultrahigh temperature ceramics. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 37946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, R.Z.; Reece, M.J. Review of high entropy ceramics: Design, synthesis, structure and properties. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 22148–22162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Akrami, S.; Edalati, P.; Fuji, M.; Edalati, K. High-entropy ceramics: Review of principles, production and applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2021, 146, 100644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Oses, C.; Toher, C.; Curtarolo, S. High-entropy ceramics. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2020, 5, 295–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jiao, Y.; Dai, J.; Fan, Z.; Cheng, J.; Zheng, G.; Grema, L.; Zhong, J.; Li, H.F.; Wang, D. Overview of high-entropy oxide ceramics. Mater. Today 2024, 77, 92–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Nisar, A.; Zhang, C.; Boesl, B.; Agarwal, A. A perspective on challenges and opportunities in developing high entropy-ultra high temperature ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 25845–25853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Castle, E.; Csanádi, T.; Grasso, S.; Dusza, J.; Reece, M. Processing and properties of high-entropy ultra-high temperature carbides. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 8609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Dadkhah, M.; Tulliani, J.M. Damage Management of Concrete Structures with Engineered Cementitious Materials and Natural Fibers: A Review of Potential Uses. Sustainability 2022, 14, 3917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Asghari, Y.; Mohammadyan-Yasouj, S.E.; Petrů, M.; Ghandvar, H.; Koloor, S.S.R. 3D Printing and Implementation of Engineered Cementitious Composites-A Review. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2024, 21, e03462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yu, K.; McGee, W.; Ng, T.Y.; Zhu, H.; Li, V.C. 3D-printable engineered cementitious composites (3DP-ECC): Fresh and hardened properties. Cem. Concr. Res. 2021, 143, 106388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. BAl-Amleh, K.; Lyons, M.V. Swain Clinical, Clinical trials in zirconia: A systematic review. J. Oral. Rehabil. 2010, 37, 641–652. [Google Scholar]
  46. Turon-Vinas, M.; Anglada, M. Fracture toughness of zirconia from a shallow notch produced by ultra-short pulsed laser ablation. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2014, 34, 3865–3870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kern, F.; Osswald, B. Properties of a pressureless sintered 2Y-TZP material combining high strength and toughness. Ceramics 2024, 7, 893–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Imariouane, M.; Saâdaoui, M.; Labrador, N.; Reveron, H.; Chevalier, J. Impact Resistance of Yttria-and Ceria-Doped Zirconia Ceramics in Relation to Their Tetragonal-to-Monoclinic Transformation Ability. Ceramics 2025, 8, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Shakirzyanov, R.; Maznykh, S.; Garanin, Y.; Kaliyekperov, M. Compositional Effects on Mechanical Performance of Zirconia–Magnesia–Alumina Ceramics. Ceramics 2025, 8, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mafra, M.P.D.A.; Silva Júnior, N.; Santos, C.D.; Ferreira, J.L.D.A.; Araújo, J.A.; Silva, C.R.M.D. Evaluation of the Mechanical Properties and Fatigue Resistance of the ZrO2CeYAl2O3 Composite. Ceramics 2024, 7, 1600–1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ceddia, M.; Morizio, A.; Solarino, G.; Trentadue, B. Reduction of Ceramic Wear by Concave Dimples on the Bearing Surface in CoC Hip Implants: A Finite Element Analysis. Ceramics 2025, 8, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. El-Azab, S.; Chen, S.; Schoenung, J.M.; Dupuy, A.D. Shear-Thickening Superplastic Transitions in High-Entropy Oxides. Ceramics 2025, 8, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wu, H.; Sun, J.; Zhang, J.; Chen, J.; Yang, Z.; Gong, Y.; Qin, G.; Yu, G.; He, S. Synergistic Effects of SiCw and Ni Addition on the Densification and Mechanical Properties of (M0.2Ti0.2Ta0.2V0.2Nb0.2)B2(M=Hf, Zr, or Cr) High-Entropy Ceramics. Ceramics 2025, 8, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Garino, G.; Nisar, A.; Sukumaran, A.K.; Agarwal, A. Scratch-induced wear behavior of multi-component ultra-high-temperature ceramics. Ceramics 2024, 7, 1658–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Tulliani, J.M. Latest Developments in 3D-Printed Engineered Cementitious Composites: Technologies, Prospects, and Challenges. Ceramics 2025, 8, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Saâdaoui, M. Mechanical Behavior and Reliability of Engineering Ceramics. Ceramics 2026, 9, 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/ceramics9040041

AMA Style

Saâdaoui M. Mechanical Behavior and Reliability of Engineering Ceramics. Ceramics. 2026; 9(4):41. https://doi.org/10.3390/ceramics9040041

Chicago/Turabian Style

Saâdaoui, Malika. 2026. "Mechanical Behavior and Reliability of Engineering Ceramics" Ceramics 9, no. 4: 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/ceramics9040041

APA Style

Saâdaoui, M. (2026). Mechanical Behavior and Reliability of Engineering Ceramics. Ceramics, 9(4), 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/ceramics9040041

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop