Skip to Content
  • Review
  • Open Access

26 October 2026

49 Pages

Turbine Integration with Rotating Detonation Combustors: Aerodynamic Constraints, Candidate Architectures, and Design Pathways

Zucrow Laboratories, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University, 500 Allison Road, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA

Abstract

Rotating detonation combustors (RDCs) can improve gas-turbine and propulsion cycles only if the downstream hardware preserves the pressure-gain benefit while converting an unusually unsteady, distorted, and high-Mach-number exhaust into useful work. This paper synthesizes turbine-integration research and argues that RDC-compatible turbines form a distinct class of startability-constrained, pressure-gain-compatible work-extraction devices. The governing selection criteria are not only stage efficiency and loading, but passage startability, choking margin, shock management, reduced-frequency response, unsteady separation, thermal survivability, outlet-flow quality, and combustor backpressure coupling. Candidate architectures are compared on that basis: transonic diffusive axial vanes, fully supersonic axial turbines, smooth-wall axial bladeless turbines, wavy/helicoidal bladeless turbines, axial-inflow–radial-outflow turbines, and statorless mixed-flow turbines. The reviewed evidence spans reduced-order and mean-line methods, RANS/URANS, large-eddy simulations, multi-objective optimization, experimental demonstrations, and recent gas-turbine integration studies. The synthesis shows that near-term RDC engines will likely require architecture-specific compromise: diffusive vanes provide a robust interface for high-subsonic/transonic exhaust; supersonic axial turbines offer compact high-specific-power extraction but are constrained by leading-edge shocks and startability; bladeless machines reduce or transform the blade-passage shock problem but with limited power extraction; radial outflow turbines use increasing area to reconcile turning with started operation; and mixed-flow statorless rotors can directly ingest transonic pulsating inflow. The resulting framework provides design logic for preserving pressure-gain benefits at the engine level rather than optimizing an isolated turbine at a single averaged inlet condition. A quantitative selection rule is also provided: when flow capacity per unit annulus area must be maximized, the optimum turbine inlet condition is transonic, whereas when shaft-power extraction from a fixed annulus must be maximized, the optimal turbine inlet Mach number lies near 2.5 for constant-height annuli.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.