Previous Issue
Volume 11, June
 
 

Philosophies, Volume 11, Issue 4 (August 2026) – 37 articles

Cover Story (view full-size image):  
  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Section
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
13 pages, 262 KB  
Article
Rousseau, Educational Happiness, and Institutional Mediation: Reinterpreting Émile for Contemporary Vietnamese School Reform
by Nam Van Lai, Thuy Thu Thi Nguyen and Quyet Thi Nguyen
Philosophies 2026, 11(4), 138; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies11040138 - 6 Aug 2026
Viewed by 33
Abstract
This article reinterprets Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s Émile as a philosophical resource for clarifying the normative meaning and institutional limits of educational happiness in contemporary Vietnamese school reform. It responds to a central tension: Émile constructs an individualized and partly anti-institutional pedagogical experiment, whereas UNESCO-inspired [...] Read more.
This article reinterprets Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s Émile as a philosophical resource for clarifying the normative meaning and institutional limits of educational happiness in contemporary Vietnamese school reform. It responds to a central tension: Émile constructs an individualized and partly anti-institutional pedagogical experiment, whereas UNESCO-inspired Happy School initiatives operate through mass schooling, policy, professional roles, assessment, and public accountability. Methodologically, the study combines conceptual reconstruction, close textual interpretation, contextual comparison, and critical institutional translation. It reconstructs amour de soi, amour-propre, perfectibility, pity, negative education, and moral freedom, and distinguishes Rousseau’s broader philosophy from the specific pedagogical construction of Émile. The article argues that Rousseau should not be treated as a policy architect or directly scalable school theorist. Rather, his work supplies diagnostic criteria for examining how schools organize comparison, authority, developmental timing, experience, and dependence on external recognition. Institutional mediation is therefore introduced as the authors’ reconstructive category for translating selected Rousseauian concerns into contemporary practices while preserving the limits of that translation. Applied to Vietnam, this approach connects UNESCO’s people–process–place framework with assessment, teacher authority, family–school relations, curriculum experience, and psychological safety. Educational happiness is thus presented not as compulsory positivity or affective comfort, but as a qualified normative ideal supported by institutions that protect dignity and enlarge learners’ capacities for judgment, responsibility, and relational freedom. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Virtues)
18 pages, 273 KB  
Article
Ethics of Responsibility in the Contemporary World
by Samal Adylkhanova, Assem Sagatova, Nursultan Sarsenbekov, Aiman Gappassova, Ali Rafet Ozkan and Halil Gunay
Philosophies 2026, 11(4), 137; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies11040137 - 5 Aug 2026
Viewed by 89
Abstract
This study examines the role of the ethics of responsibility at individual, societal, and institutional levels and explores its potential to address the ethical challenges of the contemporary world. This ethical framework requires individuals and institutions to consider not only their own interests [...] Read more.
This study examines the role of the ethics of responsibility at individual, societal, and institutional levels and explores its potential to address the ethical challenges of the contemporary world. This ethical framework requires individuals and institutions to consider not only their own interests but also the long-term societal and environmental consequences of their decisions. The study explores how this approach provides guidance in the contexts of technological innovations, environmental crises, and globalization. Technological developments are presented as a domain that both expands the scope of ethics of responsibility and introduces new ethical challenges. It is emphasized that artificial intelligence (AI) systems may give rise to issues such as bias, data privacy violations, and the spread of misinformation through digital platforms. In this context, the necessity of designing “fair AI” and ensuring that digital platforms operate in alignment with ethical principles is emphasized. From the perspective of environmental sustainability, it is stated that while individual efforts, such as recycling and energy conservation, are important, institutions must focus on large-scale initiatives, such as carbon-neutral targets and circular economy models. The article also addresses the criticisms and challenges associated with implementing this framework. The subjective nature of ethical principles and the conflict between diverse cultural values make the universal adoption of this approach difficult. Additionally, the prioritization of individual interests within the capitalist system and the inadequacy of global cooperation are seen as major obstacles to the practical application of ethics of responsibility. This situation underscores the importance of both individual awareness and institutional policies. In conclusion, this framework is presented as an important guide capable of addressing the complex issues of the contemporary world. It is argued that the broader application of this approach is essential in areas such as technological advancements, environmental crises, and global inequalities. Fulfilling the ethical responsibilities of individuals, institutions, and the international community is critical for creating a more equitable and sustainable world. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Ethics and Philosophy)
20 pages, 244 KB  
Article
Evolutionary Progress and Cultural Value: An Analysis of the Divergence Between Ernan McMullin and Michael Ruse
by Xinyu Zou and Jianhui Li
Philosophies 2026, 11(4), 136; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies11040136 - 4 Aug 2026
Viewed by 248
Abstract
The relationship between science and values is a classic and important issue in the philosophy of science. Ernan McMullin, a philosopher of science, believes that as science matures, the pursuit of epistemic values leads to the gradual exclusion of non-epistemic values. Michael Ruse, [...] Read more.
The relationship between science and values is a classic and important issue in the philosophy of science. Ernan McMullin, a philosopher of science, believes that as science matures, the pursuit of epistemic values leads to the gradual exclusion of non-epistemic values. Michael Ruse, a philosopher of biology, emphasizes the uniqueness of this issue in evolutionary biology: the expulsion of progressivist cultural values actually stems from the influence of another cultural value, rather than purely from the pursuit of epistemic values. Therefore, the concept of evolutionary progress cannot completely escape the entanglement of cultural values. Even today, biologists still use other concepts to discuss a metaphor sympathetic to progressivist cultural values. By sorting out the discussions on evolutionary progress among evolutionists in different periods, this paper aims to show that Ruse’s view that “the concept of evolutionary progress is necessarily bound to cultural values” is wrong. Although Ruse correctly points out the uniqueness of this topic in evolutionary biology, his argument hinges on Thomas Huxley’s distinction between professional science and popular science. Huxley confined evolutionary progress to the latter—an area with looser academic norms—which complicates the process of expelling cultural values. More importantly, this paper argues that Ruse’s central mistake is his failure to distinguish between two fundamentally different kinds of value: the cultural values imported by human beings into the concept of evolutionary progress, and the survival values that arise from the functional performance of organisms themselves. The former can, in principle, be excluded from mature scientific discourse; the latter cannot, because they are constitutive of what evolutionary progress describes. By conflating these two categories, Ruse wrongly concludes that even today, the concept of evolutionary progress still cannot be separated from the influence of cultural values. Full article
26 pages, 380 KB  
Article
The Critique of Modernity in René Guénon and ʿAbdal-Raḥmān Ṭāhā: A Comparative Study
by Boumediene Hamzi
Philosophies 2026, 11(4), 135; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies11040135 - 3 Aug 2026
Viewed by 203
Abstract
This article undertakes a systematic comparative study of the critiques of modernity advanced by René Guénon (1886–1951) and ʿAbd al-Raḥmān Ṭāhā (b. 1944). Both thinkers arrive at convergent diagnoses of modernity’s spiritual and ethical failures from fundamentally distinct intellectual starting points—Guénon from the [...] Read more.
This article undertakes a systematic comparative study of the critiques of modernity advanced by René Guénon (1886–1951) and ʿAbd al-Raḥmān Ṭāhā (b. 1944). Both thinkers arrive at convergent diagnoses of modernity’s spiritual and ethical failures from fundamentally distinct intellectual starting points—Guénon from the universal perennialist metaphysics of primordial Tradition, Ṭāhā from Islamic philosophy of language, logic, and ethics. Drawing on Guénon’s The Crisis of the Modern World and The Reign of Quantity and the Signs of the Times alongside Ṭāhā’s Rūḥ al-Ḥadātha (The Spirit of Modernity), Al-ʿAmal al-Dīnī wa-Tajdīd al-ʿAql (Religious Practice and the Renewal of Reason), and Rūḥ al-Dīn (The Spirit of Religion), and supported by secondary scholarship including Wael Hallaq’s Reforming Modernity (2019) and the edited volume Islamic Ethics and the Trusteeship Paradigm (2020), the article argues that the philosophical significance of their encounter lies not merely in their convergences—both condemn the reduction of human life to quantitative and instrumental horizons—but in the productive tension between Guénon’s initiatory-metaphysical model of restoration and Ṭāhā’s trusteeship-based ethic of engagement. Where Guénon describes Western civilization as a civilization of “moralism”—a shifting, interest-driven ethical veneer concealing the absence of genuine transcendent principles—Ṭāhā constructs an affirmative alternative through his concept of i’timāniyya (trusteeship), which grounds reason, speech, and knowledge in an ethics of responsibility toward God, others, and creation. The article further argues that these two thinkers together illuminate a double rupture at the heart of modernity: the loss of metaphysical orientation (the vertical rupture) and the collapse of ethical trusteeship (the horizontal rupture). Full article
73 pages, 731 KB  
Review
Topos Theory and Mereology
by JT Paasch
Philosophies 2026, 11(4), 134; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies11040134 - 1 Aug 2026
Viewed by 207
Abstract
A common idea is that logical truth values are fixed independently of the objects to which logic is applied. Topos theory reveals a different possibility. In a topos, the available truth values and logical operations depend upon the structure of its objects’ subobjects [...] Read more.
A common idea is that logical truth values are fixed independently of the objects to which logic is applied. Topos theory reveals a different possibility. In a topos, the available truth values and logical operations depend upon the structure of its objects’ subobjects (generalized parts). In fact, the familiar first-order semantics of sets appears as one instance of this more general phenomenon: it is a logic arising from a particular algebra of parts (namely, the algebra of subsets). This paper provides a detailed exposition of this idea for philosophers without prior training in category theory. Using sets and directed multigraphs as running examples, it explains how a topos’s internal logic—including its truth values—depends upon the structure of its subobjects. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mereology in Metaphysics, Science and Logic)
29 pages, 3859 KB  
Systematic Review
The Heuristics of Fear in Hans Jonas: Connecting the Status of Nature and the Nature of the Digital Artefact in the Context of Artificial Intelligence as an Extension of Modern Technology—A Systematic Review
by Rafael Alejandro Betancourt Durango, Diego Alejandro Correa Correa, Eduar Antonio Rodríguez Flores and Conrado Giraldo Zuluaga
Philosophies 2026, 11(4), 133; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies11040133 - 27 Jul 2026
Viewed by 164
Abstract
Can Hans Jonas’s heuristics of fear still ground a philosophy of artificial intelligence (AI), or does the digital artefact require its reformulation? Building on the empirical turn in the philosophy of technology and on a postphenomenological reading of human–technology relations, this article combines [...] Read more.
Can Hans Jonas’s heuristics of fear still ground a philosophy of artificial intelligence (AI), or does the digital artefact require its reformulation? Building on the empirical turn in the philosophy of technology and on a postphenomenological reading of human–technology relations, this article combines conceptual reconstruction with a PRISMA 2020-compliant bibliometric review (Scopus + Web of Science, 2010–2026; n = 2372 articles and reviews). The bibliometric map reveals an extreme productivity concentration, a stable journal core, and six thematic clusters that organise the field. Rather than treating these patterns as proof of a normative thesis, the article uses them to locate a lexical re-weighting of the field after 2021, in which applied AI-ethics and governance vocabularies expand faster than explicitly philosophical vocabularies. A targeted Jonasian sub-corpus (n = 124) indicates that Jonas remains conceptually relevant but circulates mainly in a smaller, database-visible niche of continental and environmental ethics. We argue that the heuristics of fear remains philosophically fertile provided that it is reconstructed as a threshold question of moral admissibility and expanded through phenomenological resources—lifeworld, embodiment, technological mediation—and through the cosmotechnical plurality emphasised by Yuk Hui. The convergence of bibliometric mapping and philosophical analysis suggests that robust AI governance requires not only procedural principles but also renewed attention to digital mediation, distributed agency, and the protection of the lifeworld under algorithmic uncertainty. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Phenomenological Philosophy of Science and Technology)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

1 pages, 136 KB  
Correction
Correction: Morrill, G. A Formal Synopsis of Lambek-Montague Grammar. Philosophies 2026, 11, 1
by Glyn Morrill
Philosophies 2026, 11(4), 132; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies11040132 - 27 Jul 2026
Viewed by 110
Abstract
Text Correction [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Logical Linguistic Legacy of Montague Grammar)
3 pages, 139 KB  
Editorial
Editorial for the Special Issue “Deleuze: Teacher of Spinoza’s Philosophy”
by Florian Vermeiren
Philosophies 2026, 11(4), 131; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies11040131 - 23 Jul 2026
Viewed by 197
Abstract
Philosophers come in many different shapes [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Deleuze: Teacher of Spinoza’s Philosophy)
12 pages, 194 KB  
Article
Reinterpreting Schopenhauer’s Fourfold Root: Causality, Immanence, and the Limits of Metaphysical Explanation
by Jan Kerkmann
Philosophies 2026, 11(4), 130; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies11040130 - 22 Jul 2026
Viewed by 430
Abstract
Background: Arthur Schopenhauer’s On the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason (in its revised 1847 edition) has been variously interpreted as an epistemological prelude to his metaphysics of will, as a continuation of Kantian transcendental philosophy, or as an early [...] Read more.
Background: Arthur Schopenhauer’s On the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason (in its revised 1847 edition) has been variously interpreted as an epistemological prelude to his metaphysics of will, as a continuation of Kantian transcendental philosophy, or as an early expression of Schopenhauer’s broader soteriological concerns. These readings often differ in emphasis but converge in treating the text primarily as subordinate to Schopenhauer’s later system or early intellectual development. Methods: This article offers a systematic textual reconstruction of the 1847 edition within the Kantian tradition of transcendental critique. It proceeds through close reading and conceptual analysis of Schopenhauer’s articulation of the principle of sufficient reason, situating individual argumentative steps within both Kantian and post-Kantian debates. The aim is not to deny the relevance of systematic or developmental readings, but to clarify the internal philosophical function of the text’s argumentative structure. Results: The analysis shows that Schopenhauer’s account of the principle of sufficient reason consistently operates as a critical and immanent framework for structuring possible explanation rather than as a metaphysical grounding principle. Across its four domains, the principle is differentiated into irreducible forms governing distinct types of object-relation, thereby constraining illegitimate transitions between epistemic justification and ontological explanation. This reading highlights (i) the internal differentiation of explanatory forms, (ii) the restriction of causal claims to intra-phenomenal relations, and (iii) the systematic limitation of metaphysical grounding strategies. Conclusions: On this reading, the Fourfold Root does not function primarily as a foundational doctrine for Schopenhauer’s metaphysics of will, but as a critical investigation into the limits of metaphysical explanation within experience. It thereby reconfigures metaphysical inquiry as a reflective clarification of the conditions under which explanation is possible, rather than as a doctrine of ultimate ontological grounds. Full article
32 pages, 907 KB  
Article
The Unity of Heaven and Humanity and Beautiful China: Contemporary Transformation of Traditional Chinese Ecological Aesthetics Wisdom
by Yunlei Ban
Philosophies 2026, 11(4), 129; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies11040129 - 22 Jul 2026
Viewed by 336
Abstract
The traditional Chinese ecological aesthetics takes ‘the Unity of Heaven and Humanity’ [天人合一] as its philosophical core and constructs a cosmological landscape of coexistence and prosperity between humans and nature. Given the challenges of the global ecological crisis, this research draws on the [...] Read more.
The traditional Chinese ecological aesthetics takes ‘the Unity of Heaven and Humanity’ [天人合一] as its philosophical core and constructs a cosmological landscape of coexistence and prosperity between humans and nature. Given the challenges of the global ecological crisis, this research draws on the ecological aesthetic wisdom of ‘the Unity of Heaven and Humanity’ to systematically explore its theoretical support and practical value for building a Beautiful China. By employing a mixed-method approach that integrates textual analysis, policy review, and multi-case comparative study, this research finds that in the process of building a Beautiful China, the traditional ecological aesthetic wisdom of ‘the Unity of Heaven and Humanity’ has achieved creative transformation and innovative development through the spatial creation of ‘Poetic Dwelling’, the green economy characterized by ‘Suitable for Employment’ and the ecological empowerment for the principle of ‘Suitable for Nurturing Life and Tourism’. This has paved a distinctive path for green development that integrates cultural subjectivity, ecological principles, and modern governance technologies. The discussion further emphasizes that intelligent ecological governance, leveraging technologies such as artificial intelligence and big data, provides a key technological pathway for the contemporary transformation of ‘the Unity of Heaven and Humanity’ philosophy. This study provides a unique ecological and cultural foundation for building a Beautiful China and for global ecological protection. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 283 KB  
Essay
More-than-Human Ethics: A Complex Issue
by Maria Laura Giacobello
Philosophies 2026, 11(4), 128; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies11040128 - 22 Jul 2026
Viewed by 323
Abstract
This article explores the ecological crisis as a multidimensional phenomenon that engages humanity at an existential and therefore philosophical level. Starting from the recognition of the authentic human condition, as that of a being deeply rooted in an ecosystem whose balance sustains its [...] Read more.
This article explores the ecological crisis as a multidimensional phenomenon that engages humanity at an existential and therefore philosophical level. Starting from the recognition of the authentic human condition, as that of a being deeply rooted in an ecosystem whose balance sustains its well-being, it argues for moving beyond the anthropocentric fallacy that has driven humankind to pursue its dream of Promethean domination. Rather, the complex nature of the human being, at once biological and cultural, carries a message of universal solidarity. In ignoring this message, humanity has betrayed its true identity: that of a steward of life understood in its universal dimension. As a conscious part of nature, humanity is entrusted with caring for it, adopting a more-than-human ethics grounded in respect and love for the relationships that connect all things within the web of life. This calls for revisiting the anthropological question through a systemic lens, opening onto an alternative epistemological and ontological perspective, one that allows us to rethink humanity’s relationship with the entire ecosphere and imagine a different way of co-dwelling on Earth. Full article
22 pages, 1242 KB  
Article
The Five-Year Horizon: Quantum Computing and the Philosophy of Technical Becoming
by Christophe Jurczak
Philosophies 2026, 11(4), 127; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies11040127 - 20 Jul 2026
Viewed by 1045
Abstract
Certain physics-based technologies (quantum computing, fusion energy, advanced materials, brain–computer interfaces) have remained “five years away” for decades. This paper argues that this perpetual horizon is not a forecasting failure but the temporal signature of Perpetual Five-Year Technologies (PFYTs): technologies of atoms, not [...] Read more.
Certain physics-based technologies (quantum computing, fusion energy, advanced materials, brain–computer interfaces) have remained “five years away” for decades. This paper argues that this perpetual horizon is not a forecasting failure but the temporal signature of Perpetual Five-Year Technologies (PFYTs): technologies of atoms, not bits, whose technical object and enabling ecosystem must co-develop. Drawing on philosophy of technology and sociology of scientific practice, and grounded in quantitative analysis of cross-platform performance data and high-impact research across hardware architectures, the paper shows that PFYT temporality is endogenous, produced by concretization dynamics and recursive constraint discovery rather than by market failures or insufficient funding. Quantum computing provides the paradigmatic case. Treating the quantum processor as a technical individual in active individuation explains why multiple computing paradigms persist and why each breakthrough resets rather than collapses the horizon. The convergence of machine learning and quantum hardware into pipelines for drug and materials discovery shows how Physical AI reshapes PFYT dynamics, compressing some cycles while introducing new forms of co-individuation between intelligence and matter. The framework generates diagnostics for physics-based frontiers where technical objects and milieus co-produce developmental time. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 195 KB  
Article
Simulation as Inquiry: Reframing Methodological Knowledge Through Boundary Mapping
by Sifiso Vilakati
Philosophies 2026, 11(4), 126; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies11040126 - 20 Jul 2026
Viewed by 231
Abstract
Methodological statistics has developed under the pervasive belief that the value of a simulation study lies in its ability to demonstrate the superiority of a proposed method. This belief has distorted the epistemic role of simulation research by encouraging selective reporting, narrow design [...] Read more.
Methodological statistics has developed under the pervasive belief that the value of a simulation study lies in its ability to demonstrate the superiority of a proposed method. This belief has distorted the epistemic role of simulation research by encouraging selective reporting, narrow design spaces and the suppression of results that fail to show improvement. Drawing on philosophical accounts and on meta scientific critiques by several studies, this paper argues that non-superiority is not a failure but an essential source of methodological knowledge. It marks the boundaries at which a method performs adequately, where it begins to degrade and where it breaks. Using empirical patterns evident in contemporary methodological literature and drawing on the widely cited case in which machine learning methods often failed to outperform logistic regression in clinical prediction, this paper demonstrates how non-superiority clarifies expectations and guides methodological refinement. The paper proposes a structural remedy that pairs the Registered Reports model with principled simulation design following the ADEMP framework. This alignment protects the visibility of non-superiority and restores the integrity of simulation research. Boundary mapping is therefore not a modest contribution but a scientific and ethical imperative for methodological transparency and applied reliability. Full article
20 pages, 245 KB  
Article
The Standpoint Threshold: Architectural Conditions for Processing from Somewhere
by Daniel H. Lange
Philosophies 2026, 11(4), 125; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies11040125 - 20 Jul 2026
Viewed by 316
Abstract
The philosophy of artificial intelligence often begins one question too late. Discussions move directly to whether a system could be conscious, whether there is something it is like to be the system, or whether it possesses genuine subjectivity, without first asking a more [...] Read more.
The philosophy of artificial intelligence often begins one question too late. Discussions move directly to whether a system could be conscious, whether there is something it is like to be the system, or whether it possesses genuine subjectivity, without first asking a more basic structural question: what would have to be true of a system’s internal organization before those questions gain a determinate basis in its architecture? This paper addresses that prior question. It defends a threshold account built on three jointly necessary conditions: persistent internal context, differentiated internal possibility, and closed-loop operativity. Together, these conditions mark the point at which a system’s processing can plausibly be said to unfold from an internal standpoint, rather than merely as a chain of locally linked transitions. Such organization may also have functional significance independent of consciousness by supporting temporal coherence, cross-role coordination, and reduced dependence on episodic reconstruction or external scaffolding. The account explains why simple feedback controllers are clear non-cases, why standard transformer inference remains at most a bounded near-case, and why world-model architectures are more serious candidates for assessment, while making no claim that such systems are conscious. The aim is not to provide a test for artificial consciousness, but to clarify when consciousness-oriented inquiry into intelligent systems has a determinate architectural target. Full article
19 pages, 281 KB  
Article
Environmental Esthetics and Other Non-Anthropocentric Representations of Nature
by Sandra Baquedano
Philosophies 2026, 11(4), 124; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies11040124 - 18 Jul 2026
Viewed by 323
Abstract
This article addresses environmental esthetics in dialog with other non-anthropocentric representations of nature, starting with the Ancient Western philosophy of art as a human expression of nature (φύσις, physis). In the context of this more primary understanding, the consolidation of an anthropocentric [...] Read more.
This article addresses environmental esthetics in dialog with other non-anthropocentric representations of nature, starting with the Ancient Western philosophy of art as a human expression of nature (φύσις, physis). In the context of this more primary understanding, the consolidation of an anthropocentric representation of nature based on homo mensura is examined, in which the human being emerges as the measure of all things. This interpretation of nature fosters its progressive reification, which coincides with the emergence of esthetics as a modern philosophical discipline, often articulated around the partial and isolated appreciation of the object. It is argued that environmental esthetics emphasizes an immersive and relational experience with the environment, facilitating a certain release from anthropocentric mental habits, and that the notion of hyperobjects also helps to confront them by laying bare phenomena that exceed the human scale. In line with this expansion of space–time coordinates, which challenge perceptive categories in themselves, an ecosuicidological esthetic is presented, one capable of cultivating a renewed, non-anthropocentric sensitivity. The article resorts to Amerindian knowledges for the concept’s potential deployment and discusses artistic expressions that reconfigure the experience of representing nature, transforming perception and inspiring new forms of reciprocity. Full article
27 pages, 1443 KB  
Article
Biocultural Ethics for Human–River–Biosphere Co-Inhabitation
by Ricardo Rozzi
Philosophies 2026, 11(4), 123; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies11040123 - 17 Jul 2026
Viewed by 690
Abstract
The reunification of scientific, artistic, and philosophical knowledge empowers us to rethink our relationship with nature in light of a biocultural ethic grounded in co-inhabitation among humans and other-than-human beings in shared habitats. To this end, the biocultural ethic is built upon the [...] Read more.
The reunification of scientific, artistic, and philosophical knowledge empowers us to rethink our relationship with nature in light of a biocultural ethic grounded in co-inhabitation among humans and other-than-human beings in shared habitats. To this end, the biocultural ethic is built upon the 3H model, which values the vital links among co-inhabitants and their life habits in shared habitats. The model integrates the biophysical, cultural, and sociopolitical dimensions characteristic of environmental complexity. In this essay, the 3H model is applied to rivers, examined from biological, philosophical, poetic, and legal perspectives. The result is not only to highlight that rivers are more than merely exploitable resources, but also to show that their “voice” raises a normative (ethical and legal) appeal that, among other aspects, has inspired the new Latin American constitutionalism. This ontological, epistemological, and ethical turn seeks to foster a transition from destruction and homogenization toward a bioculture that values biological and cultural diversity through renewed forms of co-inhabitation with rivers and the biosphere. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 236 KB  
Article
The Safety Versus Sensitivity Debate Revisited
by Duncan Pritchard
Philosophies 2026, 11(4), 122; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies11040122 - 17 Jul 2026
Viewed by 329
Abstract
It is widely accepted that there is a modal condition on knowledge. There are two main candidates in the literature: safety and sensitivity. My goal in this paper is to revisit this debate in the context of anti-risk epistemology. This approach [...] Read more.
It is widely accepted that there is a modal condition on knowledge. There are two main candidates in the literature: safety and sensitivity. My goal in this paper is to revisit this debate in the context of anti-risk epistemology. This approach is meant to offer an independent way of determining the modal condition on knowledge (i.e., as opposed to simply pitching modal conditions against one another and seeing which one accommodates the wider range of cases). Interestingly, while anti-risk epistemology favors safety over traditional formulations of sensitivity, it also leads to a very specific way of formulating the safety condition on knowledge. Given that sensitivity might also be reformulated along anti-risk lines, a natural question to ask is where this leaves the debate between safety and sensitivity. I will be suggesting that the most plausible anti-risk formulation of sensitivity is equivalent to the corresponding formulation of safety. If that is right, then ultimately the moral to draw from anti-risk epistemology is not that it favors safety over sensitivity but that it leads to a formulation of the anti-risk condition on knowledge whereby this distinction collapses. Full article
19 pages, 488 KB  
Article
Semantic Displacement and AI-Mediated Agency: Conversational Systems and the Externalization of Meaning
by Edu William
Philosophies 2026, 11(4), 121; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies11040121 - 15 Jul 2026
Viewed by 322
Abstract
This article develops a conceptual account of semantic displacement in conversational AI. The central question concerns how agency is affected when systems do more than automate information retrieval and begin to supply the descriptions, classifications and normative cues through which users understand what [...] Read more.
This article develops a conceptual account of semantic displacement in conversational AI. The central question concerns how agency is affected when systems do more than automate information retrieval and begin to supply the descriptions, classifications and normative cues through which users understand what they are doing. Drawing on philosophy of action, philosophy of language, hermeneutics, philosophy of technology and critical accounts of algorithmic mediation, this article reconstructs the relation between meaning and action as a condition of agency. Its methodological approach is conceptual and diagnostic, oriented toward clarifying a problem that becomes visible when established theories are brought together in relation to contemporary conversational systems. The article interprets these systems as operational semantic infrastructures that organize context-sensitive linguistic uptake within practical environments such as health, work, education, administration and everyday self-management. It then introduces semantic displacement as the condition in which action-relevant meanings become increasingly organized, prioritized and consolidated outside the agent’s own participatory interpretation. The argument contributes a vocabulary for distinguishing agency-enhancing semantic support from forms of semantic substitution that weaken interpretive participation. It concludes by proposing semantic sovereignty and interpretive contestability as normative ideals for human agency in AI-mediated environments. The argument specifies action as intentional conduct understood under socially available descriptions and cognition as situated interpretive sense-making rather than purely internal computation. It also clarifies three conditions under which semantic support becomes displacement: opaque semantic generation, practical stabilization and reduced interpretive contestability. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 250 KB  
Article
Enacting Ontological Pluralism: Informational Dynamics and Embodied Cognition in Śaiva-Śākta Phenomenology
by Diego Gonzalez-Rodriguez
Philosophies 2026, 11(4), 120; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies11040120 - 14 Jul 2026
Viewed by 339
Abstract
Contemporary cognitive science is predominantly grounded in physicalist assumptions that locate cognition and consciousness in neural and computational processes. While these approaches have yielded significant empirical advances, they often struggle to account for the qualitative and first-person structure of experience. This paper proposes [...] Read more.
Contemporary cognitive science is predominantly grounded in physicalist assumptions that locate cognition and consciousness in neural and computational processes. While these approaches have yielded significant empirical advances, they often struggle to account for the qualitative and first-person structure of experience. This paper proposes an ethno-phenomenological perspective by engaging non-Western epistemic practices through the lens of embodied cognition and ontological pluralism. Rather than treating non-Western phenomenology as external to scientific inquiry, we analyze how it can inform cognitive dynamism and ontological enactment through sophisticated epistemic practices. Particularly, we analyze how by actively manipulating cognitive and informational structures, Śaiva-Śākta phenomenology may dynamically affect embodied subjectivity. From this perspective, certain methods like visualization and ritual enactment can be understood as systematic interventions that modulate attentional, mnemonic, and perceptual processes, thereby reconfiguring the experiential architecture of the self and world. We further examine how processes such as constructive imagination function as mechanisms of cognitive reorganization, enabling practitioners to inhabit multiple ontological configurations of subject–object relations. Drawing on predictive processing and enactive cognitive science, the paper argues that Śaiva-Śākta sādhanā may operationalize a form of embodied epistemology in which ontology is not merely represented but enacted. This supports a model of ontological pluralism in which divergent experiential worlds correspond to stabilized modes of cognition rather than competing metaphysical hypotheses. Within this framework, sādhanā is considered a methodological method for investigating consciousness beyond reductionist neurophysiological accounts, offering structured access to non-ordinary modes of experience. Conclusively, the paper proposes that certain non-Western traditions may provide not only philosophical insights but also alternative phenomenological pathways for exploring the informational dynamics of embodied cognition, thereby expanding the methodological and ontological horizons of cognitive science and philosophy of mind. Full article
15 pages, 208 KB  
Article
Consummatum Est: On the Faustian Laboratory, the Hubris of AI’s Architects, and the Humanity They Forgot to Ask
by Alison L. Kahn
Philosophies 2026, 11(4), 119; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies11040119 - 13 Jul 2026
Viewed by 616
Abstract
The development of artificial intelligence has proceeded within a disciplinary culture whose positivist epistemological foundations generate a constitutive blind spot: the systematic exclusion of tacit, embodied, relational and contextually situated knowledge from what counts as knowledge at all. This article argues that this [...] Read more.
The development of artificial intelligence has proceeded within a disciplinary culture whose positivist epistemological foundations generate a constitutive blind spot: the systematic exclusion of tacit, embodied, relational and contextually situated knowledge from what counts as knowledge at all. This article argues that this exclusion is not a technical limitation, but a structural condition of AI systems as currently built, with serious consequences for individuals, institutions and the social order. The method is interdisciplinary and critically synthetic, integrating the anthropology of science and technology, the philosophy of language and the literary-philosophical tradition of techno-critique. Three original contributions are advanced. First, the Faustian framework is reformulated as a collective rather than individual pact: the AI contract implicates a civilisation. Second, the prevalent reductionist critique is refined: the error is not quantification of incommensurable goods but the enforcement of total orderings upon value landscapes that admit only partial orderings. Third, the stochastic parrot objection is reconciled with the Faustian analysis through the concept of institutional amplification: AI’s danger resides not in its intelligence but in the authority conferred upon its incomprehension. The article concludes that Mephistopheles, not Faustus, is the more precise figure for AI itself, and asks whether the defunding of humanities disciplines, those best placed to navigate the moral challenges AI presents, constitutes the most consequential characteristic deletion of all. Full article
17 pages, 280 KB  
Article
Heidegger’s “On the Basic Disposition of Knowledge”: Curiosity, Thaumazein, Terror, and Withdrawal
by Marcel Dubovec
Philosophies 2026, 11(4), 118; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies11040118 - 13 Jul 2026
Viewed by 424
Abstract
The focus of this paper is Heidegger’s lecture “On the Basic Disposition of Knowledge” (summer semester 1939), first published in 2020 in GA 80.2 and still largely unexplored in Heidegger scholarship. In this text, Heidegger problematizes the scientific disposition as a lack of [...] Read more.
The focus of this paper is Heidegger’s lecture “On the Basic Disposition of Knowledge” (summer semester 1939), first published in 2020 in GA 80.2 and still largely unexplored in Heidegger scholarship. In this text, Heidegger problematizes the scientific disposition as a lack of mindfulness (Besinnungslosigkeit). This lack of mindfulness is, in turn, characterized as a disturbance and forgetting of the original disposition that, in Plato and Aristotle, is named in Greek thaumazein. In the advanced form of occidental knowledge, shaped by techne, the remembrance of wonder at beings (Erstaunen) is no longer possible. Instead, the abandonment of Being (Seinsverlassenheit) becomes accessible only through another disposition: terror (Entsetzen). The paper argues that these distinctions between basic dispositions (curiositas, thaumazein, and terror) can be understood only by focusing on Heidegger’s concept of withdrawal (Entzug). In Heidegger’s words, one must take it seriously that Being withdraws from beings. On this basis, curiosity blocks the experience of withdrawal, thaumazein names the beginning of philosophy but cannot be repeated today, and it is terror that discloses the abandonment of Being. To place this claim in context, the paper offers a short sketch of Heidegger’s critique of curiositas, based on his Augustinian reception in the Natorp report (“Indication of the Hermeneutical Situation”) and in Being and Time (§ 36). It then draws on his account of thaumazein in Basic Questions of Philosophy (GA 45) and finally briefly turns to Contributions to Philosophy, where Heidegger develops the disposition of the other beginning in three stages: shock (Erschrecken), restraint (Verhaltenheit), and diffidence (Scheu). Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Interpreting the New Heidegger)
20 pages, 270 KB  
Article
The Society of the Like: Hegel, Veblen and the Negative Ontology of Recognition in Cyberspace
by Alejandro Pérez-y-Soto-Domínguez, Héctor Fernando Rueda-Rodríguez and Héctor Alberto Cortez-Valencia
Philosophies 2026, 11(4), 117; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies11040117 - 11 Jul 2026
Viewed by 426
Abstract
This article advances a philosophical interpretation of contemporary cyberspace through the categories of recognition, negativity and invidious distinction. Existing accounts attribute digital self-exploitation to surveillance, economic coercion or behavioural design; these readings describe mechanisms without identifying the ontological operation they presuppose. The paper [...] Read more.
This article advances a philosophical interpretation of contemporary cyberspace through the categories of recognition, negativity and invidious distinction. Existing accounts attribute digital self-exploitation to surveillance, economic coercion or behavioural design; these readings describe mechanisms without identifying the ontological operation they presuppose. The paper argues that the like is not a reduced form of recognition but its structural contrary, and that the same cancellation operates across the broader architecture of commerce in cyberspace. Drawing on Hegel’s analysis of Anerkennung as a negative operation requiring risk and determinate negation, and on Veblen’s theory of invidious distinction as the preservation of that negativity within commercial society, the article shows that algorithmic cyberspace cancels the three conditions under which recognition is ontologically possible—the risk of non-recognition, determination through scarcity, and the reciprocity of the encounter. What the like offers is pure positivity, and that positivity produces the very exhaustion it claims to soothe. Platform fatigue is therefore structural: the consequence of an institution that monetises recognition demands it cannot satisfy. The paper concludes by situating the diagnosis within the Kantian question of autonomy and the Luddite prehistory of technical resistance to the reorganisation of recognition. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Critical Theory in the Age of Digital Capitalism)
14 pages, 6070 KB  
Article
Token Trajectories as Knowledge Representation in Large Language Models
by Rafal Maciag
Philosophies 2026, 11(4), 116; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies11040116 - 9 Jul 2026
Viewed by 337
Abstract
The subject of this paper is the problem of knowledge revealed by the emergence of advanced natural language processing technology, called large language models (LLMs). It proposes an interpretation of the appearance of this phenomenon as an emergent effect of a complex system, [...] Read more.
The subject of this paper is the problem of knowledge revealed by the emergence of advanced natural language processing technology, called large language models (LLMs). It proposes an interpretation of the appearance of this phenomenon as an emergent effect of a complex system, such as LLMs. The meaning of this interpretation is based on the observation of the computational trajectory of computational units (vectors) which, on the other hand, represent discrete semantic units, tokens. To justify the autonomy and relevance of this interpretation of knowledge, the paper invokes the concept of discursive space, which allows, in particular, for the reliance on language as a container of knowledge and for the generalization of the idea of knowledge to other semantic environments. To describe more general units of knowledge, the strong version of the theory proposes the introduction of the institution of gnosemes, of which discourse is a special case. Gnosemes find application in the case of LLMs. Due to the different ontical contexts of the entities described, the paper proposes a transdisciplinary approach, the axis of which is the field of social sciences. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Intelligent Inquiry into Intelligence)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 278 KB  
Article
The Epistemological Crisis of Rationality in the Age of Artificial Intelligence Through the Lens of 4E Cognition and Postphenomenology
by Olexii Varypaiev
Philosophies 2026, 11(4), 115; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies11040115 - 8 Jul 2026
Viewed by 1129
Abstract
Everyday work with large language models (LLMs) normalizes a practice in which a generated formulation supports judgment before the user has checked its grounds. This crisis of rationality arises not from a single technical defect in the system, but from a shift in [...] Read more.
Everyday work with large language models (LLMs) normalizes a practice in which a generated formulation supports judgment before the user has checked its grounds. This crisis of rationality arises not from a single technical defect in the system, but from a shift in justificatory practice in which fluent textual coherence is read as evidence of semantic understanding and rational judgment. The method brings conceptual analysis into contact with 4E cognition and a postphenomenological account of technological mediation. Within this framework, LLMs are described neither as autonomous rational subjects nor as neutral instruments, but as multistable moral-epistemic mediators of human rationality. The analysis distinguishes textual competence from world-involved understanding and relates interface mediation to trust and responsibility. On this basis, the article proposes a four-cluster protocol for the attribution of rationality, which introduces an epistemic pause as a route of verification between a generated formulation and its authorial acceptance as a claim. The central risk lies not in whether machine consciousness has been proven, but in the normalization of practices in which ready-made text acquires the status of a ground before the user has reconstructed its sources and accepted responsibility for what is asserted. Full article
16 pages, 281 KB  
Article
Genetic Manipulation of Plants: A More-than-Human Ethical Challenge
by Grégori de Souza and Jelson Roberto de Oliveira
Philosophies 2026, 11(4), 114; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies11040114 - 8 Jul 2026
Viewed by 410
Abstract
The central argument of this article is that the genetic manipulation of plants raises profound ethical questions that cannot be adequately addressed within a purely anthropocentric framework. Drawing on Hans Jonas’s philosophy of responsibility, the article argues that modern biotechnology transforms living organisms [...] Read more.
The central argument of this article is that the genetic manipulation of plants raises profound ethical questions that cannot be adequately addressed within a purely anthropocentric framework. Drawing on Hans Jonas’s philosophy of responsibility, the article argues that modern biotechnology transforms living organisms into objects of technological intervention, thereby challenging traditional distinctions between subject and object in the domain of technology. Because plants are living beings that possess their own intrinsic good and play a fundamental role in the biosphere, their genetic manipulation must be evaluated not only in terms of human utility but also in relation to ecological integrity, intergenerational responsibility, and the preservation of life’s evolutionary continuity. The article proposes an approach that remains largely unexplored in the international literature: interpreting plant genetic engineering through the lens of Jonasian ontology of life and the ethics of responsibility, thereby moving the debate beyond the limits of traditional anthropocentrism. Full article
17 pages, 535 KB  
Article
A Taxonomy of Intelligence Measures
by David Gamez
Philosophies 2026, 11(4), 113; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies11040113 - 7 Jul 2026
Viewed by 397
Abstract
Recent progress in artificial intelligence has intensified claims about AI reaching or surpassing human intelligence. However, much of this discussion is not grounded in scientific measurements of intelligence in humans, animals or AIs. The existing methods for measuring intelligence are a patchwork of [...] Read more.
Recent progress in artificial intelligence has intensified claims about AI reaching or surpassing human intelligence. However, much of this discussion is not grounded in scientific measurements of intelligence in humans, animals or AIs. The existing methods for measuring intelligence are a patchwork of heterogeneous approaches that employ different measurement scales and are often limited to a single type of agent. This paper addresses this problem by developing a taxonomy that organizes intelligence measures according to the type of measurement scale (nominal, ordinal, interval and ratio) and methodology (judgment, test batteries, indirect and direct measurement of properties linked to intelligence). Methods that are included in this survey include human intuition, standard tests like IQ and g, test batteries for animals and AIs, and direct measurement of prediction and goal-achievement. This paper argues that direct ratio measures are the most plausible route to a single universal measure that would enable the intelligence of humans, animals and AIs to be compared on a single scale. This could provide a real measure of progress in artificial intelligence, inform debates about AI safety, and help us to develop a scientific understanding of the relationship between intelligence and consciousness. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Intelligent Inquiry into Intelligence)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 242 KB  
Article
The Immanent Ethics of Algorithms: Moral Materialization and the Governance Turn in Generative AI
by Delin Ma, Yufei Chen and Qingqi Pei
Philosophies 2026, 11(4), 112; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies11040112 - 6 Jul 2026
Viewed by 343
Abstract
This study conducts a technical analysis of frontier generative AI algorithms—including Meta’s Self-Rewarding Language Models, DeepMind’s EVA (Evolving Alignment via Asymmetric Self-Play) framework, and DeepSeek’s pure reinforcement-learning models—in order to examine an intrinsic paradigm shift in the ethical governance of generative artificial intelligence [...] Read more.
This study conducts a technical analysis of frontier generative AI algorithms—including Meta’s Self-Rewarding Language Models, DeepMind’s EVA (Evolving Alignment via Asymmetric Self-Play) framework, and DeepSeek’s pure reinforcement-learning models—in order to examine an intrinsic paradigm shift in the ethical governance of generative artificial intelligence and to advance a physicalist analysis of algorithmic endogenous ethics. Combining a close reading of alignment techniques (RLHF, DPO, iterative DPO, GRPO) with a conceptual analysis grounded in Peter-Paul Verbeek’s theory of technological mediation and moral materialization, the paper traces how value-alignment goals are being “materialized” into internal, dynamic, and evolvable “moral scripts” within the algorithms themselves. The analysis shows that contemporary alignment practices are moving from external ethical discipline toward endogenous norms generated through iterative self-evaluation, asymmetric self-play, and rule-based self-exploration. The paper argues that this trend warrants a re-examination of Verbeek’s framework for its capacity to explain the co-evolution of technology and morality in the digital age, and it envisions a future of human–machine value co-evolution organized around new research directions such as “Setting as Governance” and “value homeostasis mechanisms”. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Phenomenological Philosophy of Science and Technology)
14 pages, 220 KB  
Article
Hope as the Essence of Freedom: Fundamental Hope, Certainty, and the Vital Strength of Human Life
by Remigius Nwanosike Orjiukwu
Philosophies 2026, 11(4), 111; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies11040111 - 6 Jul 2026
Viewed by 294
Abstract
This paper develops an original philosophical anthropological account of hope, arguing that hope is the essence of freedom—the inner propulsive principle without which freedom cannot move or sustain itself. Three levels of hope are distinguished. Ontological hope is the invariable, pre-reflective orientation of [...] Read more.
This paper develops an original philosophical anthropological account of hope, arguing that hope is the essence of freedom—the inner propulsive principle without which freedom cannot move or sustain itself. Three levels of hope are distinguished. Ontological hope is the invariable, pre-reflective orientation of the human being toward the possibility of adequate response to the demand of ontological emptiness—the raison d’être of freedom itself, and the central contribution of this paper. Fundamental hope is its variable existential actualisation—the dispositional, non-object-directed orientation that emerges from the human being’s encounter with the totality of reality and is carried by the spiritual unconscious. Fragmental hope is the most variable and most familiar mode—the hope directed at particular, temporary needs and solutions. It is ontological hope—invariable, constitutive, and prior to every conscious act of hoping—that is the essence of freedom: the phenomenon that opens the space of ontological emptiness and gives freedom access to the demand of the latter, making its exercise possible at all. The paper further introduces and analyses three original concepts: certainty-mania—the obsessive quest for certainty that severs consciousness from the unconscious and from the fundamental hope it carries—showing that the loss of hope is always rooted in fear and the compulsive need for predictability; the distinction between anticipating joy (Freude-auf) and existential joy (erlebte Freude), arguing that pre-emptive certainty eliminates the tension that genuine hoping requires and thereby empties the present of its capacity to fulfil; and an original etymological and phenomenological analysis of disappointment as Enttäuschung—disillusionment, the medicinal return from illusion to reality. The paper situates its account in relation to Marcel’s ontological hope and Moltmann’s eschatological hope, and engages Frankl, Marcel, Moltmann, Fromm, Heidegger, Camus, Kierkegaard, Tillich, and Blondel as principal interlocutors. Full article
16 pages, 226 KB  
Article
Adam Smith’s Moral Theory as the Epistemological Foundation of Amartya Sen’s Theory of Justice
by Gianfranco Basti and Alfonso D’Amodio
Philosophies 2026, 11(4), 110; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies11040110 - 1 Jul 2026
Viewed by 290
Abstract
This article develops a systematic reinterpretation of Amartya Sen’s capability approach as a human-centered renewal of the theory of justice grounded in Adam Smith’s moral philosophy. The central claim is that the epistemological foundation of Sen’s theory does not primarily depends on Kantian [...] Read more.
This article develops a systematic reinterpretation of Amartya Sen’s capability approach as a human-centered renewal of the theory of justice grounded in Adam Smith’s moral philosophy. The central claim is that the epistemological foundation of Sen’s theory does not primarily depends on Kantian normativism mediated by Rawls’s theory of justice as fairness, but rather on The Theory of Moral Sentiments, particularly it depends on the concepts of “sympathy”, “impartial spectator”, and justice interpreted as “a social practice”. Through a genealogical reconstruction that brings Aristotle, Adam Smith, and Amartya Sen into dialog, the paper argues that the capability approach can be interpreted as an alternative tradition to Enlightenment theories of justice, because oriented toward human person flourishing and the public evaluation of real freedoms. By overcoming the limits of classical liberal egalitarianism and transcendental institutionalism, the article shows that Sen’s formalization of extended sympathy within social choice theory enables a comparative, pluralistic, and non-dogmatic conception of justice, capable of assessing real social states without recourse to transcendental foundations. In line with the thematic focus of the Special Issue Adam Smith’s Philosophy and Modern Moral Economics, the paper highlights the implications of this interpretation for contemporary moral economics, economic justice, human development, and the role of markets in pluralistic democratic societies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Adam Smith's Philosophy and Modern Moral Economics)
35 pages, 529 KB  
Article
Spinoza and Bergson Through and Beyond Deleuze: Freedom as Undissociated Joy
by John Robert Bagby
Philosophies 2026, 11(4), 109; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies11040109 - 29 Jun 2026
Viewed by 547
Abstract
Two related problems, problems of (in-)compatibility, are addressed to understand Deleuze’s philosophical project and to deepen our understanding of his use of Spinoza and Bergson: that of the compatible and incompatible features of Spinozism and Bergsonism, on the one hand, and, on the [...] Read more.
Two related problems, problems of (in-)compatibility, are addressed to understand Deleuze’s philosophical project and to deepen our understanding of his use of Spinoza and Bergson: that of the compatible and incompatible features of Spinozism and Bergsonism, on the one hand, and, on the other hand, the status of metaphysical compatibilism with respect to freedom in all three of their philosophies. I trace the incompatibilities and insist on the value of reopening the problem partially covered up by Deleuze’s creative engagement. Spinoza and Bergson remain incompatible despite Deleuze’s mixture, and metaphysically, Bergson and Deleuze explicitly affirm the coexistence of incompatible ingredients as constitutive of our very existence and freedom. Some version of metaphysical incompatibilism is affirmed by all three. Life, consciousness, and freedom force us to think of an irreducible incompatibility as constitutive, the coexistence of necessity and freedom, on the one hand, and a movement beyond teleology and mechanism, on the other. Deleuze’s radical pluralism rejects the value of reconciliation and instead deploys an expanding multiplicity of incompatibilities. I flag certain parallels and resonances between Spinoza and Bergson that are not common Deleuzian themes and suggest that Jean-Marie Guyau provides an alternative link to Bergsonism through his spiritualist Spinozism. Despite Bergson’s criticisms of Spinoza, they shared a moral notion of freedom expressed in intellectual generosity, which I characterize as undissociated joy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Deleuze: Teacher of Spinoza’s Philosophy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Previous Issue
Back to TopTop