Next Article in Journal
A Critical Analysis of Dreyfus’s Background Knowledge
Next Article in Special Issue
Dialectic in Early Proclus and the Unity of the Soul
Previous Article in Journal
Performance Art in the Age of Extinction
Previous Article in Special Issue
Proclus on ἕνωσις: Knowing the One by the One in the Soul
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Marsilio Ficino and the Soul: Doctrinal and Argumentative Remarks Regarding His Use of the Elements of Physics and the Elements of Theology

by
Sokratis-Athanasios Kiosoglou
Institute of Philosophy, De Wulf—Mansion Centre for Ancient, Medieval and Renaissance Philosophy, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
Philosophies 2025, 10(1), 14; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies10010014
Submission received: 29 October 2024 / Revised: 19 December 2024 / Accepted: 8 January 2025 / Published: 23 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ancient and Medieval Theories of Soul)

Abstract

The depth and extent of Ficino’s reception and use of Proclus has already attracted much scholarly attention. The present paper builds on and tries to enrich these results, focusing specifically on Ficino’s reception of Proclus’ Elements of Physics and Elements of Theology. In the first part I discuss a marginal annotation of Ficino, in which he makes use of arguments about the circular motion of the soul from the Elements of Physics. I provide some clarifications about the annotated text (of Plotinus) and propose one additional possible echo of the Elements of Physics in Ficino’s Platonic Theology and its arguments about the immortality of the soul. The second part of the paper turns to the link between the Elements of Theology and Ficino’s Platonic Theology. Together with some further doctrinal borrowings I suggest that also the structure of the two works bears important affinities. The soul is a central case in point. To ground this claim, I compare specific sections of the two texts. Also, I selectively examine Ficino’s commentary on the Philebus, which is prior to the Platonic Theology and is strongly influenced by the early theorems of the Elements of Theology. Overall, the paper wishes to shed further light on Ficino’s multiform (and not yet fully unveiled) appropriation of Proclus.
Keywords: Proclus; Marsilio Ficino; Plotinus; Elements of Theology; Elements of Physics; Platonic Theology; argumentative structure; mos geometricus; Commentary on the Philebus Proclus; Marsilio Ficino; Plotinus; Elements of Theology; Elements of Physics; Platonic Theology; argumentative structure; mos geometricus; Commentary on the Philebus

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kiosoglou, S.-A. Marsilio Ficino and the Soul: Doctrinal and Argumentative Remarks Regarding His Use of the Elements of Physics and the Elements of Theology. Philosophies 2025, 10, 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies10010014

AMA Style

Kiosoglou S-A. Marsilio Ficino and the Soul: Doctrinal and Argumentative Remarks Regarding His Use of the Elements of Physics and the Elements of Theology. Philosophies. 2025; 10(1):14. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies10010014

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kiosoglou, Sokratis-Athanasios. 2025. "Marsilio Ficino and the Soul: Doctrinal and Argumentative Remarks Regarding His Use of the Elements of Physics and the Elements of Theology" Philosophies 10, no. 1: 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies10010014

APA Style

Kiosoglou, S.-A. (2025). Marsilio Ficino and the Soul: Doctrinal and Argumentative Remarks Regarding His Use of the Elements of Physics and the Elements of Theology. Philosophies, 10(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies10010014

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop